Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#6771
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> > Well, let's see. What are Coretta Scott King's qualifications as an
> > authority on the civil rights struggle for blacks? Her credentials, her
> > track record and experience and that of her late husband.
> >
> > What are Clarence Thomas' qualifications? The color of his skin...?
>
> No - a conservative black person is automatically disqualified
By whom? Not by me.
DS
> > Well, let's see. What are Coretta Scott King's qualifications as an
> > authority on the civil rights struggle for blacks? Her credentials, her
> > track record and experience and that of her late husband.
> >
> > What are Clarence Thomas' qualifications? The color of his skin...?
>
> No - a conservative black person is automatically disqualified
By whom? Not by me.
DS
#6772
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> > Well, let's see. What are Coretta Scott King's qualifications as an
> > authority on the civil rights struggle for blacks? Her credentials, her
> > track record and experience and that of her late husband.
> >
> > What are Clarence Thomas' qualifications? The color of his skin...?
>
> No - a conservative black person is automatically disqualified
By whom? Not by me.
DS
> > Well, let's see. What are Coretta Scott King's qualifications as an
> > authority on the civil rights struggle for blacks? Her credentials, her
> > track record and experience and that of her late husband.
> >
> > What are Clarence Thomas' qualifications? The color of his skin...?
>
> No - a conservative black person is automatically disqualified
By whom? Not by me.
DS
#6773
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On 05 Dec 2003 08:02 PM, Greg posted the following:
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> And heaven forbid you Taliban would have to accept everyone as being
>> equal.
>
> When even you are sure you don't have an argument, you resort to
> calling somebody "Taliban." Cute.
Call it a hunch, but I'd be willing to bet that had it been up to Lloyd,
the Taliban would still rule Afghanistan.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> And heaven forbid you Taliban would have to accept everyone as being
>> equal.
>
> When even you are sure you don't have an argument, you resort to
> calling somebody "Taliban." Cute.
Call it a hunch, but I'd be willing to bet that had it been up to Lloyd,
the Taliban would still rule Afghanistan.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#6774
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On 05 Dec 2003 08:02 PM, Greg posted the following:
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> And heaven forbid you Taliban would have to accept everyone as being
>> equal.
>
> When even you are sure you don't have an argument, you resort to
> calling somebody "Taliban." Cute.
Call it a hunch, but I'd be willing to bet that had it been up to Lloyd,
the Taliban would still rule Afghanistan.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> And heaven forbid you Taliban would have to accept everyone as being
>> equal.
>
> When even you are sure you don't have an argument, you resort to
> calling somebody "Taliban." Cute.
Call it a hunch, but I'd be willing to bet that had it been up to Lloyd,
the Taliban would still rule Afghanistan.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#6775
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On 05 Dec 2003 08:02 PM, Greg posted the following:
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> And heaven forbid you Taliban would have to accept everyone as being
>> equal.
>
> When even you are sure you don't have an argument, you resort to
> calling somebody "Taliban." Cute.
Call it a hunch, but I'd be willing to bet that had it been up to Lloyd,
the Taliban would still rule Afghanistan.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> And heaven forbid you Taliban would have to accept everyone as being
>> equal.
>
> When even you are sure you don't have an argument, you resort to
> calling somebody "Taliban." Cute.
Call it a hunch, but I'd be willing to bet that had it been up to Lloyd,
the Taliban would still rule Afghanistan.
----------------------------------------------------
Del Rawlins- del@_kills_spammers_rawlinsbrothers.org
Remove _kills_spammers_ to reply via email.
Unofficial Bearhawk FAQ website:
http://www.rawlinsbrothers.org/bhfaq/
#6776
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> But the same could be said of those who would want the right to marry their
> dog or their tree (admitedly ridiculous examples, but they illustrate
....your ability to come up with ridiculous examples not at all germane to
the topic.
DS
> But the same could be said of those who would want the right to marry their
> dog or their tree (admitedly ridiculous examples, but they illustrate
....your ability to come up with ridiculous examples not at all germane to
the topic.
DS
#6777
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> But the same could be said of those who would want the right to marry their
> dog or their tree (admitedly ridiculous examples, but they illustrate
....your ability to come up with ridiculous examples not at all germane to
the topic.
DS
> But the same could be said of those who would want the right to marry their
> dog or their tree (admitedly ridiculous examples, but they illustrate
....your ability to come up with ridiculous examples not at all germane to
the topic.
DS
#6778
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Bill Putney wrote:
> But the same could be said of those who would want the right to marry their
> dog or their tree (admitedly ridiculous examples, but they illustrate
....your ability to come up with ridiculous examples not at all germane to
the topic.
DS
> But the same could be said of those who would want the right to marry their
> dog or their tree (admitedly ridiculous examples, but they illustrate
....your ability to come up with ridiculous examples not at all germane to
the topic.
DS
#6779
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
> Being hetero or homosexual only refers to one's activities.
Most behavioural scientists disagree with you -- this is the party line of
the Religious Reich types.
Unless you're prepared to say that being six-foot-four or blue of eye or
having a Roman nose only refers to one activities...?
DS
> Being hetero or homosexual only refers to one's activities.
Most behavioural scientists disagree with you -- this is the party line of
the Religious Reich types.
Unless you're prepared to say that being six-foot-four or blue of eye or
having a Roman nose only refers to one activities...?
DS
#6780
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study aboutsafetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Greg wrote:
> Being hetero or homosexual only refers to one's activities.
Most behavioural scientists disagree with you -- this is the party line of
the Religious Reich types.
Unless you're prepared to say that being six-foot-four or blue of eye or
having a Roman nose only refers to one activities...?
DS
> Being hetero or homosexual only refers to one's activities.
Most behavioural scientists disagree with you -- this is the party line of
the Religious Reich types.
Unless you're prepared to say that being six-foot-four or blue of eye or
having a Roman nose only refers to one activities...?
DS