Please pass nationally
08-22-2004 | 10:53 PM
#351
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
Adminstration would identify who they are.
To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
<music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295938.5AC6E33@***.net...
> If that were true they would prosecute these "two senior
> Administration officials".
> And what does this leak have to do with the president of our United
> States, you bleeding heat liberal?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Novak himself reported it was "two senior Administration officials" who
> > leaked it.
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/22/cia.leak/
> >
> > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20030714.shtml
> >
> > Care to provide any more conspiracy theories?
It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
Adminstration would identify who they are.
To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
<music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295938.5AC6E33@***.net...
> If that were true they would prosecute these "two senior
> Administration officials".
> And what does this leak have to do with the president of our United
> States, you bleeding heat liberal?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Novak himself reported it was "two senior Administration officials" who
> > leaked it.
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/22/cia.leak/
> >
> > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20030714.shtml
> >
> > Care to provide any more conspiracy theories?
08-22-2004 | 10:53 PM
#352
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
Adminstration would identify who they are.
To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
<music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295938.5AC6E33@***.net...
> If that were true they would prosecute these "two senior
> Administration officials".
> And what does this leak have to do with the president of our United
> States, you bleeding heat liberal?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Novak himself reported it was "two senior Administration officials" who
> > leaked it.
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/22/cia.leak/
> >
> > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20030714.shtml
> >
> > Care to provide any more conspiracy theories?
It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
Adminstration would identify who they are.
To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
<music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295938.5AC6E33@***.net...
> If that were true they would prosecute these "two senior
> Administration officials".
> And what does this leak have to do with the president of our United
> States, you bleeding heat liberal?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Novak himself reported it was "two senior Administration officials" who
> > leaked it.
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/22/cia.leak/
> >
> > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20030714.shtml
> >
> > Care to provide any more conspiracy theories?
08-22-2004 | 10:53 PM
#353
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
Adminstration would identify who they are.
To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
<music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295938.5AC6E33@***.net...
> If that were true they would prosecute these "two senior
> Administration officials".
> And what does this leak have to do with the president of our United
> States, you bleeding heat liberal?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Novak himself reported it was "two senior Administration officials" who
> > leaked it.
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/22/cia.leak/
> >
> > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20030714.shtml
> >
> > Care to provide any more conspiracy theories?
It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
Adminstration would identify who they are.
To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
<music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295938.5AC6E33@***.net...
> If that were true they would prosecute these "two senior
> Administration officials".
> And what does this leak have to do with the president of our United
> States, you bleeding heat liberal?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Novak himself reported it was "two senior Administration officials" who
> > leaked it.
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/22/cia.leak/
> >
> > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20030714.shtml
> >
> > Care to provide any more conspiracy theories?
08-22-2004 | 11:04 PM
#354
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
"Sorry kids, I have to go to do some very important work that just came up.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
08-22-2004 | 11:04 PM
#355
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
"Sorry kids, I have to go to do some very important work that just came up.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
08-22-2004 | 11:04 PM
#356
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
"Sorry kids, I have to go to do some very important work that just came up.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
08-22-2004 | 11:04 PM
#357
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
"Sorry kids, I have to go to do some very important work that just came up.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
I'll come back and we'll finish this nice visit, OK?"
(walk calmly out of room into a room full of staff) "Get me someone on the
phone who knows whats going on and inform me. Get me the Vice President,
Condi Rice, and the Joint Chiefs to let me know how big the attack is and
what we can to to prevent more. Americans are dying. Find out what's
happening and what we can do about it.
I'm not saying he could have stopped the other attacks. Nor would I had I
been in charge. But to answer your questions, if I was in charge, I would
need to be informed. That means dropping everything when I'm told we're
under attack and asking questions, at the very least. In a crisis, 5-7
minutes can mean a lot.
I answered your question, now you answer mine...would you sit and do nothing
for 5-7 minutes after someone told you your house was burning down? Would
you ask no questions during that time, like "did someone call the fire dept?
Did my family get out?"
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:412959F8.377560DB@***.net...
> Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
> five to seven minutes?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes
up
> > and tells you your house is on fire.
> >
> > The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of
actions
> > he could have taken way without contributing to it.
08-22-2004 | 11:07 PM
#358
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
We're talking about the CIA leak here, not the hijacking...the special
prosecutor is not investigating the hijacking. Did he know about the leak,
when it happened? Seems to me, being the President, seeing that he is the
boss of whoever made the leak, he could find out who it was if he really
wanted to.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295C2C.97F76E3@***.net...
> Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
> it happened?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to
indictments.
> > It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> > Adminstration would identify who they are.
> >
> > To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he
know
> > it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> > questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
> >
> > <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says
so</music>
prosecutor is not investigating the hijacking. Did he know about the leak,
when it happened? Seems to me, being the President, seeing that he is the
boss of whoever made the leak, he could find out who it was if he really
wanted to.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295C2C.97F76E3@***.net...
> Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
> it happened?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to
indictments.
> > It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> > Adminstration would identify who they are.
> >
> > To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he
know
> > it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> > questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
> >
> > <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says
so</music>
08-22-2004 | 11:07 PM
#359
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
We're talking about the CIA leak here, not the hijacking...the special
prosecutor is not investigating the hijacking. Did he know about the leak,
when it happened? Seems to me, being the President, seeing that he is the
boss of whoever made the leak, he could find out who it was if he really
wanted to.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295C2C.97F76E3@***.net...
> Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
> it happened?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to
indictments.
> > It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> > Adminstration would identify who they are.
> >
> > To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he
know
> > it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> > questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
> >
> > <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says
so</music>
prosecutor is not investigating the hijacking. Did he know about the leak,
when it happened? Seems to me, being the President, seeing that he is the
boss of whoever made the leak, he could find out who it was if he really
wanted to.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295C2C.97F76E3@***.net...
> Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
> it happened?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to
indictments.
> > It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> > Adminstration would identify who they are.
> >
> > To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he
know
> > it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> > questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
> >
> > <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says
so</music>
08-22-2004 | 11:07 PM
#360
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Please pass nationally
We're talking about the CIA leak here, not the hijacking...the special
prosecutor is not investigating the hijacking. Did he know about the leak,
when it happened? Seems to me, being the President, seeing that he is the
boss of whoever made the leak, he could find out who it was if he really
wanted to.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295C2C.97F76E3@***.net...
> Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
> it happened?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to
indictments.
> > It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> > Adminstration would identify who they are.
> >
> > To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he
know
> > it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> > questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
> >
> > <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says
so</music>
prosecutor is not investigating the hijacking. Did he know about the leak,
when it happened? Seems to me, being the President, seeing that he is the
boss of whoever made the leak, he could find out who it was if he really
wanted to.
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295C2C.97F76E3@***.net...
> Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
> it happened?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to
indictments.
> > It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> > Adminstration would identify who they are.
> >
> > To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he
know
> > it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> > questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
> >
> > <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says
so</music>