Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#6941
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:22:03 -0500, Daniel J Stern <dastern@127.0.0.1>
wrote:
snip of meaningless liberal drivel...
>Surely you're not *really* so crass as to believe that all heterosexual
>--- is an expression of love while all homosexual --- is simply an
>"activity"...are you?
Surely you are not really so crass as to try to pass off mental
disorders such as homosexuality as being a genetic issue ... are you?
wrote:
snip of meaningless liberal drivel...
>Surely you're not *really* so crass as to believe that all heterosexual
>--- is an expression of love while all homosexual --- is simply an
>"activity"...are you?
Surely you are not really so crass as to try to pass off mental
disorders such as homosexuality as being a genetic issue ... are you?
#6942
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:22:03 -0500, Daniel J Stern <dastern@127.0.0.1>
wrote:
snip of meaningless liberal drivel...
>Surely you're not *really* so crass as to believe that all heterosexual
>--- is an expression of love while all homosexual --- is simply an
>"activity"...are you?
Surely you are not really so crass as to try to pass off mental
disorders such as homosexuality as being a genetic issue ... are you?
wrote:
snip of meaningless liberal drivel...
>Surely you're not *really* so crass as to believe that all heterosexual
>--- is an expression of love while all homosexual --- is simply an
>"activity"...are you?
Surely you are not really so crass as to try to pass off mental
disorders such as homosexuality as being a genetic issue ... are you?
#6943
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:22:03 -0500, Daniel J Stern <dastern@127.0.0.1>
wrote:
snip of meaningless liberal drivel...
>Surely you're not *really* so crass as to believe that all heterosexual
>--- is an expression of love while all homosexual --- is simply an
>"activity"...are you?
Surely you are not really so crass as to try to pass off mental
disorders such as homosexuality as being a genetic issue ... are you?
wrote:
snip of meaningless liberal drivel...
>Surely you're not *really* so crass as to believe that all heterosexual
>--- is an expression of love while all homosexual --- is simply an
>"activity"...are you?
Surely you are not really so crass as to try to pass off mental
disorders such as homosexuality as being a genetic issue ... are you?
#6944
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:01:54 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
<dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
>> The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
>> defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
>By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
>psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
Sorry danny boy, but very few people in the fields you mention feel as
you say they do, contrary to what the media and liberal liars like you
would have us believe.
<dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
>> The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
>> defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
>By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
>psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
Sorry danny boy, but very few people in the fields you mention feel as
you say they do, contrary to what the media and liberal liars like you
would have us believe.
#6945
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:01:54 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
<dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
>> The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
>> defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
>By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
>psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
Sorry danny boy, but very few people in the fields you mention feel as
you say they do, contrary to what the media and liberal liars like you
would have us believe.
<dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
>> The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
>> defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
>By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
>psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
Sorry danny boy, but very few people in the fields you mention feel as
you say they do, contrary to what the media and liberal liars like you
would have us believe.
#6946
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:01:54 -0500, "Daniel J. Stern"
<dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
>> The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
>> defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
>By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
>psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
Sorry danny boy, but very few people in the fields you mention feel as
you say they do, contrary to what the media and liberal liars like you
would have us believe.
<dastern@127.0.0.1> wrote:
>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
>
>> The difference between a heterosexual or a homosexual individual is
>> defined by the activities the individual engages in.
>
>By you, perhaps. Not by them, nor by most folks with credentials in
>psychology, physiology, behavioural science and other related fields.
Sorry danny boy, but very few people in the fields you mention feel as
you say they do, contrary to what the media and liberal liars like you
would have us believe.
#6947
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
>
> And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> any reality.
Not really. Slippery slope arguments are not in and of themselves
invalid. The ridiculous dog and tree examples aside, the removal of
distinction between children and adults is a possible reality which does
put you on that slippery slope for legal pedophilia, marrying children,
etc. Oh - I know -t he left alwasy claims they are going to stop at the
last step that they are presently pushing for (whichever one it is at
teh time). First legalize sodomy, then legalize gay marriage, then
remove distinction between chuldren and adults...
Slippery slope - yes.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#6948
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
>
> And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> any reality.
Not really. Slippery slope arguments are not in and of themselves
invalid. The ridiculous dog and tree examples aside, the removal of
distinction between children and adults is a possible reality which does
put you on that slippery slope for legal pedophilia, marrying children,
etc. Oh - I know -t he left alwasy claims they are going to stop at the
last step that they are presently pushing for (whichever one it is at
teh time). First legalize sodomy, then legalize gay marriage, then
remove distinction between chuldren and adults...
Slippery slope - yes.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#6949
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Daniel J. Stern" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > You claim discrimination by excluding gays. I claim that others could
> > claim that you would want to discriminate against them because you would
> > exlude non-adults, non-humans, or even non-living things for those
> > humans that wanted to marry, say, their dog, tree, torque wrench, etc.
>
> And this is a slippery-slope argument totally divorced, as it were, from
> any reality.
Not really. Slippery slope arguments are not in and of themselves
invalid. The ridiculous dog and tree examples aside, the removal of
distinction between children and adults is a possible reality which does
put you on that slippery slope for legal pedophilia, marrying children,
etc. Oh - I know -t he left alwasy claims they are going to stop at the
last step that they are presently pushing for (whichever one it is at
teh time). First legalize sodomy, then legalize gay marriage, then
remove distinction between chuldren and adults...
Slippery slope - yes.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#6950
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> > > Well, yeah! Based on a higher authority that I know you have a problem
> > > with.
> > I have no problem with your higher authority. My problem is with your
> > attempting to force me to accede to your higher authority.
>
> And of course you want me to accede to your higher authority
Nope. Not at all.
DS
> > > Well, yeah! Based on a higher authority that I know you have a problem
> > > with.
> > I have no problem with your higher authority. My problem is with your
> > attempting to force me to accede to your higher authority.
>
> And of course you want me to accede to your higher authority
Nope. Not at all.
DS