Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3321
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> wrote:
>
> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
> >>middle class tax cut.
> >
> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
> >steps to get it under control.
>
> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"
It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> wrote:
>
> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
> >>middle class tax cut.
> >
> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
> >steps to get it under control.
>
> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"
#3322
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Explain how increased taxes improve the economy."
It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> wrote:
>
> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
> >>middle class tax cut.
> >
> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
> >steps to get it under control.
>
> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"
It improves the economy by starting a recession (ex. the Clinton
Recession)... see the logic I followed there??
"Bill Funk" <bfunk33@pipping.com> wrote in message
news:rtriqvkhms3sfdqhscdi2qnno4u28o5iud@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
> wrote:
>
> >>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
> >>middle class tax cut.
> >
> >And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
> >steps to get it under control.
>
> Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
> Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
>
> --
> Bill Funk
> replace "g" with "a"
#3323
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Those damn corrupt republicans!!! The damn corrupt republicans also kept
that news out of the mainstream press that is obviously conservative...
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
>
>
> >
> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> > news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> > > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
that news out of the mainstream press that is obviously conservative...
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
>
>
> >
> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> > news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> > > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
#3324
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Those damn corrupt republicans!!! The damn corrupt republicans also kept
that news out of the mainstream press that is obviously conservative...
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
>
>
> >
> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> > news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> > > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
that news out of the mainstream press that is obviously conservative...
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
>
>
> >
> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> > news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> > > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
#3325
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Those damn corrupt republicans!!! The damn corrupt republicans also kept
that news out of the mainstream press that is obviously conservative...
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
>
>
> >
> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> > news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> > > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
that news out of the mainstream press that is obviously conservative...
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vqjdrv6m9dlk0a@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:vCiqb.11714$9M3.10456@newsread2.news.atl.eart hlink.net...
> > "And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
> > Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the
results
> of
> > Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
>
> And what the Dems never acknowledge is the fact that Floridas votes were
> recounted again after Bush was declared the winner, every vote was
counted,
> no matter how poorly marked, and it gave Bush more votes than the final
> official count had given him.
>
>
> >
> > "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> > news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > > In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> > > "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
#3326
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am, are
you?????
"Joe" <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> wrote in message
news:bo979g$1c2b1s$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de...
> LLoyd,
> are you published anywhere?
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> > tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> > >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >
> > >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> > >
> > >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> > >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> > >
> > >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA,
or
> > >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> > >
> > >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> >
> > Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
> real
> > scientists publish in.
>
>
you?????
"Joe" <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> wrote in message
news:bo979g$1c2b1s$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de...
> LLoyd,
> are you published anywhere?
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> > tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> > >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >
> > >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> > >
> > >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> > >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> > >
> > >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA,
or
> > >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> > >
> > >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> >
> > Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
> real
> > scientists publish in.
>
>
#3327
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am, are
you?????
"Joe" <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> wrote in message
news:bo979g$1c2b1s$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de...
> LLoyd,
> are you published anywhere?
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> > tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> > >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >
> > >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> > >
> > >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> > >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> > >
> > >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA,
or
> > >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> > >
> > >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> >
> > Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
> real
> > scientists publish in.
>
>
you?????
"Joe" <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> wrote in message
news:bo979g$1c2b1s$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de...
> LLoyd,
> are you published anywhere?
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> > tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> > >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >
> > >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> > >
> > >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> > >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> > >
> > >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA,
or
> > >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> > >
> > >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> >
> > Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
> real
> > scientists publish in.
>
>
#3328
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Hello??? LLLLLOYD are you published in your field of expertise?? I am, are
you?????
"Joe" <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> wrote in message
news:bo979g$1c2b1s$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de...
> LLoyd,
> are you published anywhere?
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> > tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> > >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >
> > >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> > >
> > >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> > >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> > >
> > >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA,
or
> > >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> > >
> > >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> >
> > Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
> real
> > scientists publish in.
>
>
you?????
"Joe" <me@privacy.net (jo_ratner@yahoo.com)> wrote in message
news:bo979g$1c2b1s$1@ID-207166.news.uni-berlin.de...
> LLoyd,
> are you published anywhere?
>
> "Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
> news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> > In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> > tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> > >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> > >
> > >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> > >
> > >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> > >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> > >
> > >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA,
or
> > >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> > >
> > >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> >
> > Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
> real
> > scientists publish in.
>
>
#3329
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"But I bet you understood what I menat in the first place....didn't you?"
Nope, thought you were being stoopid... sorry!
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Joe wrote:
>
> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>
> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
until
> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
pollution
> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
> place....didn't you?
>
> Ed
>
Nope, thought you were being stoopid... sorry!
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Joe wrote:
>
> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>
> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
until
> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
pollution
> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
> place....didn't you?
>
> Ed
>
#3330
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"But I bet you understood what I menat in the first place....didn't you?"
Nope, thought you were being stoopid... sorry!
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Joe wrote:
>
> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>
> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
until
> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
pollution
> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
> place....didn't you?
>
> Ed
>
Nope, thought you were being stoopid... sorry!
"C. E. White" <cewhite3@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:3FA900DF.A19031A2@mindspring.com...
>
>
> Joe wrote:
>
> > "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> > if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> > have burned off long before humans showed up.
>
> OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn
until
> rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
> national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of
pollution
> into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
> place....didn't you?
>
> Ed
>