Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3331
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"But I bet you understood what I menat in the first place....didn't you?"
Nope, thought you were being stoopid... sorry!
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Joe wrote:
>
> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>
> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
until
> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
pollution
> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
> place....didn't you?
>
> Ed
>
Nope, thought you were being stoopid... sorry!
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Joe wrote:
>
> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>
> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
until
> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
pollution
> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
> place....didn't you?
>
> Ed
>
#3332
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Douglas A. Shrader" wrote:
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
I was listening to NLPR (National Liberal Public Radio) earlier today
and they ahd a piece on how certain groups were disenchanted with the
electoral process because of the supposed problems in Florida (see
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1493747 ). They had
numerous people talk about how they were certain that their ballots had
been incorrectly marked and that their votes weren't counted. The funny
thing was, the only people that seemed to have problems voting in
Florida were trying to vote for Gore. I find it hard to believe that the
system was so out of whack that only people voting for Gore had hanging
chads, or voted for the wrong person, or couldn't get to the polls, or
had to wait in long lines. They interviewed one person who claimed that
the poll worker told her she had actually voted for Bucannon when she
meant to vote for Gore and then refused to give her a new ballot.
Apparently not a single Bush voter accidently voted for Nader or had any
problem with the ballots or had to wait in lines.
Ed
#3333
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Douglas A. Shrader" wrote:
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
I was listening to NLPR (National Liberal Public Radio) earlier today
and they ahd a piece on how certain groups were disenchanted with the
electoral process because of the supposed problems in Florida (see
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1493747 ). They had
numerous people talk about how they were certain that their ballots had
been incorrectly marked and that their votes weren't counted. The funny
thing was, the only people that seemed to have problems voting in
Florida were trying to vote for Gore. I find it hard to believe that the
system was so out of whack that only people voting for Gore had hanging
chads, or voted for the wrong person, or couldn't get to the polls, or
had to wait in long lines. They interviewed one person who claimed that
the poll worker told her she had actually voted for Bucannon when she
meant to vote for Gore and then refused to give her a new ballot.
Apparently not a single Bush voter accidently voted for Nader or had any
problem with the ballots or had to wait in lines.
Ed
#3334
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Douglas A. Shrader" wrote:
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
I was listening to NLPR (National Liberal Public Radio) earlier today
and they ahd a piece on how certain groups were disenchanted with the
electoral process because of the supposed problems in Florida (see
http://www.npr.org/features/feature.php?wfId=1493747 ). They had
numerous people talk about how they were certain that their ballots had
been incorrectly marked and that their votes weren't counted. The funny
thing was, the only people that seemed to have problems voting in
Florida were trying to vote for Gore. I find it hard to believe that the
system was so out of whack that only people voting for Gore had hanging
chads, or voted for the wrong person, or couldn't get to the polls, or
had to wait in long lines. They interviewed one person who claimed that
the poll worker told her she had actually voted for Bucannon when she
meant to vote for Gore and then refused to give her a new ballot.
Apparently not a single Bush voter accidently voted for Nader or had any
problem with the ballots or had to wait in lines.
Ed
#3335
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
of Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.>
Actually it looks like the ORIGINAL results were accurate & valid!
The Democrats proved their disegenuousness when they only wanted to recout
three heavily Democratic counties. Worse, with a perfectly straight face
they had Bill Daley act as their spokesperson! For those too young to
remember, Daley is the son of the late Richard J. Daley, mayor of Chicago in
the 50's & 60's. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy, which had a much
closer National vote count than 2000, only 100,000 difference. Daley's
Democratic machine created massive voter fraud, people voted twice, dead
people voted, Hell, dead people's DOGS voted. Hence the old Chicago saying
"vote early, vote often!"
No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation!
of Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.>
Actually it looks like the ORIGINAL results were accurate & valid!
The Democrats proved their disegenuousness when they only wanted to recout
three heavily Democratic counties. Worse, with a perfectly straight face
they had Bill Daley act as their spokesperson! For those too young to
remember, Daley is the son of the late Richard J. Daley, mayor of Chicago in
the 50's & 60's. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy, which had a much
closer National vote count than 2000, only 100,000 difference. Daley's
Democratic machine created massive voter fraud, people voted twice, dead
people voted, Hell, dead people's DOGS voted. Hence the old Chicago saying
"vote early, vote often!"
No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation!
#3336
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
of Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.>
Actually it looks like the ORIGINAL results were accurate & valid!
The Democrats proved their disegenuousness when they only wanted to recout
three heavily Democratic counties. Worse, with a perfectly straight face
they had Bill Daley act as their spokesperson! For those too young to
remember, Daley is the son of the late Richard J. Daley, mayor of Chicago in
the 50's & 60's. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy, which had a much
closer National vote count than 2000, only 100,000 difference. Daley's
Democratic machine created massive voter fraud, people voted twice, dead
people voted, Hell, dead people's DOGS voted. Hence the old Chicago saying
"vote early, vote often!"
No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation!
of Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.>
Actually it looks like the ORIGINAL results were accurate & valid!
The Democrats proved their disegenuousness when they only wanted to recout
three heavily Democratic counties. Worse, with a perfectly straight face
they had Bill Daley act as their spokesperson! For those too young to
remember, Daley is the son of the late Richard J. Daley, mayor of Chicago in
the 50's & 60's. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy, which had a much
closer National vote count than 2000, only 100,000 difference. Daley's
Democratic machine created massive voter fraud, people voted twice, dead
people voted, Hell, dead people's DOGS voted. Hence the old Chicago saying
"vote early, vote often!"
No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation!
#3337
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results
of Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.>
Actually it looks like the ORIGINAL results were accurate & valid!
The Democrats proved their disegenuousness when they only wanted to recout
three heavily Democratic counties. Worse, with a perfectly straight face
they had Bill Daley act as their spokesperson! For those too young to
remember, Daley is the son of the late Richard J. Daley, mayor of Chicago in
the 50's & 60's. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy, which had a much
closer National vote count than 2000, only 100,000 difference. Daley's
Democratic machine created massive voter fraud, people voted twice, dead
people voted, Hell, dead people's DOGS voted. Hence the old Chicago saying
"vote early, vote often!"
No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation!
of Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.>
Actually it looks like the ORIGINAL results were accurate & valid!
The Democrats proved their disegenuousness when they only wanted to recout
three heavily Democratic counties. Worse, with a perfectly straight face
they had Bill Daley act as their spokesperson! For those too young to
remember, Daley is the son of the late Richard J. Daley, mayor of Chicago in
the 50's & 60's. Daley stole the 1960 election for Kennedy, which had a much
closer National vote count than 2000, only 100,000 difference. Daley's
Democratic machine created massive voter fraud, people voted twice, dead
people voted, Hell, dead people's DOGS voted. Hence the old Chicago saying
"vote early, vote often!"
No, old Al Gore screwed himself and the entire Democrat party by what he
did, and the public hasn't forgotten. By the way, Texas has only recently
become a Republican state. The Democrats have controlled politics there
since the 1870's, and their latest trick to keep from accepting reality was
to LEAVE THE STATE! Some representation!
#3338
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
damn you gerald....will you let this useless thread die already?
Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
>>Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>
>
>
> LOL!
>
> What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
> your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
> by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
> TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
> shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
> books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
> YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
> WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
> another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
> representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
> tax code.
>
> Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
> out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
> Tax....
>
Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
>>Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>
>
>
> LOL!
>
> What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
> your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
> by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
> TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
> shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
> books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
> YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
> WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
> another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
> representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
> tax code.
>
> Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
> out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
> Tax....
>
#3339
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
damn you gerald....will you let this useless thread die already?
Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
>>Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>
>
>
> LOL!
>
> What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
> your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
> by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
> TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
> shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
> books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
> YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
> WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
> another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
> representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
> tax code.
>
> Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
> out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
> Tax....
>
Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
>>Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>
>
>
> LOL!
>
> What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
> your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
> by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
> TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
> shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
> books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
> YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
> WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
> another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
> representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
> tax code.
>
> Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
> out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
> Tax....
>
#3340
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
damn you gerald....will you let this useless thread die already?
Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
>>Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>
>
>
> LOL!
>
> What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
> your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
> by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
> TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
> shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
> books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
> YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
> WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
> another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
> representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
> tax code.
>
> Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
> out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
> Tax....
>
Gerald G. McGeorge wrote:
>>Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>
>
>
> LOL!
>
> What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
> your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
> by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
> TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
> shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
> books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
> YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
> WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
> another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
> representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
> tax code.
>
> Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
> out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
> Tax....
>