Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#3171
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind real
> scientists publish in.
Please provide proof that "Energy and Environment" is not a peer-reviewed
journal. But of course instead of addressing the actual paper,
http://www.multi-science.co.uk/mcintyre_02.pdf, you decide to attack
where it's published. In other words, you once again put your politics
before science. A real scienist would find arguement with the work itself.
>>You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind real
> scientists publish in.
Please provide proof that "Energy and Environment" is not a peer-reviewed
journal. But of course instead of addressing the actual paper,
http://www.multi-science.co.uk/mcintyre_02.pdf, you decide to attack
where it's published. In other words, you once again put your politics
before science. A real scienist would find arguement with the work itself.
#3172
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
In article <bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
>>You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind real
> scientists publish in.
Please provide proof that "Energy and Environment" is not a peer-reviewed
journal. But of course instead of addressing the actual paper,
http://www.multi-science.co.uk/mcintyre_02.pdf, you decide to attack
where it's published. In other words, you once again put your politics
before science. A real scienist would find arguement with the work itself.
>>You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind real
> scientists publish in.
Please provide proof that "Energy and Environment" is not a peer-reviewed
journal. But of course instead of addressing the actual paper,
http://www.multi-science.co.uk/mcintyre_02.pdf, you decide to attack
where it's published. In other words, you once again put your politics
before science. A real scienist would find arguement with the work itself.
#3173
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
LLoyd,
are you published anywhere?
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >
> >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> >
> >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> >
> >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA, or
> >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> >
> >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
>
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
real
> scientists publish in.
are you published anywhere?
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >
> >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> >
> >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> >
> >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA, or
> >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> >
> >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
>
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
real
> scientists publish in.
#3174
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
LLoyd,
are you published anywhere?
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >
> >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> >
> >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> >
> >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA, or
> >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> >
> >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
>
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
real
> scientists publish in.
are you published anywhere?
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >
> >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> >
> >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> >
> >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA, or
> >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> >
> >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
>
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
real
> scientists publish in.
#3175
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
LLoyd,
are you published anywhere?
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >
> >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> >
> >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> >
> >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA, or
> >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> >
> >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
>
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
real
> scientists publish in.
are you published anywhere?
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8tr4$dku$11@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <duSpb.77564$275.206280@attbi_s53>,
> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >In article <bo8jlm$3lv$2@puck.cc.emory.edu>, Lloyd Parker wrote:
> >> tetraethyllead@yahoo.com (Brent P) wrote:
> >
> >>>http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99994321
> >
> >>>I am sure parker will just call it a 'right-wing' publication
> >>>or something to dismiss it all.
> >
> >> Why not read something a real scientific group says? IPCC, or EPA, or
> >> National Academy of Sciences? Afraid?
> >
> >You didn't comment on the journal article URL I posted earlier.
>
> Because it's not a peer-reviewed scientific journal. You know, the kind
real
> scientists publish in.
#3176
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8k18$3lv$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers
resort
> >to name-calling. <
> >
> >Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with
you
> >is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
> >
> >> > I register as an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader.
> >
> >> B.S. Nader was well to the left of Gore, and you sound just like a
> >commercial for Rush or Hannity. <
> >
> >But, Nader is not part of the Republicrat establishment, is he? Neither
was
> >Perot, who I voted for the previous two elections.
> >
> >By the way, if you can purge your shallow little leftist mind of all the
> >Socialist indoctrination
>
> If you're going to call people names, it hardly behooves you to **** and
moan
> when they call you names.
>
>
> >you've been fed you'll find that people in the
> >middle and on the right often have quite well formed positions on matters
> >that the left has managed to dominate, and ---- UP, for over 50 years.
> >
> >I hate to challenge your little leftist sensibilities, but Bill Clinton
was
> >not a liberal, he was just a politician wanting more & more power. He was
a
> >HYPOCRITE of the first order.
>
> And gee, wasn't the country doing great under him?
>
> >Al Gore lost becuase he couldn't carry his own State, where he got
creamed
> >because he no longer represented the values of the people who sent him to
> >Washington in the first place, and because Nader sucked off the Green
vote
> >which he'd not convinced.
> >
> >> Given the crap the Democrats are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for
Bush
> >this time for sure.
> >
> >> Uhh-huh. As if there was a chance you'd vote any other way... <
> >
> >And that's the problem, isn't it Jonesey, too many people, indeed a
MAJORITY
> >of us, don't agree with you and your Socialist buddies! (Get used to
being
> >irrelevant....)
> >
> >
> I doubt many agree with you and your fascist buddies either.
Do you even know what a fascist is Lloyd?
#3177
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8k18$3lv$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers
resort
> >to name-calling. <
> >
> >Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with
you
> >is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
> >
> >> > I register as an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader.
> >
> >> B.S. Nader was well to the left of Gore, and you sound just like a
> >commercial for Rush or Hannity. <
> >
> >But, Nader is not part of the Republicrat establishment, is he? Neither
was
> >Perot, who I voted for the previous two elections.
> >
> >By the way, if you can purge your shallow little leftist mind of all the
> >Socialist indoctrination
>
> If you're going to call people names, it hardly behooves you to **** and
moan
> when they call you names.
>
>
> >you've been fed you'll find that people in the
> >middle and on the right often have quite well formed positions on matters
> >that the left has managed to dominate, and ---- UP, for over 50 years.
> >
> >I hate to challenge your little leftist sensibilities, but Bill Clinton
was
> >not a liberal, he was just a politician wanting more & more power. He was
a
> >HYPOCRITE of the first order.
>
> And gee, wasn't the country doing great under him?
>
> >Al Gore lost becuase he couldn't carry his own State, where he got
creamed
> >because he no longer represented the values of the people who sent him to
> >Washington in the first place, and because Nader sucked off the Green
vote
> >which he'd not convinced.
> >
> >> Given the crap the Democrats are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for
Bush
> >this time for sure.
> >
> >> Uhh-huh. As if there was a chance you'd vote any other way... <
> >
> >And that's the problem, isn't it Jonesey, too many people, indeed a
MAJORITY
> >of us, don't agree with you and your Socialist buddies! (Get used to
being
> >irrelevant....)
> >
> >
> I doubt many agree with you and your fascist buddies either.
Do you even know what a fascist is Lloyd?
#3178
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
"Lloyd Parker" <lparker@NOSPAMemory.edu> wrote in message
news:bo8k18$3lv$5@puck.cc.emory.edu...
> In article <bo6rhb0rvn@enews3.newsguy.com>,
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorgenospam@frontier.net> wrote:
> >> Just like I said - when you have nothing to say, you right-wingers
resort
> >to name-calling. <
> >
> >Why is it you leftist ******** always think anyone who disagreees with
you
> >is a "right-winger"? No wonder no one takes you seriously any longer.
> >
> >> > I register as an independent and in '00 I voted for Nader.
> >
> >> B.S. Nader was well to the left of Gore, and you sound just like a
> >commercial for Rush or Hannity. <
> >
> >But, Nader is not part of the Republicrat establishment, is he? Neither
was
> >Perot, who I voted for the previous two elections.
> >
> >By the way, if you can purge your shallow little leftist mind of all the
> >Socialist indoctrination
>
> If you're going to call people names, it hardly behooves you to **** and
moan
> when they call you names.
>
>
> >you've been fed you'll find that people in the
> >middle and on the right often have quite well formed positions on matters
> >that the left has managed to dominate, and ---- UP, for over 50 years.
> >
> >I hate to challenge your little leftist sensibilities, but Bill Clinton
was
> >not a liberal, he was just a politician wanting more & more power. He was
a
> >HYPOCRITE of the first order.
>
> And gee, wasn't the country doing great under him?
>
> >Al Gore lost becuase he couldn't carry his own State, where he got
creamed
> >because he no longer represented the values of the people who sent him to
> >Washington in the first place, and because Nader sucked off the Green
vote
> >which he'd not convinced.
> >
> >> Given the crap the Democrats are putting up as leaders, I'll vote for
Bush
> >this time for sure.
> >
> >> Uhh-huh. As if there was a chance you'd vote any other way... <
> >
> >And that's the problem, isn't it Jonesey, too many people, indeed a
MAJORITY
> >of us, don't agree with you and your Socialist buddies! (Get used to
being
> >irrelevant....)
> >
> >
> I doubt many agree with you and your fascist buddies either.
Do you even know what a fascist is Lloyd?
#3179
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
So now this is becoming a religious thread here, too...?..
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"John T. Waisanen" <jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote in message
news:4jSpb.4675$H91.97823@news.itd.umich.edu...
[..................]
> for christ's sake.
>
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"John T. Waisanen" <jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote in message
news:4jSpb.4675$H91.97823@news.itd.umich.edu...
[..................]
> for christ's sake.
>
#3180
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
So now this is becoming a religious thread here, too...?..
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"John T. Waisanen" <jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote in message
news:4jSpb.4675$H91.97823@news.itd.umich.edu...
[..................]
> for christ's sake.
>
DAS
--
---
NB: To reply directly replace "nospam" with "schmetterling"
---
"John T. Waisanen" <jwaisane@NOTumich.edu> wrote in message
news:4jSpb.4675$H91.97823@news.itd.umich.edu...
[..................]
> for christ's sake.
>