On Wed, 05 Jul 2006 19:49:31 -0700, L.W.(Bill) ------ III once
again attempted to write.

> who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self.

Only you, Billie Boi, could make 3 grammatical errors in a simple 13-word
phrase.


--
I'm not an expert, but I play one on Usenet.

 

Apparently you have a problem in counting, too:
http://www.----------.com/temp/its.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

§q?@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> Only you, Billie Boi, could make 3 grammatical errors in a simple 13-word
> phrase.

 

Apparently you have a problem in counting, too:
http://www.----------.com/temp/its.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

§q?@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> Only you, Billie Boi, could make 3 grammatical errors in a simple 13-word
> phrase.

 

Apparently you have a problem in counting, too:
http://www.----------.com/temp/its.jpg
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:--------------------

§q?@r3 Wh33£s wrote:
>
> Only you, Billie Boi, could make 3 grammatical errors in a simple 13-word
> phrase.

 

On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III feebed his way along with:

> Apparently you have a problem in counting, too:

1) /who's/ means who is; the correct word is /whose/

> way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self.

2) /it's/ does not agree grammatically with /you/, feeble satire aside

3) accepting the satire, /it's self/ means 'it is self'; the correct word
is /itself/

> Whom
> here proves it has a problem in counting, too.

4) Extremely poor usage of the term /whom/; correct only in a highly
technical sense which you could never understand

And all caused by faulty logic to begin with.

Now take your mottled, overbloated pus-sac body, microcephalic cranium and
thy dried, witherèd and shriveled testes elsewhere where your feeble
attempts at adequacy can be more fully appreciated.


> Goat Bless Armenia
>Everybody please mailto:--------------------
>http://www.billsjellydills.com/


Ya really didn't get /any/ of that, didja Billie?



--
I'm not an expert, but I play one on Usenet.

 

On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III feebed his way along with:

> Apparently you have a problem in counting, too:

1) /who's/ means who is; the correct word is /whose/

> way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self.

2) /it's/ does not agree grammatically with /you/, feeble satire aside

3) accepting the satire, /it's self/ means 'it is self'; the correct word
is /itself/

> Whom
> here proves it has a problem in counting, too.

4) Extremely poor usage of the term /whom/; correct only in a highly
technical sense which you could never understand

And all caused by faulty logic to begin with.

Now take your mottled, overbloated pus-sac body, microcephalic cranium and
thy dried, witherèd and shriveled testes elsewhere where your feeble
attempts at adequacy can be more fully appreciated.


> Goat Bless Armenia
>Everybody please mailto:--------------------
>http://www.billsjellydills.com/


Ya really didn't get /any/ of that, didja Billie?



--
I'm not an expert, but I play one on Usenet.

 

On this day of this month, in a year likely to be unrecorded in human
history, L.W.(Bill) ------ III feebed his way along with:

> Apparently you have a problem in counting, too:

1) /who's/ means who is; the correct word is /whose/

> way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self.

2) /it's/ does not agree grammatically with /you/, feeble satire aside

3) accepting the satire, /it's self/ means 'it is self'; the correct word
is /itself/

> Whom
> here proves it has a problem in counting, too.

4) Extremely poor usage of the term /whom/; correct only in a highly
technical sense which you could never understand

And all caused by faulty logic to begin with.

Now take your mottled, overbloated pus-sac body, microcephalic cranium and
thy dried, witherèd and shriveled testes elsewhere where your feeble
attempts at adequacy can be more fully appreciated.


> Goat Bless Armenia
>Everybody please mailto:--------------------
>http://www.billsjellydills.com/


Ya really didn't get /any/ of that, didja Billie?



--
I'm not an expert, but I play one on Usenet.

 

"Whom" was use in past tense, as in the idiot in the previous post
that counted four errors. Proving you to be a retard along with being a
coward!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

§q?@r3 Wh33£s wrote:

> 1) /who's/ means who is; the correct word is /whose/
>
> 2) /it's/ does not agree grammatically with /you/, feeble satire aside
>
> 3) accepting the satire, /it's self/ means 'it is self'; the correct word
> is /itself/
>
> 4) Extremely poor usage of the term /whom/; correct only in a highly
> technical sense which you could never understand
>
> And all caused by faulty logic to begin with.
>
> Now take your mottled, overbloated pus-sac body, microcephalic cranium and
> thy dried, witherèd and shriveled testes elsewhere where your feeble
> attempts at adequacy can be more fully appreciated.

 

"Whom" was use in past tense, as in the idiot in the previous post
that counted four errors. Proving you to be a retard along with being a
coward!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

§q?@r3 Wh33£s wrote:

> 1) /who's/ means who is; the correct word is /whose/
>
> 2) /it's/ does not agree grammatically with /you/, feeble satire aside
>
> 3) accepting the satire, /it's self/ means 'it is self'; the correct word
> is /itself/
>
> 4) Extremely poor usage of the term /whom/; correct only in a highly
> technical sense which you could never understand
>
> And all caused by faulty logic to begin with.
>
> Now take your mottled, overbloated pus-sac body, microcephalic cranium and
> thy dried, witherèd and shriveled testes elsewhere where your feeble
> attempts at adequacy can be more fully appreciated.

 

"Whom" was use in past tense, as in the idiot in the previous post
that counted four errors. Proving you to be a retard along with being a
coward!
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

§q?@r3 Wh33£s wrote:

> 1) /who's/ means who is; the correct word is /whose/
>
> 2) /it's/ does not agree grammatically with /you/, feeble satire aside
>
> 3) accepting the satire, /it's self/ means 'it is self'; the correct word
> is /itself/
>
> 4) Extremely poor usage of the term /whom/; correct only in a highly
> technical sense which you could never understand
>
> And all caused by faulty logic to begin with.
>
> Now take your mottled, overbloated pus-sac body, microcephalic cranium and
> thy dried, witherèd and shriveled testes elsewhere where your feeble
> attempts at adequacy can be more fully appreciated.