OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
08-11-2004 | 05:02 PM
#191
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Why would someone vote for an admitted war criminal:
http://hnn.us/articles/3552
" SEN. KERRY: There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say
that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of
other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free
fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50
calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which
were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy
missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the
laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and
all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the
government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that
the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the
men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I
think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law
that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."
CRWLR wrote:
> Not implying that at all.
>
> But, if one is going to ask me to stand on a wall and protect you and your
> loved ones, maybe you should think twice about complaining of the manner in
> which I provide that protection. As much as I fully support anybody's right
> to complain, I take them much more seriously if they have stood on the wall.
> I protected the right to complain by hoisting myself up on that wall many
> long years ago, I am not going to pull that right away from anybody now that
> I have offered my life in exchange for it.
>
> I have huge disagreements with almost everything that Kerry stands for, but
> I give him credit for standing beside me on the wall before he climbed up on
> his soapbox and began deriding our country and out leaders.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:O9adnQHN45TCt4fcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
>
>>Surely you and Bill aren't implying that ONLY those that has served in
>
> the
>
>>military has the right to complain about the politics and leadership of
>
> the
>
>>USA. While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE. The alternative based on your implication is a military
>>dictatorship.
>>
>>Now, if you don't vote, and therefore do not involve yourself in the
>>political process, then I would agree that you don't have the right to
>>complain.
>>
>>"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:10hisfo1tj7vnf7@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>I think that what Bill is saying here is, if you are going to complain
>>
>>about
>>
>>>how your country is being run, you should try standing in defense of it
>>>first, then complain later. At least Kerry got that part right.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>news:41194CD7.B08DDD56@***.net...
>>>
>>>> By the way you write I can say you haven't give up a couple of
>>>>years for your country. Like I have in the ARMY. You're just dead
>>>>weight!
>>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>>Jeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think Dan Quayle was thinking of you when he said:
>>>>>
>>>>>" What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is
>>
>>being
>>
>>>>>very wasteful. How true that is."
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
http://hnn.us/articles/3552
" SEN. KERRY: There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say
that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of
other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free
fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50
calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which
were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy
missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the
laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and
all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the
government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that
the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the
men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I
think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law
that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."
CRWLR wrote:
> Not implying that at all.
>
> But, if one is going to ask me to stand on a wall and protect you and your
> loved ones, maybe you should think twice about complaining of the manner in
> which I provide that protection. As much as I fully support anybody's right
> to complain, I take them much more seriously if they have stood on the wall.
> I protected the right to complain by hoisting myself up on that wall many
> long years ago, I am not going to pull that right away from anybody now that
> I have offered my life in exchange for it.
>
> I have huge disagreements with almost everything that Kerry stands for, but
> I give him credit for standing beside me on the wall before he climbed up on
> his soapbox and began deriding our country and out leaders.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:O9adnQHN45TCt4fcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
>
>>Surely you and Bill aren't implying that ONLY those that has served in
>
> the
>
>>military has the right to complain about the politics and leadership of
>
> the
>
>>USA. While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE. The alternative based on your implication is a military
>>dictatorship.
>>
>>Now, if you don't vote, and therefore do not involve yourself in the
>>political process, then I would agree that you don't have the right to
>>complain.
>>
>>"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:10hisfo1tj7vnf7@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>I think that what Bill is saying here is, if you are going to complain
>>
>>about
>>
>>>how your country is being run, you should try standing in defense of it
>>>first, then complain later. At least Kerry got that part right.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>news:41194CD7.B08DDD56@***.net...
>>>
>>>> By the way you write I can say you haven't give up a couple of
>>>>years for your country. Like I have in the ARMY. You're just dead
>>>>weight!
>>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>>Jeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think Dan Quayle was thinking of you when he said:
>>>>>
>>>>>" What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is
>>
>>being
>>
>>>>>very wasteful. How true that is."
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
08-11-2004 | 05:02 PM
#192
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Why would someone vote for an admitted war criminal:
http://hnn.us/articles/3552
" SEN. KERRY: There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say
that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of
other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free
fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50
calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which
were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy
missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the
laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and
all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the
government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that
the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the
men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I
think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law
that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."
CRWLR wrote:
> Not implying that at all.
>
> But, if one is going to ask me to stand on a wall and protect you and your
> loved ones, maybe you should think twice about complaining of the manner in
> which I provide that protection. As much as I fully support anybody's right
> to complain, I take them much more seriously if they have stood on the wall.
> I protected the right to complain by hoisting myself up on that wall many
> long years ago, I am not going to pull that right away from anybody now that
> I have offered my life in exchange for it.
>
> I have huge disagreements with almost everything that Kerry stands for, but
> I give him credit for standing beside me on the wall before he climbed up on
> his soapbox and began deriding our country and out leaders.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:O9adnQHN45TCt4fcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
>
>>Surely you and Bill aren't implying that ONLY those that has served in
>
> the
>
>>military has the right to complain about the politics and leadership of
>
> the
>
>>USA. While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE. The alternative based on your implication is a military
>>dictatorship.
>>
>>Now, if you don't vote, and therefore do not involve yourself in the
>>political process, then I would agree that you don't have the right to
>>complain.
>>
>>"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:10hisfo1tj7vnf7@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>I think that what Bill is saying here is, if you are going to complain
>>
>>about
>>
>>>how your country is being run, you should try standing in defense of it
>>>first, then complain later. At least Kerry got that part right.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>news:41194CD7.B08DDD56@***.net...
>>>
>>>> By the way you write I can say you haven't give up a couple of
>>>>years for your country. Like I have in the ARMY. You're just dead
>>>>weight!
>>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>>Jeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think Dan Quayle was thinking of you when he said:
>>>>>
>>>>>" What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is
>>
>>being
>>
>>>>>very wasteful. How true that is."
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
http://hnn.us/articles/3552
" SEN. KERRY: There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say
that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of
other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free
fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50
calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which
were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy
missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the
laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and
all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the
government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that
the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the
men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I
think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law
that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."
CRWLR wrote:
> Not implying that at all.
>
> But, if one is going to ask me to stand on a wall and protect you and your
> loved ones, maybe you should think twice about complaining of the manner in
> which I provide that protection. As much as I fully support anybody's right
> to complain, I take them much more seriously if they have stood on the wall.
> I protected the right to complain by hoisting myself up on that wall many
> long years ago, I am not going to pull that right away from anybody now that
> I have offered my life in exchange for it.
>
> I have huge disagreements with almost everything that Kerry stands for, but
> I give him credit for standing beside me on the wall before he climbed up on
> his soapbox and began deriding our country and out leaders.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:O9adnQHN45TCt4fcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
>
>>Surely you and Bill aren't implying that ONLY those that has served in
>
> the
>
>>military has the right to complain about the politics and leadership of
>
> the
>
>>USA. While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE. The alternative based on your implication is a military
>>dictatorship.
>>
>>Now, if you don't vote, and therefore do not involve yourself in the
>>political process, then I would agree that you don't have the right to
>>complain.
>>
>>"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:10hisfo1tj7vnf7@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>I think that what Bill is saying here is, if you are going to complain
>>
>>about
>>
>>>how your country is being run, you should try standing in defense of it
>>>first, then complain later. At least Kerry got that part right.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>news:41194CD7.B08DDD56@***.net...
>>>
>>>> By the way you write I can say you haven't give up a couple of
>>>>years for your country. Like I have in the ARMY. You're just dead
>>>>weight!
>>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>>Jeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think Dan Quayle was thinking of you when he said:
>>>>>
>>>>>" What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is
>>
>>being
>>
>>>>>very wasteful. How true that is."
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
08-11-2004 | 05:02 PM
#193
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Why would someone vote for an admitted war criminal:
http://hnn.us/articles/3552
" SEN. KERRY: There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say
that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of
other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free
fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50
calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which
were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy
missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the
laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and
all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the
government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that
the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the
men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I
think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law
that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."
CRWLR wrote:
> Not implying that at all.
>
> But, if one is going to ask me to stand on a wall and protect you and your
> loved ones, maybe you should think twice about complaining of the manner in
> which I provide that protection. As much as I fully support anybody's right
> to complain, I take them much more seriously if they have stood on the wall.
> I protected the right to complain by hoisting myself up on that wall many
> long years ago, I am not going to pull that right away from anybody now that
> I have offered my life in exchange for it.
>
> I have huge disagreements with almost everything that Kerry stands for, but
> I give him credit for standing beside me on the wall before he climbed up on
> his soapbox and began deriding our country and out leaders.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:O9adnQHN45TCt4fcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
>
>>Surely you and Bill aren't implying that ONLY those that has served in
>
> the
>
>>military has the right to complain about the politics and leadership of
>
> the
>
>>USA. While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE. The alternative based on your implication is a military
>>dictatorship.
>>
>>Now, if you don't vote, and therefore do not involve yourself in the
>>political process, then I would agree that you don't have the right to
>>complain.
>>
>>"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:10hisfo1tj7vnf7@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>I think that what Bill is saying here is, if you are going to complain
>>
>>about
>>
>>>how your country is being run, you should try standing in defense of it
>>>first, then complain later. At least Kerry got that part right.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>news:41194CD7.B08DDD56@***.net...
>>>
>>>> By the way you write I can say you haven't give up a couple of
>>>>years for your country. Like I have in the ARMY. You're just dead
>>>>weight!
>>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>>Jeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think Dan Quayle was thinking of you when he said:
>>>>>
>>>>>" What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is
>>
>>being
>>
>>>>>very wasteful. How true that is."
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
http://hnn.us/articles/3552
" SEN. KERRY: There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say
that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of
other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free
fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50
calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which
were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy
missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the
laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and
all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the
government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that
the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the
men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I
think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law
that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals."
CRWLR wrote:
> Not implying that at all.
>
> But, if one is going to ask me to stand on a wall and protect you and your
> loved ones, maybe you should think twice about complaining of the manner in
> which I provide that protection. As much as I fully support anybody's right
> to complain, I take them much more seriously if they have stood on the wall.
> I protected the right to complain by hoisting myself up on that wall many
> long years ago, I am not going to pull that right away from anybody now that
> I have offered my life in exchange for it.
>
> I have huge disagreements with almost everything that Kerry stands for, but
> I give him credit for standing beside me on the wall before he climbed up on
> his soapbox and began deriding our country and out leaders.
>
>
>
>
>
> "Matt Macchiarolo" <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote in message
> news:O9adnQHN45TCt4fcRVn-rA@comcast.com...
>
>>Surely you and Bill aren't implying that ONLY those that has served in
>
> the
>
>>military has the right to complain about the politics and leadership of
>
> the
>
>>USA. While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE. The alternative based on your implication is a military
>>dictatorship.
>>
>>Now, if you don't vote, and therefore do not involve yourself in the
>>political process, then I would agree that you don't have the right to
>>complain.
>>
>>"CRWLR" <beerman@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>news:10hisfo1tj7vnf7@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>I think that what Bill is saying here is, if you are going to complain
>>
>>about
>>
>>>how your country is being run, you should try standing in defense of it
>>>first, then complain later. At least Kerry got that part right.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
>>>news:41194CD7.B08DDD56@***.net...
>>>
>>>> By the way you write I can say you haven't give up a couple of
>>>>years for your country. Like I have in the ARMY. You're just dead
>>>>weight!
>>>> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>>>>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>>>>
>>>>Jeff wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think Dan Quayle was thinking of you when he said:
>>>>>
>>>>>" What a waste it is to lose one's mind. Or not to have a mind is
>>
>>being
>>
>>>>>very wasteful. How true that is."
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
08-11-2004 | 06:55 PM
#194
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
08-11-2004 | 06:55 PM
#195
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
08-11-2004 | 06:55 PM
#196
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
08-11-2004 | 06:55 PM
#197
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
<matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
> While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>that, a CHOICE.
Actually, it is a responsibility.
08-11-2004 | 07:01 PM
#198
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Matt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>
>>While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE.
>
>
> Actually, it is a responsibility.
>
Oh, I see. People who don't join the military are irresponsible. Thanks
for clearing that up.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>
>>While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE.
>
>
> Actually, it is a responsibility.
>
Oh, I see. People who don't join the military are irresponsible. Thanks
for clearing that up.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
08-11-2004 | 07:01 PM
#199
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Matt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>
>>While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE.
>
>
> Actually, it is a responsibility.
>
Oh, I see. People who don't join the military are irresponsible. Thanks
for clearing that up.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>
>>While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE.
>
>
> Actually, it is a responsibility.
>
Oh, I see. People who don't join the military are irresponsible. Thanks
for clearing that up.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
08-11-2004 | 07:01 PM
#200
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: OT - I just got this in my email and thought I would share
Matt wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>
>>While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE.
>
>
> Actually, it is a responsibility.
>
Oh, I see. People who don't join the military are irresponsible. Thanks
for clearing that up.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:21:21 -0400, "Matt Macchiarolo"
> <matt@nospamplease.com> wrote:
>
>
>>While the choice to serve militarily is an honorable one, it is just
>>that, a CHOICE.
>
>
> Actually, it is a responsibility.
>
Oh, I see. People who don't join the military are irresponsible. Thanks
for clearing that up.
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon - Rubicon Express 4.5"
01 XJ Sport
There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry
Pronunciation: 'jEp
Function: noun
Date: 1940
Etymology: from g. p. (G= 'Government' P= '80 inch wheelbase')
A small general-purpose motor vehicle with 80-inch wheelbase,
1/4-ton capacity, and four-wheel drive used by the U.S. army in
World War II.
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________