Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#4331
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"They hope we can't read or add & subtract."
Which is why they keep the government schools so bad.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bor0l90m9p@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > >That tax increases hurt economies is an observed fact.<<
>
> > Then why is it so hotly debated? <
>
> It is only "hotly debated" beccause the Leftists must have massive &
> continual revenue stream increases to fund their plans for ever increasing
> government & its attendant patronage. They must therefore attempt to fool
> the public into thinking "the rich" need to be taxed more & more. Any
review
> of tax codes shows "the rich" turn out to be anyone making more than $50k
a
> year, with the threshold creeping lower year on year.
>
> Democrats plan for and try to perpetuate public ignorance on this subject.
> Yesterday it was reported that Bills put forward by the Democrats just
this
> this year, if enacted, would total nearly $450 billion vs. roughly 36 b by
> the Republicans. Further, cost for Democratic proposals when totalled over
> the next ten years would increased the defict nearly tenfold over their
own
> deficit figures from the "evil Bush tax cuts". They hope we can't read or
> add & subtract. They also hope we forget that they voted for them. Once
> again, Democrats represent the epitome of irresponsibility, lies and
> hypocrisy.
>
>
Which is why they keep the government schools so bad.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bor0l90m9p@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > >That tax increases hurt economies is an observed fact.<<
>
> > Then why is it so hotly debated? <
>
> It is only "hotly debated" beccause the Leftists must have massive &
> continual revenue stream increases to fund their plans for ever increasing
> government & its attendant patronage. They must therefore attempt to fool
> the public into thinking "the rich" need to be taxed more & more. Any
review
> of tax codes shows "the rich" turn out to be anyone making more than $50k
a
> year, with the threshold creeping lower year on year.
>
> Democrats plan for and try to perpetuate public ignorance on this subject.
> Yesterday it was reported that Bills put forward by the Democrats just
this
> this year, if enacted, would total nearly $450 billion vs. roughly 36 b by
> the Republicans. Further, cost for Democratic proposals when totalled over
> the next ten years would increased the defict nearly tenfold over their
own
> deficit figures from the "evil Bush tax cuts". They hope we can't read or
> add & subtract. They also hope we forget that they voted for them. Once
> again, Democrats represent the epitome of irresponsibility, lies and
> hypocrisy.
>
>
#4332
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"They hope we can't read or add & subtract."
Which is why they keep the government schools so bad.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bor0l90m9p@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > >That tax increases hurt economies is an observed fact.<<
>
> > Then why is it so hotly debated? <
>
> It is only "hotly debated" beccause the Leftists must have massive &
> continual revenue stream increases to fund their plans for ever increasing
> government & its attendant patronage. They must therefore attempt to fool
> the public into thinking "the rich" need to be taxed more & more. Any
review
> of tax codes shows "the rich" turn out to be anyone making more than $50k
a
> year, with the threshold creeping lower year on year.
>
> Democrats plan for and try to perpetuate public ignorance on this subject.
> Yesterday it was reported that Bills put forward by the Democrats just
this
> this year, if enacted, would total nearly $450 billion vs. roughly 36 b by
> the Republicans. Further, cost for Democratic proposals when totalled over
> the next ten years would increased the defict nearly tenfold over their
own
> deficit figures from the "evil Bush tax cuts". They hope we can't read or
> add & subtract. They also hope we forget that they voted for them. Once
> again, Democrats represent the epitome of irresponsibility, lies and
> hypocrisy.
>
>
Which is why they keep the government schools so bad.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bor0l90m9p@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > >That tax increases hurt economies is an observed fact.<<
>
> > Then why is it so hotly debated? <
>
> It is only "hotly debated" beccause the Leftists must have massive &
> continual revenue stream increases to fund their plans for ever increasing
> government & its attendant patronage. They must therefore attempt to fool
> the public into thinking "the rich" need to be taxed more & more. Any
review
> of tax codes shows "the rich" turn out to be anyone making more than $50k
a
> year, with the threshold creeping lower year on year.
>
> Democrats plan for and try to perpetuate public ignorance on this subject.
> Yesterday it was reported that Bills put forward by the Democrats just
this
> this year, if enacted, would total nearly $450 billion vs. roughly 36 b by
> the Republicans. Further, cost for Democratic proposals when totalled over
> the next ten years would increased the defict nearly tenfold over their
own
> deficit figures from the "evil Bush tax cuts". They hope we can't read or
> add & subtract. They also hope we forget that they voted for them. Once
> again, Democrats represent the epitome of irresponsibility, lies and
> hypocrisy.
>
>
#4333
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"They hope we can't read or add & subtract."
Which is why they keep the government schools so bad.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bor0l90m9p@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > >That tax increases hurt economies is an observed fact.<<
>
> > Then why is it so hotly debated? <
>
> It is only "hotly debated" beccause the Leftists must have massive &
> continual revenue stream increases to fund their plans for ever increasing
> government & its attendant patronage. They must therefore attempt to fool
> the public into thinking "the rich" need to be taxed more & more. Any
review
> of tax codes shows "the rich" turn out to be anyone making more than $50k
a
> year, with the threshold creeping lower year on year.
>
> Democrats plan for and try to perpetuate public ignorance on this subject.
> Yesterday it was reported that Bills put forward by the Democrats just
this
> this year, if enacted, would total nearly $450 billion vs. roughly 36 b by
> the Republicans. Further, cost for Democratic proposals when totalled over
> the next ten years would increased the defict nearly tenfold over their
own
> deficit figures from the "evil Bush tax cuts". They hope we can't read or
> add & subtract. They also hope we forget that they voted for them. Once
> again, Democrats represent the epitome of irresponsibility, lies and
> hypocrisy.
>
>
Which is why they keep the government schools so bad.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote in message
news:bor0l90m9p@enews3.newsguy.com...
> > >That tax increases hurt economies is an observed fact.<<
>
> > Then why is it so hotly debated? <
>
> It is only "hotly debated" beccause the Leftists must have massive &
> continual revenue stream increases to fund their plans for ever increasing
> government & its attendant patronage. They must therefore attempt to fool
> the public into thinking "the rich" need to be taxed more & more. Any
review
> of tax codes shows "the rich" turn out to be anyone making more than $50k
a
> year, with the threshold creeping lower year on year.
>
> Democrats plan for and try to perpetuate public ignorance on this subject.
> Yesterday it was reported that Bills put forward by the Democrats just
this
> this year, if enacted, would total nearly $450 billion vs. roughly 36 b by
> the Republicans. Further, cost for Democratic proposals when totalled over
> the next ten years would increased the defict nearly tenfold over their
own
> deficit figures from the "evil Bush tax cuts". They hope we can't read or
> add & subtract. They also hope we forget that they voted for them. Once
> again, Democrats represent the epitome of irresponsibility, lies and
> hypocrisy.
>
>
#4334
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
>> "They hope we can't read or add & subtract." <<
> Which is why they keep the government schools so bad. <
Indeed, they've made teacher tenure & benefits more important than learning,
accountability for student peroformance is "unfair" to the Liberal teacher's
unions, etc. Then they one one hand join in the President's "No Child Left
Behind" plan, but trash the entire program publiclly because they don't get
egrtegious financial increases, instead they're asked to be responsible.
Again, more lies & hypocrisy from your Democrat leaders. (This time from Ted
"Hey, Can't You Swim??!! Kennedy.)
Public education has become, not a venue for learning, but instead a means
of Socialist indoctrination. (This is from an ex-teacher, by ther way, who
quit in disgust.)
> Which is why they keep the government schools so bad. <
Indeed, they've made teacher tenure & benefits more important than learning,
accountability for student peroformance is "unfair" to the Liberal teacher's
unions, etc. Then they one one hand join in the President's "No Child Left
Behind" plan, but trash the entire program publiclly because they don't get
egrtegious financial increases, instead they're asked to be responsible.
Again, more lies & hypocrisy from your Democrat leaders. (This time from Ted
"Hey, Can't You Swim??!! Kennedy.)
Public education has become, not a venue for learning, but instead a means
of Socialist indoctrination. (This is from an ex-teacher, by ther way, who
quit in disgust.)
#4335
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
>> "They hope we can't read or add & subtract." <<
> Which is why they keep the government schools so bad. <
Indeed, they've made teacher tenure & benefits more important than learning,
accountability for student peroformance is "unfair" to the Liberal teacher's
unions, etc. Then they one one hand join in the President's "No Child Left
Behind" plan, but trash the entire program publiclly because they don't get
egrtegious financial increases, instead they're asked to be responsible.
Again, more lies & hypocrisy from your Democrat leaders. (This time from Ted
"Hey, Can't You Swim??!! Kennedy.)
Public education has become, not a venue for learning, but instead a means
of Socialist indoctrination. (This is from an ex-teacher, by ther way, who
quit in disgust.)
> Which is why they keep the government schools so bad. <
Indeed, they've made teacher tenure & benefits more important than learning,
accountability for student peroformance is "unfair" to the Liberal teacher's
unions, etc. Then they one one hand join in the President's "No Child Left
Behind" plan, but trash the entire program publiclly because they don't get
egrtegious financial increases, instead they're asked to be responsible.
Again, more lies & hypocrisy from your Democrat leaders. (This time from Ted
"Hey, Can't You Swim??!! Kennedy.)
Public education has become, not a venue for learning, but instead a means
of Socialist indoctrination. (This is from an ex-teacher, by ther way, who
quit in disgust.)
#4336
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
>> "They hope we can't read or add & subtract." <<
> Which is why they keep the government schools so bad. <
Indeed, they've made teacher tenure & benefits more important than learning,
accountability for student peroformance is "unfair" to the Liberal teacher's
unions, etc. Then they one one hand join in the President's "No Child Left
Behind" plan, but trash the entire program publiclly because they don't get
egrtegious financial increases, instead they're asked to be responsible.
Again, more lies & hypocrisy from your Democrat leaders. (This time from Ted
"Hey, Can't You Swim??!! Kennedy.)
Public education has become, not a venue for learning, but instead a means
of Socialist indoctrination. (This is from an ex-teacher, by ther way, who
quit in disgust.)
> Which is why they keep the government schools so bad. <
Indeed, they've made teacher tenure & benefits more important than learning,
accountability for student peroformance is "unfair" to the Liberal teacher's
unions, etc. Then they one one hand join in the President's "No Child Left
Behind" plan, but trash the entire program publiclly because they don't get
egrtegious financial increases, instead they're asked to be responsible.
Again, more lies & hypocrisy from your Democrat leaders. (This time from Ted
"Hey, Can't You Swim??!! Kennedy.)
Public education has become, not a venue for learning, but instead a means
of Socialist indoctrination. (This is from an ex-teacher, by ther way, who
quit in disgust.)
#4337
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can bemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <bc01rvo1ccrj1brkg41b38p5ejoa4ef2n6@4ax.com>,
Marc <whineryy@yifan.net> wrote:
>russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>I live in a state that has no income or sales taxes and pays over $1000 per
>year back to residents.
Yes, but they (or rather WE, as there's massive federal subsidies
there) have to pay people that much just to live to the north of
nowhere.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
Marc <whineryy@yifan.net> wrote:
>russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>I live in a state that has no income or sales taxes and pays over $1000 per
>year back to residents.
Yes, but they (or rather WE, as there's massive federal subsidies
there) have to pay people that much just to live to the north of
nowhere.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
#4338
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can bemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <bc01rvo1ccrj1brkg41b38p5ejoa4ef2n6@4ax.com>,
Marc <whineryy@yifan.net> wrote:
>russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>I live in a state that has no income or sales taxes and pays over $1000 per
>year back to residents.
Yes, but they (or rather WE, as there's massive federal subsidies
there) have to pay people that much just to live to the north of
nowhere.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
Marc <whineryy@yifan.net> wrote:
>russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>I live in a state that has no income or sales taxes and pays over $1000 per
>year back to residents.
Yes, but they (or rather WE, as there's massive federal subsidies
there) have to pay people that much just to live to the north of
nowhere.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
#4339
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can bemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <bc01rvo1ccrj1brkg41b38p5ejoa4ef2n6@4ax.com>,
Marc <whineryy@yifan.net> wrote:
>russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>I live in a state that has no income or sales taxes and pays over $1000 per
>year back to residents.
Yes, but they (or rather WE, as there's massive federal subsidies
there) have to pay people that much just to live to the north of
nowhere.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
Marc <whineryy@yifan.net> wrote:
>russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>
>I live in a state that has no income or sales taxes and pays over $1000 per
>year back to residents.
Yes, but they (or rather WE, as there's massive federal subsidies
there) have to pay people that much just to live to the north of
nowhere.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
#4340
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can bemisinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Marc" <whineryy@yifan.net> wrote in message
news:bc01rvo1ccrj1brkg41b38p5ejoa4ef2n6@4ax.com...
> russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
> >In article <boojos$dmh$9@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
> >Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
> >>In article <8a5tqvsnv70r2vv63ljkja40g619efvpc2@4ax.com>,
> >> DTJ <dtj@comcast.net> wrote:
> >>>On Sat, 8 Nov 2003 20:26:51 -0700, "Gerald G. McGeorge"
> >>><gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>> Sorry, I forgot that using my brain is against everything liberals
stand
> >>>>for.<
> >>>>
> >>>>That's right, you just stop thinking and let them make all the
decisions for
> >>>>you, meanwhile be sure and let them have 50% of your wages and shut
up! They
> >>>>know far better than you how it should be spent...
> >>>
> >>>50%? You have to be really poor to pay that small of a tax rate!
> >>What an idiot. Effective tax rate on the middle class is around 25%,
> >>including federal and state income, sales, gas, social security, and
property.
> >
> >Maybe if you live in a state with no income or sales tax. The average
> >Marylander, for instance, is paying 8% in income and 5% in sales in
> >state taxes alone.
>
> I live in a state that has no income or sales taxes and pays over $1000
per
> year back to residents.
>
> But then, I live in the least populous state.
The least populous state is Wyoming, which I thought had no income tax but
did have a sales tax. If you live there though I will accept your word on
it./
>
> Marc
> For email, remove the first "y" of "whineryy"