Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters required on all new diesels: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters required on all new diesels: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters required on all new diesels: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters required on all new diesels: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters required on all new diesels: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards:
http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters required on all new diesels: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
California required ULSD on September 1, 2006.
"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:45ef50ad$0$16387$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. . > They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards: > http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters > required on all new diesels: > http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... >> I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >> torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >> nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >> engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >> almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >> price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >> Mike > > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
California required ULSD on September 1, 2006.
"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:45ef50ad$0$16387$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. . > They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards: > http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters > required on all new diesels: > http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... >> I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >> torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >> nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >> engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >> almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >> price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >> Mike > > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
California required ULSD on September 1, 2006.
"L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:45ef50ad$0$16387$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. . > They still don't meet Kalifornia's clean air standards: > http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/ld.php Even with the exhaust filters > required on all new diesels: > http://www.epa.gov/otaq/retrofit/documents/f03017.pdf > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... >> I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >> torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >> nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >> engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >> almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >> price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >> Mike > > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
"Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > is. 15ppm, down from 500ppm. Diesel in Europe is 50ppm and they're debating dropping to 10ppm, what they call "sulphur-free." > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > difference > between that and a gasoline car. Well, yeah, different fuel, different exhaust smell. You can smell the difference between beef farts and bean farts, too. I don't know what it would be like with a > whole city full of them. Bean or beef? I'd prefer bean...less lingering power. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > the > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. When I visited Great Britain I was amazed how many diesel passenger cars there were. My friends in Germany have a diesel Mercedes crossover that will regulary do 140mph on the 'Bahn. We're visting next month and I am anticipating the ride! > > Earle > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... >> I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >> torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >> nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >> engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >> almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >> price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >> Mike >> >> Spdloader wrote: >> > I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > latest >> > '87 CJ project. >> > I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > wheel in >> > large groups like that anyway. >> > >> > Spdloader >> > >> > >> > >> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >> > news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com... >> >> I'll bite for the Troll. >> >> >> >> Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > eh? >> >> >> >> There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > Despite >> >> your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > are >> >> smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are >> >> still >> >> smarter than you Bret... >> >> >> >> And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >> >> forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out >> >> the >> >> 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. >> >> >> >> Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > welcome >> >> addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > end >> >> like I mentioned. >> >> >> >> Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > in >> >> an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. >> >> >> >> And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > by >> >> not just me. >> >> >> >> Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >> >> supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still >> >> get >> >> sent to the back of the line because of stench. >> >> >> >> Mike >> >> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >> >> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >> >> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >> >> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >> >> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >> >> >> >> Bret Ludwig wrote: >> >>> "Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >> >>> doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, >> >>> "What >> >>> diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >> >>> >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> common across the nation >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> the right size >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> the right weight >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle >> >>> such >> >>> as a Jeep >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> affordable to buy >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >> >>> requirements" >> >>> >> >>> Let's see: >> >>> >> >>> Isuzu-several >> >>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >> >>> Mercedes-OM617 >> >>> Mitsubishi-several >> >>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >> >>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >> >>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >> >>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >> >>> Volvo-same as Cummins >> >>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >> >>> Iveco-possible >> >>> >> >>> How many do you need? >> >>> >> > >> > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
"Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > is. 15ppm, down from 500ppm. Diesel in Europe is 50ppm and they're debating dropping to 10ppm, what they call "sulphur-free." > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > difference > between that and a gasoline car. Well, yeah, different fuel, different exhaust smell. You can smell the difference between beef farts and bean farts, too. I don't know what it would be like with a > whole city full of them. Bean or beef? I'd prefer bean...less lingering power. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > the > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. When I visited Great Britain I was amazed how many diesel passenger cars there were. My friends in Germany have a diesel Mercedes crossover that will regulary do 140mph on the 'Bahn. We're visting next month and I am anticipating the ride! > > Earle > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... >> I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >> torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >> nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >> engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >> almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >> price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >> Mike >> >> Spdloader wrote: >> > I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > latest >> > '87 CJ project. >> > I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > wheel in >> > large groups like that anyway. >> > >> > Spdloader >> > >> > >> > >> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >> > news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com... >> >> I'll bite for the Troll. >> >> >> >> Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > eh? >> >> >> >> There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > Despite >> >> your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > are >> >> smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are >> >> still >> >> smarter than you Bret... >> >> >> >> And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >> >> forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out >> >> the >> >> 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. >> >> >> >> Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > welcome >> >> addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > end >> >> like I mentioned. >> >> >> >> Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > in >> >> an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. >> >> >> >> And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > by >> >> not just me. >> >> >> >> Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >> >> supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still >> >> get >> >> sent to the back of the line because of stench. >> >> >> >> Mike >> >> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >> >> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >> >> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >> >> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >> >> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >> >> >> >> Bret Ludwig wrote: >> >>> "Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >> >>> doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, >> >>> "What >> >>> diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >> >>> >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> common across the nation >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> the right size >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> the right weight >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle >> >>> such >> >>> as a Jeep >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> affordable to buy >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >> >>> requirements" >> >>> >> >>> Let's see: >> >>> >> >>> Isuzu-several >> >>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >> >>> Mercedes-OM617 >> >>> Mitsubishi-several >> >>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >> >>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >> >>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >> >>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >> >>> Volvo-same as Cummins >> >>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >> >>> Iveco-possible >> >>> >> >>> How many do you need? >> >>> >> > >> > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
"Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > is. 15ppm, down from 500ppm. Diesel in Europe is 50ppm and they're debating dropping to 10ppm, what they call "sulphur-free." > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > difference > between that and a gasoline car. Well, yeah, different fuel, different exhaust smell. You can smell the difference between beef farts and bean farts, too. I don't know what it would be like with a > whole city full of them. Bean or beef? I'd prefer bean...less lingering power. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > the > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. When I visited Great Britain I was amazed how many diesel passenger cars there were. My friends in Germany have a diesel Mercedes crossover that will regulary do 140mph on the 'Bahn. We're visting next month and I am anticipating the ride! > > Earle > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... >> I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >> torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >> nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >> engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >> almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >> price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >> Mike >> >> Spdloader wrote: >> > I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > latest >> > '87 CJ project. >> > I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > wheel in >> > large groups like that anyway. >> > >> > Spdloader >> > >> > >> > >> > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >> > news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com... >> >> I'll bite for the Troll. >> >> >> >> Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > eh? >> >> >> >> There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > Despite >> >> your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > are >> >> smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are >> >> still >> >> smarter than you Bret... >> >> >> >> And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >> >> forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out >> >> the >> >> 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. >> >> >> >> Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > welcome >> >> addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > end >> >> like I mentioned. >> >> >> >> Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > in >> >> an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. >> >> >> >> And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > by >> >> not just me. >> >> >> >> Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >> >> supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still >> >> get >> >> sent to the back of the line because of stench. >> >> >> >> Mike >> >> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >> >> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >> >> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >> >> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >> >> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >> >> >> >> Bret Ludwig wrote: >> >>> "Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >> >>> doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, >> >>> "What >> >>> diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >> >>> >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> common across the nation >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> the right size >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> the right weight >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle >> >>> such >> >>> as a Jeep >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> affordable to buy >> >>> * >> >>> >> >>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >> >>> requirements" >> >>> >> >>> Let's see: >> >>> >> >>> Isuzu-several >> >>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >> >>> Mercedes-OM617 >> >>> Mitsubishi-several >> >>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >> >>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >> >>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >> >>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >> >>> Volvo-same as Cummins >> >>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >> >>> Iveco-possible >> >>> >> >>> How many do you need? >> >>> >> > >> > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
I have been there. You can see the mountains, but when you are coming down
into the valley from the mountains you can see that something is different down there, just like you can with Denver. I may have exaggerated a little bit. The tourist from L.A. only had to take a couple of breaths from the bus exhaust to clear his head. ;^) Earle "L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:45ef50b1$0$16387$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. . > Hi Earle, > You know that hasn't been true in twenty years, we can see the > mountains, now. > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message > news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > is. > > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > difference > > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with > a > > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night > in > > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > the > > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > > > Earle > > > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
I have been there. You can see the mountains, but when you are coming down
into the valley from the mountains you can see that something is different down there, just like you can with Denver. I may have exaggerated a little bit. The tourist from L.A. only had to take a couple of breaths from the bus exhaust to clear his head. ;^) Earle "L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:45ef50b1$0$16387$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. . > Hi Earle, > You know that hasn't been true in twenty years, we can see the > mountains, now. > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message > news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > is. > > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > difference > > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with > a > > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night > in > > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > the > > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > > > Earle > > > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
I have been there. You can see the mountains, but when you are coming down
into the valley from the mountains you can see that something is different down there, just like you can with Denver. I may have exaggerated a little bit. The tourist from L.A. only had to take a couple of breaths from the bus exhaust to clear his head. ;^) Earle "L.W. (Bill) ------ III" <----------@cox.net> wrote in message news:45ef50b1$0$16387$88260bb3@free.teranews.com.. . > Hi Earle, > You know that hasn't been true in twenty years, we can see the > mountains, now. > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message > news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > is. > > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > difference > > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with > a > > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night > in > > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > the > > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > > > Earle > > > > > -- > Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 7, 8:52 am, Mike Romain <roma...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> I'll bite for the Troll. > > Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, eh? Look on the net. About the only one that is a pain in the ass is the MBZ because of its front sump. It's also dirt cheap and about bulletproof. There are CJs with Isuzus, Mits, Nissans and Cumminses. > > There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > Despite your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they > obviously are smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means > they are still smarter than you Bret... Most diesels are made so they can have the sump in the front or in the back and sometimes the middle because they are made for a variety of uses. MBZ insists on putting huge bag sumps on the front. They are the exception. Adapterwise they are not that difficult since every manner of car and light truck was sold somewhere with the more common diesel engines. I don't believe in adapting alien bellhousings to transmissions and prefer the scattershield approach. > > And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line > forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the > 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. > > Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > welcome addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along > at the end like I mentioned. > > Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic in > an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. > > And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > by not just me. > > Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that > supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get > sent to the back of the line because of stench. Real Jeepers are independent and don't jeep in conga lines. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 7, 8:52 am, Mike Romain <roma...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> I'll bite for the Troll. > > Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, eh? Look on the net. About the only one that is a pain in the ass is the MBZ because of its front sump. It's also dirt cheap and about bulletproof. There are CJs with Isuzus, Mits, Nissans and Cumminses. > > There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > Despite your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they > obviously are smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means > they are still smarter than you Bret... Most diesels are made so they can have the sump in the front or in the back and sometimes the middle because they are made for a variety of uses. MBZ insists on putting huge bag sumps on the front. They are the exception. Adapterwise they are not that difficult since every manner of car and light truck was sold somewhere with the more common diesel engines. I don't believe in adapting alien bellhousings to transmissions and prefer the scattershield approach. > > And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line > forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the > 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. > > Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > welcome addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along > at the end like I mentioned. > > Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic in > an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. > > And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > by not just me. > > Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that > supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get > sent to the back of the line because of stench. Real Jeepers are independent and don't jeep in conga lines. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 7, 8:52 am, Mike Romain <roma...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> I'll bite for the Troll. > > Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, eh? Look on the net. About the only one that is a pain in the ass is the MBZ because of its front sump. It's also dirt cheap and about bulletproof. There are CJs with Isuzus, Mits, Nissans and Cumminses. > > There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > Despite your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they > obviously are smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means > they are still smarter than you Bret... Most diesels are made so they can have the sump in the front or in the back and sometimes the middle because they are made for a variety of uses. MBZ insists on putting huge bag sumps on the front. They are the exception. Adapterwise they are not that difficult since every manner of car and light truck was sold somewhere with the more common diesel engines. I don't believe in adapting alien bellhousings to transmissions and prefer the scattershield approach. > > And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line > forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the > 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. > > Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > welcome addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along > at the end like I mentioned. > > Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic in > an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. > > And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > by not just me. > > Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that > supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get > sent to the back of the line because of stench. Real Jeepers are independent and don't jeep in conga lines. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 7, 2:16 pm, "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
> The oil companies already have in Europe. My dad's diesel doesn't stink, and > it certainly doesn't belch smoke. The engines you describe disappeared 20 > years ago here. > > There are many advantages to diesels over petrols for offroading - better > torque per litre (the isuzu actually puts out more bhp/litre as well than > the I6), and as they have much higher compression at around 20:1 you get a > lot better engine braking. Plus the ability to cope with water better. > The torque and economy mean that in most countries if it isn't diesel it isn't a off road vehicle. Unless propane is dirt cheap. Propane is what Romain needs so his jeep club can sniff away to their hearts' content. And you can run a barbecue grill off it too. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 7, 2:16 pm, "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
> The oil companies already have in Europe. My dad's diesel doesn't stink, and > it certainly doesn't belch smoke. The engines you describe disappeared 20 > years ago here. > > There are many advantages to diesels over petrols for offroading - better > torque per litre (the isuzu actually puts out more bhp/litre as well than > the I6), and as they have much higher compression at around 20:1 you get a > lot better engine braking. Plus the ability to cope with water better. > The torque and economy mean that in most countries if it isn't diesel it isn't a off road vehicle. Unless propane is dirt cheap. Propane is what Romain needs so his jeep club can sniff away to their hearts' content. And you can run a barbecue grill off it too. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 7, 2:16 pm, "Dave Milne" <jeep@_nospam_milne.info> wrote:
> The oil companies already have in Europe. My dad's diesel doesn't stink, and > it certainly doesn't belch smoke. The engines you describe disappeared 20 > years ago here. > > There are many advantages to diesels over petrols for offroading - better > torque per litre (the isuzu actually puts out more bhp/litre as well than > the I6), and as they have much higher compression at around 20:1 you get a > lot better engine braking. Plus the ability to cope with water better. > The torque and economy mean that in most countries if it isn't diesel it isn't a off road vehicle. Unless propane is dirt cheap. Propane is what Romain needs so his jeep club can sniff away to their hearts' content. And you can run a barbecue grill off it too. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Our USofA has decreed that sulfur must be removed as of mumble mumble so
those new urea injecting style diesels can run on it. Rumor is that benz may be making some much bigger diesels available soon now--possibly to stay in competition with the big V-10s available from the VW group. If you really want high rpm torque, put in a diesel-electric where the electric motors have max torque at stall. And put one in for each wheel. Or put in a turbine which can generate enough torque to ruin the bearings on an Indy Racer. Mike Romain proclaimed: > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike > > Spdloader wrote: > >> I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my >> latest '87 CJ project. >> I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't >> wheel in large groups like that anyway. >> >> Spdloader >> >> >> >> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >> news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com... >> >>> I'll bite for the Troll. >>> >>> Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a >>> Jeep, eh? >>> >>> There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. >>> Despite your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they >>> obviously are smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. >>> Means they are still smarter than you Bret... >>> >>> And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >>> forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out >>> the 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black >>> smoke. >>> >>> Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a >>> welcome addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag >>> along at the end like I mentioned. >>> >>> Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic >>> in an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the >>> trail. >>> >>> And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this >>> troll by not just me. >>> >>> Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >>> supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still >>> get sent to the back of the line because of stench. >>> >>> Mike >>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >>> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >>> >>> Bret Ludwig wrote: >>> >>>> "Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >>>> doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What >>>> diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >>>> >>>> * >>>> >>>> common across the nation >>>> * >>>> >>>> the right size >>>> * >>>> >>>> the right weight >>>> * >>>> >>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such >>>> as a Jeep >>>> * >>>> >>>> affordable to buy >>>> * >>>> >>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >>>> requirements" >>>> >>>> Let's see: >>>> >>>> Isuzu-several >>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >>>> Mercedes-OM617 >>>> Mitsubishi-several >>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >>>> Volvo-same as Cummins >>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >>>> Iveco-possible >>>> >>>> How many do you need? >>>> >> >> |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Our USofA has decreed that sulfur must be removed as of mumble mumble so
those new urea injecting style diesels can run on it. Rumor is that benz may be making some much bigger diesels available soon now--possibly to stay in competition with the big V-10s available from the VW group. If you really want high rpm torque, put in a diesel-electric where the electric motors have max torque at stall. And put one in for each wheel. Or put in a turbine which can generate enough torque to ruin the bearings on an Indy Racer. Mike Romain proclaimed: > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike > > Spdloader wrote: > >> I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my >> latest '87 CJ project. >> I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't >> wheel in large groups like that anyway. >> >> Spdloader >> >> >> >> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >> news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com... >> >>> I'll bite for the Troll. >>> >>> Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a >>> Jeep, eh? >>> >>> There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. >>> Despite your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they >>> obviously are smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. >>> Means they are still smarter than you Bret... >>> >>> And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >>> forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out >>> the 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black >>> smoke. >>> >>> Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a >>> welcome addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag >>> along at the end like I mentioned. >>> >>> Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic >>> in an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the >>> trail. >>> >>> And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this >>> troll by not just me. >>> >>> Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >>> supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still >>> get sent to the back of the line because of stench. >>> >>> Mike >>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >>> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >>> >>> Bret Ludwig wrote: >>> >>>> "Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >>>> doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What >>>> diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >>>> >>>> * >>>> >>>> common across the nation >>>> * >>>> >>>> the right size >>>> * >>>> >>>> the right weight >>>> * >>>> >>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such >>>> as a Jeep >>>> * >>>> >>>> affordable to buy >>>> * >>>> >>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >>>> requirements" >>>> >>>> Let's see: >>>> >>>> Isuzu-several >>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >>>> Mercedes-OM617 >>>> Mitsubishi-several >>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >>>> Volvo-same as Cummins >>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >>>> Iveco-possible >>>> >>>> How many do you need? >>>> >> >> |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Our USofA has decreed that sulfur must be removed as of mumble mumble so
those new urea injecting style diesels can run on it. Rumor is that benz may be making some much bigger diesels available soon now--possibly to stay in competition with the big V-10s available from the VW group. If you really want high rpm torque, put in a diesel-electric where the electric motors have max torque at stall. And put one in for each wheel. Or put in a turbine which can generate enough torque to ruin the bearings on an Indy Racer. Mike Romain proclaimed: > I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > > Mike > > Spdloader wrote: > >> I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my >> latest '87 CJ project. >> I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't >> wheel in large groups like that anyway. >> >> Spdloader >> >> >> >> "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >> news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshosti ng.com... >> >>> I'll bite for the Troll. >>> >>> Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a >>> Jeep, eh? >>> >>> There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. >>> Despite your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they >>> obviously are smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. >>> Means they are still smarter than you Bret... >>> >>> And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >>> forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out >>> the 'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black >>> smoke. >>> >>> Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a >>> welcome addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag >>> along at the end like I mentioned. >>> >>> Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic >>> in an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the >>> trail. >>> >>> And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this >>> troll by not just me. >>> >>> Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >>> supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still >>> get sent to the back of the line because of stench. >>> >>> Mike >>> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >>> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >>> Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >>> Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >>> (More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >>> >>> Bret Ludwig wrote: >>> >>>> "Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >>>> doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What >>>> diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >>>> >>>> * >>>> >>>> common across the nation >>>> * >>>> >>>> the right size >>>> * >>>> >>>> the right weight >>>> * >>>> >>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such >>>> as a Jeep >>>> * >>>> >>>> affordable to buy >>>> * >>>> >>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >>>> requirements" >>>> >>>> Let's see: >>>> >>>> Isuzu-several >>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >>>> Mercedes-OM617 >>>> Mitsubishi-several >>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >>>> Volvo-same as Cummins >>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >>>> Iveco-possible >>>> >>>> How many do you need? >>>> >> >> |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Run bio diesel.
Earle Horton proclaimed: > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it is. > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the difference > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with a > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call the > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > Earle > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > >>I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >>torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >>nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >>engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >>almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >>price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >>Mike >> >>Spdloader wrote: >> >>>I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > > latest > >>>'87 CJ project. >>>I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > > wheel in > >>>large groups like that anyway. >>> >>>Spdloader >>> >>> >>> >>>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >>>news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newsho sting.com... >>> >>>>I'll bite for the Troll. >>>> >>>>Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > > eh? > >>>>There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > > Despite > >>>>your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > > are > >>>>smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are still >>>>smarter than you Bret... >>>> >>>>And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >>>>forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the >>>>'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. >>>> >>>>Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > > welcome > >>>>addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > > end > >>>>like I mentioned. >>>> >>>>Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > > in > >>>>an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. >>>> >>>>And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > > by > >>>>not just me. >>>> >>>>Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >>>>supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get >>>>sent to the back of the line because of stench. >>>> >>>>Mike >>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >>>> >>>>Bret Ludwig wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >>>>>doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What >>>>>diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> common across the nation >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> the right size >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> the right weight >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such >>>>>as a Jeep >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> affordable to buy >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >>>>>requirements" >>>>> >>>>> Let's see: >>>>> >>>>> Isuzu-several >>>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >>>>> Mercedes-OM617 >>>>> Mitsubishi-several >>>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >>>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >>>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >>>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >>>>> Volvo-same as Cummins >>>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >>>>> Iveco-possible >>>>> >>>>> How many do you need? >>>>> >>> >>> > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Run bio diesel.
Earle Horton proclaimed: > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it is. > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the difference > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with a > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call the > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > Earle > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > >>I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >>torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >>nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >>engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >>almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >>price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >>Mike >> >>Spdloader wrote: >> >>>I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > > latest > >>>'87 CJ project. >>>I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > > wheel in > >>>large groups like that anyway. >>> >>>Spdloader >>> >>> >>> >>>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >>>news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newsho sting.com... >>> >>>>I'll bite for the Troll. >>>> >>>>Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > > eh? > >>>>There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > > Despite > >>>>your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > > are > >>>>smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are still >>>>smarter than you Bret... >>>> >>>>And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >>>>forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the >>>>'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. >>>> >>>>Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > > welcome > >>>>addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > > end > >>>>like I mentioned. >>>> >>>>Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > > in > >>>>an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. >>>> >>>>And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > > by > >>>>not just me. >>>> >>>>Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >>>>supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get >>>>sent to the back of the line because of stench. >>>> >>>>Mike >>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >>>> >>>>Bret Ludwig wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >>>>>doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What >>>>>diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> common across the nation >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> the right size >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> the right weight >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such >>>>>as a Jeep >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> affordable to buy >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >>>>>requirements" >>>>> >>>>> Let's see: >>>>> >>>>> Isuzu-several >>>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >>>>> Mercedes-OM617 >>>>> Mitsubishi-several >>>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >>>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >>>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >>>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >>>>> Volvo-same as Cummins >>>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >>>>> Iveco-possible >>>>> >>>>> How many do you need? >>>>> >>> >>> > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Run bio diesel.
Earle Horton proclaimed: > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it is. > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the difference > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with a > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call the > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > Earle > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > >>I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm >>torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, >>nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas >>engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is >>almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the >>price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) >> >>Mike >> >>Spdloader wrote: >> >>>I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > > latest > >>>'87 CJ project. >>>I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > > wheel in > >>>large groups like that anyway. >>> >>>Spdloader >>> >>> >>> >>>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message >>>news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newsho sting.com... >>> >>>>I'll bite for the Troll. >>>> >>>>Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > > eh? > >>>>There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > > Despite > >>>>your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > > are > >>>>smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are still >>>>smarter than you Bret... >>>> >>>>And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line >>>>forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the >>>>'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. >>>> >>>>Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > > welcome > >>>>addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > > end > >>>>like I mentioned. >>>> >>>>Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > > in > >>>>an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. >>>> >>>>And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > > by > >>>>not just me. >>>> >>>>Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that >>>>supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get >>>>sent to the back of the line because of stench. >>>> >>>>Mike >>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 >>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's >>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! >>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 >>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) >>>> >>>>Bret Ludwig wrote: >>>> >>>>>"Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no >>>>>doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What >>>>>diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: >>>>> >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> common across the nation >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> the right size >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> the right weight >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such >>>>>as a Jeep >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> affordable to buy >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above >>>>>requirements" >>>>> >>>>> Let's see: >>>>> >>>>> Isuzu-several >>>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T >>>>> Mercedes-OM617 >>>>> Mitsubishi-several >>>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs >>>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender >>>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! >>>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud >>>>> Volvo-same as Cummins >>>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! >>>>> Iveco-possible >>>>> >>>>> How many do you need? >>>>> >>> >>> > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On a clear day... and the skies are such a pretty blend of amber and
brown tones. L.W. (Bill) ------ III proclaimed: > Hi Earle, > You know that hasn't been true in twenty years, we can see the > mountains, now. > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message > news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > >>We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > > is. > >>I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > > difference > >>between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with > > a > >>whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night > > in > >>the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who >>was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > > the > >>ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few >>minutes. "There, that's better", he said. >> >>Earle > > > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On a clear day... and the skies are such a pretty blend of amber and
brown tones. L.W. (Bill) ------ III proclaimed: > Hi Earle, > You know that hasn't been true in twenty years, we can see the > mountains, now. > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message > news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > >>We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > > is. > >>I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > > difference > >>between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with > > a > >>whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night > > in > >>the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who >>was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > > the > >>ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few >>minutes. "There, that's better", he said. >> >>Earle > > > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On a clear day... and the skies are such a pretty blend of amber and
brown tones. L.W. (Bill) ------ III proclaimed: > Hi Earle, > You know that hasn't been true in twenty years, we can see the > mountains, now. > God Bless America, Bill 0|||||||0 > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > "Earle Horton" <apodo@gracioso.usa> wrote in message > news:87udnaUsw8E213LYnZ2dnUVZ_sapnZ2d@comcast.com. .. > >>We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it > > is. > >>I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the > > difference > >>between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with > > a > >>whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night > > in > >>the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who >>was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call > > the > >>ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few >>minutes. "There, that's better", he said. >> >>Earle > > > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Bio diesel sounds great on paper but it competes with food and worse, beer.
Maybe if food were more expensive it would help the obesity "epidemic" in this country. Earle "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message news:ldidndF8u6L5u23YnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@comcast.com. .. > Run bio diesel. > > Earle Horton proclaimed: > > > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it is. > > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the difference > > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with a > > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call the > > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > > > Earle > > > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > > > >>I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > >>torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > >>nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > >>engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > >>almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > >>price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > >> > >>Mike > >> > >>Spdloader wrote: > >> > >>>I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > > > > latest > > > >>>'87 CJ project. > >>>I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > > > > wheel in > > > >>>large groups like that anyway. > >>> > >>>Spdloader > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > >>>news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newsho sting.com... > >>> > >>>>I'll bite for the Troll. > >>>> > >>>>Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > > > > eh? > > > >>>>There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > > > > Despite > > > >>>>your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > > > > are > > > >>>>smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are still > >>>>smarter than you Bret... > >>>> > >>>>And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line > >>>>forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the > >>>>'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. > >>>> > >>>>Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > > > > welcome > > > >>>>addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > > > > end > > > >>>>like I mentioned. > >>>> > >>>>Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > > > > in > > > >>>>an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. > >>>> > >>>>And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > > > > by > > > >>>>not just me. > >>>> > >>>>Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that > >>>>supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get > >>>>sent to the back of the line because of stench. > >>>> > >>>>Mike > >>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > >>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > >>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! > >>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 > >>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) > >>>> > >>>>Bret Ludwig wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>"Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no > >>>>>doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What > >>>>>diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: > >>>>> > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> common across the nation > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> the right size > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> the right weight > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such > >>>>>as a Jeep > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> affordable to buy > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above > >>>>>requirements" > >>>>> > >>>>> Let's see: > >>>>> > >>>>> Isuzu-several > >>>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T > >>>>> Mercedes-OM617 > >>>>> Mitsubishi-several > >>>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs > >>>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender > >>>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! > >>>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud > >>>>> Volvo-same as Cummins > >>>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! > >>>>> Iveco-possible > >>>>> > >>>>> How many do you need? > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Bio diesel sounds great on paper but it competes with food and worse, beer.
Maybe if food were more expensive it would help the obesity "epidemic" in this country. Earle "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message news:ldidndF8u6L5u23YnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@comcast.com. .. > Run bio diesel. > > Earle Horton proclaimed: > > > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it is. > > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the difference > > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with a > > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call the > > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > > > Earle > > > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > > > >>I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > >>torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > >>nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > >>engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > >>almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > >>price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > >> > >>Mike > >> > >>Spdloader wrote: > >> > >>>I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > > > > latest > > > >>>'87 CJ project. > >>>I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > > > > wheel in > > > >>>large groups like that anyway. > >>> > >>>Spdloader > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > >>>news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newsho sting.com... > >>> > >>>>I'll bite for the Troll. > >>>> > >>>>Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > > > > eh? > > > >>>>There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > > > > Despite > > > >>>>your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > > > > are > > > >>>>smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are still > >>>>smarter than you Bret... > >>>> > >>>>And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line > >>>>forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the > >>>>'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. > >>>> > >>>>Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > > > > welcome > > > >>>>addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > > > > end > > > >>>>like I mentioned. > >>>> > >>>>Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > > > > in > > > >>>>an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. > >>>> > >>>>And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > > > > by > > > >>>>not just me. > >>>> > >>>>Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that > >>>>supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get > >>>>sent to the back of the line because of stench. > >>>> > >>>>Mike > >>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > >>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > >>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! > >>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 > >>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) > >>>> > >>>>Bret Ludwig wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>"Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no > >>>>>doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What > >>>>>diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: > >>>>> > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> common across the nation > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> the right size > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> the right weight > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such > >>>>>as a Jeep > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> affordable to buy > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above > >>>>>requirements" > >>>>> > >>>>> Let's see: > >>>>> > >>>>> Isuzu-several > >>>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T > >>>>> Mercedes-OM617 > >>>>> Mitsubishi-several > >>>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs > >>>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender > >>>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! > >>>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud > >>>>> Volvo-same as Cummins > >>>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! > >>>>> Iveco-possible > >>>>> > >>>>> How many do you need? > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
Bio diesel sounds great on paper but it competes with food and worse, beer.
Maybe if food were more expensive it would help the obesity "epidemic" in this country. Earle "Lon" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message news:ldidndF8u6L5u23YnZ2dnUVZ_v7inZ2d@comcast.com. .. > Run bio diesel. > > Earle Horton proclaimed: > > > We have low sulfur road fuel in the U.S. now. I don't know how "low" it is. > > I rented a diesel Golf in Spain last year, and you can smell the difference > > between that and a gasoline car. I don't know what it would be like with a > > whole city full of them. They don't even have that in Europe. One night in > > the bus station in Burgos, I was talking to a fellow tourist from L.A. who > > was having difficulty breathing. I thought I was going to have to call the > > ambulancia, but he stuck his face down by the bus exhausts for a few > > minutes. "There, that's better", he said. > > > > Earle > > > > "Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > > news:45ef469b$0$4966$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newshostin g.com... > > > >>I would love to run Diesel if it wasn't so bad smelling. I am a low rpm > >>torque lover. No problems for a generator or even furnace, but Jeep, > >>nope.... We get enough fumes if the wind is wrong with just a gas > >>engine if running solo, let alone in groups. Our Canadian stuff is > >>almost half sulfur I think. Apparently they would have to double the > >>price or something like that to clean it up... ;-) > >> > >>Mike > >> > >>Spdloader wrote: > >> > >>>I must admit, I, too have considered some type of diesel swap into my > > > > latest > > > >>>'87 CJ project. > >>>I didn't consider the "stinkin' people out" side of it, but I don't > > > > wheel in > > > >>>large groups like that anyway. > >>> > >>>Spdloader > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>"Mike Romain" <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in message > >>>news:45eed1d5$0$18152$9a6e19ea@unlimited.newsho sting.com... > >>> > >>>>I'll bite for the Troll. > >>>> > >>>>Just how many of the various stink pots will actually 'fit' in a Jeep, > > > > eh? > > > >>>>There is this slight issue with oil pan clearances and adapters. > > > > Despite > > > >>>>your racist take on the companies that make adapters, they obviously > > > > are > > > >>>>smart enough to know stupidity when they see it. Means they are still > >>>>smarter than you Bret... > >>>> > >>>>And who would want to 'always' have to bring up the end of the line > >>>>forever when off road or even on a road trip because they stink out the > >>>>'real' Jeeps behind them too much with their belching of black smoke. > >>>> > >>>>Until the oil companies clean up their Diesel, it will never be a > > > > welcome > > > >>>>addition to any of the Jeep runs we go on, except to tag along at the > > > > end > > > >>>>like I mentioned. > >>>> > >>>>Here in Canada, it is impossible to even follow a city bus in traffic > > > > in > > > >>>>an open top Jeep, let along have to gag along behind one on the trail. > >>>> > >>>>And Yes Bret, this have been brought up every time you post this troll > > > > by > > > >>>>not just me. > >>>> > >>>>Now if you have the money to but one of these 'new' engines that > >>>>supposedly don't smoke 'as bad', others have posted that they still get > >>>>sent to the back of the line because of stench. > >>>> > >>>>Mike > >>>>86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00 > >>>>88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's > >>>>Canadian Off Road Trips Photos: Non members can still view! > >>>>Jan/06 http://www.imagestation.com/album/pi...?id=2115147590 > >>>>(More Off Road album links at bottom of the view page) > >>>> > >>>>Bret Ludwig wrote: > >>>> > >>>>>"Diesels are neat. They power some amazing equipment. There is no > >>>>>doubt that diesels can offer great economy, but the question is, "What > >>>>>diesel engines are available for Jeep conversions that are: > >>>>> > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> common across the nation > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> the right size > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> the right weight > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> have a broad enough operating range for a multi-use vehicle such > >>>>>as a Jeep > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> affordable to buy > >>>>> * > >>>>> > >>>>> compatible with transmissions that must also meet the above > >>>>>requirements" > >>>>> > >>>>> Let's see: > >>>>> > >>>>> Isuzu-several > >>>>> Nissan-SD25, SD33T > >>>>> Mercedes-OM617 > >>>>> Mitsubishi-several > >>>>> Perkins-still out there, low power-but FACTORY in CJs > >>>>> VW-maybe for a flatfender > >>>>> Peugeot-don't laugh, common in Bobcats! > >>>>> Cummins-OK if trans upgraded, heavy, loud > >>>>> Volvo-same as Cummins > >>>>> Detroit Diesel, Cat, Mack-NO!!! > >>>>> Iveco-possible > >>>>> > >>>>> How many do you need? > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > > > > |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173342238.770768.70000@t69g2000cwt.googlegro ups.com... .... > Most diesels are made so they can have the sump in the front or in > the back and sometimes the middle because they are made for a variety > of uses. MBZ insists on putting huge bag sumps on the front. They are > the exception. Adapterwise they are not that difficult since every > manner of car and light truck was sold somewhere with the more common > diesel engines. I don't believe in adapting alien bellhousings to > transmissions and prefer the scattershield approach. > > How's the Deutz Wrangler with oil-cooled cab heater coming? People really want to know. Cheers, Earle |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173342238.770768.70000@t69g2000cwt.googlegro ups.com... .... > Most diesels are made so they can have the sump in the front or in > the back and sometimes the middle because they are made for a variety > of uses. MBZ insists on putting huge bag sumps on the front. They are > the exception. Adapterwise they are not that difficult since every > manner of car and light truck was sold somewhere with the more common > diesel engines. I don't believe in adapting alien bellhousings to > transmissions and prefer the scattershield approach. > > How's the Deutz Wrangler with oil-cooled cab heater coming? People really want to know. Cheers, Earle |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
"Bret Ludwig" <bretldwig@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1173342238.770768.70000@t69g2000cwt.googlegro ups.com... .... > Most diesels are made so they can have the sump in the front or in > the back and sometimes the middle because they are made for a variety > of uses. MBZ insists on putting huge bag sumps on the front. They are > the exception. Adapterwise they are not that difficult since every > manner of car and light truck was sold somewhere with the more common > diesel engines. I don't believe in adapting alien bellhousings to > transmissions and prefer the scattershield approach. > > How's the Deutz Wrangler with oil-cooled cab heater coming? People really want to know. Cheers, Earle |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 8, 9:05 am, Lon <lon.stow...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Our USofA has decreed that sulfur must be removed as of mumble mumble so > those new urea injecting style diesels can run on it. Rumor is that > benz may be making some much bigger diesels available soon now--possibly > to stay in competition with the big V-10s available from the VW group. It's easy to get all the common rail engines over here-junkyards over there will crate them up complete with ECM and harnesses. And if you get rid of the catalysts, particulate traps and EGR they will burn regular fuel. The EPA has nothing to say about it if you tell them it's for a race car or an experimental aircraft at Customs. EPA is prohibited from messing with those. If you are going into an older chassis, KKKalifornia can be stumped if the engine is a "Service Replacement Block" engine. Which since Euro engines do not have a US format VIN they all are. You just have to be smarter than the average bear. > > If you really want high rpm torque, put in a diesel-electric where the > electric motors have max torque at stall. And put one in for each > wheel. Or put in a turbine which can generate enough torque to ruin > the bearings on an Indy Racer. That's a myth that has persisted forty years now! The four wheel drive STP racer (which took the pole on a junk unairworthy engine PWC gave Granatelli to shut him up) broke bearings because of exceedingly poor chassis design, NOT because of the mighty torque of the PT6A. They refused to put U-joints at the transfer case. I am kind of surprised that with all the junk unairworthy Allison and Lycoming helo engines floating on the surplus market we haven't seen more in off road recreational use. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 8, 9:05 am, Lon <lon.stow...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Our USofA has decreed that sulfur must be removed as of mumble mumble so > those new urea injecting style diesels can run on it. Rumor is that > benz may be making some much bigger diesels available soon now--possibly > to stay in competition with the big V-10s available from the VW group. It's easy to get all the common rail engines over here-junkyards over there will crate them up complete with ECM and harnesses. And if you get rid of the catalysts, particulate traps and EGR they will burn regular fuel. The EPA has nothing to say about it if you tell them it's for a race car or an experimental aircraft at Customs. EPA is prohibited from messing with those. If you are going into an older chassis, KKKalifornia can be stumped if the engine is a "Service Replacement Block" engine. Which since Euro engines do not have a US format VIN they all are. You just have to be smarter than the average bear. > > If you really want high rpm torque, put in a diesel-electric where the > electric motors have max torque at stall. And put one in for each > wheel. Or put in a turbine which can generate enough torque to ruin > the bearings on an Indy Racer. That's a myth that has persisted forty years now! The four wheel drive STP racer (which took the pole on a junk unairworthy engine PWC gave Granatelli to shut him up) broke bearings because of exceedingly poor chassis design, NOT because of the mighty torque of the PT6A. They refused to put U-joints at the transfer case. I am kind of surprised that with all the junk unairworthy Allison and Lycoming helo engines floating on the surplus market we haven't seen more in off road recreational use. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 8, 9:05 am, Lon <lon.stow...@comcast.net> wrote:
> Our USofA has decreed that sulfur must be removed as of mumble mumble so > those new urea injecting style diesels can run on it. Rumor is that > benz may be making some much bigger diesels available soon now--possibly > to stay in competition with the big V-10s available from the VW group. It's easy to get all the common rail engines over here-junkyards over there will crate them up complete with ECM and harnesses. And if you get rid of the catalysts, particulate traps and EGR they will burn regular fuel. The EPA has nothing to say about it if you tell them it's for a race car or an experimental aircraft at Customs. EPA is prohibited from messing with those. If you are going into an older chassis, KKKalifornia can be stumped if the engine is a "Service Replacement Block" engine. Which since Euro engines do not have a US format VIN they all are. You just have to be smarter than the average bear. > > If you really want high rpm torque, put in a diesel-electric where the > electric motors have max torque at stall. And put one in for each > wheel. Or put in a turbine which can generate enough torque to ruin > the bearings on an Indy Racer. That's a myth that has persisted forty years now! The four wheel drive STP racer (which took the pole on a junk unairworthy engine PWC gave Granatelli to shut him up) broke bearings because of exceedingly poor chassis design, NOT because of the mighty torque of the PT6A. They refused to put U-joints at the transfer case. I am kind of surprised that with all the junk unairworthy Allison and Lycoming helo engines floating on the surplus market we haven't seen more in off road recreational use. |
Re: Novak has pulled their heads out-a little
On Mar 8, 11:08 am, "Earle Horton" <a...@gracioso.usa> wrote:
> Bio diesel sounds great on paper but it competes with food and worse, beer. > Maybe if food were more expensive it would help the obesity "epidemic" in > this country. We have a lot of farmland not in production because the government pays for its nonuse. Else farmers would overproduce. Biofuels will probably raise commodity prices a little, but the price you pay at the supermarket is not going to be much affected. I expect hemp will be put back once they develop a version which looks different than the THC producing kind so the booze lobby does not stop it. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands