Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#6741
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <f4ussvo9j315a0hms7l9tfirlc77672p8s@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 11:09:23 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <3F7CE3E2.B772E342@mindspring.com>,
> >> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So are conservatives -- telling people what kind of --- to have, what
> >>genders
> >>>> can marry, what a woman can do with her body, etc.
> >>>
> >>>It is not just conservatives who oppose the redefinition of "marriage."
> >>>Any reasonable person should oppose this sort of reckless redefinition
> >>>of a long established legal / social / religious institution. If same
> >>>--- couples want to form a long term commitment to each other, I think
> >>>that is fine. If they feel they need a governmental sanction to this
> >>>commitment, then pass a law that creates a new class of civil union. But
> >>>trying to call this a "marriage" is an insult to millions of American
> >>>and serves no useful purpose.
> >>>
> >>
> >>But why should government institutionalize discrimination? OK, no religion
> >>should be required to perform or recognize a marriage not in keeping with
> its
> >>creed (doesn't the catholic church not recognize marriages by divorced
> >>people?), but why should government discriminate?
> >>
> >>>Ed
> >
> >The government discriminates all the time:
> >Affirmative action.
>
> You probably thought segregation wasn't discrimination though.
>
> >Seperate bathrooms.
>
> Which laws mandate that?
In Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority had to build a
rather expensive toilet for a ----------- employee.
"The $ 8,000 renovation of a former porter's closet at the T's Reservoir carhouse
in January created a separate shower stall, toilet and sink for the -----------
worker, T officials said.
"(The renovation) was done because it's important to ensure a comfortable and
stress-free workplace for all employees and we felt the best course of action was
to provide a third restroom," said MBTA spokesman Joe Pesaturo."
Title: ----------- toilet costs T $ 8G
BOSTON HERALD ; June 6, 2000 Tuesday Pg. 001
#6742
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <f4ussvo9j315a0hms7l9tfirlc77672p8s@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 11:09:23 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <3F7CE3E2.B772E342@mindspring.com>,
> >> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So are conservatives -- telling people what kind of --- to have, what
> >>genders
> >>>> can marry, what a woman can do with her body, etc.
> >>>
> >>>It is not just conservatives who oppose the redefinition of "marriage."
> >>>Any reasonable person should oppose this sort of reckless redefinition
> >>>of a long established legal / social / religious institution. If same
> >>>--- couples want to form a long term commitment to each other, I think
> >>>that is fine. If they feel they need a governmental sanction to this
> >>>commitment, then pass a law that creates a new class of civil union. But
> >>>trying to call this a "marriage" is an insult to millions of American
> >>>and serves no useful purpose.
> >>>
> >>
> >>But why should government institutionalize discrimination? OK, no religion
> >>should be required to perform or recognize a marriage not in keeping with
> its
> >>creed (doesn't the catholic church not recognize marriages by divorced
> >>people?), but why should government discriminate?
> >>
> >>>Ed
> >
> >The government discriminates all the time:
> >Affirmative action.
>
> You probably thought segregation wasn't discrimination though.
>
> >Seperate bathrooms.
>
> Which laws mandate that?
In Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority had to build a
rather expensive toilet for a ----------- employee.
"The $ 8,000 renovation of a former porter's closet at the T's Reservoir carhouse
in January created a separate shower stall, toilet and sink for the -----------
worker, T officials said.
"(The renovation) was done because it's important to ensure a comfortable and
stress-free workplace for all employees and we felt the best course of action was
to provide a third restroom," said MBTA spokesman Joe Pesaturo."
Title: ----------- toilet costs T $ 8G
BOSTON HERALD ; June 6, 2000 Tuesday Pg. 001
#6743
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <6atssv4pjatpjf2bmiqc1jv17o0dnte89l@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:54:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <2c7qsvgrtldnv0d50g0u57c2j0cadcc7if@4ax.com>,
> >> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In article <Us5zb.282500$275.1000782@attbi_s53>,
> >>>> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >>>>>In article <bqinb6$him$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on
> >>>>health
> >>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >>insurance
> >>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health
> >>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and
> Japan,
> >>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover
> everybody?
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
> >>>canadian health care problems
> >>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
> >>>friends promise.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
> >>
> >>Try this:
> >>
> >>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.e...cs/HealthCare/
> Co
> >>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?
> >
> >Consumer Reports???
> >You've GOT to be kidding.
> >
> Why is it all the right-wing Taliban here would believe anything an HMO or
> drug company tells them but reject the main voice for the consumer?
As a consumer, I can positively say that Consumer Reports is not a main voice for
me, whether they consider themselves such or not.
#6744
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <6atssv4pjatpjf2bmiqc1jv17o0dnte89l@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:54:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <2c7qsvgrtldnv0d50g0u57c2j0cadcc7if@4ax.com>,
> >> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In article <Us5zb.282500$275.1000782@attbi_s53>,
> >>>> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >>>>>In article <bqinb6$him$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on
> >>>>health
> >>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >>insurance
> >>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health
> >>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and
> Japan,
> >>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover
> everybody?
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
> >>>canadian health care problems
> >>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
> >>>friends promise.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
> >>
> >>Try this:
> >>
> >>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.e...cs/HealthCare/
> Co
> >>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?
> >
> >Consumer Reports???
> >You've GOT to be kidding.
> >
> Why is it all the right-wing Taliban here would believe anything an HMO or
> drug company tells them but reject the main voice for the consumer?
As a consumer, I can positively say that Consumer Reports is not a main voice for
me, whether they consider themselves such or not.
#6745
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <6atssv4pjatpjf2bmiqc1jv17o0dnte89l@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:54:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <2c7qsvgrtldnv0d50g0u57c2j0cadcc7if@4ax.com>,
> >> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In article <Us5zb.282500$275.1000782@attbi_s53>,
> >>>> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >>>>>In article <bqinb6$him$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on
> >>>>health
> >>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >>insurance
> >>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health
> >>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and
> Japan,
> >>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover
> everybody?
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
> >>>canadian health care problems
> >>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
> >>>friends promise.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
> >>
> >>Try this:
> >>
> >>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.e...cs/HealthCare/
> Co
> >>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?
> >
> >Consumer Reports???
> >You've GOT to be kidding.
> >
> Why is it all the right-wing Taliban here would believe anything an HMO or
> drug company tells them but reject the main voice for the consumer?
As a consumer, I can positively say that Consumer Reports is not a main voice for
me, whether they consider themselves such or not.
#6746
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <vssrf65q72uc7f@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bql0t8$c29$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vsq6jtru8cnd96@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bqitfk$of5$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> In article <3FCCEA4D.9F9665EC@greg.greg>, Greg <greg@greg.greg> wrote:
> >> >> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less
> >on
> >> >> health
> >> >> >> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >> >insurance
> >> >> >> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Many HMOs are not even for profit.
> >> >>
> >> >> Huh? They're all run by insurance companies, and they sure are for
> >> >profit.
> >> >> In most states, even Blue Cross is now for profit.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > And let's attack drug companies and put them
> >> >> >out of business.
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. They earn a greater return on capital than any other industry.
> >> >> 2. They take drugs discovered and tested with tax-funded research and
> >make
> >> >> huge profits on them.
> >> >> 3. They do fine in other countries where they aren't allowed such
> >> >exorbitant
> >> >> profits.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > After all we can all just invent our own miracle drugs,
> >> >>
> >> >> Most are -- most new drugs come out of government-funded university
> >> >research.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >so who
> >> >> >needs pharmecutical companies? I'm sure you've contributed even more
> >> >useful
> >> >> drugs
> >> >> >than average given your superior chemistry background. Finally,
> >having
> >> >the
> >> >> >government do as a monopoly what the private sector can do is
> >socialism
> >> >you'd
> >> >> end
> >> >> >up spending far more under your socialism plan.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> But why not a single-payer, like Canada then? You wouldn't have
> >> >national
> >> >> >> health care, just national health insurance.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Huh? Even HillaryClintonCare was forecast to cost in double digit
> >> >TRILLIONS
> >> >> of
> >> >> >dollars.
> >> >>
> >> >> And what do you think we spend now on health care?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > And yes, the Canada care system with its people fleeing to the US to
> >get
> >> >> >needed healthcare would be an improvement in your alternate reality.
> >> >>
> >> >> Totally false.
> >> >
> >> >Totally true, reported many times in the news. Stop lying Parker, it
> >doesn't
> >> >work, we are all smarter than you, even my dog.
> >>
> >> It's false. Totally, absolutely false. Read:
> >
> >Oh great, more of your left wing propaganda.
> >It's true Lloyd, learn to read, watch the news, open your mind. Consumer
> >Reports, give me a break, what a sorry source of left wing lies.
>
> I see your IQ is still below room temperature.
After you can't make an actual coherent argument, you are left babbling with
personal attacks about IQs.
#6747
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <vssrf65q72uc7f@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bql0t8$c29$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vsq6jtru8cnd96@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bqitfk$of5$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> In article <3FCCEA4D.9F9665EC@greg.greg>, Greg <greg@greg.greg> wrote:
> >> >> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less
> >on
> >> >> health
> >> >> >> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >> >insurance
> >> >> >> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Many HMOs are not even for profit.
> >> >>
> >> >> Huh? They're all run by insurance companies, and they sure are for
> >> >profit.
> >> >> In most states, even Blue Cross is now for profit.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > And let's attack drug companies and put them
> >> >> >out of business.
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. They earn a greater return on capital than any other industry.
> >> >> 2. They take drugs discovered and tested with tax-funded research and
> >make
> >> >> huge profits on them.
> >> >> 3. They do fine in other countries where they aren't allowed such
> >> >exorbitant
> >> >> profits.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > After all we can all just invent our own miracle drugs,
> >> >>
> >> >> Most are -- most new drugs come out of government-funded university
> >> >research.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >so who
> >> >> >needs pharmecutical companies? I'm sure you've contributed even more
> >> >useful
> >> >> drugs
> >> >> >than average given your superior chemistry background. Finally,
> >having
> >> >the
> >> >> >government do as a monopoly what the private sector can do is
> >socialism
> >> >you'd
> >> >> end
> >> >> >up spending far more under your socialism plan.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> But why not a single-payer, like Canada then? You wouldn't have
> >> >national
> >> >> >> health care, just national health insurance.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Huh? Even HillaryClintonCare was forecast to cost in double digit
> >> >TRILLIONS
> >> >> of
> >> >> >dollars.
> >> >>
> >> >> And what do you think we spend now on health care?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > And yes, the Canada care system with its people fleeing to the US to
> >get
> >> >> >needed healthcare would be an improvement in your alternate reality.
> >> >>
> >> >> Totally false.
> >> >
> >> >Totally true, reported many times in the news. Stop lying Parker, it
> >doesn't
> >> >work, we are all smarter than you, even my dog.
> >>
> >> It's false. Totally, absolutely false. Read:
> >
> >Oh great, more of your left wing propaganda.
> >It's true Lloyd, learn to read, watch the news, open your mind. Consumer
> >Reports, give me a break, what a sorry source of left wing lies.
>
> I see your IQ is still below room temperature.
After you can't make an actual coherent argument, you are left babbling with
personal attacks about IQs.
#6748
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <vssrf65q72uc7f@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bql0t8$c29$8@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <vsq6jtru8cnd96@corp.supernews.com>,
> >> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >> >news:bqitfk$of5$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> >> In article <3FCCEA4D.9F9665EC@greg.greg>, Greg <greg@greg.greg> wrote:
> >> >> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less
> >on
> >> >> health
> >> >> >> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >> >insurance
> >> >> >> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Many HMOs are not even for profit.
> >> >>
> >> >> Huh? They're all run by insurance companies, and they sure are for
> >> >profit.
> >> >> In most states, even Blue Cross is now for profit.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > And let's attack drug companies and put them
> >> >> >out of business.
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. They earn a greater return on capital than any other industry.
> >> >> 2. They take drugs discovered and tested with tax-funded research and
> >make
> >> >> huge profits on them.
> >> >> 3. They do fine in other countries where they aren't allowed such
> >> >exorbitant
> >> >> profits.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > After all we can all just invent our own miracle drugs,
> >> >>
> >> >> Most are -- most new drugs come out of government-funded university
> >> >research.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >so who
> >> >> >needs pharmecutical companies? I'm sure you've contributed even more
> >> >useful
> >> >> drugs
> >> >> >than average given your superior chemistry background. Finally,
> >having
> >> >the
> >> >> >government do as a monopoly what the private sector can do is
> >socialism
> >> >you'd
> >> >> end
> >> >> >up spending far more under your socialism plan.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> But why not a single-payer, like Canada then? You wouldn't have
> >> >national
> >> >> >> health care, just national health insurance.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Huh? Even HillaryClintonCare was forecast to cost in double digit
> >> >TRILLIONS
> >> >> of
> >> >> >dollars.
> >> >>
> >> >> And what do you think we spend now on health care?
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> > And yes, the Canada care system with its people fleeing to the US to
> >get
> >> >> >needed healthcare would be an improvement in your alternate reality.
> >> >>
> >> >> Totally false.
> >> >
> >> >Totally true, reported many times in the news. Stop lying Parker, it
> >doesn't
> >> >work, we are all smarter than you, even my dog.
> >>
> >> It's false. Totally, absolutely false. Read:
> >
> >Oh great, more of your left wing propaganda.
> >It's true Lloyd, learn to read, watch the news, open your mind. Consumer
> >Reports, give me a break, what a sorry source of left wing lies.
>
> I see your IQ is still below room temperature.
After you can't make an actual coherent argument, you are left babbling with
personal attacks about IQs.
#6749
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <3fce1e95.263879672@news.mi.comcast.giganews.com >,
> mielkman@excite.com (John Mielke) wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:54:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <2c7qsvgrtldnv0d50g0u57c2j0cadcc7if@4ax.com>,
> >> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In article <Us5zb.282500$275.1000782@attbi_s53>,
> >>>> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >>>>>In article <bqinb6$him$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on
> >>>>health
> >>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >>insurance
> >>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health
> >>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and
> Japan,
> >>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover
> everybody?
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
> >>>canadian health care problems
> >>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
> >>>friends promise.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
> >>
> >>Try this:
> >>
> >>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.e...cs/HealthCare/
> Co
> >>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?
> >
> >
> >So now a simple google search is "right-wing propaganda"? Every one
> >of 2,280,000 pages is right wing? No wonder people have such a low
> >opinion of you.
>
> If you cite right-web web sites, and medical-insurance-drug industry sites,
> then, yes, they're propaganda.
Only if you can actually disprove them with actual facts, which you certainly have
shown that you will not do.
> Consumer Reports analyzed the health care
> situation from a consumer's point of view.
You've never been bothered with citing left wing web sites, such as Sierra Club.
#6750
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <3fce1e95.263879672@news.mi.comcast.giganews.com >,
> mielkman@excite.com (John Mielke) wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 10:54:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <2c7qsvgrtldnv0d50g0u57c2j0cadcc7if@4ax.com>,
> >> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 02 Dec 03 15:37:02 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >>>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In article <Us5zb.282500$275.1000782@attbi_s53>,
> >>>> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >>>>>In article <bqinb6$him$8@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yeah, it'd be terrible if everybody were covered and we spent less on
> >>>>health
> >>>>>> care, as Europe, Canada, and Japan do, wouldn't it? Terrible for
> >>insurance
> >>>>>> companies, drug companies, HMOs, etc, that is.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>How would we spend "less on health care" ? Instead of paying for health
> >>>>>insurance we would pay *AT LEAST* that much in additional taxes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>Why is it, then, that every western European nation, plus Canada and
> Japan,
> >>>>spend less per capita on health care than the US yet still cover
> everybody?
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd, you might want to do a Google search on the keywords:
> >>>canadian health care problems
> >>>This would let you see reality instead of the utopia your liberal
> >>>friends promise.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Oh great, he wants me to absorb his right-wing propaganda.
> >>
> >>Try this:
> >>
> >>http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs.cmu.e...cs/HealthCare/
> Co
> >>nsumerReports-Sep92.html.gz#Does%20Canada%20Have%20The%20Answer?
> >
> >
> >So now a simple google search is "right-wing propaganda"? Every one
> >of 2,280,000 pages is right wing? No wonder people have such a low
> >opinion of you.
>
> If you cite right-web web sites, and medical-insurance-drug industry sites,
> then, yes, they're propaganda.
Only if you can actually disprove them with actual facts, which you certainly have
shown that you will not do.
> Consumer Reports analyzed the health care
> situation from a consumer's point of view.
You've never been bothered with citing left wing web sites, such as Sierra Club.