Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#4741
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Thu, 20 Nov 03 10:09:08 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>>> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda sources.>
>>
>>As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist press,
>>looney-left websites, etc.?
>>
>>
>No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
The same people who saw a normal hole in the ozone layer, and
proclaimed that the sky was falling.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>>> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda sources.>
>>
>>As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist press,
>>looney-left websites, etc.?
>>
>>
>No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
The same people who saw a normal hole in the ozone layer, and
proclaimed that the sky was falling.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#4742
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:44:38 -0500, "Douglas A. Shrader"
<dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
>news:vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>> > >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
>> sources.>
>> > >
>> > >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
>press,
>> > >looney-left websites, etc.?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>> > National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
>>
>> The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.globalclimate.org/Newsweek.htm
>
> A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic
>and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average
>ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968.
>
>Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery.
>"Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as
>fragmentary as our data," concedes the National Academy of Sciences report.
>"Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many
>cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions."
>
> "The world's food-producing system," warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA's
>Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, "is much more sensitive to
>the weather variable than it was even five years ago." Furthermore, the
>growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it
>impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as
>they did during past famines.
>
> Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
>positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its
>effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed,
>such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or
>diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they
>solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are
>even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of
>introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections
>of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult
>will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim
>reality.
>
That can't be right.
Lloyd says the causes of past ice ages and subsequent warming periods
are well known, and cites the NOAA as authority for this.
Hmmm, the NOAA must be lying, or Lloyd is lying.
Gee, tough choice...
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
<dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
>news:vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>> > >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
>> sources.>
>> > >
>> > >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
>press,
>> > >looney-left websites, etc.?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>> > National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
>>
>> The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.globalclimate.org/Newsweek.htm
>
> A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic
>and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average
>ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968.
>
>Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery.
>"Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as
>fragmentary as our data," concedes the National Academy of Sciences report.
>"Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many
>cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions."
>
> "The world's food-producing system," warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA's
>Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, "is much more sensitive to
>the weather variable than it was even five years ago." Furthermore, the
>growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it
>impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as
>they did during past famines.
>
> Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
>positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its
>effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed,
>such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or
>diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they
>solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are
>even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of
>introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections
>of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult
>will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim
>reality.
>
That can't be right.
Lloyd says the causes of past ice ages and subsequent warming periods
are well known, and cites the NOAA as authority for this.
Hmmm, the NOAA must be lying, or Lloyd is lying.
Gee, tough choice...
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#4743
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:44:38 -0500, "Douglas A. Shrader"
<dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
>news:vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>> > >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
>> sources.>
>> > >
>> > >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
>press,
>> > >looney-left websites, etc.?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>> > National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
>>
>> The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.globalclimate.org/Newsweek.htm
>
> A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic
>and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average
>ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968.
>
>Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery.
>"Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as
>fragmentary as our data," concedes the National Academy of Sciences report.
>"Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many
>cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions."
>
> "The world's food-producing system," warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA's
>Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, "is much more sensitive to
>the weather variable than it was even five years ago." Furthermore, the
>growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it
>impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as
>they did during past famines.
>
> Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
>positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its
>effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed,
>such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or
>diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they
>solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are
>even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of
>introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections
>of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult
>will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim
>reality.
>
That can't be right.
Lloyd says the causes of past ice ages and subsequent warming periods
are well known, and cites the NOAA as authority for this.
Hmmm, the NOAA must be lying, or Lloyd is lying.
Gee, tough choice...
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
<dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
>news:vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>> > >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
>> sources.>
>> > >
>> > >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
>press,
>> > >looney-left websites, etc.?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>> > National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
>>
>> The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.globalclimate.org/Newsweek.htm
>
> A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic
>and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average
>ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968.
>
>Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery.
>"Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as
>fragmentary as our data," concedes the National Academy of Sciences report.
>"Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many
>cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions."
>
> "The world's food-producing system," warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA's
>Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, "is much more sensitive to
>the weather variable than it was even five years ago." Furthermore, the
>growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it
>impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as
>they did during past famines.
>
> Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
>positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its
>effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed,
>such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or
>diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they
>solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are
>even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of
>introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections
>of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult
>will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim
>reality.
>
That can't be right.
Lloyd says the causes of past ice ages and subsequent warming periods
are well known, and cites the NOAA as authority for this.
Hmmm, the NOAA must be lying, or Lloyd is lying.
Gee, tough choice...
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#4744
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 19:44:38 -0500, "Douglas A. Shrader"
<dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
>news:vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>> > >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
>> sources.>
>> > >
>> > >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
>press,
>> > >looney-left websites, etc.?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>> > National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
>>
>> The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.globalclimate.org/Newsweek.htm
>
> A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic
>and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average
>ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968.
>
>Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery.
>"Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as
>fragmentary as our data," concedes the National Academy of Sciences report.
>"Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many
>cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions."
>
> "The world's food-producing system," warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA's
>Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, "is much more sensitive to
>the weather variable than it was even five years ago." Furthermore, the
>growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it
>impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as
>they did during past famines.
>
> Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
>positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its
>effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed,
>such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or
>diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they
>solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are
>even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of
>introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections
>of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult
>will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim
>reality.
>
That can't be right.
Lloyd says the causes of past ice ages and subsequent warming periods
are well known, and cites the NOAA as authority for this.
Hmmm, the NOAA must be lying, or Lloyd is lying.
Gee, tough choice...
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
<dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote in message
>news:vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com...
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
>> > >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
>> sources.>
>> > >
>> > >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
>press,
>> > >looney-left websites, etc.?
>> > >
>> > >
>> > No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
>> > National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
>>
>> The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
>>
>>
>
>http://www.globalclimate.org/Newsweek.htm
>
> A survey completed last year by Dr. Murray Mitchell of the National Oceanic
>and Atmospheric Administration reveals a drop of half a degree in average
>ground temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere between 1945 and 1968.
>
>Just what causes the onset of major and minor ice ages remains a mystery.
>"Our knowledge of the mechanisms of climatic change is at least as
>fragmentary as our data," concedes the National Academy of Sciences report.
>"Not only are the basic scientific questions largely unanswered, but in many
>cases we do not yet know enough to pose the key questions."
>
> "The world's food-producing system," warns Dr. James D. McQuigg of NOAA's
>Center for Climatic and Environmental Assessment, "is much more sensitive to
>the weather variable than it was even five years ago." Furthermore, the
>growth of world population and creation of new national boundaries make it
>impossible for starving peoples to migrate from their devastated fields, as
>they did during past famines.
>
> Climatologists are pessimistic that political leaders will take any
>positive action to compensate for the climatic change, or even to allay its
>effects. They concede that some of the more spectacular solutions proposed,
>such as melting the Arctic ice cap by covering it with black soot or
>diverting arctic rivers, might create problems far greater than those they
>solve. But the scientists see few signs that government leaders anywhere are
>even prepared to take the simple measures of stockpiling food or of
>introducing the variables of climatic uncertainty into economic projections
>of future food supplies. The longer the planners delay, the more difficult
>will they find it to cope with climatic change once the results become grim
>reality.
>
That can't be right.
Lloyd says the causes of past ice ages and subsequent warming periods
are well known, and cites the NOAA as authority for this.
Hmmm, the NOAA must be lying, or Lloyd is lying.
Gee, tough choice...
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#4745
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ICE AGE? (was Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpldf2$njr$19@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vrqjhih3n6k752@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bpinaa$rom$23@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> >> >documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal
fluctuations
> >in
> >> >climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will
refute
> >> >anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities
as
> >an
> >> >explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> No, we look to science -- peer-reviewed scientific journals, groups
like
> >EPA,
> >> NASA, NOAA, etc. We don't just call people who disagree "socialists"
like
> >> some little child.
> >
> >You insult anyone who disagrees with you.
> >Those sites you quote said we were heading into another ice age in 1975,
>
>
> They did not.
They did to. That article names names Lloyd, NOAA, National Academy of
Science, they said it, your lies can't change it. You are wrong, you are
always wrong.
No scientific publication or group said that. Some "popular"
> press magazines, like Popular Science, are the only places you will find
that.
> Someone on sci.environment has a standing challenge for anyone to find a
> scientific journal that made that claim. No one has.
>
>
> > and
> >urged immediate action to warm up the climate before millions of people
> >starved to death.
> >Why are they more believable now?
> >
> >
> >
#4746
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ICE AGE? (was Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpldf2$njr$19@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vrqjhih3n6k752@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bpinaa$rom$23@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> >> >documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal
fluctuations
> >in
> >> >climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will
refute
> >> >anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities
as
> >an
> >> >explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> No, we look to science -- peer-reviewed scientific journals, groups
like
> >EPA,
> >> NASA, NOAA, etc. We don't just call people who disagree "socialists"
like
> >> some little child.
> >
> >You insult anyone who disagrees with you.
> >Those sites you quote said we were heading into another ice age in 1975,
>
>
> They did not.
They did to. That article names names Lloyd, NOAA, National Academy of
Science, they said it, your lies can't change it. You are wrong, you are
always wrong.
No scientific publication or group said that. Some "popular"
> press magazines, like Popular Science, are the only places you will find
that.
> Someone on sci.environment has a standing challenge for anyone to find a
> scientific journal that made that claim. No one has.
>
>
> > and
> >urged immediate action to warm up the climate before millions of people
> >starved to death.
> >Why are they more believable now?
> >
> >
> >
#4747
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: ICE AGE? (was Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpldf2$njr$19@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vrqjhih3n6k752@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bpinaa$rom$23@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bpgviq081a@enews4.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >Nice selection of studies. Unfortunately, rather than accept the well
> >> >documented and monumental forces of nature to explain normal
fluctuations
> >in
> >> >climate and temperature, socialist green gas (bag) theorists will
refute
> >> >anything other than "destructive Co2 emissions" from human activities
as
> >an
> >> >explanation for their totally unproven theories of global warming.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> No, we look to science -- peer-reviewed scientific journals, groups
like
> >EPA,
> >> NASA, NOAA, etc. We don't just call people who disagree "socialists"
like
> >> some little child.
> >
> >You insult anyone who disagrees with you.
> >Those sites you quote said we were heading into another ice age in 1975,
>
>
> They did not.
They did to. That article names names Lloyd, NOAA, National Academy of
Science, they said it, your lies can't change it. You are wrong, you are
always wrong.
No scientific publication or group said that. Some "popular"
> press magazines, like Popular Science, are the only places you will find
that.
> Someone on sci.environment has a standing challenge for anyone to find a
> scientific journal that made that claim. No one has.
>
>
> > and
> >urged immediate action to warm up the climate before millions of people
> >starved to death.
> >Why are they more believable now?
> >
> >
> >
#4748
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpldff$njr$20@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
> >sources.>
> >> >
> >> >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
press,
> >> >looney-left websites, etc.?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
> >> National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
> >
> >The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
> >
> >
> Lie. No group said that.
NOAA did, National Academy of Science did. Come on Lloyd, grow up and admit
you're wrong, it won't kill you. No one believes you, you are incapable of
telling the truth. Prove me wrong, admit you are wrong for once.
#4749
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpldff$njr$20@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
> >sources.>
> >> >
> >> >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
press,
> >> >looney-left websites, etc.?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
> >> National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
> >
> >The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
> >
> >
> Lie. No group said that.
NOAA did, National Academy of Science did. Come on Lloyd, grow up and admit
you're wrong, it won't kill you. No one believes you, you are incapable of
telling the truth. Prove me wrong, admit you are wrong for once.
#4750
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bpldff$njr$20@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <vrqjn514krhf8b@corp.supernews.com>,
> "The Ancient One" <onlytheone@thetopknows.com> wrote:
> >
> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> >news:bpild2$rom$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> >> In article <bpg9t30i20@enews2.newsguy.com>,
> >> "Jerry McGeorge" <gmcgeorge.REMOVE@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> >> I wish you wouldn't get your "facts" from right-wing propaganda
> >sources.>
> >> >
> >> >As opposed to what, your lefty friends in academia, the socialist
press,
> >> >looney-left websites, etc.?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> No, peer-reviewed scientific journals and groups like NASA, NOAA, EPA,
> >> National Aacdemy of Sciences, etc.
> >
> >The same groups that claimed we were heading into a new ice age in 1975.
> >
> >
> Lie. No group said that.
NOAA did, National Academy of Science did. Come on Lloyd, grow up and admit
you're wrong, it won't kill you. No one believes you, you are incapable of
telling the truth. Prove me wrong, admit you are wrong for once.