Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#4211
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> If you think GW isn't real, then you need to learn what "proof" means.
>
> And in 1990, we weren't exactly living in the 1600s.
Thank goodness, the 1600's were COLD.
Ed
#4212
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> If you think GW isn't real, then you need to learn what "proof" means.
>
> And in 1990, we weren't exactly living in the 1600s.
Thank goodness, the 1600's were COLD.
Ed
#4213
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safetycanbe misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
> If you think GW isn't real, then you need to learn what "proof" means.
>
> And in 1990, we weren't exactly living in the 1600s.
Thank goodness, the 1600's were COLD.
Ed
#4214
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote
>
> <snip flaming liberal -------->
>
> when i hadnt heard from you all weekend i had hoped that youd choked to
> death while slamming some form of processed fat. then i remembered that
you
> only post while youre at work on company time using company resources. i
> have to wonder if anyone from emory would be interested in the 60,000
easily
> verifiable messages youve posted all using emory resources.
Haven't you noticed? Lloyd posts from his university account, when he
should be in the classroom filling minds with drivel.
Floyd
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote
>
> <snip flaming liberal -------->
>
> when i hadnt heard from you all weekend i had hoped that youd choked to
> death while slamming some form of processed fat. then i remembered that
you
> only post while youre at work on company time using company resources. i
> have to wonder if anyone from emory would be interested in the 60,000
easily
> verifiable messages youve posted all using emory resources.
Haven't you noticed? Lloyd posts from his university account, when he
should be in the classroom filling minds with drivel.
Floyd
#4215
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote
>
> <snip flaming liberal -------->
>
> when i hadnt heard from you all weekend i had hoped that youd choked to
> death while slamming some form of processed fat. then i remembered that
you
> only post while youre at work on company time using company resources. i
> have to wonder if anyone from emory would be interested in the 60,000
easily
> verifiable messages youve posted all using emory resources.
Haven't you noticed? Lloyd posts from his university account, when he
should be in the classroom filling minds with drivel.
Floyd
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote
>
> <snip flaming liberal -------->
>
> when i hadnt heard from you all weekend i had hoped that youd choked to
> death while slamming some form of processed fat. then i remembered that
you
> only post while youre at work on company time using company resources. i
> have to wonder if anyone from emory would be interested in the 60,000
easily
> verifiable messages youve posted all using emory resources.
Haven't you noticed? Lloyd posts from his university account, when he
should be in the classroom filling minds with drivel.
Floyd
#4216
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
"Nathan Collier" <JeepMail@7SlotGrille.com> wrote
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote
>
> <snip flaming liberal -------->
>
> when i hadnt heard from you all weekend i had hoped that youd choked to
> death while slamming some form of processed fat. then i remembered that
you
> only post while youre at work on company time using company resources. i
> have to wonder if anyone from emory would be interested in the 60,000
easily
> verifiable messages youve posted all using emory resources.
Haven't you noticed? Lloyd posts from his university account, when he
should be in the classroom filling minds with drivel.
Floyd
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote
>
> <snip flaming liberal -------->
>
> when i hadnt heard from you all weekend i had hoped that youd choked to
> death while slamming some form of processed fat. then i remembered that
you
> only post while youre at work on company time using company resources. i
> have to wonder if anyone from emory would be interested in the 60,000
easily
> verifiable messages youve posted all using emory resources.
Haven't you noticed? Lloyd posts from his university account, when he
should be in the classroom filling minds with drivel.
Floyd
#4217
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote in message news:<3FAF7A28.19E1D5EF@kinez.net>...
> Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >
> > ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> > the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> > precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> > people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> > idiots that won't matter in the long run.
>
> The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> debacle is less than 0.1%.
The likelihood of my voting for Dean went up after this one. I guess
it's a sort of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line of thinking.
If the wealthy special interests on *both* sides of the aisle really
jab at him, then I get more and more certain that he's the man for me.
- Erik
> Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >
> > ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> > the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> > precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> > people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> > idiots that won't matter in the long run.
>
> The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> debacle is less than 0.1%.
The likelihood of my voting for Dean went up after this one. I guess
it's a sort of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line of thinking.
If the wealthy special interests on *both* sides of the aisle really
jab at him, then I get more and more certain that he's the man for me.
- Erik
#4218
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote in message news:<3FAF7A28.19E1D5EF@kinez.net>...
> Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >
> > ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> > the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> > precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> > people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> > idiots that won't matter in the long run.
>
> The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> debacle is less than 0.1%.
The likelihood of my voting for Dean went up after this one. I guess
it's a sort of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line of thinking.
If the wealthy special interests on *both* sides of the aisle really
jab at him, then I get more and more certain that he's the man for me.
- Erik
> Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >
> > ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> > the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> > precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> > people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> > idiots that won't matter in the long run.
>
> The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> debacle is less than 0.1%.
The likelihood of my voting for Dean went up after this one. I guess
it's a sort of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line of thinking.
If the wealthy special interests on *both* sides of the aisle really
jab at him, then I get more and more certain that he's the man for me.
- Erik
#4219
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Bill Putney <bputney@kinez.net> wrote in message news:<3FAF7A28.19E1D5EF@kinez.net>...
> Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >
> > ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> > the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> > precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> > people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> > idiots that won't matter in the long run.
>
> The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> debacle is less than 0.1%.
The likelihood of my voting for Dean went up after this one. I guess
it's a sort of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line of thinking.
If the wealthy special interests on *both* sides of the aisle really
jab at him, then I get more and more certain that he's the man for me.
- Erik
> Erik Aronesty wrote:
> >
> > ...I would contend that offending Al Sharpton and raising a brouhaha in
> > the media is NOT a bad thing for Dean. I would contend that this is
> > precisely the sort of incident that will make him more popular with
> > people like you and I. Although less popular wih a minority of angry
> > idiots that won't matter in the long run.
>
> The likelihood of my voting for Dean or any of the other existing
> Democratic contenders (including Hillary if she decides to be the hero
> to save the party from it's current demise) with or without this latest
> debacle is less than 0.1%.
The likelihood of my voting for Dean went up after this one. I guess
it's a sort of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" line of thinking.
If the wealthy special interests on *both* sides of the aisle really
jab at him, then I get more and more certain that he's the man for me.
- Erik
#4220
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Global Warming - a Liberal Scam?, (was Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers)
In article <3FAFE3B4.A42DF686@mindspring.com>, C. E. White wrote:
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> Wrong. The last 120 years have shown warming, and the hottest years on
>> record have all occurred in the last decade.
>
> There are a lot of problems with this claim. By biggest concern is the source of
> the data. A lot of the old data is being inferred from unreliable sources. The
> newer data is better, but it is not always corrected for changes in the micro
> environment around the reporting station.
After someone altered me to a recent paper via a USA today article I
hunted it down and posted the URL. It was published in the journal
energy and environment. the authors fixed a number of errors in the
original analysis that's the basis for many of the claims lloyd has
made. Some of those claims then fall apart.
>
>
> Lloyd Parker wrote:
>
>> Wrong. The last 120 years have shown warming, and the hottest years on
>> record have all occurred in the last decade.
>
> There are a lot of problems with this claim. By biggest concern is the source of
> the data. A lot of the old data is being inferred from unreliable sources. The
> newer data is better, but it is not always corrected for changes in the micro
> environment around the reporting station.
After someone altered me to a recent paper via a USA today article I
hunted it down and posted the URL. It was published in the journal
energy and environment. the authors fixed a number of errors in the
original analysis that's the basis for many of the claims lloyd has
made. Some of those claims then fall apart.