Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
11-01-2003 | 09:01 AM
#141
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
In article <nPudne7ZC7RWnj6iRVn-vQ@gbronline.com>, "mabar"
<mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> writes:
>Bill speechless! That's a first!
>
>:)
>
>Tom
He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> writes:
>Bill speechless! That's a first!
>
>:)
>
>Tom
He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-01-2003 | 09:01 AM
#142
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
In article <nPudne7ZC7RWnj6iRVn-vQ@gbronline.com>, "mabar"
<mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> writes:
>Bill speechless! That's a first!
>
>:)
>
>Tom
He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
<mabar@NOSPAMgbronline.com> writes:
>Bill speechless! That's a first!
>
>:)
>
>Tom
He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
* * *
Matt Macchiarolo
www.townpeddler.com
www.wolverine4wd.org
http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-01-2003 | 11:22 AM
#143
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
Now that scary!
Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
They try again.
I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
control on a couple real hairy ones.
Mike
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi mike,
>
> I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> powerful engines.
>
> > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> >
> > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > brakes.
> >
> > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> >
Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
They try again.
I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
control on a couple real hairy ones.
Mike
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi mike,
>
> I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> powerful engines.
>
> > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> >
> > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > brakes.
> >
> > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> >
11-01-2003 | 11:22 AM
#144
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
Now that scary!
Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
They try again.
I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
control on a couple real hairy ones.
Mike
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi mike,
>
> I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> powerful engines.
>
> > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> >
> > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > brakes.
> >
> > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> >
Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
They try again.
I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
control on a couple real hairy ones.
Mike
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi mike,
>
> I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> powerful engines.
>
> > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> >
> > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > brakes.
> >
> > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> >
11-01-2003 | 11:22 AM
#145
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
Now that scary!
Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
They try again.
I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
control on a couple real hairy ones.
Mike
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi mike,
>
> I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> powerful engines.
>
> > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> >
> > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > brakes.
> >
> > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> >
Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
They try again.
I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
control on a couple real hairy ones.
Mike
Joshua Nelson wrote:
>
> Hi mike,
>
> I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> powerful engines.
>
> > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> >
> > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > brakes.
> >
> > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> >
11-01-2003 | 11:45 AM
#146
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
That should be 'aren't' grabbing....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Now that scary!
>
> Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
> safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
> They try again.
>
> I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
> grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
> brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
>
> I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
> control on a couple real hairy ones.
>
> Mike
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi mike,
> >
> > I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> > V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> > reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> > can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> > simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> > the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> > powerful engines.
> >
> > > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> > >
> > > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > > brakes.
> > >
> > > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> > >
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Now that scary!
>
> Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
> safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
> They try again.
>
> I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
> grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
> brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
>
> I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
> control on a couple real hairy ones.
>
> Mike
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi mike,
> >
> > I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> > V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> > reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> > can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> > simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> > the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> > powerful engines.
> >
> > > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> > >
> > > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > > brakes.
> > >
> > > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> > >
11-01-2003 | 11:45 AM
#147
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
That should be 'aren't' grabbing....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Now that scary!
>
> Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
> safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
> They try again.
>
> I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
> grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
> brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
>
> I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
> control on a couple real hairy ones.
>
> Mike
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi mike,
> >
> > I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> > V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> > reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> > can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> > simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> > the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> > powerful engines.
> >
> > > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> > >
> > > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > > brakes.
> > >
> > > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> > >
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Now that scary!
>
> Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
> safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
> They try again.
>
> I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
> grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
> brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
>
> I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
> control on a couple real hairy ones.
>
> Mike
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi mike,
> >
> > I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> > V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> > reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> > can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> > simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> > the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> > powerful engines.
> >
> > > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> > >
> > > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > > brakes.
> > >
> > > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> > >
11-01-2003 | 11:45 AM
#148
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
That should be 'aren't' grabbing....
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Now that scary!
>
> Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
> safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
> They try again.
>
> I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
> grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
> brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
>
> I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
> control on a couple real hairy ones.
>
> Mike
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi mike,
> >
> > I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> > V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> > reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> > can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> > simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> > the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> > powerful engines.
> >
> > > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> > >
> > > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > > brakes.
> > >
> > > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> > >
Mike
Mike Romain wrote:
>
> Now that scary!
>
> Even so the brakes should have been able to manage the speed down to a
> safe level and then if still going too fast, drop the clutch and stop.
> They try again.
>
> I would be having a real close look at those brakes! If the rears are
> grabbing, the fronts can be asked to do to much work and you can have
> brakes that won't stop the engine maybe...
>
> I have used the e-brake to keep the speed down and retain steering
> control on a couple real hairy ones.
>
> Mike
>
> Joshua Nelson wrote:
> >
> > Hi mike,
> >
> > I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option. I have a
> > V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
> > reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
> > can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine. The torque
> > simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
> > the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
> > powerful engines.
> >
> > > You are lucky to still have a Jeep.....
> > >
> > > Even if the lowest gear is too fast, leave it in gear and use the
> > > brakes.
> > >
> > > As long as you are moving, you won't stall out and if you are going slow
> > > enough to stall out, then dump the clutch and stop.
> > >
11-01-2003 | 02:37 PM
#149
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
I think it was you people's wild, paranoid imaginations. I don't
see a post. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
see a post. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
11-01-2003 | 02:37 PM
#150
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
I think it was you people's wild, paranoid imaginations. I don't
see a post. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
see a post. ;-)
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> He didn't even utter "Real Jeep..."
> * * *
> Matt Macchiarolo
> www.townpeddler.com
> www.wolverine4wd.org
> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html