Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#6851
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Daniel J Stern wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > But the idea of a gay "couple" being officially married is almost as
> > ridiculous according to
>
> ...you and your ilk. Best get used to the idea; it will happen. Maybe not
> tomorrow and maybe not by 2006, but it will happen within my lifetime and
> probably within yours, as well.
>
> DS
My concience will be clear before God. It will all be sorted out in the
end.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#6852
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Daniel J Stern wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > But the idea of a gay "couple" being officially married is almost as
> > ridiculous according to
>
> ...you and your ilk. Best get used to the idea; it will happen. Maybe not
> tomorrow and maybe not by 2006, but it will happen within my lifetime and
> probably within yours, as well.
>
> DS
My concience will be clear before God. It will all be sorted out in the
end.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#6853
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Daniel J Stern wrote:
>
> On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
>
> > But the idea of a gay "couple" being officially married is almost as
> > ridiculous according to
>
> ...you and your ilk. Best get used to the idea; it will happen. Maybe not
> tomorrow and maybe not by 2006, but it will happen within my lifetime and
> probably within yours, as well.
>
> DS
My concience will be clear before God. It will all be sorted out in the
end.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#6854
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> neither do I accept that homosexuality is more than a choice.
Oh, indubitably. For all recorded history, some people have been
*choosing* to get ostracized (at best) and violently killed (at worst) by
their families and society at large. Fer sher, fer sher.
> I just believe that there is a "natural" order to things.
....which, apparently, includes only those things you deem "natural".
DS
> neither do I accept that homosexuality is more than a choice.
Oh, indubitably. For all recorded history, some people have been
*choosing* to get ostracized (at best) and violently killed (at worst) by
their families and society at large. Fer sher, fer sher.
> I just believe that there is a "natural" order to things.
....which, apparently, includes only those things you deem "natural".
DS
#6855
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> neither do I accept that homosexuality is more than a choice.
Oh, indubitably. For all recorded history, some people have been
*choosing* to get ostracized (at best) and violently killed (at worst) by
their families and society at large. Fer sher, fer sher.
> I just believe that there is a "natural" order to things.
....which, apparently, includes only those things you deem "natural".
DS
> neither do I accept that homosexuality is more than a choice.
Oh, indubitably. For all recorded history, some people have been
*choosing* to get ostracized (at best) and violently killed (at worst) by
their families and society at large. Fer sher, fer sher.
> I just believe that there is a "natural" order to things.
....which, apparently, includes only those things you deem "natural".
DS
#6856
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> neither do I accept that homosexuality is more than a choice.
Oh, indubitably. For all recorded history, some people have been
*choosing* to get ostracized (at best) and violently killed (at worst) by
their families and society at large. Fer sher, fer sher.
> I just believe that there is a "natural" order to things.
....which, apparently, includes only those things you deem "natural".
DS
> neither do I accept that homosexuality is more than a choice.
Oh, indubitably. For all recorded history, some people have been
*choosing* to get ostracized (at best) and violently killed (at worst) by
their families and society at large. Fer sher, fer sher.
> I just believe that there is a "natural" order to things.
....which, apparently, includes only those things you deem "natural".
DS
#6857
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> > > So why don't the other examples of potential married couples or groups
> > > have as much validity as gay "couples". You want to discriminate
> > > against those others.
> > Are you sure?
> But if you're for those other things too (i.e., I can marry my dog
Whoops, that wasn't part of the question. We were discussing consenting
adults.
Try again?
DS
> > > So why don't the other examples of potential married couples or groups
> > > have as much validity as gay "couples". You want to discriminate
> > > against those others.
> > Are you sure?
> But if you're for those other things too (i.e., I can marry my dog
Whoops, that wasn't part of the question. We were discussing consenting
adults.
Try again?
DS
#6858
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> > > So why don't the other examples of potential married couples or groups
> > > have as much validity as gay "couples". You want to discriminate
> > > against those others.
> > Are you sure?
> But if you're for those other things too (i.e., I can marry my dog
Whoops, that wasn't part of the question. We were discussing consenting
adults.
Try again?
DS
> > > So why don't the other examples of potential married couples or groups
> > > have as much validity as gay "couples". You want to discriminate
> > > against those others.
> > Are you sure?
> But if you're for those other things too (i.e., I can marry my dog
Whoops, that wasn't part of the question. We were discussing consenting
adults.
Try again?
DS
#6859
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> > > So why don't the other examples of potential married couples or groups
> > > have as much validity as gay "couples". You want to discriminate
> > > against those others.
> > Are you sure?
> But if you're for those other things too (i.e., I can marry my dog
Whoops, that wasn't part of the question. We were discussing consenting
adults.
Try again?
DS
> > > So why don't the other examples of potential married couples or groups
> > > have as much validity as gay "couples". You want to discriminate
> > > against those others.
> > Are you sure?
> But if you're for those other things too (i.e., I can marry my dog
Whoops, that wasn't part of the question. We were discussing consenting
adults.
Try again?
DS
#6860
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Sat, 06 Dec 2003 00:35:30 -0500, Greg <greg@greg.greg> wrote:
>Siblings cannot either. I don't see you pointing out the 'discrimination' here.
There are significant medical reasons for disallowing siblings to
marry. Are you suggesting that there are similar reasons preventing
gays from marrying?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.
>Siblings cannot either. I don't see you pointing out the 'discrimination' here.
There are significant medical reasons for disallowing siblings to
marry. Are you suggesting that there are similar reasons preventing
gays from marrying?
--
Brandon Sommerville
remove ".gov" to e-mail
Definition of "Lottery":
Millions of stupid people contributing
to make one stupid person look smart.