Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#6731
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <tdudnVxyI7goDlKiRTvUqA@texas.net>, Steve <no@spam.thanks> wrote:
> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And the US refusing to buy any military hardware from Airbus isn't a form
> of
> >> subsidy to Boeing?
> >>
> >
> >Nope. Lockheed, Northrop-Grumman, and even Gulfstream and Cessna are
> >free to submit bids also. Its restricting military contracting to US
> >companies, and I have no problem with that.
> >
> It's subsidizing US companies by giving only them government contracts.
Which is not a "subsidy."
#6732
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <tdudnVxyI7goDlKiRTvUqA@texas.net>, Steve <no@spam.thanks> wrote:
> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And the US refusing to buy any military hardware from Airbus isn't a form
> of
> >> subsidy to Boeing?
> >>
> >
> >Nope. Lockheed, Northrop-Grumman, and even Gulfstream and Cessna are
> >free to submit bids also. Its restricting military contracting to US
> >companies, and I have no problem with that.
> >
> It's subsidizing US companies by giving only them government contracts.
Which is not a "subsidy."
#6733
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <tdudnVxyI7goDlKiRTvUqA@texas.net>, Steve <no@spam.thanks> wrote:
> >Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >
> >
> >> And the US refusing to buy any military hardware from Airbus isn't a form
> of
> >> subsidy to Boeing?
> >>
> >
> >Nope. Lockheed, Northrop-Grumman, and even Gulfstream and Cessna are
> >free to submit bids also. Its restricting military contracting to US
> >companies, and I have no problem with that.
> >
> It's subsidizing US companies by giving only them government contracts.
Which is not a "subsidy."
#6734
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> Yeah, what else to expect of the mind-set that thinks Fox News is "fair and
> balanced"?
Certainly more so than its three-letter competition that intentionally ignored
hideous tortures and abuses by the Saddam regime in Iraq in order to remain
close to said regime.
NY Times: The News We Kept to Ourselves - Eason Jordan, CNN chief news executive
April 11, 2003 Friday Section A Page 25, Column 2.
> Yeah, what else to expect of the mind-set that thinks Fox News is "fair and
> balanced"?
Certainly more so than its three-letter competition that intentionally ignored
hideous tortures and abuses by the Saddam regime in Iraq in order to remain
close to said regime.
NY Times: The News We Kept to Ourselves - Eason Jordan, CNN chief news executive
April 11, 2003 Friday Section A Page 25, Column 2.
#6735
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> Yeah, what else to expect of the mind-set that thinks Fox News is "fair and
> balanced"?
Certainly more so than its three-letter competition that intentionally ignored
hideous tortures and abuses by the Saddam regime in Iraq in order to remain
close to said regime.
NY Times: The News We Kept to Ourselves - Eason Jordan, CNN chief news executive
April 11, 2003 Friday Section A Page 25, Column 2.
> Yeah, what else to expect of the mind-set that thinks Fox News is "fair and
> balanced"?
Certainly more so than its three-letter competition that intentionally ignored
hideous tortures and abuses by the Saddam regime in Iraq in order to remain
close to said regime.
NY Times: The News We Kept to Ourselves - Eason Jordan, CNN chief news executive
April 11, 2003 Friday Section A Page 25, Column 2.
#6736
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> Yeah, what else to expect of the mind-set that thinks Fox News is "fair and
> balanced"?
Certainly more so than its three-letter competition that intentionally ignored
hideous tortures and abuses by the Saddam regime in Iraq in order to remain
close to said regime.
NY Times: The News We Kept to Ourselves - Eason Jordan, CNN chief news executive
April 11, 2003 Friday Section A Page 25, Column 2.
> Yeah, what else to expect of the mind-set that thinks Fox News is "fair and
> balanced"?
Certainly more so than its three-letter competition that intentionally ignored
hideous tortures and abuses by the Saddam regime in Iraq in order to remain
close to said regime.
NY Times: The News We Kept to Ourselves - Eason Jordan, CNN chief news executive
April 11, 2003 Friday Section A Page 25, Column 2.
#6740
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <f4ussvo9j315a0hms7l9tfirlc77672p8s@4ax.com>,
> Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
> >On Wed, 03 Dec 03 11:09:23 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> >wrote:
> >
> >>In article <3F7CE3E2.B772E342@mindspring.com>,
> >> "C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> So are conservatives -- telling people what kind of --- to have, what
> >>genders
> >>>> can marry, what a woman can do with her body, etc.
> >>>
> >>>It is not just conservatives who oppose the redefinition of "marriage."
> >>>Any reasonable person should oppose this sort of reckless redefinition
> >>>of a long established legal / social / religious institution. If same
> >>>--- couples want to form a long term commitment to each other, I think
> >>>that is fine. If they feel they need a governmental sanction to this
> >>>commitment, then pass a law that creates a new class of civil union. But
> >>>trying to call this a "marriage" is an insult to millions of American
> >>>and serves no useful purpose.
> >>>
> >>
> >>But why should government institutionalize discrimination? OK, no religion
> >>should be required to perform or recognize a marriage not in keeping with
> its
> >>creed (doesn't the catholic church not recognize marriages by divorced
> >>people?), but why should government discriminate?
> >>
> >>>Ed
> >
> >The government discriminates all the time:
> >Affirmative action.
>
> You probably thought segregation wasn't discrimination though.
>
> >Seperate bathrooms.
>
> Which laws mandate that?
In Massachusetts, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority had to build a
rather expensive toilet for a ----------- employee.
"The $ 8,000 renovation of a former porter's closet at the T's Reservoir carhouse
in January created a separate shower stall, toilet and sink for the -----------
worker, T officials said.
"(The renovation) was done because it's important to ensure a comfortable and
stress-free workplace for all employees and we felt the best course of action was
to provide a third restroom," said MBTA spokesman Joe Pesaturo."
Title: ----------- toilet costs T $ 8G
BOSTON HERALD ; June 6, 2000 Tuesday Pg. 001