A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
Michael
> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
Michael
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:46:34 -0800 (PST), michael.white@charter.net
wrote:
>On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
>I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
>Michael
I guess you could call that "having the runs!
wrote:
>On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
>I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
>Michael
I guess you could call that "having the runs!
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:46:34 -0800, michael.white wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
> Michael
Although it would be a hoot to see Billie's Real Jheap finally do a Real
Wheelie.....
....and get a temporary cammo-job at the same time.
--
Words ought to be a little wild, for they are the assault of thoughts
on the unthinking.
-John Maynard Keynes, economist (1883-1946)
> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
> Michael
Although it would be a hoot to see Billie's Real Jheap finally do a Real
Wheelie.....
....and get a temporary cammo-job at the same time.
--
Words ought to be a little wild, for they are the assault of thoughts
on the unthinking.
-John Maynard Keynes, economist (1883-1946)
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 20:46:34 -0800 (PST), michael.white@charter.net
wrote:
>On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
>I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
>Michael
Why, seems like that would be the best time to use it! Just don't drop
the roll of TP!
wrote:
>On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
>I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
>Michael
Why, seems like that would be the best time to use it! Just don't drop
the roll of TP!
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
michael.white@charter.net wrote:
> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
***** off your bumper?
> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>
> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
***** off your bumper?
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
Who Cares wrote:
> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>
>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
> ***** off your bumper?
I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
off his bumper.
Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
student/20 something type?
> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>
>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>
> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
> ***** off your bumper?
I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
off his bumper.
Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
student/20 something type?
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 23:50:17 -0500, "T. Greening" <tgreen@yomama.com>
wrote:
>Who Cares wrote:
>> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>>
>>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>>
>> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
>> ***** off your bumper?
>
>
>
>I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
>loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
>off his bumper.
>
>Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
>student/20 something type?
http://www.bullsballs.com/
--
Old Crow "Yol Bolson!"
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'95 YJ Rio Grande
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
wrote:
>Who Cares wrote:
>> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>>
>>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>>
>> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
>> ***** off your bumper?
>
>
>
>I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
>loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
>off his bumper.
>
>Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
>student/20 something type?
http://www.bullsballs.com/
--
Old Crow "Yol Bolson!"
'82 FLTC-P "Miss Pearl"
'95 YJ Rio Grande
BS#133, SENS, TOMKAT, MAMBM
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
T. Greening wrote:
> Who Cares wrote:
>> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>>
>>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>>
>> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
>> ***** off your bumper?
>
>
>
> I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
> loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
> off his bumper.
>
> Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
> student/20 something type?
Ah, but that isnt the issue. The issue is whether or not questionable
taste is a crime.
> Who Cares wrote:
>> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>>
>>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>>
>> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
>> ***** off your bumper?
>
>
>
> I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
> loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
> off his bumper.
>
> Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
> student/20 something type?
Ah, but that isnt the issue. The issue is whether or not questionable
taste is a crime.
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: A new use for your 2 inch receiver hitch!
"Who Cares" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:76Kdnd4KP7KvRQzanZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> T. Greening wrote:
>> Who Cares wrote:
>>> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>>>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>>>
>>>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>>>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>>>
>>> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
>>> ***** off your bumper?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
>> loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
>> off his bumper.
>>
>> Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
>> student/20 something type?
>
> Ah, but that isnt the issue. The issue is whether or not questionable
> taste is a crime.
Excessive censorship should at least be a tort, like the unwarranted
infringement of civil rights that it is. I am thinking advanced age and
excessive stuffiness, but I am pushing sixty and I still get it. If we put
some evangelical Christians in jail for attempting to inflict their
restrictive moral code on the rest of us, the rest of them might get it too.
Or it just might make them martyrs, like the Taliban that they are.
Cheers,
Earle
news:76Kdnd4KP7KvRQzanZ2dnUVZ_rXinZ2d@comcast.com. ..
> T. Greening wrote:
>> Who Cares wrote:
>>> michael.white@charter.net wrote:
>>>> On Jan 15, 2:19 am, Socks <sock...@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>>>> http://www.metacafe.com/watch/216119/off_road_commode/
>>>>
>>>> I saw one of those while waiting around at the local Jeep shop.
>>>> Funniest line on the box: "Not for use on a moving vehicle".
>>>
>>> What tight-*ssed state is it back east that is planning to ban hanging
>>> ***** off your bumper?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm wondering what kind of ill-educated, school boy bathroom humor
>> loving, snaggle-toothed redneck thinks it's funny to hang a set of *****
>> off his bumper.
>>
>> Or maybe it's the well educated but still immensely immature college
>> student/20 something type?
>
> Ah, but that isnt the issue. The issue is whether or not questionable
> taste is a crime.
Excessive censorship should at least be a tort, like the unwarranted
infringement of civil rights that it is. I am thinking advanced age and
excessive stuffiness, but I am pushing sixty and I still get it. If we put
some evangelical Christians in jail for attempting to inflict their
restrictive moral code on the rest of us, the rest of them might get it too.
Or it just might make them martyrs, like the Taliban that they are.
Cheers,
Earle