On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:11:05 GMT in <3EFF4772.92465B1D@***.net>,
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> graced the world with this
thought:

>Here in bleeding heart liberal
>Kalifornia, I'm sure the provoker, looser would find a way to throw you
>in jail, and sue.

I might remind you that California is traditionally a Republican
supporting state, you pinheaded ----.

 

"bizbee" <tuberoo@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:E26Ma.72676$Io.6806290@newsread2.prod.itd.ear thlink.net...

> I might remind you that California is traditionally a Republican
> supporting state, you pinheaded ----.

No kidding, we usually elect Republicans??? I did not realize our top
three state officers, Governor Davis, Senator Feinstein, and Senator Boxer,
were anything but liberal democrats. You mean they're actually
Republicans?? Dang, for a Republican supporting state, we sure seem to have
a lot of liberal democrats up at the top. This must be due to California
not having many minorities, right? Bizbee, you are one ignoramous.

 

bizbee wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:11:05 GMT in <3EFF4772.92465B1D@***.net>,
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> graced the world with this
> thought:
>
>
>>Here in bleeding heart liberal
>>Kalifornia, I'm sure the provoker, looser would find a way to throw you
>>in jail, and sue.
>
>
> I might remind you that California is traditionally a Republican
> supporting state, you pinheaded ----.

Whether or not they win the election, you pimple on a
donkey's buttocks?

 

I feel you are a part of the inbreeding problem Georgia has.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

bizbee wrote:
>
> I might remind you that California is traditionally a Republican
> supporting state, you pinheaded ----.

 

you need to look at your laws, senators, reps, governors, social programs,
and overall general liberalistic foolishness before you go any further
making yourself look like an ***.

there is a reason it's the people's republic of kalifornia.



"bizbee" <tuberoo@ix.netcom.com> wrote in message
news:E26Ma.72676$Io.6806290@newsread2.prod.itd.ear thlink.net...
> On Sun, 29 Jun 2003 20:11:05 GMT in <3EFF4772.92465B1D@***.net>,
> L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> graced the world with this
> thought:
>
> >Here in bleeding heart liberal
> >Kalifornia, I'm sure the provoker, looser would find a way to throw you
> >in jail, and sue.
>
> I might remind you that California is traditionally a Republican
> supporting state, you pinheaded ----.

 

Carlo Jr. wrote:
> true.........but did you see the map on CNN just after Davis was elected? It
> appears that S.F & L.A. voted for Davis & the rest of the state (me
> included) voted Republican. That's also the reason that California is not 3
> states, now.
>

I think most Californians would be insulted at the insinuation
we voted FOR Davis. Most of us voted against the other guy,
and since Al Capone was not available as a write-in, that
pretty much limited the choices. Still, I don't like the
recall, I'd much rather just have him tarred and feathered as
I try to move to Colorado.

 

what I am saying, though, is that, according to the map on CNN, the whole
state voted FOR "the other guy" - except S.F. & L.A.

--
Carlo F. Serusa, Jr. RPh
carlo.jr@comcast.net
'98 Sahara TJ - '89 YJ - '79 Scout II
O|||||||O
'92 Explorer '65 Mustang


"Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:3F01F1A7.5090508@comcast.net...
> Carlo Jr. wrote:
> > true.........but did you see the map on CNN just after Davis was
elected? It
> > appears that S.F & L.A. voted for Davis & the rest of the state (me
> > included) voted Republican. That's also the reason that California is
not 3
> > states, now.
> >
>
> I think most Californians would be insulted at the insinuation
> we voted FOR Davis. Most of us voted against the other guy,
> and since Al Capone was not available as a write-in, that
> pretty much limited the choices. Still, I don't like the
> recall, I'd much rather just have him tarred and feathered as
> I try to move to Colorado.
>
>