Answer the f**kin question! What would you have done during that
five to seven minutes?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Sit still and do nothing for five to seven minutes after someone comes up
> and tells you your house is on fire.
>
> The attacks themselves caused mass panic. There are a multitude of actions
> he could have taken way without contributing to it.

 

Sorry, hit the wrong button, should have been sent to the newsgroup. Don't
you enjoy a lively debate?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchiarolo@comcast.net>
To: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: Please pass nationally


> Are you saying that there is no grand jury investigating? Colin Powell
> testified before it last month...
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5570006/site/newsweek
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Please pass nationally
>
>
> > He didn't initiate a grand jury.
> > And where are these statements, and their wild guesses as to their
> > names?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > >
> > > Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago who was
> > > appointed special prosecutor investigating this case, and the
Washington
> DC
> > > grand jury don't seem to think so.
>

 

Sorry, hit the wrong button, should have been sent to the newsgroup. Don't
you enjoy a lively debate?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchiarolo@comcast.net>
To: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: Please pass nationally


> Are you saying that there is no grand jury investigating? Colin Powell
> testified before it last month...
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5570006/site/newsweek
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Please pass nationally
>
>
> > He didn't initiate a grand jury.
> > And where are these statements, and their wild guesses as to their
> > names?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > >
> > > Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago who was
> > > appointed special prosecutor investigating this case, and the
Washington
> DC
> > > grand jury don't seem to think so.
>

 

Sorry, hit the wrong button, should have been sent to the newsgroup. Don't
you enjoy a lively debate?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchiarolo@comcast.net>
To: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: Please pass nationally


> Are you saying that there is no grand jury investigating? Colin Powell
> testified before it last month...
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5570006/site/newsweek
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Please pass nationally
>
>
> > He didn't initiate a grand jury.
> > And where are these statements, and their wild guesses as to their
> > names?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > >
> > > Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago who was
> > > appointed special prosecutor investigating this case, and the
Washington
> DC
> > > grand jury don't seem to think so.
>

 

Sorry, hit the wrong button, should have been sent to the newsgroup. Don't
you enjoy a lively debate?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Macchiarolo" <mlmacchiarolo@comcast.net>
To: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:31 PM
Subject: Re: Please pass nationally


> Are you saying that there is no grand jury investigating? Colin Powell
> testified before it last month...
>
> http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5570006/site/newsweek
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net>
> Newsgroups: rec.autos.makers.jeep+******
> Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2004 10:06 PM
> Subject: Re: Please pass nationally
>
>
> > He didn't initiate a grand jury.
> > And where are these statements, and their wild guesses as to their
> > names?
> > God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
> >
> > Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> > >
> > > Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the United States attorney in Chicago who was
> > > appointed special prosecutor investigating this case, and the
Washington
> DC
> > > grand jury don't seem to think so.
>

 

Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
it happened?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
> It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> Adminstration would identify who they are.
>
> To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
> it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
>
> <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>

 

Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
it happened?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
> It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> Adminstration would identify who they are.
>
> To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
> it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
>
> <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>

 

Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
it happened?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
> It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> Adminstration would identify who they are.
>
> To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
> it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
>
> <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>

 

Are you insinuating the President knew of the high jacking before
it happened?
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
>
> Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
> It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
> Adminstration would identify who they are.
>
> To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
> it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
> questioned by the Special Prosecutor...
>
> <music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>

 

Of course they will prosecute, once the investigation leads to indictments.
It would be much easier and less expensive for the taxpayers if the
Adminstration would identify who they are.

To answer your question, "What did the president know, and when did he know
it?" Makes you wonder why he retained a criminal attorney before he was
questioned by the Special Prosecutor...

<music> I'm a bleeding heart liberal, because Bill ------ says so</music>

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:41295938.5AC6E33@***.net...
> If that were true they would prosecute these "two senior
> Administration officials".
> And what does this leak have to do with the president of our United
> States, you bleeding heat liberal?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Novak himself reported it was "two senior Administration officials" who
> > leaked it.
> >
> > http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/01/22/cia.leak/
> >
> > http://www.townhall.com/columnists/r...20030714.shtml
> >
> > Care to provide any more conspiracy theories?