Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3361
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <hNbqb.10739$9M3.9268@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>,
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>>
>>
>> Joe wrote:
>>
>> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
>> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>>
>> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
>until
>> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>pollution
>> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
>> place....didn't you?
>>
>> Ed
>>
>
>What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>
>
CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
>news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>>
>>
>> Joe wrote:
>>
>> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
>> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>>
>> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
>until
>> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>pollution
>> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
>> place....didn't you?
>>
>> Ed
>>
>
>What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>
>
CO2 put into the air by nature has been in balance for millions of years.
It's man changing this equilibrium that's the problem.
#3362
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <Sicqb.54272$Ub4.8985@twister.socal.rr.com>,
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> > Joe wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It
>would
>> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>> >
>> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires
>burn
>> until
>> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>> pollution
>> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the
>first
>> > place....didn't you?
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>>
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
>thinning
>> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>>
>>
>
>I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on Sunday
>morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way across
>the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in history
>to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day! The
>whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
>
>Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of large
>cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973 CAFE
>regulations.
>
>
Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> > Joe wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It
>would
>> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>> >
>> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires
>burn
>> until
>> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>> pollution
>> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the
>first
>> > place....didn't you?
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>>
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
>thinning
>> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>>
>>
>
>I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on Sunday
>morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way across
>the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in history
>to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day! The
>whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
>
>Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of large
>cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973 CAFE
>regulations.
>
>
Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
#3363
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <Sicqb.54272$Ub4.8985@twister.socal.rr.com>,
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> > Joe wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It
>would
>> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>> >
>> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires
>burn
>> until
>> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>> pollution
>> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the
>first
>> > place....didn't you?
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>>
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
>thinning
>> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>>
>>
>
>I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on Sunday
>morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way across
>the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in history
>to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day! The
>whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
>
>Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of large
>cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973 CAFE
>regulations.
>
>
Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> > Joe wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It
>would
>> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>> >
>> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires
>burn
>> until
>> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>> pollution
>> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the
>first
>> > place....didn't you?
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>>
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
>thinning
>> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>>
>>
>
>I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on Sunday
>morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way across
>the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in history
>to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day! The
>whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
>
>Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of large
>cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973 CAFE
>regulations.
>
>
Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
#3364
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <Sicqb.54272$Ub4.8985@twister.socal.rr.com>,
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> > Joe wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It
>would
>> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>> >
>> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires
>burn
>> until
>> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>> pollution
>> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the
>first
>> > place....didn't you?
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>>
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
>thinning
>> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>>
>>
>
>I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on Sunday
>morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way across
>the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in history
>to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day! The
>whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
>
>Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of large
>cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973 CAFE
>regulations.
>
>
Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
"David J. Allen" <dallen03NO_SPAM@sanNO_SPAM.rr.com> wrote:
>
>> > Joe wrote:
>> >
>> > > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
>> > > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It
>would
>> > > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>> >
>> > OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires
>burn
>> until
>> > rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
>> > national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
>> pollution
>> > into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the
>first
>> > place....didn't you?
>> >
>> > Ed
>> >
>>
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>> air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any
>thinning
>> of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>> to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>> truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>>
>>
>
>I was thinking the same thing when I went out to get the paper on Sunday
>morning and saw plumes of smoke the size of thunderheads all the way across
>the horizon. There aren't enough SUV's in the world.... NO!.... in history
>to put out the amount of greenhouse gases being released in one day! The
>whole SUV/Greenhouse gases thing is a canard.
>
>Ironically, one of the reasons SUV's are so popular is the supply of large
>cars with powerful engines were so restricted starting with the1973 CAFE
>regulations.
>
>
Humans put out more CO2 than nature by several orders of magnitude.
#3365
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com>,
Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>wrote:
>
>>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>>middle class tax cut.
>>
>>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>>steps to get it under control.
>
>Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Bush's was bigger, since it raised the payroll tax.
>Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy.
Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>wrote:
>
>>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>>middle class tax cut.
>>
>>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>>steps to get it under control.
>
>Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Bush's was bigger, since it raised the payroll tax.
>Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy.
#3366
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com>,
Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>wrote:
>
>>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>>middle class tax cut.
>>
>>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>>steps to get it under control.
>
>Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Bush's was bigger, since it raised the payroll tax.
>Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy.
Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>wrote:
>
>>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>>middle class tax cut.
>>
>>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>>steps to get it under control.
>
>Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Bush's was bigger, since it raised the payroll tax.
>Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy.
#3367
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com>,
Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>wrote:
>
>>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>>middle class tax cut.
>>
>>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>>steps to get it under control.
>
>Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Bush's was bigger, since it raised the payroll tax.
>Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy.
Bill Funk <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
>wrote:
>
>>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>>middle class tax cut.
>>
>>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>>steps to get it under control.
>
>Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Bush's was bigger, since it raised the payroll tax.
>Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
Explain how Clinton's tax on the wealthy hurt the economy.
#3368
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bobrle01ad7@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
>
>LOL!!!
>
>Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
>in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
>decades.
>
>
Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
>
>LOL!!!
>
>Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
>in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
>decades.
>
>
Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you.
#3369
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bobrle01ad7@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
>
>LOL!!!
>
>Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
>in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
>decades.
>
>
Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
>
>LOL!!!
>
>Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
>in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
>decades.
>
>
Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you.
#3370
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bobrle01ad7@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
>
>LOL!!!
>
>Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
>in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
>decades.
>
>
Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you.
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
>air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
>of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
>to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
>truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.>
>
>LOL!!!
>
>Frankly, one volcanic eruption releases more toxic gasses inthe atmosphere
>in an hour than all the man-created activities for the preceding three
>decades.
>
>
Totally false. I suggest remedial reading for you.