what exactly happened here?
04-24-2006 | 11:13 AM
#191
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:c133g.7245$oW1.4963@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Good.. we're cool then
always. ;-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:c133g.7245$oW1.4963@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Good.. we're cool then
always. ;-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
04-24-2006 | 11:13 AM
#192
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:c133g.7245$oW1.4963@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Good.. we're cool then
always. ;-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:c133g.7245$oW1.4963@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Good.. we're cool then
always. ;-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
04-24-2006 | 11:13 AM
#193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in message
news:c133g.7245$oW1.4963@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Good.. we're cool then
always. ;-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
news:c133g.7245$oW1.4963@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
> Good.. we're cool then
always. ;-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
04-24-2006 | 11:20 AM
#194
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote:
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation, like crossposting, language, or advertising.
>And never do I get mad, but will get even if possible. So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Crossposting and language are not TOS violations. You goat ------- kOOk.
Take a peek in alt.usenet.kooks and you will see that you are quite on
topic there. Try to be a little less boring and you might even be honored
with one of their prestigious awards.
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
Quite correct.
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
I hope he plans to live for several millennium if he wants to trace my
posts.
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
Correct on all counts.
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation, like crossposting, language, or advertising.
>And never do I get mad, but will get even if possible. So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Crossposting and language are not TOS violations. You goat ------- kOOk.
Take a peek in alt.usenet.kooks and you will see that you are quite on
topic there. Try to be a little less boring and you might even be honored
with one of their prestigious awards.
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
Quite correct.
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
I hope he plans to live for several millennium if he wants to trace my
posts.
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
Correct on all counts.
04-24-2006 | 11:20 AM
#195
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote:
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation, like crossposting, language, or advertising.
>And never do I get mad, but will get even if possible. So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Crossposting and language are not TOS violations. You goat ------- kOOk.
Take a peek in alt.usenet.kooks and you will see that you are quite on
topic there. Try to be a little less boring and you might even be honored
with one of their prestigious awards.
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
Quite correct.
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
I hope he plans to live for several millennium if he wants to trace my
posts.
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
Correct on all counts.
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation, like crossposting, language, or advertising.
>And never do I get mad, but will get even if possible. So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Crossposting and language are not TOS violations. You goat ------- kOOk.
Take a peek in alt.usenet.kooks and you will see that you are quite on
topic there. Try to be a little less boring and you might even be honored
with one of their prestigious awards.
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
Quite correct.
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
I hope he plans to live for several millennium if he wants to trace my
posts.
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
Correct on all counts.
04-24-2006 | 11:20 AM
#196
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote:
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation, like crossposting, language, or advertising.
>And never do I get mad, but will get even if possible. So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Crossposting and language are not TOS violations. You goat ------- kOOk.
Take a peek in alt.usenet.kooks and you will see that you are quite on
topic there. Try to be a little less boring and you might even be honored
with one of their prestigious awards.
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
Quite correct.
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
I hope he plans to live for several millennium if he wants to trace my
posts.
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
Correct on all counts.
>Hi Ted,
> You've got it, I don't have a life, so this is just plain fun, it's
>a game to see how many user names and actual Internet Service Provider
>accounts I can have closed, of course I don't go after them until I get
>a real charter violation, like crossposting, language, or advertising.
>And never do I get mad, but will get even if possible. So, those that
>don't want to watch, simple filter my address out.
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Crossposting and language are not TOS violations. You goat ------- kOOk.
Take a peek in alt.usenet.kooks and you will see that you are quite on
topic there. Try to be a little less boring and you might even be honored
with one of their prestigious awards.
>
>The Lord of Eltingville wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only thing I'd disagree with about what Kate said was that Bill's
>> tormentors are angry. They're not. They're having fun, and they're
>> having it at his expense (and at the expense of anyone else who takes it
>> marginally seriously).
Quite correct.
>> To break it down:
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort sifting through headers and
>> trying to track down the posts' origins.
I hope he plans to live for several millennium if he wants to trace my
posts.
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to report his findings to
>> providers who may/may not care about what's happening -- if they're
>> even the appropriate providers in the first place.
>>
>> * Bill's the one spending time and effort to respond to each post.
>>
>> And ultimately:
>>
>> * Bill's naive enough to think that all his time and effort is going
>> to make a bit of difference because as quickly as he might be
>> able to get an account nuked, new ones are created.
>>
>> * Bill keeps encouraging them to continue by obediently fetching every
>> stick that's thrown.
>>
>> Unless Bill (and anyone else who's getting upset by what he brought
>> here) learns to simply ignore posts that offend/don't interest him/them,
>> it's going to continue...and probably escalate. Like it or not, there's
>> ~25 years of usenet history to back that up.
>>
>> ~Ted (returning to lurker mode)
Correct on all counts.
04-24-2006 | 12:08 PM
#197
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
Looks like fun.... I'd suggest you get a muffler though before you lose your
hearing...
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZyZ2g.131$KO6.23106@news.uswest.net...
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:444C2287.A6E8F7B1@***.net...
>> So when ya going to trade your quads in on a Real Jeep?
>
> here is a small video of the trip that got cut short this weekend. i have
> file blockers on my server to prevent people from hot-linking, so i can
> only link you to the page. click the first video, at the top of the pile
> listed as Nathan/Pryor Mountain http://utilityoffroad.com/multimedia/
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
hearing...
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZyZ2g.131$KO6.23106@news.uswest.net...
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:444C2287.A6E8F7B1@***.net...
>> So when ya going to trade your quads in on a Real Jeep?
>
> here is a small video of the trip that got cut short this weekend. i have
> file blockers on my server to prevent people from hot-linking, so i can
> only link you to the page. click the first video, at the top of the pile
> listed as Nathan/Pryor Mountain http://utilityoffroad.com/multimedia/
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
04-24-2006 | 12:08 PM
#198
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
Looks like fun.... I'd suggest you get a muffler though before you lose your
hearing...
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZyZ2g.131$KO6.23106@news.uswest.net...
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:444C2287.A6E8F7B1@***.net...
>> So when ya going to trade your quads in on a Real Jeep?
>
> here is a small video of the trip that got cut short this weekend. i have
> file blockers on my server to prevent people from hot-linking, so i can
> only link you to the page. click the first video, at the top of the pile
> listed as Nathan/Pryor Mountain http://utilityoffroad.com/multimedia/
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
hearing...
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZyZ2g.131$KO6.23106@news.uswest.net...
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:444C2287.A6E8F7B1@***.net...
>> So when ya going to trade your quads in on a Real Jeep?
>
> here is a small video of the trip that got cut short this weekend. i have
> file blockers on my server to prevent people from hot-linking, so i can
> only link you to the page. click the first video, at the top of the pile
> listed as Nathan/Pryor Mountain http://utilityoffroad.com/multimedia/
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
04-24-2006 | 12:08 PM
#199
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
Looks like fun.... I'd suggest you get a muffler though before you lose your
hearing...
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZyZ2g.131$KO6.23106@news.uswest.net...
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:444C2287.A6E8F7B1@***.net...
>> So when ya going to trade your quads in on a Real Jeep?
>
> here is a small video of the trip that got cut short this weekend. i have
> file blockers on my server to prevent people from hot-linking, so i can
> only link you to the page. click the first video, at the top of the pile
> listed as Nathan/Pryor Mountain http://utilityoffroad.com/multimedia/
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
hearing...
"Nathan W. Collier" <Nathan@NoSpam.com> wrote in message
news:ZyZ2g.131$KO6.23106@news.uswest.net...
> "L.W.(Bill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> news:444C2287.A6E8F7B1@***.net...
>> So when ya going to trade your quads in on a Real Jeep?
>
> here is a small video of the trip that got cut short this weekend. i have
> file blockers on my server to prevent people from hot-linking, so i can
> only link you to the page. click the first video, at the top of the pile
> listed as Nathan/Pryor Mountain http://utilityoffroad.com/multimedia/
>
> --
> Nathan W. Collier
> http://UtilityOffRoad.com
> http://7SlotGrille.com
> http://InlineDiesel.com
> http://BighornRefrigeration.com
> http://ConcealedCarryForum.com
>
04-24-2006 | 05:38 PM
#200
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: what exactly happened here?
jbjeep <jbjeep@saw.net> wrote in
news:20jo425akpgavcj5rbb86o65kq5d5t6g0u@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:33:40 -0700, XS11E <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in
>>>news:W_N2g.26463$Kh5.1353@bignews8.bellsouth.ne t:
>>>
>>>> On another note, it's in the 70's outside and my Jeep is
>>>> calling to me. Can you hear it?
>>>> "Katieeeeeee... come put the top down.... lets go for a drive!"
>>>
>>>I'd like to, how do I put the top down on a Grand Cherokee? Oh,
>>>wait, never mind, the top's already down on the Miata and you're
>>>right, it's time for a drive!
> Sawzall.
OK, did that. Now how do I put it back up? ;-)
> But hey, you got a Miata, dont bother with the saw, just get
> going!
Did, had a nice drive! Thanks to you and to Kate for the
suggestion....
news:20jo425akpgavcj5rbb86o65kq5d5t6g0u@4ax.com:
> On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 11:33:40 -0700, XS11E <xs11eNO@SPAMyahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>"Kate" <Kate@dub.dub.dub.com (please ask)> wrote in
>>>news:W_N2g.26463$Kh5.1353@bignews8.bellsouth.ne t:
>>>
>>>> On another note, it's in the 70's outside and my Jeep is
>>>> calling to me. Can you hear it?
>>>> "Katieeeeeee... come put the top down.... lets go for a drive!"
>>>
>>>I'd like to, how do I put the top down on a Grand Cherokee? Oh,
>>>wait, never mind, the top's already down on the Miata and you're
>>>right, it's time for a drive!
> Sawzall.
OK, did that. Now how do I put it back up? ;-)
> But hey, you got a Miata, dont bother with the saw, just get
> going!
Did, had a nice drive! Thanks to you and to Kate for the
suggestion....