Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#4251
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 10 Nov 03 13:03:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>The fact is that while greenhouse gas emissions may affect the rate of
>>change, one does not know if it will increase or decrease that rate,
>
>Yes one does. Just as adding acid to water will lower the pH, adding a gas
>which traps heat will heat up the atmosphere.
Thanks for admitting I am right. Since the Earth is cooling, adding
CO2 will result in a slowing of the rate of change.
wrote:
>>The fact is that while greenhouse gas emissions may affect the rate of
>>change, one does not know if it will increase or decrease that rate,
>
>Yes one does. Just as adding acid to water will lower the pH, adding a gas
>which traps heat will heat up the atmosphere.
Thanks for admitting I am right. Since the Earth is cooling, adding
CO2 will result in a slowing of the rate of change.
#4252
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 10 Nov 03 13:03:53 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>The fact is that while greenhouse gas emissions may affect the rate of
>>change, one does not know if it will increase or decrease that rate,
>
>Yes one does. Just as adding acid to water will lower the pH, adding a gas
>which traps heat will heat up the atmosphere.
Thanks for admitting I am right. Since the Earth is cooling, adding
CO2 will result in a slowing of the rate of change.
wrote:
>>The fact is that while greenhouse gas emissions may affect the rate of
>>change, one does not know if it will increase or decrease that rate,
>
>Yes one does. Just as adding acid to water will lower the pH, adding a gas
>which traps heat will heat up the atmosphere.
Thanks for admitting I am right. Since the Earth is cooling, adding
CO2 will result in a slowing of the rate of change.
#4253
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 10 Nov 03 13:06:50 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>If CO2 is really a problem, then it should be considered on a per
>>product manufactured, per unit of fuel consumed, etc basis. Not a
>>which-country-emits-it basis.
>
>Exactly. You should look at the CO2 per person, not per country. Agreed?
Your logic is amazingly lacking. There is no correlation between
production and population.
wrote:
>>If CO2 is really a problem, then it should be considered on a per
>>product manufactured, per unit of fuel consumed, etc basis. Not a
>>which-country-emits-it basis.
>
>Exactly. You should look at the CO2 per person, not per country. Agreed?
Your logic is amazingly lacking. There is no correlation between
production and population.
#4254
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 10 Nov 03 13:06:50 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>If CO2 is really a problem, then it should be considered on a per
>>product manufactured, per unit of fuel consumed, etc basis. Not a
>>which-country-emits-it basis.
>
>Exactly. You should look at the CO2 per person, not per country. Agreed?
Your logic is amazingly lacking. There is no correlation between
production and population.
wrote:
>>If CO2 is really a problem, then it should be considered on a per
>>product manufactured, per unit of fuel consumed, etc basis. Not a
>>which-country-emits-it basis.
>
>Exactly. You should look at the CO2 per person, not per country. Agreed?
Your logic is amazingly lacking. There is no correlation between
production and population.
#4255
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
On Mon, 10 Nov 03 13:06:50 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>If CO2 is really a problem, then it should be considered on a per
>>product manufactured, per unit of fuel consumed, etc basis. Not a
>>which-country-emits-it basis.
>
>Exactly. You should look at the CO2 per person, not per country. Agreed?
Your logic is amazingly lacking. There is no correlation between
production and population.
wrote:
>>If CO2 is really a problem, then it should be considered on a per
>>product manufactured, per unit of fuel consumed, etc basis. Not a
>>which-country-emits-it basis.
>
>Exactly. You should look at the CO2 per person, not per country. Agreed?
Your logic is amazingly lacking. There is no correlation between
production and population.
#4256
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> In article <3FAF7A28.19E1D5EF@kinez.net>,
> Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >>
> >> ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> >> the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> >> precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> >> people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> >> idiots that won't matter in the long run.
> >
> >The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> >Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> >to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> >debacle is less than 0.1%.
>
> But if Pat Buchanan were to run? If someone reincarnated George Wallace?
> Gee, I bet you'd jump at the chance to vote for them!
And, as usual, you'd be 180% wrong. Besides - I don't believe in
reincarnation. 8^)
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#4257
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> In article <3FAF7A28.19E1D5EF@kinez.net>,
> Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >>
> >> ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> >> the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> >> precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> >> people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> >> idiots that won't matter in the long run.
> >
> >The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> >Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> >to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> >debacle is less than 0.1%.
>
> But if Pat Buchanan were to run? If someone reincarnated George Wallace?
> Gee, I bet you'd jump at the chance to vote for them!
And, as usual, you'd be 180% wrong. Besides - I don't believe in
reincarnation. 8^)
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#4258
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> In article <3FAF7A28.19E1D5EF@kinez.net>,
> Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote:
> >
> >
> >Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >>
> >> ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> >> the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> >> precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> >> people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> >> idiots that won't matter in the long run.
> >
> >The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> >Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> >to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> >debacle is less than 0.1%.
>
> But if Pat Buchanan were to run? If someone reincarnated George Wallace?
> Gee, I bet you'd jump at the chance to vote for them!
And, as usual, you'd be 180% wrong. Besides - I don't believe in
reincarnation. 8^)
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#4259
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"David J. Allen" wrote:
>
> I've always thought this accusation against the US, that it, being a
> minority of the worlds population but uses a majority of the resources and
> produces a majority of the waste, was meant to pander to envy of and anger
> against the US.
>
> It requires one to believe that there is a fixed amount of wealth and
> limited resources that must go around fairly to everyone, and that the US
> wants an unfair share of it. This is completely false. The fact is that
> wealth is created by private and free enterprise and the US has always been
> (hopefully will continue to be) about free enterprise. It isn't a measure
> of greed or waste, but of entrepreneurialism and achievement.
>
> Ironically, it's the US that has led the way in cleaning up industry
> emissions and auto emissions. The tax the US places on it's own economy in
> striving for clean air and clean water is enormous. Finding newer
> technologies to reduce or illiminate pollution is great, but there's
> currently nothing that can replace oil as a source of energy without killing
> the world economy.
>
> And like it or not, it's the power of the US economy that has protected the
> world from despotism... from the ***** and from the Communists. And now
> from Islamic extremists. They are more dangerous than ***** or Communists
> because they understand that destroying the US economy is what will give
> them the ability to push back and defeat the "infidel" west and impose an
> Islamic empire. If you're looking for greed, look there.
Hear, hear! Or is it "here, here!"? In either case, right on, dude!
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#4260
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety canbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"David J. Allen" wrote:
>
> I've always thought this accusation against the US, that it, being a
> minority of the worlds population but uses a majority of the resources and
> produces a majority of the waste, was meant to pander to envy of and anger
> against the US.
>
> It requires one to believe that there is a fixed amount of wealth and
> limited resources that must go around fairly to everyone, and that the US
> wants an unfair share of it. This is completely false. The fact is that
> wealth is created by private and free enterprise and the US has always been
> (hopefully will continue to be) about free enterprise. It isn't a measure
> of greed or waste, but of entrepreneurialism and achievement.
>
> Ironically, it's the US that has led the way in cleaning up industry
> emissions and auto emissions. The tax the US places on it's own economy in
> striving for clean air and clean water is enormous. Finding newer
> technologies to reduce or illiminate pollution is great, but there's
> currently nothing that can replace oil as a source of energy without killing
> the world economy.
>
> And like it or not, it's the power of the US economy that has protected the
> world from despotism... from the ***** and from the Communists. And now
> from Islamic extremists. They are more dangerous than ***** or Communists
> because they understand that destroying the US economy is what will give
> them the ability to push back and defeat the "infidel" west and impose an
> Islamic empire. If you're looking for greed, look there.
Hear, hear! Or is it "here, here!"? In either case, right on, dude!
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----