Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3251
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 04 Nov 03 11:29:22 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>because those are not lies, and thus he cannot argue against
>>them. Thus, since they prove that his conclusion - we shouldn't have gone
>>to war in Iraq - is wrong, he ignores them.
>>
>
>So when are we going to overthrow the saudis? The Chinese? Does your
>morality extend to all nasty regimes?
The inability to do *all* one wishes to do does not translate into the
need to do *nothing*.
Don't be so childish.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>>because those are not lies, and thus he cannot argue against
>>them. Thus, since they prove that his conclusion - we shouldn't have gone
>>to war in Iraq - is wrong, he ignores them.
>>
>
>So when are we going to overthrow the saudis? The Chinese? Does your
>morality extend to all nasty regimes?
The inability to do *all* one wishes to do does not translate into the
need to do *nothing*.
Don't be so childish.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3252
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 04 Nov 03 11:29:22 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>because those are not lies, and thus he cannot argue against
>>them. Thus, since they prove that his conclusion - we shouldn't have gone
>>to war in Iraq - is wrong, he ignores them.
>>
>
>So when are we going to overthrow the saudis? The Chinese? Does your
>morality extend to all nasty regimes?
The inability to do *all* one wishes to do does not translate into the
need to do *nothing*.
Don't be so childish.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>>because those are not lies, and thus he cannot argue against
>>them. Thus, since they prove that his conclusion - we shouldn't have gone
>>to war in Iraq - is wrong, he ignores them.
>>
>
>So when are we going to overthrow the saudis? The Chinese? Does your
>morality extend to all nasty regimes?
The inability to do *all* one wishes to do does not translate into the
need to do *nothing*.
Don't be so childish.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3253
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 04 Nov 03 11:29:22 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>because those are not lies, and thus he cannot argue against
>>them. Thus, since they prove that his conclusion - we shouldn't have gone
>>to war in Iraq - is wrong, he ignores them.
>>
>
>So when are we going to overthrow the saudis? The Chinese? Does your
>morality extend to all nasty regimes?
The inability to do *all* one wishes to do does not translate into the
need to do *nothing*.
Don't be so childish.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>>because those are not lies, and thus he cannot argue against
>>them. Thus, since they prove that his conclusion - we shouldn't have gone
>>to war in Iraq - is wrong, he ignores them.
>>
>
>So when are we going to overthrow the saudis? The Chinese? Does your
>morality extend to all nasty regimes?
The inability to do *all* one wishes to do does not translate into the
need to do *nothing*.
Don't be so childish.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3254
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:34:35 -0500, "John T. Waisanen"
<jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote:
>hey why don't you two funboys get a room and quit arguing over usenet?
>for christ's sake.
That's what usenet is for.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
<jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote:
>hey why don't you two funboys get a room and quit arguing over usenet?
>for christ's sake.
That's what usenet is for.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3255
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:34:35 -0500, "John T. Waisanen"
<jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote:
>hey why don't you two funboys get a room and quit arguing over usenet?
>for christ's sake.
That's what usenet is for.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
<jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote:
>hey why don't you two funboys get a room and quit arguing over usenet?
>for christ's sake.
That's what usenet is for.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3256
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Tue, 04 Nov 2003 13:34:35 -0500, "John T. Waisanen"
<jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote:
>hey why don't you two funboys get a room and quit arguing over usenet?
>for christ's sake.
That's what usenet is for.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
<jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote:
>hey why don't you two funboys get a room and quit arguing over usenet?
>for christ's sake.
That's what usenet is for.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3257
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>middle class tax cut.
>
>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>steps to get it under control.
Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>middle class tax cut.
>
>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>steps to get it under control.
Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3258
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>middle class tax cut.
>
>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>steps to get it under control.
Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>middle class tax cut.
>
>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>steps to get it under control.
Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3259
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
On Wed, 05 Nov 03 11:42:46 GMT, lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu (Lloyd Parker)
wrote:
>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>middle class tax cut.
>
>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>steps to get it under control.
Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
wrote:
>>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>>middle class tax cut.
>
>And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
>steps to get it under control.
Would that be by instituting the largest tax increase in our history?
Explain how increased taxes improve the economy.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
#3260
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Bravo! Couldn't have put that better myself. Read and try to open your
mind just a bit Lloyd maybe you'll learn something.>
Indeed, Lloyd will become conservative and green-fable-questioning when 1)
he works his @$$ off, gets a well-deserved promotion and finds out 55% went
to taxes, and 2) when the forest around his house is neglecetd by law and
the resulting inferno burns his house to the ground. He'll then learn he's
too wealthy to qualify for Federal assistance because he makes more than
$30k a year.
mind just a bit Lloyd maybe you'll learn something.>
Indeed, Lloyd will become conservative and green-fable-questioning when 1)
he works his @$$ off, gets a well-deserved promotion and finds out 55% went
to taxes, and 2) when the forest around his house is neglecetd by law and
the resulting inferno burns his house to the ground. He'll then learn he's
too wealthy to qualify for Federal assistance because he makes more than
$30k a year.