> Yes it is a Grand Cherokee and they seemed not to be negative at this time
to a replacement.If it comes to that I'm thinking because it is a leased
vehicle they won't screw around.<

In early '00 Mercedes Benz took back my '98 E Class after the local dealer
wrecked it TWICE while it was in for routine servicing. They were really not
obligated to do so, as it was the dealers fault, but very much to their
credit they stepped right up. They simply took back the '98 and wrote a new
lease on the '00 at the same terms.

> "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> news:20031121094433.00545.00002448@mb-m02.aol.com...
> > In article <bpl43m02pek@enews1.newsguy.com>, "Jerry McG"
> > <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
> >
> > >This could be interesting, since three are no Cherokees being
> > >produced any longer.
> >
> > In the original post he said it was an '02 Cherokee, which would
probably
> make
> > it a Grand Cherokee, since the XJ Cherokee last model year was '01.
> > * * *
> > Matt Macchiarolo
> > www.townpeddler.com
> > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

 

> Yes it is a Grand Cherokee and they seemed not to be negative at this time
to a replacement.If it comes to that I'm thinking because it is a leased
vehicle they won't screw around.<

In early '00 Mercedes Benz took back my '98 E Class after the local dealer
wrecked it TWICE while it was in for routine servicing. They were really not
obligated to do so, as it was the dealers fault, but very much to their
credit they stepped right up. They simply took back the '98 and wrote a new
lease on the '00 at the same terms.

> "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> news:20031121094433.00545.00002448@mb-m02.aol.com...
> > In article <bpl43m02pek@enews1.newsguy.com>, "Jerry McG"
> > <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
> >
> > >This could be interesting, since three are no Cherokees being
> > >produced any longer.
> >
> > In the original post he said it was an '02 Cherokee, which would
probably
> make
> > it a Grand Cherokee, since the XJ Cherokee last model year was '01.
> > * * *
> > Matt Macchiarolo
> > www.townpeddler.com
> > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

 

> Yes it is a Grand Cherokee and they seemed not to be negative at this time
to a replacement.If it comes to that I'm thinking because it is a leased
vehicle they won't screw around.<

In early '00 Mercedes Benz took back my '98 E Class after the local dealer
wrecked it TWICE while it was in for routine servicing. They were really not
obligated to do so, as it was the dealers fault, but very much to their
credit they stepped right up. They simply took back the '98 and wrote a new
lease on the '00 at the same terms.

> "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchia@aol.comspambgon> wrote in message
> news:20031121094433.00545.00002448@mb-m02.aol.com...
> > In article <bpl43m02pek@enews1.newsguy.com>, "Jerry McG"
> > <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> writes:
> >
> > >This could be interesting, since three are no Cherokees being
> > >produced any longer.
> >
> > In the original post he said it was an '02 Cherokee, which would
probably
> make
> > it a Grand Cherokee, since the XJ Cherokee last model year was '01.
> > * * *
> > Matt Macchiarolo
> > www.townpeddler.com
> > www.wolverine4wd.org
> > http://wolverine4wd.org/rigs/macchiarolo_ml.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>