Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
10-31-2003 | 05:32 PM
#121
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
10-31-2003 | 05:47 PM
#122
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
>
> --
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
>
> --
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
10-31-2003 | 05:47 PM
#123
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
>
> --
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
>
> --
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
10-31-2003 | 05:47 PM
#124
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
>
> --
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
>
> --
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
10-31-2003 | 07:18 PM
#125
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
I'm astonished!
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pmkcob72o15@corp.supernews.com...
> Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
> >
> > --
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pmkcob72o15@corp.supernews.com...
> Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
> >
> > --
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
10-31-2003 | 07:18 PM
#126
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
I'm astonished!
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pmkcob72o15@corp.supernews.com...
> Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
> >
> > --
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pmkcob72o15@corp.supernews.com...
> Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
> >
> > --
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
10-31-2003 | 07:18 PM
#127
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
I'm astonished!
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pmkcob72o15@corp.supernews.com...
> Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
> >
> > --
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:vq5pmkcob72o15@corp.supernews.com...
> Sheesh, my logic is so simple that Bill is speechless ...
>
>
>
>
> "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:3FA2E2F8.5F3AFF36@***.net...
> >
> > --
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
10-31-2003 | 07:26 PM
#128
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:25:52 -0800, "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com>
shared the following:
>I don't remember if it was Josh or Travis that said they decided that R sent
>them down the hill with too much speed.
Wasn't me...
> I'm with you, the brakes should have
>keep things managable while the trans was set in R, if there was still more
>speed than one would have liked, then the Idle Speed must be too high.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
>news:20031031170243.12300.00001401@mb-m20.aol.com...
>> In article <b102b6e4.0310311331.1c8451eb@posting.google.com >,
>spam_box@ev1.net
>> (Joshua Nelson) writes:
>>
>> >I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option.
>>
>> You're not reading his post correcty.
>>
>> I have a
>> >V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
>> >reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
>> >can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine.
>>
>> If that is the case you should have had enough engine compression braking
>to
>> safely back down, feathering the brake pedal just to augment the
>compression
>> braking.
>>
>> The torque
>> >simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
>> >the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
>> >powerful engines.
>>
>> You may want to have your brakes looked at. Remember, acceleration is
>optional,
>> stopping is not.
>>
>> Your CJ8 might be too much machine to learn to 'wheel on. Better stick
>with
>> that TJ 4-popper.
>> * * *
>> Matt Macchiarolo
>> www.townpeddler.com
>> www.wolverine4wd.org
>> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
shared the following:
>I don't remember if it was Josh or Travis that said they decided that R sent
>them down the hill with too much speed.
Wasn't me...
> I'm with you, the brakes should have
>keep things managable while the trans was set in R, if there was still more
>speed than one would have liked, then the Idle Speed must be too high.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
>news:20031031170243.12300.00001401@mb-m20.aol.com...
>> In article <b102b6e4.0310311331.1c8451eb@posting.google.com >,
>spam_box@ev1.net
>> (Joshua Nelson) writes:
>>
>> >I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option.
>>
>> You're not reading his post correcty.
>>
>> I have a
>> >V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
>> >reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
>> >can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine.
>>
>> If that is the case you should have had enough engine compression braking
>to
>> safely back down, feathering the brake pedal just to augment the
>compression
>> braking.
>>
>> The torque
>> >simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
>> >the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
>> >powerful engines.
>>
>> You may want to have your brakes looked at. Remember, acceleration is
>optional,
>> stopping is not.
>>
>> Your CJ8 might be too much machine to learn to 'wheel on. Better stick
>with
>> that TJ 4-popper.
>> * * *
>> Matt Macchiarolo
>> www.townpeddler.com
>> www.wolverine4wd.org
>> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
10-31-2003 | 07:26 PM
#129
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:25:52 -0800, "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com>
shared the following:
>I don't remember if it was Josh or Travis that said they decided that R sent
>them down the hill with too much speed.
Wasn't me...
> I'm with you, the brakes should have
>keep things managable while the trans was set in R, if there was still more
>speed than one would have liked, then the Idle Speed must be too high.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
>news:20031031170243.12300.00001401@mb-m20.aol.com...
>> In article <b102b6e4.0310311331.1c8451eb@posting.google.com >,
>spam_box@ev1.net
>> (Joshua Nelson) writes:
>>
>> >I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option.
>>
>> You're not reading his post correcty.
>>
>> I have a
>> >V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
>> >reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
>> >can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine.
>>
>> If that is the case you should have had enough engine compression braking
>to
>> safely back down, feathering the brake pedal just to augment the
>compression
>> braking.
>>
>> The torque
>> >simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
>> >the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
>> >powerful engines.
>>
>> You may want to have your brakes looked at. Remember, acceleration is
>optional,
>> stopping is not.
>>
>> Your CJ8 might be too much machine to learn to 'wheel on. Better stick
>with
>> that TJ 4-popper.
>> * * *
>> Matt Macchiarolo
>> www.townpeddler.com
>> www.wolverine4wd.org
>> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
shared the following:
>I don't remember if it was Josh or Travis that said they decided that R sent
>them down the hill with too much speed.
Wasn't me...
> I'm with you, the brakes should have
>keep things managable while the trans was set in R, if there was still more
>speed than one would have liked, then the Idle Speed must be too high.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
>news:20031031170243.12300.00001401@mb-m20.aol.com...
>> In article <b102b6e4.0310311331.1c8451eb@posting.google.com >,
>spam_box@ev1.net
>> (Joshua Nelson) writes:
>>
>> >I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option.
>>
>> You're not reading his post correcty.
>>
>> I have a
>> >V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
>> >reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
>> >can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine.
>>
>> If that is the case you should have had enough engine compression braking
>to
>> safely back down, feathering the brake pedal just to augment the
>compression
>> braking.
>>
>> The torque
>> >simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
>> >the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
>> >powerful engines.
>>
>> You may want to have your brakes looked at. Remember, acceleration is
>optional,
>> stopping is not.
>>
>> Your CJ8 might be too much machine to learn to 'wheel on. Better stick
>with
>> that TJ 4-popper.
>> * * *
>> Matt Macchiarolo
>> www.townpeddler.com
>> www.wolverine4wd.org
>> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
10-31-2003 | 07:26 PM
#130
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Who was it that said I didn't need lockers...?
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:25:52 -0800, "CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com>
shared the following:
>I don't remember if it was Josh or Travis that said they decided that R sent
>them down the hill with too much speed.
Wasn't me...
> I'm with you, the brakes should have
>keep things managable while the trans was set in R, if there was still more
>speed than one would have liked, then the Idle Speed must be too high.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
>news:20031031170243.12300.00001401@mb-m20.aol.com...
>> In article <b102b6e4.0310311331.1c8451eb@posting.google.com >,
>spam_box@ev1.net
>> (Joshua Nelson) writes:
>>
>> >I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option.
>>
>> You're not reading his post correcty.
>>
>> I have a
>> >V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
>> >reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
>> >can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine.
>>
>> If that is the case you should have had enough engine compression braking
>to
>> safely back down, feathering the brake pedal just to augment the
>compression
>> braking.
>>
>> The torque
>> >simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
>> >the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
>> >powerful engines.
>>
>> You may want to have your brakes looked at. Remember, acceleration is
>optional,
>> stopping is not.
>>
>> Your CJ8 might be too much machine to learn to 'wheel on. Better stick
>with
>> that TJ 4-popper.
>> * * *
>> Matt Macchiarolo
>> www.townpeddler.com
>> www.wolverine4wd.org
>> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!
shared the following:
>I don't remember if it was Josh or Travis that said they decided that R sent
>them down the hill with too much speed.
Wasn't me...
> I'm with you, the brakes should have
>keep things managable while the trans was set in R, if there was still more
>speed than one would have liked, then the Idle Speed must be too high.
>
>
>
>
>
>"Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
>news:20031031170243.12300.00001401@mb-m20.aol.com...
>> In article <b102b6e4.0310311331.1c8451eb@posting.google.com >,
>spam_box@ev1.net
>> (Joshua Nelson) writes:
>>
>> >I'm not trying to argue with you, but this wasn't an option.
>>
>> You're not reading his post correcty.
>>
>> I have a
>> >V8 and 4.10 gear ratio, and when it's in 4-low and a low gear such as
>> >reverse, not to mention a downhill incline, there is no way the brakes
>> >can apply enough stopping power to stall the engine.
>>
>> If that is the case you should have had enough engine compression braking
>to
>> safely back down, feathering the brake pedal just to augment the
>compression
>> braking.
>>
>> The torque
>> >simply overpowers the brakes. I can't help but suspect that this is
>> >the case for many others here as well, since a lot of folks have quite
>> >powerful engines.
>>
>> You may want to have your brakes looked at. Remember, acceleration is
>optional,
>> stopping is not.
>>
>> Your CJ8 might be too much machine to learn to 'wheel on. Better stick
>with
>> that TJ 4-popper.
>> * * *
>> Matt Macchiarolo
>> www.townpeddler.com
>> www.wolverine4wd.org
>> http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!