Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3731
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bog919$44t$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <Khxqb.91903$mZ5.602598@attbi_s54>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>> CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>> It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>CO2 content of the atmosphere been changing for millions years.
> It's been around 280 ppm for half a million years; now it's up to 350 ppm in
> the last 120 years.
Your wrong again Parker.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/...onnin2001.html
Clearly this shows that CO2 levels were aproximately 195ppm 17,000 years
ago. Rising to aproximately 265ppm about 9000 years ago.
>>Did you not
>>look at the data you keep harping on?
> Yes. Have you?
You clearly haven't. In a couple minutes of searching I've turned
up proof from a source you've certified (NOAA), that you are wrong.
> In article <Khxqb.91903$mZ5.602598@attbi_s54>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>> CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>> It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>CO2 content of the atmosphere been changing for millions years.
> It's been around 280 ppm for half a million years; now it's up to 350 ppm in
> the last 120 years.
Your wrong again Parker.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/...onnin2001.html
Clearly this shows that CO2 levels were aproximately 195ppm 17,000 years
ago. Rising to aproximately 265ppm about 9000 years ago.
>>Did you not
>>look at the data you keep harping on?
> Yes. Have you?
You clearly haven't. In a couple minutes of searching I've turned
up proof from a source you've certified (NOAA), that you are wrong.
#3732
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bog919$44t$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <Khxqb.91903$mZ5.602598@attbi_s54>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>> CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>> It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>CO2 content of the atmosphere been changing for millions years.
> It's been around 280 ppm for half a million years; now it's up to 350 ppm in
> the last 120 years.
Your wrong again Parker.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/...onnin2001.html
Clearly this shows that CO2 levels were aproximately 195ppm 17,000 years
ago. Rising to aproximately 265ppm about 9000 years ago.
>>Did you not
>>look at the data you keep harping on?
> Yes. Have you?
You clearly haven't. In a couple minutes of searching I've turned
up proof from a source you've certified (NOAA), that you are wrong.
> In article <Khxqb.91903$mZ5.602598@attbi_s54>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>> CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>> It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>CO2 content of the atmosphere been changing for millions years.
> It's been around 280 ppm for half a million years; now it's up to 350 ppm in
> the last 120 years.
Your wrong again Parker.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/...onnin2001.html
Clearly this shows that CO2 levels were aproximately 195ppm 17,000 years
ago. Rising to aproximately 265ppm about 9000 years ago.
>>Did you not
>>look at the data you keep harping on?
> Yes. Have you?
You clearly haven't. In a couple minutes of searching I've turned
up proof from a source you've certified (NOAA), that you are wrong.
#3733
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bog919$44t$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> In article <Khxqb.91903$mZ5.602598@attbi_s54>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>> CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>> It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>CO2 content of the atmosphere been changing for millions years.
> It's been around 280 ppm for half a million years; now it's up to 350 ppm in
> the last 120 years.
Your wrong again Parker.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/...onnin2001.html
Clearly this shows that CO2 levels were aproximately 195ppm 17,000 years
ago. Rising to aproximately 265ppm about 9000 years ago.
>>Did you not
>>look at the data you keep harping on?
> Yes. Have you?
You clearly haven't. In a couple minutes of searching I've turned
up proof from a source you've certified (NOAA), that you are wrong.
> In article <Khxqb.91903$mZ5.602598@attbi_s54>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>
>>> CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>> It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>CO2 content of the atmosphere been changing for millions years.
> It's been around 280 ppm for half a million years; now it's up to 350 ppm in
> the last 120 years.
Your wrong again Parker.
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/...onnin2001.html
Clearly this shows that CO2 levels were aproximately 195ppm 17,000 years
ago. Rising to aproximately 265ppm about 9000 years ago.
>>Did you not
>>look at the data you keep harping on?
> Yes. Have you?
You clearly haven't. In a couple minutes of searching I've turned
up proof from a source you've certified (NOAA), that you are wrong.
#3734
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
human activities produce CO2. <
Yeah, WEIRD, GREEN Science!!!!
science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
human activities produce CO2. <
Yeah, WEIRD, GREEN Science!!!!
#3735
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
human activities produce CO2. <
Yeah, WEIRD, GREEN Science!!!!
science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
human activities produce CO2. <
Yeah, WEIRD, GREEN Science!!!!
#3736
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Science tells up CO2 absorbs heat, science tells us the earth is warming,
science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
human activities produce CO2. <
Yeah, WEIRD, GREEN Science!!!!
science tells us CO2 has increased along with temperature, science tells us
human activities produce CO2. <
Yeah, WEIRD, GREEN Science!!!!
#3737
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bogc91$44t$35@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>In article <yLOdnbTulOtwLzaiRTvUqQ@speakeasy.net>,
> russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
>>Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>>It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>Man's hardly making a dent. (and man is not exactly separate from
>>nature anyway).
>
>Gee, you know more science than the thousands in IPCC, EPA, NASA, NOAA,
>National Academy of Sciences, and American Geophysical Union!
Naa, I just know more science than you. (OK, perhaps not chemistry,
but I wouldn't bet on that if I were you). Heck, I'm even published.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>In article <yLOdnbTulOtwLzaiRTvUqQ@speakeasy.net>,
> russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
>>Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>>It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>Man's hardly making a dent. (and man is not exactly separate from
>>nature anyway).
>
>Gee, you know more science than the thousands in IPCC, EPA, NASA, NOAA,
>National Academy of Sciences, and American Geophysical Union!
Naa, I just know more science than you. (OK, perhaps not chemistry,
but I wouldn't bet on that if I were you). Heck, I'm even published.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
#3738
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bogc91$44t$35@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>In article <yLOdnbTulOtwLzaiRTvUqQ@speakeasy.net>,
> russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
>>Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>>It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>Man's hardly making a dent. (and man is not exactly separate from
>>nature anyway).
>
>Gee, you know more science than the thousands in IPCC, EPA, NASA, NOAA,
>National Academy of Sciences, and American Geophysical Union!
Naa, I just know more science than you. (OK, perhaps not chemistry,
but I wouldn't bet on that if I were you). Heck, I'm even published.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>In article <yLOdnbTulOtwLzaiRTvUqQ@speakeasy.net>,
> russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
>>Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>>It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>Man's hardly making a dent. (and man is not exactly separate from
>>nature anyway).
>
>Gee, you know more science than the thousands in IPCC, EPA, NASA, NOAA,
>National Academy of Sciences, and American Geophysical Union!
Naa, I just know more science than you. (OK, perhaps not chemistry,
but I wouldn't bet on that if I were you). Heck, I'm even published.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
#3739
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bogc91$44t$35@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>In article <yLOdnbTulOtwLzaiRTvUqQ@speakeasy.net>,
> russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
>>Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>>It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>Man's hardly making a dent. (and man is not exactly separate from
>>nature anyway).
>
>Gee, you know more science than the thousands in IPCC, EPA, NASA, NOAA,
>National Academy of Sciences, and American Geophysical Union!
Naa, I just know more science than you. (OK, perhaps not chemistry,
but I wouldn't bet on that if I were you). Heck, I'm even published.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>In article <yLOdnbTulOtwLzaiRTvUqQ@speakeasy.net>,
> russotto@grace.speakeasy.net (Matthew Russotto) wrote:
>>In article <boe5a7$i0q$4@puck.cc.emory.edu>,
>>Lloyd Parker <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
>>>It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
>>
>>Man's hardly making a dent. (and man is not exactly separate from
>>nature anyway).
>
>Gee, you know more science than the thousands in IPCC, EPA, NASA, NOAA,
>National Academy of Sciences, and American Geophysical Union!
Naa, I just know more science than you. (OK, perhaps not chemistry,
but I wouldn't bet on that if I were you). Heck, I'm even published.
--
Matthew T. Russotto mrussotto@speakeasy.net
"Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice, and moderation in pursuit
of justice is no virtue." But extreme restriction of liberty in pursuit of
a modicum of security is a very expensive vice.
#3740
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> They have a sense of entitlement and moral superiority that aloows them to
use whatever extreme measures are required to return themselves to their
proper place in the seat of power. <
Precisely, these arrogant, elitist people are currently spouting alarmist
rhetoric about the dangers of "one party rule", but seemed to think it was
okay back in the mid-late 7-'s under Carter and a Dem Congress. What a bunch
of hypocrites!
use whatever extreme measures are required to return themselves to their
proper place in the seat of power. <
Precisely, these arrogant, elitist people are currently spouting alarmist
rhetoric about the dangers of "one party rule", but seemed to think it was
okay back in the mid-late 7-'s under Carter and a Dem Congress. What a bunch
of hypocrites!