Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3381
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
>Florida?
No, it was the Republicans who tried to stop an honest recounting of the
votes.
>The final results were accurate and valid.
Says who?
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
><snip>
>> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>>
>
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
>Florida?
No, it was the Republicans who tried to stop an honest recounting of the
votes.
>The final results were accurate and valid.
Says who?
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
><snip>
>> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>>
>
>
>
#3382
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
>Florida?
No, it was the Republicans who tried to stop an honest recounting of the
votes.
>The final results were accurate and valid.
Says who?
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
><snip>
>> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>>
>
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
>Florida?
No, it was the Republicans who tried to stop an honest recounting of the
votes.
>The final results were accurate and valid.
Says who?
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
><snip>
>> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>>
>
>
>
#3383
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <0Hiqb.11729$9M3.6724@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>At a federal level? YES. STATES should do that, NOT the feds...
So why should a US citizen who lives in Mississippi not have the same rights
and privileges as one who lives in New York?
> But why
>listen to what the "founding fathers" wanted...
They wanted the government to "provide for the general welfare" and wrote that
into the constitution.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0pi$s2a$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> >necessary"
>> >Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all
>the
>> >"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
>>
>> OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut.
>If
>> they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
>> workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
>> want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>>
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >snip
>> >> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>> >something
>> >> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>> >
>> >
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>At a federal level? YES. STATES should do that, NOT the feds...
So why should a US citizen who lives in Mississippi not have the same rights
and privileges as one who lives in New York?
> But why
>listen to what the "founding fathers" wanted...
They wanted the government to "provide for the general welfare" and wrote that
into the constitution.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0pi$s2a$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> >necessary"
>> >Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all
>the
>> >"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
>>
>> OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut.
>If
>> they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
>> workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
>> want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>>
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >snip
>> >> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>> >something
>> >> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>> >
>> >
>
>
#3384
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <0Hiqb.11729$9M3.6724@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>At a federal level? YES. STATES should do that, NOT the feds...
So why should a US citizen who lives in Mississippi not have the same rights
and privileges as one who lives in New York?
> But why
>listen to what the "founding fathers" wanted...
They wanted the government to "provide for the general welfare" and wrote that
into the constitution.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0pi$s2a$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> >necessary"
>> >Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all
>the
>> >"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
>>
>> OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut.
>If
>> they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
>> workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
>> want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>>
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >snip
>> >> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>> >something
>> >> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>> >
>> >
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>At a federal level? YES. STATES should do that, NOT the feds...
So why should a US citizen who lives in Mississippi not have the same rights
and privileges as one who lives in New York?
> But why
>listen to what the "founding fathers" wanted...
They wanted the government to "provide for the general welfare" and wrote that
into the constitution.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0pi$s2a$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> >necessary"
>> >Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all
>the
>> >"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
>>
>> OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut.
>If
>> they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
>> workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
>> want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>>
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >snip
>> >> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>> >something
>> >> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>> >
>> >
>
>
#3385
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <0Hiqb.11729$9M3.6724@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>At a federal level? YES. STATES should do that, NOT the feds...
So why should a US citizen who lives in Mississippi not have the same rights
and privileges as one who lives in New York?
> But why
>listen to what the "founding fathers" wanted...
They wanted the government to "provide for the general welfare" and wrote that
into the constitution.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0pi$s2a$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> >necessary"
>> >Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all
>the
>> >"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
>>
>> OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut.
>If
>> they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
>> workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
>> want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>>
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >snip
>> >> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>> >something
>> >> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>> >
>> >
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>At a federal level? YES. STATES should do that, NOT the feds...
So why should a US citizen who lives in Mississippi not have the same rights
and privileges as one who lives in New York?
> But why
>listen to what the "founding fathers" wanted...
They wanted the government to "provide for the general welfare" and wrote that
into the constitution.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bob0pi$s2a$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
>> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> >necessary"
>> >Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all
>the
>> >"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
>>
>> OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut.
>If
>> they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
>> workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
>> want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>>
>> >
>> >"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> >news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> >> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> >> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >snip
>> >> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>> >something
>> >> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>> >
>> >
>
>
#3386
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com>,
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
>> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
>of
>> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
>And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
>recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
>no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
>official count had given him.
Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
(strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win some.
>
>
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
>> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
>of
>> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
>And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
>recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
>no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
>official count had given him.
Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
(strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win some.
>
>
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
#3387
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com>,
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
>> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
>of
>> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
>And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
>recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
>no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
>official count had given him.
Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
(strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win some.
>
>
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
>> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
>of
>> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
>And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
>recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
>no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
>official count had given him.
Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
(strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win some.
>
>
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
#3388
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com>,
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
>> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
>of
>> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
>And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
>recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
>no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
>official count had given him.
Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
(strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win some.
>
>
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.ear thlink.net...
>> "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
>> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
>of
>> Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
>And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
>recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
>no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
>official count had given him.
Wrong. As the media reported, depending on how the votes were counted
(strictly, loosely), Bush would win some recounts and Gore would win some.
>
>
>>
>> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>> news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
>> > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> <snip>
>> > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>
>
#3389
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
lows, gotta be in a recession!
>
>"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
>news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com.. .
>> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>> >>middle class tax cut.
>> >
>> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>> >steps to get it under control.
>>
>> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
>> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>>
>> --
>> Bill Funk
>> replace "g" with "a"
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
lows, gotta be in a recession!
>
>"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
>news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com.. .
>> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>> >>middle class tax cut.
>> >
>> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>> >steps to get it under control.
>>
>> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
>> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>>
>> --
>> Bill Funk
>> replace "g" with "a"
>
>
#3390
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <2Kiqb.11735$9M3.10343@newsread2.news.atl.earthlin k.net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
lows, gotta be in a recession!
>
>"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
>news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com.. .
>> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>> >>middle class tax cut.
>> >
>> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>> >steps to get it under control.
>>
>> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
>> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>>
>> --
>> Bill Funk
>> replace "g" with "a"
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
>It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
>Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
Yes, those 8 years of gloom, doom, and recession. When the stock market goes
above 10,000, that's a sure sign of recession. When unemployment hits record
lows, gotta be in a recession!
>
>"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
>news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com.. .
>> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>> >>middle class tax cut.
>> >
>> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>> >steps to get it under control.
>>
>> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
>> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>>
>> --
>> Bill Funk
>> replace "g" with "a"
>
>