Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3301
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Its actually 101% when you include the death taxes.>
LOL!
What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
tax code.
Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
Tax....
> --
> Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum
immane
> mittam.
>
>
LOL!
What Lloyd doesn;t want anyone to understand is that when your employer pays
your Social Security taxes, in round numbers he pays around 13%, half paid
by you and shown on your paycheck stub, the other half withheld from your
TRUE SALARY/WAGES and paid by the employer. In other words, the employer
shows the additional 6.2% as part of your your true compensation on his
books. Lloyd thinks it's a tax on the employer, but it's not, it's a tax on
YOU. That's why self-employed persons get the joyous honor of paying the
WHOLE amount, with the second half called "self-employment tax" on the 1040,
another piece of subterfuge your liberal tax & spend eleceted
representatives concocted back in the '70's when they wrote this entire scam
tax code.
Lloyd and the other leftists think everyone's too stupid to figure this all
out, but it's actually very easy to unravel it using a program like Turbo
Tax....
> --
> Catapultam habeo. Nisi pecuniam omnem mihi dabis, ad caput tuum saxum
immane
> mittam.
>
>
#3302
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Bill Putney wrote:
>
> I always get a kick out of hearing reports that such-and-such a city has
> too much ozone (considered a pollutant). Whenever I hear such reports,
> I rush to that city and discharge a couple of cans of R12 to neutralize
> the ozone - what do they claim - 10 to 1 effectiveness? Just trying to
> do my part to save the world.
If only things worked that way.
Ed
#3303
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Bill Putney wrote:
>
> I always get a kick out of hearing reports that such-and-such a city has
> too much ozone (considered a pollutant). Whenever I hear such reports,
> I rush to that city and discharge a couple of cans of R12 to neutralize
> the ozone - what do they claim - 10 to 1 effectiveness? Just trying to
> do my part to save the world.
If only things worked that way.
Ed
#3304
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Bill Putney wrote:
>
> I always get a kick out of hearing reports that such-and-such a city has
> too much ozone (considered a pollutant). Whenever I hear such reports,
> I rush to that city and discharge a couple of cans of R12 to neutralize
> the ozone - what do they claim - 10 to 1 effectiveness? Just trying to
> do my part to save the world.
If only things worked that way.
Ed
#3305
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Brent P wrote:
>
> In article <hNbqb.10739$9M3.9268@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>, FDRanger92 wrote:
>
> > What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
> > air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
> > of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
> > to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
> > truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>
> You forget, it's the source and location of the CO2 that matters in
> the political arguement. Not that it simply takes from a carbon sink
> and releases CO2 to the atmosphere. A forest fire produces good CO2. An
> automobile in the USA produces bad CO2. A factory in China produces good
> CO2. A factory in the USA produces bad CO2. A tractor on a farm in the USA
> produces bad CO2. A coal fired electric plant in china produces good
> CO2. And on and on...
Sarcasm, right? 8^)
I always get a kick out of hearing reports that such-and-such a city has
too much ozone (considered a pollutant). Whenever I hear such reports,
I rush to that city and discharge a couple of cans of R12 to neutralize
the ozone - what do they claim - 10 to 1 effectiveness? Just trying to
do my part to save the world.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#3306
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Brent P wrote:
>
> In article <hNbqb.10739$9M3.9268@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>, FDRanger92 wrote:
>
> > What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
> > air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
> > of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
> > to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
> > truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>
> You forget, it's the source and location of the CO2 that matters in
> the political arguement. Not that it simply takes from a carbon sink
> and releases CO2 to the atmosphere. A forest fire produces good CO2. An
> automobile in the USA produces bad CO2. A factory in China produces good
> CO2. A factory in the USA produces bad CO2. A tractor on a farm in the USA
> produces bad CO2. A coal fired electric plant in china produces good
> CO2. And on and on...
Sarcasm, right? 8^)
I always get a kick out of hearing reports that such-and-such a city has
too much ozone (considered a pollutant). Whenever I hear such reports,
I rush to that city and discharge a couple of cans of R12 to neutralize
the ozone - what do they claim - 10 to 1 effectiveness? Just trying to
do my part to save the world.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#3307
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Brent P wrote:
>
> In article <hNbqb.10739$9M3.9268@newsread2.news.atl.earthlink .net>, FDRanger92 wrote:
>
> > What about all those greenhouse gasses that the fires have spewed into the
> > air? Does that mean that the environmental groups that blocked any thinning
> > of the forests are responsible for releasing all that CO2 and contributing
> > to global warming. Its certainly put more CO2 into the air than my little
> > truck ever will or has in the 11 years I've owned it.
>
> You forget, it's the source and location of the CO2 that matters in
> the political arguement. Not that it simply takes from a carbon sink
> and releases CO2 to the atmosphere. A forest fire produces good CO2. An
> automobile in the USA produces bad CO2. A factory in China produces good
> CO2. A factory in the USA produces bad CO2. A tractor on a farm in the USA
> produces bad CO2. A coal fired electric plant in china produces good
> CO2. And on and on...
Sarcasm, right? 8^)
I always get a kick out of hearing reports that such-and-such a city has
too much ozone (considered a pollutant). Whenever I hear such reports,
I rush to that city and discharge a couple of cans of R12 to neutralize
the ozone - what do they claim - 10 to 1 effectiveness? Just trying to
do my part to save the world.
Bill Putney
(to reply by e-mail, replace the last letter of the alphabet in my
address with "x")
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
#3308
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
<snip>
> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>
Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
<snip>
> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>
#3309
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
<snip>
> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>
Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
<snip>
> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>
#3310
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?"
Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
<snip>
> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>
Wasn't it the corrupt democrats that tried to illegally alter the results of
Florida? The final results were accurate and valid.
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bob0k1$s2a$1@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo8tgh012ij@enews1.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
<snip>
> And there're no corrupt Republican machines? Hello, Texas? Florida?
>