Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3431
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you. <
Sorry, Mr. Scientist, but volcanic and other geothermal activity are one of
the greatest contributors to climatic shifts. The eruption of Krakatoa
caused global COOLING on a massive scale, the total effect of which lasted
several years, indeed the first year was referred to in Europe as the "Year
Without Summer". More recently the eruption of Mt Pinatubo caused almost
instantaneous weather pattern changes and had an extreme effect on upper
atmosphere conditions globally.
Hey, you're supposed to be the scientist around here and you don't know this
stuff? Hey, REMEDIAL READING FOR YOU!!!!
#3432
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you. <
Sorry, Mr. Scientist, but volcanic and other geothermal activity are one of
the greatest contributors to climatic shifts. The eruption of Krakatoa
caused global COOLING on a massive scale, the total effect of which lasted
several years, indeed the first year was referred to in Europe as the "Year
Without Summer". More recently the eruption of Mt Pinatubo caused almost
instantaneous weather pattern changes and had an extreme effect on upper
atmosphere conditions globally.
Hey, you're supposed to be the scientist around here and you don't know this
stuff? Hey, REMEDIAL READING FOR YOU!!!!
#3433
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you. <
Sorry, Mr. Scientist, but volcanic and other geothermal activity are one of
the greatest contributors to climatic shifts. The eruption of Krakatoa
caused global COOLING on a massive scale, the total effect of which lasted
several years, indeed the first year was referred to in Europe as the "Year
Without Summer". More recently the eruption of Mt Pinatubo caused almost
instantaneous weather pattern changes and had an extreme effect on upper
atmosphere conditions globally.
Hey, you're supposed to be the scientist around here and you don't know this
stuff? Hey, REMEDIAL READING FOR YOU!!!!
#3434
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Not proven. <
Was proven and confirmed. The resulting squeal you jeard was Joan Claybrook
and her idiot friends at the Center for Auto Safety making up more lies.
> And the NAS looked at it and said NHTSA's study was flawed -- they lumped
together cars of different weights, they lumped together model years with
different safety features, etc. <
Not true, the NAS had no role in either the original or sunbsequent
research. These people died because the cars lacked mass. Simple, end of
argument fact, Lloyd, they're DEAD because they got forced into death traps
by meddling, know-nothing Socialists.
Was proven and confirmed. The resulting squeal you jeard was Joan Claybrook
and her idiot friends at the Center for Auto Safety making up more lies.
> And the NAS looked at it and said NHTSA's study was flawed -- they lumped
together cars of different weights, they lumped together model years with
different safety features, etc. <
Not true, the NAS had no role in either the original or sunbsequent
research. These people died because the cars lacked mass. Simple, end of
argument fact, Lloyd, they're DEAD because they got forced into death traps
by meddling, know-nothing Socialists.
#3435
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Not proven. <
Was proven and confirmed. The resulting squeal you jeard was Joan Claybrook
and her idiot friends at the Center for Auto Safety making up more lies.
> And the NAS looked at it and said NHTSA's study was flawed -- they lumped
together cars of different weights, they lumped together model years with
different safety features, etc. <
Not true, the NAS had no role in either the original or sunbsequent
research. These people died because the cars lacked mass. Simple, end of
argument fact, Lloyd, they're DEAD because they got forced into death traps
by meddling, know-nothing Socialists.
Was proven and confirmed. The resulting squeal you jeard was Joan Claybrook
and her idiot friends at the Center for Auto Safety making up more lies.
> And the NAS looked at it and said NHTSA's study was flawed -- they lumped
together cars of different weights, they lumped together model years with
different safety features, etc. <
Not true, the NAS had no role in either the original or sunbsequent
research. These people died because the cars lacked mass. Simple, end of
argument fact, Lloyd, they're DEAD because they got forced into death traps
by meddling, know-nothing Socialists.
#3436
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Not proven. <
Was proven and confirmed. The resulting squeal you jeard was Joan Claybrook
and her idiot friends at the Center for Auto Safety making up more lies.
> And the NAS looked at it and said NHTSA's study was flawed -- they lumped
together cars of different weights, they lumped together model years with
different safety features, etc. <
Not true, the NAS had no role in either the original or sunbsequent
research. These people died because the cars lacked mass. Simple, end of
argument fact, Lloyd, they're DEAD because they got forced into death traps
by meddling, know-nothing Socialists.
Was proven and confirmed. The resulting squeal you jeard was Joan Claybrook
and her idiot friends at the Center for Auto Safety making up more lies.
> And the NAS looked at it and said NHTSA's study was flawed -- they lumped
together cars of different weights, they lumped together model years with
different safety features, etc. <
Not true, the NAS had no role in either the original or sunbsequent
research. These people died because the cars lacked mass. Simple, end of
argument fact, Lloyd, they're DEAD because they got forced into death traps
by meddling, know-nothing Socialists.
#3437
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Thus said Steve <no@spam.thanks>:
>More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
>Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
>conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
>levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
>terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
>is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
>values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
>different ways.
Without commenting on the aptness of it, traditionally in such a diagram
6:00 would represent libertarianism (or possibly anarchism.)
Conservatism (as the term is used today in the US, anyway) would be at
9:00.
>More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
>Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
>conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
>levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
>terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
>is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
>values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
>different ways.
Without commenting on the aptness of it, traditionally in such a diagram
6:00 would represent libertarianism (or possibly anarchism.)
Conservatism (as the term is used today in the US, anyway) would be at
9:00.
#3438
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Thus said Steve <no@spam.thanks>:
>More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
>Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
>conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
>levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
>terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
>is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
>values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
>different ways.
Without commenting on the aptness of it, traditionally in such a diagram
6:00 would represent libertarianism (or possibly anarchism.)
Conservatism (as the term is used today in the US, anyway) would be at
9:00.
>More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
>Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
>conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
>levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
>terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
>is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
>values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
>different ways.
Without commenting on the aptness of it, traditionally in such a diagram
6:00 would represent libertarianism (or possibly anarchism.)
Conservatism (as the term is used today in the US, anyway) would be at
9:00.
#3439
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Thus said Steve <no@spam.thanks>:
>More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
>Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
>conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
>levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
>terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
>is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
>values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
>different ways.
Without commenting on the aptness of it, traditionally in such a diagram
6:00 would represent libertarianism (or possibly anarchism.)
Conservatism (as the term is used today in the US, anyway) would be at
9:00.
>More like a circle. Imagine a clock face- at noon you have communism.
>Moving clockwise you have liberalism, down around 6:00 you have
>conservatism. Moving toward 9 and then back to 12 you have increasing
>levels of the police state until you finally get to fascism, which in
>terms of the rights of the individual is no different than communism and
>is right back there at 11:59 on the clock dial. One side of the circle
>values the indiviual, the other empowers the goverment albeit in
>different ways.
Without commenting on the aptness of it, traditionally in such a diagram
6:00 would represent libertarianism (or possibly anarchism.)
Conservatism (as the term is used today in the US, anyway) would be at
9:00.
#3440
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Do you have any idea how few estates are subject to the estate tax? <
Well, Lloyd, I'm sure when you've amassed roughly $650k in combined net
worth (easy to do with either coast's real estate market) your heirs will be
more than happy to fork over 50% of it to the Socialists to spend on
patronage jobs for their leftist cronies.
MILLIONS of normal, everyday folks are worth this much and their heirs
either have to give it away in terms of $10k gifts, of sell the family
residence to pay the ------- taxes.