Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3561
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Then you're in the minority. In most businesses, people pay more out of
their paycheck to cover a family than if they were single. >
But that doesn;t justify unfairly taxing singles. Marrieds use grossly more
resources and government services than do singles, and singles get virtually
nothing in exchange for paying double the taxes of marrieds.
Being married and having children is a matter of choice. That decision
should not be subsidised by the government at the expense of singles, the
most discriminated against minority after white males over 45.
their paycheck to cover a family than if they were single. >
But that doesn;t justify unfairly taxing singles. Marrieds use grossly more
resources and government services than do singles, and singles get virtually
nothing in exchange for paying double the taxes of marrieds.
Being married and having children is a matter of choice. That decision
should not be subsidised by the government at the expense of singles, the
most discriminated against minority after white males over 45.
#3562
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Then you're in the minority. In most businesses, people pay more out of
their paycheck to cover a family than if they were single. >
But that doesn;t justify unfairly taxing singles. Marrieds use grossly more
resources and government services than do singles, and singles get virtually
nothing in exchange for paying double the taxes of marrieds.
Being married and having children is a matter of choice. That decision
should not be subsidised by the government at the expense of singles, the
most discriminated against minority after white males over 45.
their paycheck to cover a family than if they were single. >
But that doesn;t justify unfairly taxing singles. Marrieds use grossly more
resources and government services than do singles, and singles get virtually
nothing in exchange for paying double the taxes of marrieds.
Being married and having children is a matter of choice. That decision
should not be subsidised by the government at the expense of singles, the
most discriminated against minority after white males over 45.
#3563
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> There was nothing honest about it. It was all tilted to find Gore votes
and not find Bush votes. What's honest about that? <
Lloyd is like all the other liberal Socialists, they're convinced the
citizens are idiots who wouldn't notice what you just pointed out. We're to
believe the old bastards in Palm Beach county, who can manage a
multi-million dollar portfolio, handicap a horse race and manage 4 bingo
cards at a time couldn't figure out a simple ballot, or were too weak or
stupid to punch through a card. What, like these same people hadn't used the
same voting machines for years? What a crock!
and not find Bush votes. What's honest about that? <
Lloyd is like all the other liberal Socialists, they're convinced the
citizens are idiots who wouldn't notice what you just pointed out. We're to
believe the old bastards in Palm Beach county, who can manage a
multi-million dollar portfolio, handicap a horse race and manage 4 bingo
cards at a time couldn't figure out a simple ballot, or were too weak or
stupid to punch through a card. What, like these same people hadn't used the
same voting machines for years? What a crock!
#3564
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> There was nothing honest about it. It was all tilted to find Gore votes
and not find Bush votes. What's honest about that? <
Lloyd is like all the other liberal Socialists, they're convinced the
citizens are idiots who wouldn't notice what you just pointed out. We're to
believe the old bastards in Palm Beach county, who can manage a
multi-million dollar portfolio, handicap a horse race and manage 4 bingo
cards at a time couldn't figure out a simple ballot, or were too weak or
stupid to punch through a card. What, like these same people hadn't used the
same voting machines for years? What a crock!
and not find Bush votes. What's honest about that? <
Lloyd is like all the other liberal Socialists, they're convinced the
citizens are idiots who wouldn't notice what you just pointed out. We're to
believe the old bastards in Palm Beach county, who can manage a
multi-million dollar portfolio, handicap a horse race and manage 4 bingo
cards at a time couldn't figure out a simple ballot, or were too weak or
stupid to punch through a card. What, like these same people hadn't used the
same voting machines for years? What a crock!
#3565
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> There was nothing honest about it. It was all tilted to find Gore votes
and not find Bush votes. What's honest about that? <
Lloyd is like all the other liberal Socialists, they're convinced the
citizens are idiots who wouldn't notice what you just pointed out. We're to
believe the old bastards in Palm Beach county, who can manage a
multi-million dollar portfolio, handicap a horse race and manage 4 bingo
cards at a time couldn't figure out a simple ballot, or were too weak or
stupid to punch through a card. What, like these same people hadn't used the
same voting machines for years? What a crock!
and not find Bush votes. What's honest about that? <
Lloyd is like all the other liberal Socialists, they're convinced the
citizens are idiots who wouldn't notice what you just pointed out. We're to
believe the old bastards in Palm Beach county, who can manage a
multi-million dollar portfolio, handicap a horse race and manage 4 bingo
cards at a time couldn't figure out a simple ballot, or were too weak or
stupid to punch through a card. What, like these same people hadn't used the
same voting machines for years? What a crock!
#3566
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> It's just like a liberal to look to the preamble to find a "right".
That's what the Florida Supreme Court did to undo state election law. If
you're to interpret "provide for the general welfare" in the preample, which
is a statement of purpose, you can't conclude that citizens have a right of
"general welfare" they can lay claim to. The articles that follow the
preamble and lay out the function of government ARE the interpretation of
general welfare.>
Oh, oh, Lloyd, it appears someone actually understands Constitutional law
here, better go get one of your Socialist lawyer buddies to help you provide
obfuscation on this one!
That's what the Florida Supreme Court did to undo state election law. If
you're to interpret "provide for the general welfare" in the preample, which
is a statement of purpose, you can't conclude that citizens have a right of
"general welfare" they can lay claim to. The articles that follow the
preamble and lay out the function of government ARE the interpretation of
general welfare.>
Oh, oh, Lloyd, it appears someone actually understands Constitutional law
here, better go get one of your Socialist lawyer buddies to help you provide
obfuscation on this one!
#3567
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> It's just like a liberal to look to the preamble to find a "right".
That's what the Florida Supreme Court did to undo state election law. If
you're to interpret "provide for the general welfare" in the preample, which
is a statement of purpose, you can't conclude that citizens have a right of
"general welfare" they can lay claim to. The articles that follow the
preamble and lay out the function of government ARE the interpretation of
general welfare.>
Oh, oh, Lloyd, it appears someone actually understands Constitutional law
here, better go get one of your Socialist lawyer buddies to help you provide
obfuscation on this one!
That's what the Florida Supreme Court did to undo state election law. If
you're to interpret "provide for the general welfare" in the preample, which
is a statement of purpose, you can't conclude that citizens have a right of
"general welfare" they can lay claim to. The articles that follow the
preamble and lay out the function of government ARE the interpretation of
general welfare.>
Oh, oh, Lloyd, it appears someone actually understands Constitutional law
here, better go get one of your Socialist lawyer buddies to help you provide
obfuscation on this one!
#3568
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> It's just like a liberal to look to the preamble to find a "right".
That's what the Florida Supreme Court did to undo state election law. If
you're to interpret "provide for the general welfare" in the preample, which
is a statement of purpose, you can't conclude that citizens have a right of
"general welfare" they can lay claim to. The articles that follow the
preamble and lay out the function of government ARE the interpretation of
general welfare.>
Oh, oh, Lloyd, it appears someone actually understands Constitutional law
here, better go get one of your Socialist lawyer buddies to help you provide
obfuscation on this one!
That's what the Florida Supreme Court did to undo state election law. If
you're to interpret "provide for the general welfare" in the preample, which
is a statement of purpose, you can't conclude that citizens have a right of
"general welfare" they can lay claim to. The articles that follow the
preamble and lay out the function of government ARE the interpretation of
general welfare.>
Oh, oh, Lloyd, it appears someone actually understands Constitutional law
here, better go get one of your Socialist lawyer buddies to help you provide
obfuscation on this one!
#3569
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> No, there was ONE way of counting where Gore came out ahead. But it is
all academic because it wasn't how the state law says to count ballots.
(Not that THAT would have stopped the Dems). Gore lost every recount and
only had the HOPE of finding a way to recount where he would come out ahead.
This is what the USSC stopped. It's amazing to hear you say that's how Bush
"stole" the election!>
Now, David, there you go again, trying to bring reality rather than Democrat
fable into this entire matter. Now, Everyone knows Gore won, but those awful
Bush brothers and the Republicans conspired to steal the election by not
allowing the Democrats to only count the votes they wanted counted, and that
AWFUL, Kathryn Harris had the audacity to interpret Florida election law the
way it was written. Maybe Howard Dean can fix all this after he wins the
Presidency....
all academic because it wasn't how the state law says to count ballots.
(Not that THAT would have stopped the Dems). Gore lost every recount and
only had the HOPE of finding a way to recount where he would come out ahead.
This is what the USSC stopped. It's amazing to hear you say that's how Bush
"stole" the election!>
Now, David, there you go again, trying to bring reality rather than Democrat
fable into this entire matter. Now, Everyone knows Gore won, but those awful
Bush brothers and the Republicans conspired to steal the election by not
allowing the Democrats to only count the votes they wanted counted, and that
AWFUL, Kathryn Harris had the audacity to interpret Florida election law the
way it was written. Maybe Howard Dean can fix all this after he wins the
Presidency....
#3570
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> No, there was ONE way of counting where Gore came out ahead. But it is
all academic because it wasn't how the state law says to count ballots.
(Not that THAT would have stopped the Dems). Gore lost every recount and
only had the HOPE of finding a way to recount where he would come out ahead.
This is what the USSC stopped. It's amazing to hear you say that's how Bush
"stole" the election!>
Now, David, there you go again, trying to bring reality rather than Democrat
fable into this entire matter. Now, Everyone knows Gore won, but those awful
Bush brothers and the Republicans conspired to steal the election by not
allowing the Democrats to only count the votes they wanted counted, and that
AWFUL, Kathryn Harris had the audacity to interpret Florida election law the
way it was written. Maybe Howard Dean can fix all this after he wins the
Presidency....
all academic because it wasn't how the state law says to count ballots.
(Not that THAT would have stopped the Dems). Gore lost every recount and
only had the HOPE of finding a way to recount where he would come out ahead.
This is what the USSC stopped. It's amazing to hear you say that's how Bush
"stole" the election!>
Now, David, there you go again, trying to bring reality rather than Democrat
fable into this entire matter. Now, Everyone knows Gore won, but those awful
Bush brothers and the Republicans conspired to steal the election by not
allowing the Democrats to only count the votes they wanted counted, and that
AWFUL, Kathryn Harris had the audacity to interpret Florida election law the
way it was written. Maybe Howard Dean can fix all this after he wins the
Presidency....