I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
seems to be the crux of the matter.

Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:

> And I see you didn't read my answer that all my answers are to the
> "best of my ability" and truthfully. Frankly, I'm disappoint you don't
> understand. Twenty years ago there were no unlisted phone numbers, but
> for a few helpless little girls, now, it seems all of American are
> wimps.
> Getting back to what this thread means to me is, a lie is a lie,
> and just like the law we live by, so far, if any part of a testimony is
> false, we may strike it all, as that person is a liar. Understand?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> travis wrote:
>
>>OK. I see you took the "Don't stop and think before you reply"
>>option. I'm not upset about it, just disappointed. You come off as a
>>pretty tense person. I still think you need to lighten up some, but
>>hey... It's your blood pressure, not mine. Take care.
>>
>>--
>>Travis
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

 

I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
seems to be the crux of the matter.

Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

L.W.(ßill) ------ III wrote:

> And I see you didn't read my answer that all my answers are to the
> "best of my ability" and truthfully. Frankly, I'm disappoint you don't
> understand. Twenty years ago there were no unlisted phone numbers, but
> for a few helpless little girls, now, it seems all of American are
> wimps.
> Getting back to what this thread means to me is, a lie is a lie,
> and just like the law we live by, so far, if any part of a testimony is
> false, we may strike it all, as that person is a liar. Understand?
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> travis wrote:
>
>>OK. I see you took the "Don't stop and think before you reply"
>>option. I'm not upset about it, just disappointed. You come off as a
>>pretty tense person. I still think you need to lighten up some, but
>>hey... It's your blood pressure, not mine. Take care.
>>
>>--
>>Travis
--
__________________________________________________ _________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/t...ron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
__________________________________________________ _________

 

That's your opinion, I respect it, but don't agree. The posters you
mentioned are not asking me to believe them.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

twaldron wrote:
>
> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>
> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

 

That's your opinion, I respect it, but don't agree. The posters you
mentioned are not asking me to believe them.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

twaldron wrote:
>
> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>
> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

 

That's your opinion, I respect it, but don't agree. The posters you
mentioned are not asking me to believe them.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

twaldron wrote:
>
> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>
> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

 

An after thought, if the original poster, troller, hadn't wanted me
to bit, s/he wouldn't have sign it "Game on"
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

twaldron wrote:
>
> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>
> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

 

An after thought, if the original poster, troller, hadn't wanted me
to bit, s/he wouldn't have sign it "Game on"
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

twaldron wrote:
>
> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>
> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

 

An after thought, if the original poster, troller, hadn't wanted me
to bit, s/he wouldn't have sign it "Game on"
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/

twaldron wrote:
>
> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>
> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.

 

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 15:41:09 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> shared the following:

> An after thought, if the original poster, troller, hadn't wanted me
>to bit, s/he wouldn't have sign it "Game on"

Here's another after-thought for you . You're the only one freaking
out over the public declaration of the name the person in question
decided to start using. Now I wonder why you are the only one it
bothers. Nah, just kidding. I don't wonder at all. C'mon, dude. If
he was trying to deceive someone then why would he have publicly said
"my old name I used was XXX and my new one now is YYY."? Can you
answer that question?

> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>twaldron wrote:
>>
>> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
>> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
>> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
>> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
>> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
>> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
>> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
>> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
>> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>>
>> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
>> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
>> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
>> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.


--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!

 

On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 15:41:09 -0700, L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> shared the following:

> An after thought, if the original poster, troller, hadn't wanted me
>to bit, s/he wouldn't have sign it "Game on"

Here's another after-thought for you . You're the only one freaking
out over the public declaration of the name the person in question
decided to start using. Now I wonder why you are the only one it
bothers. Nah, just kidding. I don't wonder at all. C'mon, dude. If
he was trying to deceive someone then why would he have publicly said
"my old name I used was XXX and my new one now is YYY."? Can you
answer that question?

> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
>mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
>twaldron wrote:
>>
>> I think it's common for people to use 'handles' on the Usenet, much like
>> in CB radio. That doesn't necessarily make them liars. While Nathan II
>> didn't really make his ID known, most people knew 'Tyler Dirden' was an
>> alias, much like using MABAR, JBJEEP, SNOW, MYDINGY, ETC. because it is
>> a fictitious name. I can see the confusion if you hadn't seen the movie
>> but I don't think there was any malicious intent in using the handle.
>> Had he used 'Mickey Mouse', I don't know that we'd even be having the
>> discussion, but I'm sure no one would have felt deceived. Deception
>> seems to be the crux of the matter.
>>
>> Bill, I'm not sure where your correlation with the phonebook came from,
>> but I think most people have unlisted numbers because they want to avoid
>> solicitors or unwanted phone calls. I think we can all relate to that
>> desire. I certainly don't see how it makes anyone a 'wimp' or a 'liar'.


--
Travis
http://jeepadventures.dyndns.org/jeep.html
The meek shall inherit the earth. After I'm finished with it.
:wq!