Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3451
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> FL law allowed for a candidate to ask for a recount in specific counties.<
Common sense says people know total -------- when they smell it!
> The US constitution provides that a person's transgressions do not extend
to their children. Guess that puts you on the wrong side of the
constitution.>
Guess thais proves you're not very good at either history, logil or debate,
Bozo!
> >No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation! >>
Again Lloyd avoids dealing with the obvious. Face it, the Democrats are
fading into obscurity, they even lost TWO MORE Governorships this week, and
will probably lose anpther next week.
> >
Common sense says people know total -------- when they smell it!
> The US constitution provides that a person's transgressions do not extend
to their children. Guess that puts you on the wrong side of the
constitution.>
Guess thais proves you're not very good at either history, logil or debate,
Bozo!
> >No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation! >>
Again Lloyd avoids dealing with the obvious. Face it, the Democrats are
fading into obscurity, they even lost TWO MORE Governorships this week, and
will probably lose anpther next week.
> >
#3455
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> I've learned from science, and it's not science that you preach parker.
You spout political views and hide behind a PhD in chemistry as if that
makes your political views correct. You dismiss without discussion any
scientific data or analysis that challenges your beliefs. That is *NOT*
science. >
Ah, but it does make for great sport!
#3456
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> I've learned from science, and it's not science that you preach parker.
You spout political views and hide behind a PhD in chemistry as if that
makes your political views correct. You dismiss without discussion any
scientific data or analysis that challenges your beliefs. That is *NOT*
science. >
Ah, but it does make for great sport!
#3457
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> I've learned from science, and it's not science that you preach parker.
You spout political views and hide behind a PhD in chemistry as if that
makes your political views correct. You dismiss without discussion any
scientific data or analysis that challenges your beliefs. That is *NOT*
science. >
Ah, but it does make for great sport!
#3458
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Thu, 06 Nov 03 14:06:30 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
>
>Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
>above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
>lows, gotta be in a recession!
But you didn't answer the question:
How does a tax increase improve the economy?
Simply saying that an improved economy followed a tax increase proves
nothing.
How about it?
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
>
>Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
>above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
>lows, gotta be in a recession!
But you didn't answer the question:
How does a tax increase improve the economy?
Simply saying that an improved economy followed a tax increase proves
nothing.
How about it?
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3459
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Thu, 06 Nov 03 14:06:30 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
>
>Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
>above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
>lows, gotta be in a recession!
But you didn't answer the question:
How does a tax increase improve the economy?
Simply saying that an improved economy followed a tax increase proves
nothing.
How about it?
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
>
>Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
>above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
>lows, gotta be in a recession!
But you didn't answer the question:
How does a tax increase improve the economy?
Simply saying that an improved economy followed a tax increase proves
nothing.
How about it?
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3460
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Thu, 06 Nov 03 14:06:30 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
>
>Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
>above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
>lows, gotta be in a recession!
But you didn't answer the question:
How does a tax increase improve the economy?
Simply saying that an improved economy followed a tax increase proves
nothing.
How about it?
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
>
>Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
>above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
>lows, gotta be in a recession!
But you didn't answer the question:
How does a tax increase improve the economy?
Simply saying that an improved economy followed a tax increase proves
nothing.
How about it?
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"