Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#5341
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On 1 Dec 2003 09:36:26 -0800, gzuckier@yahoo.com (z) wrote:
>But there are already all those environmental and labor regulations in
>the US, and industry is moving manufacturing, and now serive, overseas
>already. Do you think that this will be speeded up by regulations
>reducing CO2, making 'energy production more streamlined', which is
>just another way to say making energy production more efficient?
>Doesn't making energy production more efficient end up lowering the
>cost of energy?
If "efficiency" were the goal of the regulations, that might be so.
But it isn't, is it?
It just never seems that the pollution regulations result in a more
streamlined energy production, but rather result in expensive add-ons.
Only during upgrades of major plants does the streamlining occur, and
that's strictly on an 'as needed' basis, not by regulation.
And there are precious few new major generating plants being built,
because (surprise!) regulations make them too expensive.
IOW, Yes, new regulations here will indeed speed up the movement of
manufacturing to other countries, where the costs are lower.
And, yes, making energy production more efficient lowers the cost of
power; but governmental regulations are about pollution, not
efficiency.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
>But there are already all those environmental and labor regulations in
>the US, and industry is moving manufacturing, and now serive, overseas
>already. Do you think that this will be speeded up by regulations
>reducing CO2, making 'energy production more streamlined', which is
>just another way to say making energy production more efficient?
>Doesn't making energy production more efficient end up lowering the
>cost of energy?
If "efficiency" were the goal of the regulations, that might be so.
But it isn't, is it?
It just never seems that the pollution regulations result in a more
streamlined energy production, but rather result in expensive add-ons.
Only during upgrades of major plants does the streamlining occur, and
that's strictly on an 'as needed' basis, not by regulation.
And there are precious few new major generating plants being built,
because (surprise!) regulations make them too expensive.
IOW, Yes, new regulations here will indeed speed up the movement of
manufacturing to other countries, where the costs are lower.
And, yes, making energy production more efficient lowers the cost of
power; but governmental regulations are about pollution, not
efficiency.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#5342
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message news:<SNLyb.60941$t01.26184@twister.socal.rr.com>. ..
> "z" <gzuckier@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b5b4685f.0312010806.78d80d53@posting.google.c om...
> > "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:<bqbpqa021gd@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > > > I'd rather take my chances with global warming rather than turn
> control
> > > over to the wackos who have grabbed onto the global warming scenario as
> a
> > > way to force the implementation of their ideas of how I should live. If
> > > global warming wasn't
> > > available, the wackos would have to create it, or something else like it
> so
> > > they can have an excuse for forcing the implementation of their ideas.>
> > >
> > > Bravo, Ed! These people are attempting to impose their own social
> > > reengineering upon everyone based upon their own crypto-communist
> ideals.
> > > They hate capitalism and the abilities of free peoples to do as they
> choose.
> > > They latched onto this madness when people actually took them seriously
> 30
> > > years ago that a "new ice age" was upon us, when that fell apart they
> > > concocted this latest scam. The more people pillory these arrogant
> bastards
> > > the better off we'll all be.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's a requirement for a grant, like your predecessors here
> > say. You have to say 'and if funded, this project will destroy
> > capitalism and further the crypto-communist agenda, destroying the
> > middle class life style of myself and others like me and my family'.
> > Bravo, you've figured it out. Down with science!!!
>
> This is the strategy of the left. When they find them on the wrong side of
> morality, they redefine morality. Now it's science. If you disagree with
> the "science" of global warming (and the global disaster it leads to) then
> you reject science. Likewise, morality is no longer fidelity, honesty,
> personal responsibility. It's now support for the policies of the left,
> like gay marriage and adopting the Kyoto protocol.
>
> The groups standing behind extreme environmentalists are Socialists and
> Communists. They are idealogical siblings to protect people from "evil
> corporations".
Yes, that makes great sense from the rightwingnut position that
science is that which fights Socialism, Communism, and gay marriage,
all as defined by the rightwingnuts. It all started with that
sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.
> "z" <gzuckier@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b5b4685f.0312010806.78d80d53@posting.google.c om...
> > "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:<bqbpqa021gd@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > > > I'd rather take my chances with global warming rather than turn
> control
> > > over to the wackos who have grabbed onto the global warming scenario as
> a
> > > way to force the implementation of their ideas of how I should live. If
> > > global warming wasn't
> > > available, the wackos would have to create it, or something else like it
> so
> > > they can have an excuse for forcing the implementation of their ideas.>
> > >
> > > Bravo, Ed! These people are attempting to impose their own social
> > > reengineering upon everyone based upon their own crypto-communist
> ideals.
> > > They hate capitalism and the abilities of free peoples to do as they
> choose.
> > > They latched onto this madness when people actually took them seriously
> 30
> > > years ago that a "new ice age" was upon us, when that fell apart they
> > > concocted this latest scam. The more people pillory these arrogant
> bastards
> > > the better off we'll all be.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's a requirement for a grant, like your predecessors here
> > say. You have to say 'and if funded, this project will destroy
> > capitalism and further the crypto-communist agenda, destroying the
> > middle class life style of myself and others like me and my family'.
> > Bravo, you've figured it out. Down with science!!!
>
> This is the strategy of the left. When they find them on the wrong side of
> morality, they redefine morality. Now it's science. If you disagree with
> the "science" of global warming (and the global disaster it leads to) then
> you reject science. Likewise, morality is no longer fidelity, honesty,
> personal responsibility. It's now support for the policies of the left,
> like gay marriage and adopting the Kyoto protocol.
>
> The groups standing behind extreme environmentalists are Socialists and
> Communists. They are idealogical siblings to protect people from "evil
> corporations".
Yes, that makes great sense from the rightwingnut position that
science is that which fights Socialism, Communism, and gay marriage,
all as defined by the rightwingnuts. It all started with that
sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.
#5343
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message news:<SNLyb.60941$t01.26184@twister.socal.rr.com>. ..
> "z" <gzuckier@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b5b4685f.0312010806.78d80d53@posting.google.c om...
> > "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:<bqbpqa021gd@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > > > I'd rather take my chances with global warming rather than turn
> control
> > > over to the wackos who have grabbed onto the global warming scenario as
> a
> > > way to force the implementation of their ideas of how I should live. If
> > > global warming wasn't
> > > available, the wackos would have to create it, or something else like it
> so
> > > they can have an excuse for forcing the implementation of their ideas.>
> > >
> > > Bravo, Ed! These people are attempting to impose their own social
> > > reengineering upon everyone based upon their own crypto-communist
> ideals.
> > > They hate capitalism and the abilities of free peoples to do as they
> choose.
> > > They latched onto this madness when people actually took them seriously
> 30
> > > years ago that a "new ice age" was upon us, when that fell apart they
> > > concocted this latest scam. The more people pillory these arrogant
> bastards
> > > the better off we'll all be.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's a requirement for a grant, like your predecessors here
> > say. You have to say 'and if funded, this project will destroy
> > capitalism and further the crypto-communist agenda, destroying the
> > middle class life style of myself and others like me and my family'.
> > Bravo, you've figured it out. Down with science!!!
>
> This is the strategy of the left. When they find them on the wrong side of
> morality, they redefine morality. Now it's science. If you disagree with
> the "science" of global warming (and the global disaster it leads to) then
> you reject science. Likewise, morality is no longer fidelity, honesty,
> personal responsibility. It's now support for the policies of the left,
> like gay marriage and adopting the Kyoto protocol.
>
> The groups standing behind extreme environmentalists are Socialists and
> Communists. They are idealogical siblings to protect people from "evil
> corporations".
Yes, that makes great sense from the rightwingnut position that
science is that which fights Socialism, Communism, and gay marriage,
all as defined by the rightwingnuts. It all started with that
sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.
> "z" <gzuckier@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b5b4685f.0312010806.78d80d53@posting.google.c om...
> > "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:<bqbpqa021gd@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > > > I'd rather take my chances with global warming rather than turn
> control
> > > over to the wackos who have grabbed onto the global warming scenario as
> a
> > > way to force the implementation of their ideas of how I should live. If
> > > global warming wasn't
> > > available, the wackos would have to create it, or something else like it
> so
> > > they can have an excuse for forcing the implementation of their ideas.>
> > >
> > > Bravo, Ed! These people are attempting to impose their own social
> > > reengineering upon everyone based upon their own crypto-communist
> ideals.
> > > They hate capitalism and the abilities of free peoples to do as they
> choose.
> > > They latched onto this madness when people actually took them seriously
> 30
> > > years ago that a "new ice age" was upon us, when that fell apart they
> > > concocted this latest scam. The more people pillory these arrogant
> bastards
> > > the better off we'll all be.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's a requirement for a grant, like your predecessors here
> > say. You have to say 'and if funded, this project will destroy
> > capitalism and further the crypto-communist agenda, destroying the
> > middle class life style of myself and others like me and my family'.
> > Bravo, you've figured it out. Down with science!!!
>
> This is the strategy of the left. When they find them on the wrong side of
> morality, they redefine morality. Now it's science. If you disagree with
> the "science" of global warming (and the global disaster it leads to) then
> you reject science. Likewise, morality is no longer fidelity, honesty,
> personal responsibility. It's now support for the policies of the left,
> like gay marriage and adopting the Kyoto protocol.
>
> The groups standing behind extreme environmentalists are Socialists and
> Communists. They are idealogical siblings to protect people from "evil
> corporations".
Yes, that makes great sense from the rightwingnut position that
science is that which fights Socialism, Communism, and gay marriage,
all as defined by the rightwingnuts. It all started with that
sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.
#5344
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote in message news:<SNLyb.60941$t01.26184@twister.socal.rr.com>. ..
> "z" <gzuckier@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b5b4685f.0312010806.78d80d53@posting.google.c om...
> > "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:<bqbpqa021gd@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > > > I'd rather take my chances with global warming rather than turn
> control
> > > over to the wackos who have grabbed onto the global warming scenario as
> a
> > > way to force the implementation of their ideas of how I should live. If
> > > global warming wasn't
> > > available, the wackos would have to create it, or something else like it
> so
> > > they can have an excuse for forcing the implementation of their ideas.>
> > >
> > > Bravo, Ed! These people are attempting to impose their own social
> > > reengineering upon everyone based upon their own crypto-communist
> ideals.
> > > They hate capitalism and the abilities of free peoples to do as they
> choose.
> > > They latched onto this madness when people actually took them seriously
> 30
> > > years ago that a "new ice age" was upon us, when that fell apart they
> > > concocted this latest scam. The more people pillory these arrogant
> bastards
> > > the better off we'll all be.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's a requirement for a grant, like your predecessors here
> > say. You have to say 'and if funded, this project will destroy
> > capitalism and further the crypto-communist agenda, destroying the
> > middle class life style of myself and others like me and my family'.
> > Bravo, you've figured it out. Down with science!!!
>
> This is the strategy of the left. When they find them on the wrong side of
> morality, they redefine morality. Now it's science. If you disagree with
> the "science" of global warming (and the global disaster it leads to) then
> you reject science. Likewise, morality is no longer fidelity, honesty,
> personal responsibility. It's now support for the policies of the left,
> like gay marriage and adopting the Kyoto protocol.
>
> The groups standing behind extreme environmentalists are Socialists and
> Communists. They are idealogical siblings to protect people from "evil
> corporations".
Yes, that makes great sense from the rightwingnut position that
science is that which fights Socialism, Communism, and gay marriage,
all as defined by the rightwingnuts. It all started with that
sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.
> "z" <gzuckier@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:b5b4685f.0312010806.78d80d53@posting.google.c om...
> > "Jerry McG" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:<bqbpqa021gd@enews2.newsguy.com>...
> > > > I'd rather take my chances with global warming rather than turn
> control
> > > over to the wackos who have grabbed onto the global warming scenario as
> a
> > > way to force the implementation of their ideas of how I should live. If
> > > global warming wasn't
> > > available, the wackos would have to create it, or something else like it
> so
> > > they can have an excuse for forcing the implementation of their ideas.>
> > >
> > > Bravo, Ed! These people are attempting to impose their own social
> > > reengineering upon everyone based upon their own crypto-communist
> ideals.
> > > They hate capitalism and the abilities of free peoples to do as they
> choose.
> > > They latched onto this madness when people actually took them seriously
> 30
> > > years ago that a "new ice age" was upon us, when that fell apart they
> > > concocted this latest scam. The more people pillory these arrogant
> bastards
> > > the better off we'll all be.
> >
> >
> > Yeah, that's a requirement for a grant, like your predecessors here
> > say. You have to say 'and if funded, this project will destroy
> > capitalism and further the crypto-communist agenda, destroying the
> > middle class life style of myself and others like me and my family'.
> > Bravo, you've figured it out. Down with science!!!
>
> This is the strategy of the left. When they find them on the wrong side of
> morality, they redefine morality. Now it's science. If you disagree with
> the "science" of global warming (and the global disaster it leads to) then
> you reject science. Likewise, morality is no longer fidelity, honesty,
> personal responsibility. It's now support for the policies of the left,
> like gay marriage and adopting the Kyoto protocol.
>
> The groups standing behind extreme environmentalists are Socialists and
> Communists. They are idealogical siblings to protect people from "evil
> corporations".
Yes, that makes great sense from the rightwingnut position that
science is that which fights Socialism, Communism, and gay marriage,
all as defined by the rightwingnuts. It all started with that
sonofabitch Galileo and his immoral socialist assertion that the sun
did not revolve around the earth, as the bible clearly states.
#5345
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:38:54 GMT, tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P)
wrote:
>Another invalid arguement. The foreign automakers building plants in
>the USA are from Germany and Japan. Other nations with similiar labor
>and environmental regulations. The USA competes on an near equal footing
>with those nations with regards to factory locations. The nature of
>the product demands it be built in a developed nation, and since the
>USA is the largest market for that product, it makes economic sense
>to locate the plant here. But, if china can ever be trusted to build
>cars and the savings were greater than the shipping costs and taxes
>well expect that production to move there too.
Something that's really interesting is that one of the reasons those
car makers are moving production here is because it's cheaper to hire
US workers than it is to hire the workers in their own countries.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>Another invalid arguement. The foreign automakers building plants in
>the USA are from Germany and Japan. Other nations with similiar labor
>and environmental regulations. The USA competes on an near equal footing
>with those nations with regards to factory locations. The nature of
>the product demands it be built in a developed nation, and since the
>USA is the largest market for that product, it makes economic sense
>to locate the plant here. But, if china can ever be trusted to build
>cars and the savings were greater than the shipping costs and taxes
>well expect that production to move there too.
Something that's really interesting is that one of the reasons those
car makers are moving production here is because it's cheaper to hire
US workers than it is to hire the workers in their own countries.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#5346
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:38:54 GMT, tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P)
wrote:
>Another invalid arguement. The foreign automakers building plants in
>the USA are from Germany and Japan. Other nations with similiar labor
>and environmental regulations. The USA competes on an near equal footing
>with those nations with regards to factory locations. The nature of
>the product demands it be built in a developed nation, and since the
>USA is the largest market for that product, it makes economic sense
>to locate the plant here. But, if china can ever be trusted to build
>cars and the savings were greater than the shipping costs and taxes
>well expect that production to move there too.
Something that's really interesting is that one of the reasons those
car makers are moving production here is because it's cheaper to hire
US workers than it is to hire the workers in their own countries.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>Another invalid arguement. The foreign automakers building plants in
>the USA are from Germany and Japan. Other nations with similiar labor
>and environmental regulations. The USA competes on an near equal footing
>with those nations with regards to factory locations. The nature of
>the product demands it be built in a developed nation, and since the
>USA is the largest market for that product, it makes economic sense
>to locate the plant here. But, if china can ever be trusted to build
>cars and the savings were greater than the shipping costs and taxes
>well expect that production to move there too.
Something that's really interesting is that one of the reasons those
car makers are moving production here is because it's cheaper to hire
US workers than it is to hire the workers in their own countries.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#5347
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 17:38:54 GMT, tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P)
wrote:
>Another invalid arguement. The foreign automakers building plants in
>the USA are from Germany and Japan. Other nations with similiar labor
>and environmental regulations. The USA competes on an near equal footing
>with those nations with regards to factory locations. The nature of
>the product demands it be built in a developed nation, and since the
>USA is the largest market for that product, it makes economic sense
>to locate the plant here. But, if china can ever be trusted to build
>cars and the savings were greater than the shipping costs and taxes
>well expect that production to move there too.
Something that's really interesting is that one of the reasons those
car makers are moving production here is because it's cheaper to hire
US workers than it is to hire the workers in their own countries.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>Another invalid arguement. The foreign automakers building plants in
>the USA are from Germany and Japan. Other nations with similiar labor
>and environmental regulations. The USA competes on an near equal footing
>with those nations with regards to factory locations. The nature of
>the product demands it be built in a developed nation, and since the
>USA is the largest market for that product, it makes economic sense
>to locate the plant here. But, if china can ever be trusted to build
>cars and the savings were greater than the shipping costs and taxes
>well expect that production to move there too.
Something that's really interesting is that one of the reasons those
car makers are moving production here is because it's cheaper to hire
US workers than it is to hire the workers in their own countries.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#5348
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
news:4tgpsv0qjj3fk9mq5t2goiuibmpnu8k64r@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:17:32 GMT, "David J. Allen"
> <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >Reminds me of my experience in a country a few years ago that had "free"
> >(i.e., rationed) medical care for all. The demand for care outstripped
the
> >supply and the only people who got decent medical care were the people
with
> >money, who could pay for a private doctor. Everyone else had to go wait
in
> >line at the clinic and hope for decent care.
>
> Well, Hillary's solution would have fixed that; any doctor caught
> giving care outside the approved system would be liable to legal
> prosecution, with penalties including fines, jail time & loss of
> license.
> A true utopia.
Reminds me of how it was in Cambodia as shown in "The Killing Fields". If
you planted a tomato plant in your (well, the governments) yard to feed
yourself and got caught, you'd be punished for enriching yourself.
> >
> >This is the template one could overlay anything. Energy, Healthcare,
Food,
> >etc., etc. Those who support Kyoto are lefties and the farther left you
go,
> >the more strident the support for Kyoto. The "rich" are the ones one
need
> >to be reigned in so the "poor" will have a chance.
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"
#5349
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
news:4tgpsv0qjj3fk9mq5t2goiuibmpnu8k64r@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:17:32 GMT, "David J. Allen"
> <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >Reminds me of my experience in a country a few years ago that had "free"
> >(i.e., rationed) medical care for all. The demand for care outstripped
the
> >supply and the only people who got decent medical care were the people
with
> >money, who could pay for a private doctor. Everyone else had to go wait
in
> >line at the clinic and hope for decent care.
>
> Well, Hillary's solution would have fixed that; any doctor caught
> giving care outside the approved system would be liable to legal
> prosecution, with penalties including fines, jail time & loss of
> license.
> A true utopia.
Reminds me of how it was in Cambodia as shown in "The Killing Fields". If
you planted a tomato plant in your (well, the governments) yard to feed
yourself and got caught, you'd be punished for enriching yourself.
> >
> >This is the template one could overlay anything. Energy, Healthcare,
Food,
> >etc., etc. Those who support Kyoto are lefties and the farther left you
go,
> >the more strident the support for Kyoto. The "rich" are the ones one
need
> >to be reigned in so the "poor" will have a chance.
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"
#5350
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
news:4tgpsv0qjj3fk9mq5t2goiuibmpnu8k64r@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 02 Dec 2003 05:17:32 GMT, "David J. Allen"
> <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
> >Reminds me of my experience in a country a few years ago that had "free"
> >(i.e., rationed) medical care for all. The demand for care outstripped
the
> >supply and the only people who got decent medical care were the people
with
> >money, who could pay for a private doctor. Everyone else had to go wait
in
> >line at the clinic and hope for decent care.
>
> Well, Hillary's solution would have fixed that; any doctor caught
> giving care outside the approved system would be liable to legal
> prosecution, with penalties including fines, jail time & loss of
> license.
> A true utopia.
Reminds me of how it was in Cambodia as shown in "The Killing Fields". If
you planted a tomato plant in your (well, the governments) yard to feed
yourself and got caught, you'd be punished for enriching yourself.
> >
> >This is the template one could overlay anything. Energy, Healthcare,
Food,
> >etc., etc. Those who support Kyoto are lefties and the farther left you
go,
> >the more strident the support for Kyoto. The "rich" are the ones one
need
> >to be reigned in so the "poor" will have a chance.
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"