|
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote:
> Sounds like F*ck's got you running scared. Like I said, given the quality of the posters making that judgement, I can live with that. >Do you think he would send me > that info? :-) Send you what info, Bill? > God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O > mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ > > > "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message > news:lA6Ai.90864$dI1.88830@newsfe08.phx... >> In which case he can be called out on it, as has been done. >> >> >> Bill did. Oh, that's right, you inserted yourself into a thread in >> which you profess ignorance of the thread's primary subject. >> >> Are you always this clueless? >> >> Given the quality of the two posters making that judgment, I can live >> with that. And so far as I know, my taunts are totally anonymous, >> unlike yours. >> >> Have a lot of experience with that, do you? >> > > > |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote: >L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote: >> To make them responsible, > >How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible? Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to their home. You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia organization. Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on the state and federal level. >>like I am using my God given name makes me >> think before I use elementary school yard language like you. > >Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the >middle of your swear words, coward. God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin Award doesn't it? >>Of course a >> little litigation wouldn't hurt. > >Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other >kook award(s)? Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs department would get dragged into discovery process. >> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> >> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx... >>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be >>> to you? -- Bob Officer COOSN-266-06-01986 Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005 |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote: >L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote: >> To make them responsible, > >How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible? Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to their home. You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia organization. Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on the state and federal level. >>like I am using my God given name makes me >> think before I use elementary school yard language like you. > >Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the >middle of your swear words, coward. God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin Award doesn't it? >>Of course a >> little litigation wouldn't hurt. > >Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other >kook award(s)? Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs department would get dragged into discovery process. >> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> >> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx... >>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be >>> to you? -- Bob Officer COOSN-266-06-01986 Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005 |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote: >L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote: >> To make them responsible, > >How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible? Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to their home. You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia organization. Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on the state and federal level. >>like I am using my God given name makes me >> think before I use elementary school yard language like you. > >Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the >middle of your swear words, coward. God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin Award doesn't it? >>Of course a >> little litigation wouldn't hurt. > >Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other >kook award(s)? Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs department would get dragged into discovery process. >> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> >> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx... >>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be >>> to you? -- Bob Officer COOSN-266-06-01986 Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005 |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 01:41:06 -0700, in alt.usenet.kooks, Cassandra
Incognito <a@b.invalid> wrote: >L.W. (Bill) ------ III wrote: >> To make them responsible, > >How would you having their names and addresses make them responsible? Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to their home. You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia organization. Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on the state and federal level. >>like I am using my God given name makes me >> think before I use elementary school yard language like you. > >Don't pretend you're not swearing because you stick asterisks in the >middle of your swear words, coward. God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin Award doesn't it? >>Of course a >> little litigation wouldn't hurt. > >Litigation over what? Do you want a Balsa Gavel as well as your other >kook award(s)? Sure he does. the minute he were to file, the CHP and local sheriffs department would get dragged into discovery process. >> God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O >> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ >> >> "Cassandra Incognito" <a@b.invalid> wrote in message >> news:bL6Ai.90866$dI1.77161@newsfe08.phx... >>> Why do you want their names and addresses, Bill? What use would they be >>> to you? -- Bob Officer COOSN-266-06-01986 Hammer of Thor, Sept 2005 |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:
> Posse Comitatus [posse=having power + comitatus=the county] For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws. Double=plus uncomforting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act Homeland Security TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the following: 1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act) prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress. 2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to prevent United States Marshals, on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in enforcing Federal law. 3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to debate. 4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious emergency. 5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order. 6. The Posse Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act of Congress. In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to: "...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States..., where the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. 331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what conditions martial law may be declared. [4] Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006, Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806, followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29, 2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4, 2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006. Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec. 1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September 29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333 of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report - FINAL VOTE RESULTS -- 30 -- |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:
> Posse Comitatus [posse=having power + comitatus=the county] For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws. Double=plus uncomforting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act Homeland Security TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the following: 1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act) prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress. 2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to prevent United States Marshals, on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in enforcing Federal law. 3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to debate. 4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious emergency. 5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order. 6. The Posse Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act of Congress. In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to: "...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States..., where the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. 331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what conditions martial law may be declared. [4] Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006, Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806, followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29, 2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4, 2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006. Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec. 1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September 29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333 of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report - FINAL VOTE RESULTS -- 30 -- |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:
> Posse Comitatus [posse=having power + comitatus=the county] For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws. Double=plus uncomforting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act Homeland Security TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the following: 1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act) prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress. 2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to prevent United States Marshals, on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in enforcing Federal law. 3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to debate. 4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious emergency. 5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order. 6. The Posse Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act of Congress. In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to: "...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States..., where the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. 331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what conditions martial law may be declared. [4] Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006, Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806, followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29, 2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4, 2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006. Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec. 1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September 29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333 of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report - FINAL VOTE RESULTS -- 30 -- |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 13:39:52 -0700, Bob Officer wrote:
> Posse Comitatus [posse=having power + comitatus=the county] For those who don't know, here's the new take on the old set of laws. Double=plus uncomforting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posse_Comitatus_Act Homeland Security TITLE 6 CHAPTER 1 SUBCHAPTER VIII Part H Sec. 466. Congress finds the following: 1. Section 1385 of title 18 (commonly known as the Posse Comitatus Act) prohibits the use of the Armed Forces as a Posse comitatus to execute the laws except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress. 2. Enacted in 1878, the Posse Comitatus Act was expressly intended to prevent United States Marshals, on their own initiative, from calling on the Army for assistance in enforcing Federal law. 3. Some believe the Posse Comitatus Act has served the Nation well in limiting the use of the Armed Forces to enforce the law. Whether this is a good thing or not is subject to debate. 4. The Posse Comitatus Act was not intended to be a complete barrier to the use of the Armed Forces for a range of domestic purposes, including law enforcement functions, when the use of the Armed Forces is authorized by Act of Congress or the President determines that the use of the Armed Forces is required to fulfill the President's obligations under the Constitution provide for the common defense or to respond promptly to insurrection, or other serious emergency. 5. Existing laws, including Title 10, Chapter 15 (commonly known as The Insurrection Act), and The Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (Title 42, Chapter 68), grant the President broad powers that may be invoked in the event of domestic emergencies, including an attack against the Nation using weapons of mass destruction, and these laws specifically authorize the President to use the Armed Forces to help restore public order. 6. The Posse Comitatus Act could be replaced, nullified or modified by a simple act of Congress. In early 2006, the 109th Congress passed a controversial bill which grants the President the right to commandeer Federal or even State National Guard Troops and use them inside the United States. This bill, entitled the John Warner Defense Appropriation Act for Fiscal Year 2007 (H.R. 5122.ENR), contains a provision, (Section 1076) which allows the President to: "...employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to... restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, --------- attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States..., where the President determines that,...domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy..." [3] Senator Patrick Leahy and others have condemned Section 1076 because it effectively nullifies the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act (10 U.S.C. 331-335) and gives the President the legal ability to define under what conditions martial law may be declared. [4] Note: H.R.5122 was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives on April 6, 2006, as H.R.5122 by Rep. Duncan Hunter (R-CA). On May 5, 2006, Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) introduced another version of the bill, H.Res.806, followed by H.Res.811 on May 11, 2006, and H.Res.1062 on September 29, 2006. In the U.S. Senate, Sen. John Warner introduced S.2507 on April 4, 2006, followed by S.2766 on May 9, 2006, and S.2766 on May 9, 2006. Section 1076 appears only in the final signed version of the bill (Public Law No: 109-364, October 17, 2006): Title X--General Provisions, Sec. 1076, Use of Armed Forces in major public emergencies. The Congressional Record (Page H8151 and Page H8152 shows Section 1076 as amended September 29, 2006, in the U.S. House of Representatives as a change to Section 333 of title 10, United States Code. On Agreeing to the Conference Report - FINAL VOTE RESULTS -- 30 -- |
Re: Jeepers LW, what's leaking from your pants?
This is that little coward too afraid to use it's name and address,
who's only way to get attention is to make a fool of it's self. With an obsession with goats, and other faggots, and writes via remailers, and cross posts to other perverts to no one's surprise. With extreme jealous ranting over my documents, possessions, successes, manliness and super Southern California body. You remind me of a little rat dog, like a Mexican Chiwawa with its senseless barking it's rabid head off, me too, me too. What a pity! Why don't you call my friends at the San Diego Sheriffs Department at 858-974-2020 as you said you would, but haven't! YOU NEED HELP! God Bless America, Bill O|||||||O mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/ "Bob Officer" <bobofficers@127.0.0.7> wrote in message news:85d6d31mqf532s4q0hd7hhf0u9bdc2c4r4@4ax.com... > > Lewdellen would go real life on them, maybe make a personal visit to > their home. > > You know Billy brags about being part of an unlawful militia > organization. > > Do you remember the outlaw organization called "Posse Comitatus"? of > the late 60's and early 70's. Dozens if not 1000's of people were > arrested taken, to trial and convicted of felonies and misdemenors on > the state and federal level. > > > God didn't name Lewdelleen, his parents did. the use of the term "God > given Name", makes Billy a delusional kook and worthy of the Raisin > Award doesn't it? > -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands