Noticed on Ebay
02-02-2006 | 10:00 PM
#121
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
And they are still using the Allison and Model T conversions in
racing aren't they??????????
You let me know when you find an overhead cam that will produce
thousand horsepower on pump gas:
http://www.hotrod.com/howto/113_0206_1000/
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bret Ludwig wrote:
>
> There were no SMOG laws when American Made Overhead Cam heads were put
> on Model T's and A's for racing, and on the American Made Duesenberg J
> and SJ or the American made Miller-Meyer-Drake-Offenheuser that won
> Indy 35 times. The only GM engine they make anymore that's any good
> except Duramax, is the Northstar as you well know. Let's not forget the
> Overhead Cam Allison V-1710 that won WWII and a lot of Boat races. No
> one in their right mind would build a pushrod engine today except for
> racing where the ridiculous rules favored them like Mercedes Benz did
> when they won Indy a few years back.
>
> The Ford GT is a JOKE and a CARTOON CAR unlike the real Lola built
> GT40 that is really a Lola of course.
racing aren't they??????????
You let me know when you find an overhead cam that will produce
thousand horsepower on pump gas:
http://www.hotrod.com/howto/113_0206_1000/
God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Bret Ludwig wrote:
>
> There were no SMOG laws when American Made Overhead Cam heads were put
> on Model T's and A's for racing, and on the American Made Duesenberg J
> and SJ or the American made Miller-Meyer-Drake-Offenheuser that won
> Indy 35 times. The only GM engine they make anymore that's any good
> except Duramax, is the Northstar as you well know. Let's not forget the
> Overhead Cam Allison V-1710 that won WWII and a lot of Boat races. No
> one in their right mind would build a pushrod engine today except for
> racing where the ridiculous rules favored them like Mercedes Benz did
> when they won Indy a few years back.
>
> The Ford GT is a JOKE and a CARTOON CAR unlike the real Lola built
> GT40 that is really a Lola of course.
02-03-2006 | 03:47 AM
#122
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Then put your money where your mouth is. <ROTFLMAO>
> Dirty! And I drove a million miles behind one! Fortunately the
> Mercedes across the street died! And will never be replaced:
> http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html
> Diesels last longer because the use twice the filters an a American
> manufacturer knows the public would maintain on an gasoline engine:
They're right; thinking is not your strong suit.
> Then put your money where your mouth is. <ROTFLMAO>
> Dirty! And I drove a million miles behind one! Fortunately the
> Mercedes across the street died! And will never be replaced:
> http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html
> Diesels last longer because the use twice the filters an a American
> manufacturer knows the public would maintain on an gasoline engine:
They're right; thinking is not your strong suit.
02-03-2006 | 03:47 AM
#123
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Then put your money where your mouth is. <ROTFLMAO>
> Dirty! And I drove a million miles behind one! Fortunately the
> Mercedes across the street died! And will never be replaced:
> http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html
> Diesels last longer because the use twice the filters an a American
> manufacturer knows the public would maintain on an gasoline engine:
They're right; thinking is not your strong suit.
> Then put your money where your mouth is. <ROTFLMAO>
> Dirty! And I drove a million miles behind one! Fortunately the
> Mercedes across the street died! And will never be replaced:
> http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html
> Diesels last longer because the use twice the filters an a American
> manufacturer knows the public would maintain on an gasoline engine:
They're right; thinking is not your strong suit.
02-03-2006 | 03:47 AM
#124
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Then put your money where your mouth is. <ROTFLMAO>
> Dirty! And I drove a million miles behind one! Fortunately the
> Mercedes across the street died! And will never be replaced:
> http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html
> Diesels last longer because the use twice the filters an a American
> manufacturer knows the public would maintain on an gasoline engine:
They're right; thinking is not your strong suit.
> Then put your money where your mouth is. <ROTFLMAO>
> Dirty! And I drove a million miles behind one! Fortunately the
> Mercedes across the street died! And will never be replaced:
> http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/us/light.html
> Diesels last longer because the use twice the filters an a American
> manufacturer knows the public would maintain on an gasoline engine:
They're right; thinking is not your strong suit.
02-03-2006 | 03:47 AM
#125
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Have ever been to Europe, and seen what diesel, and coal oil has
> done to their buildings?
That's from coal, not diesel, you dolt!
> Or looked at the rear bumper of a diesel car,
> here?
The bumper on my Jetta is perfectly clean.
> Have ever been to Europe, and seen what diesel, and coal oil has
> done to their buildings?
That's from coal, not diesel, you dolt!
> Or looked at the rear bumper of a diesel car,
> here?
The bumper on my Jetta is perfectly clean.
02-03-2006 | 03:47 AM
#126
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Have ever been to Europe, and seen what diesel, and coal oil has
> done to their buildings?
That's from coal, not diesel, you dolt!
> Or looked at the rear bumper of a diesel car,
> here?
The bumper on my Jetta is perfectly clean.
> Have ever been to Europe, and seen what diesel, and coal oil has
> done to their buildings?
That's from coal, not diesel, you dolt!
> Or looked at the rear bumper of a diesel car,
> here?
The bumper on my Jetta is perfectly clean.
02-03-2006 | 03:47 AM
#127
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
L.W.(ßill) ------ III <----------@***.net> wrote:
> Have ever been to Europe, and seen what diesel, and coal oil has
> done to their buildings?
That's from coal, not diesel, you dolt!
> Or looked at the rear bumper of a diesel car,
> here?
The bumper on my Jetta is perfectly clean.
> Have ever been to Europe, and seen what diesel, and coal oil has
> done to their buildings?
That's from coal, not diesel, you dolt!
> Or looked at the rear bumper of a diesel car,
> here?
The bumper on my Jetta is perfectly clean.
02-03-2006 | 03:48 AM
#128
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
They love to quote the net profit w/o including the gross income or
capitalization. Why bore them with facts when you can wow them with
half-truths?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:08:51 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Actually we pay for the programs in higher retail costs by forcing
> the oil companies to use their moneys in explorations. Making the oil
> companies' thirty six billion dollar profit, which is a mere drop in the
> bucket when compared to their assists, that's the reason as you have
> found they're NOT a good investment at any time in their history!
> I'm not going to waste my time searching for coal to diesel, unless
> YOU really can't find an example, because I know it is Total waste, like
> using six times the energy to produce ethanol or hydrogen. Geez, ask
> your Dad, what diesel is!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Nope, Alberta has oil sands, sandy soil with a high concentration of natural
> > bitumen. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/89.asp
> >
> > Please cite a source for liberal-wacko US-funded coal-to-diesel programs in
> > Canada.
> >
> > Exxon is not a good buy, the price is too high. Should have bought this time
> > last year, the return since then has been 24% I believe. And I think it was
> > closer to a 10% margin last year. Major retailers regularly work on less
> > than 4%.
--
Will Honea
capitalization. Why bore them with facts when you can wow them with
half-truths?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:08:51 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Actually we pay for the programs in higher retail costs by forcing
> the oil companies to use their moneys in explorations. Making the oil
> companies' thirty six billion dollar profit, which is a mere drop in the
> bucket when compared to their assists, that's the reason as you have
> found they're NOT a good investment at any time in their history!
> I'm not going to waste my time searching for coal to diesel, unless
> YOU really can't find an example, because I know it is Total waste, like
> using six times the energy to produce ethanol or hydrogen. Geez, ask
> your Dad, what diesel is!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Nope, Alberta has oil sands, sandy soil with a high concentration of natural
> > bitumen. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/89.asp
> >
> > Please cite a source for liberal-wacko US-funded coal-to-diesel programs in
> > Canada.
> >
> > Exxon is not a good buy, the price is too high. Should have bought this time
> > last year, the return since then has been 24% I believe. And I think it was
> > closer to a 10% margin last year. Major retailers regularly work on less
> > than 4%.
--
Will Honea
02-03-2006 | 03:48 AM
#129
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
They love to quote the net profit w/o including the gross income or
capitalization. Why bore them with facts when you can wow them with
half-truths?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:08:51 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Actually we pay for the programs in higher retail costs by forcing
> the oil companies to use their moneys in explorations. Making the oil
> companies' thirty six billion dollar profit, which is a mere drop in the
> bucket when compared to their assists, that's the reason as you have
> found they're NOT a good investment at any time in their history!
> I'm not going to waste my time searching for coal to diesel, unless
> YOU really can't find an example, because I know it is Total waste, like
> using six times the energy to produce ethanol or hydrogen. Geez, ask
> your Dad, what diesel is!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Nope, Alberta has oil sands, sandy soil with a high concentration of natural
> > bitumen. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/89.asp
> >
> > Please cite a source for liberal-wacko US-funded coal-to-diesel programs in
> > Canada.
> >
> > Exxon is not a good buy, the price is too high. Should have bought this time
> > last year, the return since then has been 24% I believe. And I think it was
> > closer to a 10% margin last year. Major retailers regularly work on less
> > than 4%.
--
Will Honea
capitalization. Why bore them with facts when you can wow them with
half-truths?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:08:51 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Actually we pay for the programs in higher retail costs by forcing
> the oil companies to use their moneys in explorations. Making the oil
> companies' thirty six billion dollar profit, which is a mere drop in the
> bucket when compared to their assists, that's the reason as you have
> found they're NOT a good investment at any time in their history!
> I'm not going to waste my time searching for coal to diesel, unless
> YOU really can't find an example, because I know it is Total waste, like
> using six times the energy to produce ethanol or hydrogen. Geez, ask
> your Dad, what diesel is!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Nope, Alberta has oil sands, sandy soil with a high concentration of natural
> > bitumen. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/89.asp
> >
> > Please cite a source for liberal-wacko US-funded coal-to-diesel programs in
> > Canada.
> >
> > Exxon is not a good buy, the price is too high. Should have bought this time
> > last year, the return since then has been 24% I believe. And I think it was
> > closer to a 10% margin last year. Major retailers regularly work on less
> > than 4%.
--
Will Honea
02-03-2006 | 03:48 AM
#130
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Noticed on Ebay
They love to quote the net profit w/o including the gross income or
capitalization. Why bore them with facts when you can wow them with
half-truths?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:08:51 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Actually we pay for the programs in higher retail costs by forcing
> the oil companies to use their moneys in explorations. Making the oil
> companies' thirty six billion dollar profit, which is a mere drop in the
> bucket when compared to their assists, that's the reason as you have
> found they're NOT a good investment at any time in their history!
> I'm not going to waste my time searching for coal to diesel, unless
> YOU really can't find an example, because I know it is Total waste, like
> using six times the energy to produce ethanol or hydrogen. Geez, ask
> your Dad, what diesel is!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Nope, Alberta has oil sands, sandy soil with a high concentration of natural
> > bitumen. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/89.asp
> >
> > Please cite a source for liberal-wacko US-funded coal-to-diesel programs in
> > Canada.
> >
> > Exxon is not a good buy, the price is too high. Should have bought this time
> > last year, the return since then has been 24% I believe. And I think it was
> > closer to a 10% margin last year. Major retailers regularly work on less
> > than 4%.
--
Will Honea
capitalization. Why bore them with facts when you can wow them with
half-truths?
On Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:08:51 UTC L.W.(ßill) ------ III
<----------@***.net> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> Actually we pay for the programs in higher retail costs by forcing
> the oil companies to use their moneys in explorations. Making the oil
> companies' thirty six billion dollar profit, which is a mere drop in the
> bucket when compared to their assists, that's the reason as you have
> found they're NOT a good investment at any time in their history!
> I'm not going to waste my time searching for coal to diesel, unless
> YOU really can't find an example, because I know it is Total waste, like
> using six times the energy to produce ethanol or hydrogen. Geez, ask
> your Dad, what diesel is!
> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Matt Macchiarolo wrote:
> >
> > Nope, Alberta has oil sands, sandy soil with a high concentration of natural
> > bitumen. http://www.energy.gov.ab.ca/89.asp
> >
> > Please cite a source for liberal-wacko US-funded coal-to-diesel programs in
> > Canada.
> >
> > Exxon is not a good buy, the price is too high. Should have bought this time
> > last year, the return since then has been 24% I believe. And I think it was
> > closer to a 10% margin last year. Major retailers regularly work on less
> > than 4%.
--
Will Honea