Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3551
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> > Llotd: Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy. >
> First of all, it wasn't just on the wealthy. Second, money taken out of
the private sector will equal a certain number of lost jobs regardless of
where the money comes from (rich or poor). The "drag" the Clinton tax
increase put on the economy wasn't enought to stop the dot com speculation,
which was
wild beyond caring about the diffence between 33% and 39%. <
Good for you! Clinton lucked out, the internet boom and tech speculation of
the mid-90's fueled the entire "Clinton recovery" and simply brushed aside
the Democrats' egregious middle class tax increases. Then the inevetable
happened, the bubble burst and the weight of the tax increases weight
collapsed the economy in on itself.
>
>
#3552
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> > Llotd: Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy. >
> First of all, it wasn't just on the wealthy. Second, money taken out of
the private sector will equal a certain number of lost jobs regardless of
where the money comes from (rich or poor). The "drag" the Clinton tax
increase put on the economy wasn't enought to stop the dot com speculation,
which was
wild beyond caring about the diffence between 33% and 39%. <
Good for you! Clinton lucked out, the internet boom and tech speculation of
the mid-90's fueled the entire "Clinton recovery" and simply brushed aside
the Democrats' egregious middle class tax increases. Then the inevetable
happened, the bubble burst and the weight of the tax increases weight
collapsed the economy in on itself.
>
>
#3553
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> > Llotd: Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy. >
> First of all, it wasn't just on the wealthy. Second, money taken out of
the private sector will equal a certain number of lost jobs regardless of
where the money comes from (rich or poor). The "drag" the Clinton tax
increase put on the economy wasn't enought to stop the dot com speculation,
which was
wild beyond caring about the diffence between 33% and 39%. <
Good for you! Clinton lucked out, the internet boom and tech speculation of
the mid-90's fueled the entire "Clinton recovery" and simply brushed aside
the Democrats' egregious middle class tax increases. Then the inevetable
happened, the bubble burst and the weight of the tax increases weight
collapsed the economy in on itself.
>
>
#3554
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> >>>
> >>>Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
> >>
> >>Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government
as
> >>able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> >>systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
> >
> >
> > Cute, but zealots have claimed to be on the side of God throughout
history.
> > The fact is, the political spectrum runs from communism and socialism on
the
> > left, to fascism and Nazism on the right.
> >
> >
>
> More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
> Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
> conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
> levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
> terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
> is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
> values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
> different ways.
>
Very nice!
> >>>Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
> >>
> >>Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government
as
> >>able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> >>systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
> >
> >
> > Cute, but zealots have claimed to be on the side of God throughout
history.
> > The fact is, the political spectrum runs from communism and socialism on
the
> > left, to fascism and Nazism on the right.
> >
> >
>
> More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
> Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
> conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
> levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
> terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
> is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
> values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
> different ways.
>
Very nice!
#3555
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> >>>
> >>>Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
> >>
> >>Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government
as
> >>able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> >>systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
> >
> >
> > Cute, but zealots have claimed to be on the side of God throughout
history.
> > The fact is, the political spectrum runs from communism and socialism on
the
> > left, to fascism and Nazism on the right.
> >
> >
>
> More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
> Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
> conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
> levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
> terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
> is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
> values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
> different ways.
>
Very nice!
> >>>Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
> >>
> >>Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government
as
> >>able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> >>systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
> >
> >
> > Cute, but zealots have claimed to be on the side of God throughout
history.
> > The fact is, the political spectrum runs from communism and socialism on
the
> > left, to fascism and Nazism on the right.
> >
> >
>
> More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
> Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
> conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
> levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
> terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
> is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
> values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
> different ways.
>
Very nice!
#3556
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> >>>
> >>>Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
> >>
> >>Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government
as
> >>able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> >>systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
> >
> >
> > Cute, but zealots have claimed to be on the side of God throughout
history.
> > The fact is, the political spectrum runs from communism and socialism on
the
> > left, to fascism and Nazism on the right.
> >
> >
>
> More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
> Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
> conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
> levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
> terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
> is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
> values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
> different ways.
>
Very nice!
> >>>Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
> >>
> >>Fascism and Socialism have one thing in common... they view government
as
> >>able to give and take away rights according to their respective value
> >>systems. That puts both of them on the opposite side of conservatism
> >
> >
> > Cute, but zealots have claimed to be on the side of God throughout
history.
> > The fact is, the political spectrum runs from communism and socialism on
the
> > left, to fascism and Nazism on the right.
> >
> >
>
> More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
> Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
> conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
> levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
> terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
> is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
> values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
> different ways.
>
Very nice!
#3557
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Because he chose to live in Mississippi. If New York wishes to be a
socialist state, that's fine as long as I don't have to live in a socialist
state. It's called choice, or the 'freedom to choose' or 'pro choice'. <
Well, see , there you have a problem with Socialists like Lloyd, he doesn't
believe you should have a choice where to live, or any rights to the product
of your labor. Lloyd & his people know far better than you what's right for
the Country and they need your money for their pet causes. Besides, you live
too well anyway, people in Cameroon are starving....
socialist state, that's fine as long as I don't have to live in a socialist
state. It's called choice, or the 'freedom to choose' or 'pro choice'. <
Well, see , there you have a problem with Socialists like Lloyd, he doesn't
believe you should have a choice where to live, or any rights to the product
of your labor. Lloyd & his people know far better than you what's right for
the Country and they need your money for their pet causes. Besides, you live
too well anyway, people in Cameroon are starving....
#3558
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Because he chose to live in Mississippi. If New York wishes to be a
socialist state, that's fine as long as I don't have to live in a socialist
state. It's called choice, or the 'freedom to choose' or 'pro choice'. <
Well, see , there you have a problem with Socialists like Lloyd, he doesn't
believe you should have a choice where to live, or any rights to the product
of your labor. Lloyd & his people know far better than you what's right for
the Country and they need your money for their pet causes. Besides, you live
too well anyway, people in Cameroon are starving....
socialist state, that's fine as long as I don't have to live in a socialist
state. It's called choice, or the 'freedom to choose' or 'pro choice'. <
Well, see , there you have a problem with Socialists like Lloyd, he doesn't
believe you should have a choice where to live, or any rights to the product
of your labor. Lloyd & his people know far better than you what's right for
the Country and they need your money for their pet causes. Besides, you live
too well anyway, people in Cameroon are starving....
#3559
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Because he chose to live in Mississippi. If New York wishes to be a
socialist state, that's fine as long as I don't have to live in a socialist
state. It's called choice, or the 'freedom to choose' or 'pro choice'. <
Well, see , there you have a problem with Socialists like Lloyd, he doesn't
believe you should have a choice where to live, or any rights to the product
of your labor. Lloyd & his people know far better than you what's right for
the Country and they need your money for their pet causes. Besides, you live
too well anyway, people in Cameroon are starving....
socialist state, that's fine as long as I don't have to live in a socialist
state. It's called choice, or the 'freedom to choose' or 'pro choice'. <
Well, see , there you have a problem with Socialists like Lloyd, he doesn't
believe you should have a choice where to live, or any rights to the product
of your labor. Lloyd & his people know far better than you what's right for
the Country and they need your money for their pet causes. Besides, you live
too well anyway, people in Cameroon are starving....
#3560
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Then you're in the minority. In most businesses, people pay more out of
their paycheck to cover a family than if they were single. >
But that doesn;t justify unfairly taxing singles. Marrieds use grossly more
resources and government services than do singles, and singles get virtually
nothing in exchange for paying double the taxes of marrieds.
Being married and having children is a matter of choice. That decision
should not be subsidised by the government at the expense of singles, the
most discriminated against minority after white males over 45.
their paycheck to cover a family than if they were single. >
But that doesn;t justify unfairly taxing singles. Marrieds use grossly more
resources and government services than do singles, and singles get virtually
nothing in exchange for paying double the taxes of marrieds.
Being married and having children is a matter of choice. That decision
should not be subsidised by the government at the expense of singles, the
most discriminated against minority after white males over 45.