Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3201
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <7wVpb.9500$Oo4.4594@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8k18$3lv$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >> Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers
>resort
>> >to name-calling. <
>> >
>> >Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with
>you
>> >is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
>> >
>> >> > I register as an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader.
>> >
>> >> B.S. Nader was well to the left of Gore, and you sound just like a
>> >commercial for Rush or Hannity. <
>> >
>> >But, Nader is not part of the Republicrat establishment, is he? Neither
>was
>> >Perot, who I voted for the previous two elections.
>> >
>> >By the way, if you can purge your shallow little leftist mind of all the
>> >Socialist indoctrination
>>
>> If you're going to call people names, it hardly behooves you to **** and
>moan
>> when they call you names.
>>
>>
>> >you've been fed you'll find that people in the
>> >middle and on the right often have quite well formed positions on matters
>> >that the left has managed to dominate, and ---- UP, for over 50 years.
>> >
>> >I hate to challenge your little leftist sensibilities, but Bill Clinton
>was
>> >not a liberal, he was just a politician wanting more & more power. He was
>a
>> >HYPOCRITE of the first order.
>>
>> And gee, wasn't the country doing great under him?
>>
>> >Al Gore lost becuase he couldn't carry his own State, where he got
>creamed
>> >because he no longer represented the values of the people who sent him to
>> >Washington in the first place, and because Nader sucked off the Green
>vote
>> >which he'd not convinced.
>> >
>> >> Given the crap the Democrats are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for
>Bush
>> >this time for sure.
>> >
>> >> Uhh-huh. As if there was a chance you'd vote any other way... <
>> >
>> >And that's the problem, isn't it Jonesey, too many people, indeed a
>MAJORITY
>> >of us, don't agree with you and your Socialist buddies! (Get used to
>being
>> >irrelevant....)
>> >
>> >
>> I doubt many agree with you and your fascist buddies either.
>
>Do you even know what a fascist is Lloyd?
>
>
Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8k18$3lv$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >> Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers
>resort
>> >to name-calling. <
>> >
>> >Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with
>you
>> >is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
>> >
>> >> > I register as an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader.
>> >
>> >> B.S. Nader was well to the left of Gore, and you sound just like a
>> >commercial for Rush or Hannity. <
>> >
>> >But, Nader is not part of the Republicrat establishment, is he? Neither
>was
>> >Perot, who I voted for the previous two elections.
>> >
>> >By the way, if you can purge your shallow little leftist mind of all the
>> >Socialist indoctrination
>>
>> If you're going to call people names, it hardly behooves you to **** and
>moan
>> when they call you names.
>>
>>
>> >you've been fed you'll find that people in the
>> >middle and on the right often have quite well formed positions on matters
>> >that the left has managed to dominate, and ---- UP, for over 50 years.
>> >
>> >I hate to challenge your little leftist sensibilities, but Bill Clinton
>was
>> >not a liberal, he was just a politician wanting more & more power. He was
>a
>> >HYPOCRITE of the first order.
>>
>> And gee, wasn't the country doing great under him?
>>
>> >Al Gore lost becuase he couldn't carry his own State, where he got
>creamed
>> >because he no longer represented the values of the people who sent him to
>> >Washington in the first place, and because Nader sucked off the Green
>vote
>> >which he'd not convinced.
>> >
>> >> Given the crap the Democrats are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for
>Bush
>> >this time for sure.
>> >
>> >> Uhh-huh. As if there was a chance you'd vote any other way... <
>> >
>> >And that's the problem, isn't it Jonesey, too many people, indeed a
>MAJORITY
>> >of us, don't agree with you and your Socialist buddies! (Get used to
>being
>> >irrelevant....)
>> >
>> >
>> I doubt many agree with you and your fascist buddies either.
>
>Do you even know what a fascist is Lloyd?
>
>
Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
#3202
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <7wVpb.9500$Oo4.4594@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8k18$3lv$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >> Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers
>resort
>> >to name-calling. <
>> >
>> >Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with
>you
>> >is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
>> >
>> >> > I register as an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader.
>> >
>> >> B.S. Nader was well to the left of Gore, and you sound just like a
>> >commercial for Rush or Hannity. <
>> >
>> >But, Nader is not part of the Republicrat establishment, is he? Neither
>was
>> >Perot, who I voted for the previous two elections.
>> >
>> >By the way, if you can purge your shallow little leftist mind of all the
>> >Socialist indoctrination
>>
>> If you're going to call people names, it hardly behooves you to **** and
>moan
>> when they call you names.
>>
>>
>> >you've been fed you'll find that people in the
>> >middle and on the right often have quite well formed positions on matters
>> >that the left has managed to dominate, and ---- UP, for over 50 years.
>> >
>> >I hate to challenge your little leftist sensibilities, but Bill Clinton
>was
>> >not a liberal, he was just a politician wanting more & more power. He was
>a
>> >HYPOCRITE of the first order.
>>
>> And gee, wasn't the country doing great under him?
>>
>> >Al Gore lost becuase he couldn't carry his own State, where he got
>creamed
>> >because he no longer represented the values of the people who sent him to
>> >Washington in the first place, and because Nader sucked off the Green
>vote
>> >which he'd not convinced.
>> >
>> >> Given the crap the Democrats are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for
>Bush
>> >this time for sure.
>> >
>> >> Uhh-huh. As if there was a chance you'd vote any other way... <
>> >
>> >And that's the problem, isn't it Jonesey, too many people, indeed a
>MAJORITY
>> >of us, don't agree with you and your Socialist buddies! (Get used to
>being
>> >irrelevant....)
>> >
>> >
>> I doubt many agree with you and your fascist buddies either.
>
>Do you even know what a fascist is Lloyd?
>
>
Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
"FDRanger92" <csu13081@nospammail.clayton.edu> wrote:
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8k18$3lv$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> >> Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers
>resort
>> >to name-calling. <
>> >
>> >Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with
>you
>> >is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
>> >
>> >> > I register as an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader.
>> >
>> >> B.S. Nader was well to the left of Gore, and you sound just like a
>> >commercial for Rush or Hannity. <
>> >
>> >But, Nader is not part of the Republicrat establishment, is he? Neither
>was
>> >Perot, who I voted for the previous two elections.
>> >
>> >By the way, if you can purge your shallow little leftist mind of all the
>> >Socialist indoctrination
>>
>> If you're going to call people names, it hardly behooves you to **** and
>moan
>> when they call you names.
>>
>>
>> >you've been fed you'll find that people in the
>> >middle and on the right often have quite well formed positions on matters
>> >that the left has managed to dominate, and ---- UP, for over 50 years.
>> >
>> >I hate to challenge your little leftist sensibilities, but Bill Clinton
>was
>> >not a liberal, he was just a politician wanting more & more power. He was
>a
>> >HYPOCRITE of the first order.
>>
>> And gee, wasn't the country doing great under him?
>>
>> >Al Gore lost becuase he couldn't carry his own State, where he got
>creamed
>> >because he no longer represented the values of the people who sent him to
>> >Washington in the first place, and because Nader sucked off the Green
>vote
>> >which he'd not convinced.
>> >
>> >> Given the crap the Democrats are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for
>Bush
>> >this time for sure.
>> >
>> >> Uhh-huh. As if there was a chance you'd vote any other way... <
>> >
>> >And that's the problem, isn't it Jonesey, too many people, indeed a
>MAJORITY
>> >of us, don't agree with you and your Socialist buddies! (Get used to
>being
>> >irrelevant....)
>> >
>> >
>> I doubt many agree with you and your fascist buddies either.
>
>Do you even know what a fascist is Lloyd?
>
>
Yes, but you right-wingers obviously do not know what a socialist is.
#3203
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as something
>necessary"
>Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all the
>"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If
they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>snip
>> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as something
>necessary"
>Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all the
>"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If
they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>snip
>> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>
>
#3204
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as something
>necessary"
>Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all the
>"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If
they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>snip
>> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as something
>necessary"
>Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all the
>"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If
they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>snip
>> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>
>
#3205
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <DGZpb.9884$Oo4.7606@newsread1.news.atl.earthlink. net>,
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as something
>necessary"
>Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all the
>"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If
they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>snip
>> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>
>
"Joe" <jo_ratner@NOSPAM.yahoo.com> wrote:
>"Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as something
>necessary"
>Most people don't mind paying for infrastructure and defense... It's all the
>"social programs" and pork that I HATE...
OK, ask the middle class if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If
they want their parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want
workplace safety not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they
want to eliminate prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.
>
>"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
>news:bo8jur$3lv$4@puck.cc.emory.edu...
>> In article <bo6q9l0qb2@enews3.newsguy.com>,
>> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>snip
>> Most people view paying taxes in return for government sources as
>something
>> necessary. That's why they live in a society and not an anarchy.
>
>
#3206
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bob6130ajm@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> OK, ask the middle class <<
>
>And, who might the "middle class" be Lloyd? By the tax code the liar
>Clinton and the Democrats rammed down everyone's throats, anyone making $50k
>a year is Rich"!
Right-wing propaganda.
>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>middle class tax cut.
And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
steps to get it under control.
>As soon as the worm got elected he promptly went on TV
>and abandoned it, then signed into law the biggest tax increase in history.
For the wealthy, not the middle class.
>
>> if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If they want their
>parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want workplace safety
>not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they want to eliminate
>prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.>
>
>This rant is precisely why the Liberals are out of power, everyone (even the
>elderly) see through these typical Liberal scare tactics and lies. Fact is,
>all these people know to do is create more useless Federal agancies, fill
>them full of lazy-*** patronage workers and pause taxts to pay for it all.
>
>
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> OK, ask the middle class <<
>
>And, who might the "middle class" be Lloyd? By the tax code the liar
>Clinton and the Democrats rammed down everyone's throats, anyone making $50k
>a year is Rich"!
Right-wing propaganda.
>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>middle class tax cut.
And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
steps to get it under control.
>As soon as the worm got elected he promptly went on TV
>and abandoned it, then signed into law the biggest tax increase in history.
For the wealthy, not the middle class.
>
>> if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If they want their
>parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want workplace safety
>not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they want to eliminate
>prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.>
>
>This rant is precisely why the Liberals are out of power, everyone (even the
>elderly) see through these typical Liberal scare tactics and lies. Fact is,
>all these people know to do is create more useless Federal agancies, fill
>them full of lazy-*** patronage workers and pause taxts to pay for it all.
>
>
#3207
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bob6130ajm@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> OK, ask the middle class <<
>
>And, who might the "middle class" be Lloyd? By the tax code the liar
>Clinton and the Democrats rammed down everyone's throats, anyone making $50k
>a year is Rich"!
Right-wing propaganda.
>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>middle class tax cut.
And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
steps to get it under control.
>As soon as the worm got elected he promptly went on TV
>and abandoned it, then signed into law the biggest tax increase in history.
For the wealthy, not the middle class.
>
>> if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If they want their
>parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want workplace safety
>not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they want to eliminate
>prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.>
>
>This rant is precisely why the Liberals are out of power, everyone (even the
>elderly) see through these typical Liberal scare tactics and lies. Fact is,
>all these people know to do is create more useless Federal agancies, fill
>them full of lazy-*** patronage workers and pause taxts to pay for it all.
>
>
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> OK, ask the middle class <<
>
>And, who might the "middle class" be Lloyd? By the tax code the liar
>Clinton and the Democrats rammed down everyone's throats, anyone making $50k
>a year is Rich"!
Right-wing propaganda.
>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>middle class tax cut.
And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
steps to get it under control.
>As soon as the worm got elected he promptly went on TV
>and abandoned it, then signed into law the biggest tax increase in history.
For the wealthy, not the middle class.
>
>> if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If they want their
>parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want workplace safety
>not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they want to eliminate
>prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.>
>
>This rant is precisely why the Liberals are out of power, everyone (even the
>elderly) see through these typical Liberal scare tactics and lies. Fact is,
>all these people know to do is create more useless Federal agancies, fill
>them full of lazy-*** patronage workers and pause taxts to pay for it all.
>
>
#3208
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bob6130ajm@enews3.newsguy.com>,
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> OK, ask the middle class <<
>
>And, who might the "middle class" be Lloyd? By the tax code the liar
>Clinton and the Democrats rammed down everyone's throats, anyone making $50k
>a year is Rich"!
Right-wing propaganda.
>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>middle class tax cut.
And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
steps to get it under control.
>As soon as the worm got elected he promptly went on TV
>and abandoned it, then signed into law the biggest tax increase in history.
For the wealthy, not the middle class.
>
>> if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If they want their
>parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want workplace safety
>not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they want to eliminate
>prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.>
>
>This rant is precisely why the Liberals are out of power, everyone (even the
>elderly) see through these typical Liberal scare tactics and lies. Fact is,
>all these people know to do is create more useless Federal agancies, fill
>them full of lazy-*** patronage workers and pause taxts to pay for it all.
>
>
"Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
>> OK, ask the middle class <<
>
>And, who might the "middle class" be Lloyd? By the tax code the liar
>Clinton and the Democrats rammed down everyone's throats, anyone making $50k
>a year is Rich"!
Right-wing propaganda.
>We all remember that lying bastard Clinton ran in '92 on a
>middle class tax cut.
And when Bush left the budget in much worse shape, to his credit, he took
steps to get it under control.
>As soon as the worm got elected he promptly went on TV
>and abandoned it, then signed into law the biggest tax increase in history.
For the wealthy, not the middle class.
>
>> if they want college grants and scholarships cut. If they want their
>parents' Medicare and Medicaid benefits cut. If they want workplace safety
>not enforced. If they want no meat inspections. If they want to eliminate
>prisons, or aid to local schools, or law enforcement.>
>
>This rant is precisely why the Liberals are out of power, everyone (even the
>elderly) see through these typical Liberal scare tactics and lies. Fact is,
>all these people know to do is create more useless Federal agancies, fill
>them full of lazy-*** patronage workers and pause taxts to pay for it all.
>
>
#3209
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Joe wrote:
> "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> have burned off long before humans showed up.
OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn until
rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of pollution
into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
place....didn't you?
Ed
#3210
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Joe wrote:
> "Nature doesn't extinguish fires started by lightening "
> if this were true, there would be no vegitation on the planet. It would
> have burned off long before humans showed up.
OK, you got me. I should have said something like "nature lets fires burn until
rain storms put them out and doesn't fight them just becasue they are in
national forests or near populated areas or becasue they dump lots of pollution
into the environment." But I bet you understood what I menat in the first
place....didn't you?
Ed