Re: Unlimited 4 door
The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A
Pacer engine in a Jeep? "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. .. > I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote: > >> Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power. > > I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque > numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the > entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my > lifetime. > > Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of > HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS, > and you shoot yourself in the foot. > > A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have > ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than > the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better. > |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
Did you forget about Slick Willie and our missile technology?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Which Bush the First worked hard to get. |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
Did you forget about Slick Willie and our missile technology?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Which Bush the First worked hard to get. |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
Did you forget about Slick Willie and our missile technology?
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > > Which Bush the First worked hard to get. |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:11:28 GMT, Brett Ryan <bsryan@houston.rr.com>
wrote: >Jim, > I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the >thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to >make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use >of that wheel base than the 4 door for me). > >JimG wrote: >> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do >> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a.... >> say Tahoe? >> I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)? Mark '93 XJ |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:11:28 GMT, Brett Ryan <bsryan@houston.rr.com>
wrote: >Jim, > I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the >thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to >make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use >of that wheel base than the 4 door for me). > >JimG wrote: >> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do >> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a.... >> say Tahoe? >> I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)? Mark '93 XJ |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 02:11:28 GMT, Brett Ryan <bsryan@houston.rr.com>
wrote: >Jim, > I have no idea as to how they ride but I've seen one up close and the >thing is BIG compared to the previous Wrangler. It is big enough to >make a Scrambler out of if Jeep wanted to (which would be a better use >of that wheel base than the 4 door for me). > >JimG wrote: >> Unlimited Rubicon to be specific. Anyone tried one of these yet? How do >> they ride? Do they approach (mind you I say "approach") the ride of a.... >> say Tahoe? >> I'd think it would be about the closest thing you'll ever get to a new XJ, wouldn't it ('cept for the loss of the 4 litre, of course)? Mark '93 XJ |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
It was in a Jeep before it was in a Pacer, so you could say it was a
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>. Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler engine, and a great engine it is. Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability, and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account? Jeff DeWitt Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A > Pacer engine in a Jeep? > > "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message > news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. .. > >>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> >>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power. >> >>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque >>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the >>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my >>lifetime. >> >>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of >>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS, >>and you shoot yourself in the foot. >> >>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have >>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than >>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better. >> > > > |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
It was in a Jeep before it was in a Pacer, so you could say it was a
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>. Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler engine, and a great engine it is. Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability, and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account? Jeff DeWitt Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A > Pacer engine in a Jeep? > > "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message > news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. .. > >>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> >>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power. >> >>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque >>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the >>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my >>lifetime. >> >>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of >>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS, >>and you shoot yourself in the foot. >> >>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have >>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than >>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better. >> > > > |
Re: Unlimited 4 door
It was in a Jeep before it was in a Pacer, so you could say it was a
Jeep engine in a Pacer <G>. Although actually it's roots go a LONG way back as a Nash/Rambler engine, and a great engine it is. Guys correct me if I'm wrong, but if I were to do something stupid like trade my XJ in for the nearest equivalent Liberty wouldn't I get something heavier, slower, with worse gas mileage, lower reliability, and of course a REALLY big hole in my bank account? Jeff DeWitt Matt Macchiarolo wrote: > The AMC I-6 was offered in the CJ's and the AMC Pacers, were they not? A > Pacer engine in a Jeep? > > "Outatime" <WhoKnows@here.com> wrote in message > news:YeqdndW7R63XOcbYnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d@softcom.net. .. > >>I_AM_Raptor@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> >>>Only one thing kept me from picking one up: Lack of power. >> >>I figured as much. DC will spend 5 years playing with HP and torque >>numbers until sales drop to the point where they will either dump the >>entire line or bring back the straight-6, which ain't bloody likely in my >>lifetime. >> >>Whoever says the V-6 is a smart replacement for the I-6 is full of >>HORSEHOCKY. I was RIGHT. Mess with something that just flat-out WORKS, >>and you shoot yourself in the foot. >> >>A minivan engine in a Wrangler. Who, in their worst nightmare, could have >>ever imagined such horror. Worse, I'd bet that V-sucks is heavier than >>the I-6 as well. So much for progress. Newer ain't better. >> > > > |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 AM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands