Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
#2911
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> Did he have them in 2003? If so, where are they?
>
>
Yes. Read every post I've made LP, I've answered this a dozen times. You're
the scientist, you tell me. If an item is created, and is not destroyed in
anyway, does it still exist?
Your like the little kid who keeps saying "why" everytime it gets an answer,
no matter how thorough the answer is, until the parent finally has enough
and states BECAUSE I SAID SO!.
LP, BECAUSE I SAID SO!!. Now shut up and go to bed, you wish to act like a
child I'll treat you like one.
#2912
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> More like saying if you get cancer you will die from it, ignoring all the
> cancer survivors out there. But you ignore all facts that don't agree with
> what you already believe. You are not a scientist, you are a parrot. <
"Lloyd want a CRACKER? Rawk!"
> cancer survivors out there. But you ignore all facts that don't agree with
> what you already believe. You are not a scientist, you are a parrot. <
"Lloyd want a CRACKER? Rawk!"
#2913
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> More like saying if you get cancer you will die from it, ignoring all the
> cancer survivors out there. But you ignore all facts that don't agree with
> what you already believe. You are not a scientist, you are a parrot. <
"Lloyd want a CRACKER? Rawk!"
> cancer survivors out there. But you ignore all facts that don't agree with
> what you already believe. You are not a scientist, you are a parrot. <
"Lloyd want a CRACKER? Rawk!"
#2914
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
> More like saying if you get cancer you will die from it, ignoring all the
> cancer survivors out there. But you ignore all facts that don't agree with
> what you already believe. You are not a scientist, you are a parrot. <
"Lloyd want a CRACKER? Rawk!"
> cancer survivors out there. But you ignore all facts that don't agree with
> what you already believe. You are not a scientist, you are a parrot. <
"Lloyd want a CRACKER? Rawk!"
#2915
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
This is the worst crop of candidates the Democrats have yet to put forward.
Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a time
of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
disgrace to the name of their political party. Never in history have we seen
a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
actions.
None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable of
enemies. (As a former liberal Democrat and McGovern campaign worker, I
remind people I know losers when I see 'em.) Clark is nothing but a
chameleon, running as a Democrat because he can't run as a Republican.
The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax the
rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at heart.
Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and pull
out our troops at this time. But, if they gained power in the process, what
would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a major
world crisis for his successor to clean up.
The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything truly
effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal. Sad, but
unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant to
lead their country. As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
one. He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
colors.
Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a time
of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
disgrace to the name of their political party. Never in history have we seen
a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
actions.
None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable of
enemies. (As a former liberal Democrat and McGovern campaign worker, I
remind people I know losers when I see 'em.) Clark is nothing but a
chameleon, running as a Democrat because he can't run as a Republican.
The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax the
rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at heart.
Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and pull
out our troops at this time. But, if they gained power in the process, what
would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a major
world crisis for his successor to clean up.
The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything truly
effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal. Sad, but
unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant to
lead their country. As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
one. He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
colors.
#2916
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
This is the worst crop of candidates the Democrats have yet to put forward.
Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a time
of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
disgrace to the name of their political party. Never in history have we seen
a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
actions.
None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable of
enemies. (As a former liberal Democrat and McGovern campaign worker, I
remind people I know losers when I see 'em.) Clark is nothing but a
chameleon, running as a Democrat because he can't run as a Republican.
The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax the
rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at heart.
Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and pull
out our troops at this time. But, if they gained power in the process, what
would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a major
world crisis for his successor to clean up.
The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything truly
effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal. Sad, but
unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant to
lead their country. As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
one. He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
colors.
Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a time
of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
disgrace to the name of their political party. Never in history have we seen
a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
actions.
None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable of
enemies. (As a former liberal Democrat and McGovern campaign worker, I
remind people I know losers when I see 'em.) Clark is nothing but a
chameleon, running as a Democrat because he can't run as a Republican.
The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax the
rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at heart.
Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and pull
out our troops at this time. But, if they gained power in the process, what
would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a major
world crisis for his successor to clean up.
The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything truly
effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal. Sad, but
unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant to
lead their country. As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
one. He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
colors.
#2917
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
This is the worst crop of candidates the Democrats have yet to put forward.
Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a time
of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
disgrace to the name of their political party. Never in history have we seen
a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
actions.
None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable of
enemies. (As a former liberal Democrat and McGovern campaign worker, I
remind people I know losers when I see 'em.) Clark is nothing but a
chameleon, running as a Democrat because he can't run as a Republican.
The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax the
rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at heart.
Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and pull
out our troops at this time. But, if they gained power in the process, what
would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a major
world crisis for his successor to clean up.
The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything truly
effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal. Sad, but
unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant to
lead their country. As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
one. He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
colors.
Worse, their attacks on the President and national policy coming at a time
of war, articulated for personal partisan gain, are reprehensible and a
disgrace to the name of their political party. Never in history have we seen
a major political party so devoid of vision and so obstructionist in its
actions.
None of them has even a remote chance of beating Bush in '04, but in the
process of all this they give true aid & comfort to the most despicable of
enemies. (As a former liberal Democrat and McGovern campaign worker, I
remind people I know losers when I see 'em.) Clark is nothing but a
chameleon, running as a Democrat because he can't run as a Republican.
The sad part is these ******** have nothing to put forward, except "tax the
rich" (which really means tax anyone making enough to afford a roof over
their heads) and "cut & run", proving they're nothing but cowards at heart.
Imagine the total chaos in the middle east if we were to knee-jerk and pull
out our troops at this time. But, if they gained power in the process, what
would these selfish idiots care? Every Democrat since FDR has left a major
world crisis for his successor to clean up.
The Democrats have not articulated a inspirational, constructive vision
since Kennedy & Johnson. Indeed, they have not implemented anything truly
effective (other than confiscating income) since the New Deal. Sad, but
unavoidable conclusion: they're so bound up in their special interest
obligations they can't step forward with anything coherent or relevant to
lead their country. As for Bush, Americans know a real leader when they see
one. He may have his flaws, but after 9/11 he passed the test with flying
colors.
#2918
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Yeah, I'm out, too. Best!
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vq3h7gqev7th58@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnq6u506nb@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > The more you nail this stuff, Doug, the more ranting you'll hear!
>
> Hehee. I really need to stop reading this thread. Tonight is my last time,
> scouts honor. :-) Nice meeting you to BTW.
>
>
> >
> > > > <fanatical anti-socialist, anti-communist crap snipped>
> > > >
> > > > > The bottom line is, CO2 is a non-poisonous, life-sustaining gas.
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Apollo 13 astronauts.
> > > > What biology course did YOU take? I got two A's in biology.
> > > > I saw NOWHERE that humans breathe CO2.
> > >
> > > CO2 is essential for plant life, so it is a life sustaining gas. Plant
> > life
> > > is essential to sustain animal life, so CO2 indirectly sustains human
> > life.
> > > You did not deserve your A's if you cannot see what he meant by his
> > > statement.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Get a clue: even chemical engineering and chemistry departments
> > > > teach us that ANY chemical is toxic enough in high enough doses:
> > > > even O2 for humans and CO2 for deciduous trees.
> > >
> > > CO2 is nowhere near that level, nor will it ever be.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Global warming theory is being used for a political agenda
> > > >
> > > > <more me-me-me anti-environmental lunacy from a pro-capitalist
> extremist
> > > > caring only about their freedom to consume and pollute the world
> > > > leaving nothing else for everybody else
> > > > snipped>
> > >
> > > So anyone you disagree with is an extremist? No one here has suggested
> nor
> > > do they want to do as you suggest. What is desired is sensible, sane
> > > management based on facts, not emotion or political bias.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How about the freedom to live in a world with a few trees left,
> > > > some clean air and water, some privacy free of overpopulation,
> > > > and where the quality of life is better than death?
> > >
> > > We have that now, at least I do. The world is looking much better now
> than
> > > it did even a few years ago. Pollution levels are dropping, streams
and
> > > lakes are cleaner, more people every year are working to make Earth a
> > little
> > > nicer. Change takes time, extreme measures traditionally bring less
than
> > > desirable results. Loosen up a little, you'll live longer and enjoy it
> > more,
> > > plus you'll accomplish far more good than your present ranting will
ever
> > > achieve.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vq3h7gqev7th58@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnq6u506nb@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > The more you nail this stuff, Doug, the more ranting you'll hear!
>
> Hehee. I really need to stop reading this thread. Tonight is my last time,
> scouts honor. :-) Nice meeting you to BTW.
>
>
> >
> > > > <fanatical anti-socialist, anti-communist crap snipped>
> > > >
> > > > > The bottom line is, CO2 is a non-poisonous, life-sustaining gas.
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Apollo 13 astronauts.
> > > > What biology course did YOU take? I got two A's in biology.
> > > > I saw NOWHERE that humans breathe CO2.
> > >
> > > CO2 is essential for plant life, so it is a life sustaining gas. Plant
> > life
> > > is essential to sustain animal life, so CO2 indirectly sustains human
> > life.
> > > You did not deserve your A's if you cannot see what he meant by his
> > > statement.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Get a clue: even chemical engineering and chemistry departments
> > > > teach us that ANY chemical is toxic enough in high enough doses:
> > > > even O2 for humans and CO2 for deciduous trees.
> > >
> > > CO2 is nowhere near that level, nor will it ever be.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Global warming theory is being used for a political agenda
> > > >
> > > > <more me-me-me anti-environmental lunacy from a pro-capitalist
> extremist
> > > > caring only about their freedom to consume and pollute the world
> > > > leaving nothing else for everybody else
> > > > snipped>
> > >
> > > So anyone you disagree with is an extremist? No one here has suggested
> nor
> > > do they want to do as you suggest. What is desired is sensible, sane
> > > management based on facts, not emotion or political bias.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How about the freedom to live in a world with a few trees left,
> > > > some clean air and water, some privacy free of overpopulation,
> > > > and where the quality of life is better than death?
> > >
> > > We have that now, at least I do. The world is looking much better now
> than
> > > it did even a few years ago. Pollution levels are dropping, streams
and
> > > lakes are cleaner, more people every year are working to make Earth a
> > little
> > > nicer. Change takes time, extreme measures traditionally bring less
than
> > > desirable results. Loosen up a little, you'll live longer and enjoy it
> > more,
> > > plus you'll accomplish far more good than your present ranting will
ever
> > > achieve.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
#2919
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Yeah, I'm out, too. Best!
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vq3h7gqev7th58@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnq6u506nb@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > The more you nail this stuff, Doug, the more ranting you'll hear!
>
> Hehee. I really need to stop reading this thread. Tonight is my last time,
> scouts honor. :-) Nice meeting you to BTW.
>
>
> >
> > > > <fanatical anti-socialist, anti-communist crap snipped>
> > > >
> > > > > The bottom line is, CO2 is a non-poisonous, life-sustaining gas.
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Apollo 13 astronauts.
> > > > What biology course did YOU take? I got two A's in biology.
> > > > I saw NOWHERE that humans breathe CO2.
> > >
> > > CO2 is essential for plant life, so it is a life sustaining gas. Plant
> > life
> > > is essential to sustain animal life, so CO2 indirectly sustains human
> > life.
> > > You did not deserve your A's if you cannot see what he meant by his
> > > statement.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Get a clue: even chemical engineering and chemistry departments
> > > > teach us that ANY chemical is toxic enough in high enough doses:
> > > > even O2 for humans and CO2 for deciduous trees.
> > >
> > > CO2 is nowhere near that level, nor will it ever be.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Global warming theory is being used for a political agenda
> > > >
> > > > <more me-me-me anti-environmental lunacy from a pro-capitalist
> extremist
> > > > caring only about their freedom to consume and pollute the world
> > > > leaving nothing else for everybody else
> > > > snipped>
> > >
> > > So anyone you disagree with is an extremist? No one here has suggested
> nor
> > > do they want to do as you suggest. What is desired is sensible, sane
> > > management based on facts, not emotion or political bias.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How about the freedom to live in a world with a few trees left,
> > > > some clean air and water, some privacy free of overpopulation,
> > > > and where the quality of life is better than death?
> > >
> > > We have that now, at least I do. The world is looking much better now
> than
> > > it did even a few years ago. Pollution levels are dropping, streams
and
> > > lakes are cleaner, more people every year are working to make Earth a
> > little
> > > nicer. Change takes time, extreme measures traditionally bring less
than
> > > desirable results. Loosen up a little, you'll live longer and enjoy it
> > more,
> > > plus you'll accomplish far more good than your present ranting will
ever
> > > achieve.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vq3h7gqev7th58@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnq6u506nb@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > The more you nail this stuff, Doug, the more ranting you'll hear!
>
> Hehee. I really need to stop reading this thread. Tonight is my last time,
> scouts honor. :-) Nice meeting you to BTW.
>
>
> >
> > > > <fanatical anti-socialist, anti-communist crap snipped>
> > > >
> > > > > The bottom line is, CO2 is a non-poisonous, life-sustaining gas.
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Apollo 13 astronauts.
> > > > What biology course did YOU take? I got two A's in biology.
> > > > I saw NOWHERE that humans breathe CO2.
> > >
> > > CO2 is essential for plant life, so it is a life sustaining gas. Plant
> > life
> > > is essential to sustain animal life, so CO2 indirectly sustains human
> > life.
> > > You did not deserve your A's if you cannot see what he meant by his
> > > statement.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Get a clue: even chemical engineering and chemistry departments
> > > > teach us that ANY chemical is toxic enough in high enough doses:
> > > > even O2 for humans and CO2 for deciduous trees.
> > >
> > > CO2 is nowhere near that level, nor will it ever be.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Global warming theory is being used for a political agenda
> > > >
> > > > <more me-me-me anti-environmental lunacy from a pro-capitalist
> extremist
> > > > caring only about their freedom to consume and pollute the world
> > > > leaving nothing else for everybody else
> > > > snipped>
> > >
> > > So anyone you disagree with is an extremist? No one here has suggested
> nor
> > > do they want to do as you suggest. What is desired is sensible, sane
> > > management based on facts, not emotion or political bias.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How about the freedom to live in a world with a few trees left,
> > > > some clean air and water, some privacy free of overpopulation,
> > > > and where the quality of life is better than death?
> > >
> > > We have that now, at least I do. The world is looking much better now
> than
> > > it did even a few years ago. Pollution levels are dropping, streams
and
> > > lakes are cleaner, more people every year are working to make Earth a
> > little
> > > nicer. Change takes time, extreme measures traditionally bring less
than
> > > desirable results. Loosen up a little, you'll live longer and enjoy it
> > more,
> > > plus you'll accomplish far more good than your present ranting will
ever
> > > achieve.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
#2920
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Huge study about safety can be misinterpreted by SUV drivers
Yeah, I'm out, too. Best!
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vq3h7gqev7th58@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnq6u506nb@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > The more you nail this stuff, Doug, the more ranting you'll hear!
>
> Hehee. I really need to stop reading this thread. Tonight is my last time,
> scouts honor. :-) Nice meeting you to BTW.
>
>
> >
> > > > <fanatical anti-socialist, anti-communist crap snipped>
> > > >
> > > > > The bottom line is, CO2 is a non-poisonous, life-sustaining gas.
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Apollo 13 astronauts.
> > > > What biology course did YOU take? I got two A's in biology.
> > > > I saw NOWHERE that humans breathe CO2.
> > >
> > > CO2 is essential for plant life, so it is a life sustaining gas. Plant
> > life
> > > is essential to sustain animal life, so CO2 indirectly sustains human
> > life.
> > > You did not deserve your A's if you cannot see what he meant by his
> > > statement.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Get a clue: even chemical engineering and chemistry departments
> > > > teach us that ANY chemical is toxic enough in high enough doses:
> > > > even O2 for humans and CO2 for deciduous trees.
> > >
> > > CO2 is nowhere near that level, nor will it ever be.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Global warming theory is being used for a political agenda
> > > >
> > > > <more me-me-me anti-environmental lunacy from a pro-capitalist
> extremist
> > > > caring only about their freedom to consume and pollute the world
> > > > leaving nothing else for everybody else
> > > > snipped>
> > >
> > > So anyone you disagree with is an extremist? No one here has suggested
> nor
> > > do they want to do as you suggest. What is desired is sensible, sane
> > > management based on facts, not emotion or political bias.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How about the freedom to live in a world with a few trees left,
> > > > some clean air and water, some privacy free of overpopulation,
> > > > and where the quality of life is better than death?
> > >
> > > We have that now, at least I do. The world is looking much better now
> than
> > > it did even a few years ago. Pollution levels are dropping, streams
and
> > > lakes are cleaner, more people every year are working to make Earth a
> > little
> > > nicer. Change takes time, extreme measures traditionally bring less
than
> > > desirable results. Loosen up a little, you'll live longer and enjoy it
> > more,
> > > plus you'll accomplish far more good than your present ranting will
ever
> > > achieve.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
"Douglas A. Shrader" <dshrader@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:vq3h7gqev7th58@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "Gerald G. McGeorge" <gmcgeorge@frontier.net> wrote in message
> news:bnq6u506nb@enews1.newsguy.com...
> > The more you nail this stuff, Doug, the more ranting you'll hear!
>
> Hehee. I really need to stop reading this thread. Tonight is my last time,
> scouts honor. :-) Nice meeting you to BTW.
>
>
> >
> > > > <fanatical anti-socialist, anti-communist crap snipped>
> > > >
> > > > > The bottom line is, CO2 is a non-poisonous, life-sustaining gas.
> > > >
> > > > Tell that to the Apollo 13 astronauts.
> > > > What biology course did YOU take? I got two A's in biology.
> > > > I saw NOWHERE that humans breathe CO2.
> > >
> > > CO2 is essential for plant life, so it is a life sustaining gas. Plant
> > life
> > > is essential to sustain animal life, so CO2 indirectly sustains human
> > life.
> > > You did not deserve your A's if you cannot see what he meant by his
> > > statement.
> > >
> > >
> > > > Get a clue: even chemical engineering and chemistry departments
> > > > teach us that ANY chemical is toxic enough in high enough doses:
> > > > even O2 for humans and CO2 for deciduous trees.
> > >
> > > CO2 is nowhere near that level, nor will it ever be.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > > Global warming theory is being used for a political agenda
> > > >
> > > > <more me-me-me anti-environmental lunacy from a pro-capitalist
> extremist
> > > > caring only about their freedom to consume and pollute the world
> > > > leaving nothing else for everybody else
> > > > snipped>
> > >
> > > So anyone you disagree with is an extremist? No one here has suggested
> nor
> > > do they want to do as you suggest. What is desired is sensible, sane
> > > management based on facts, not emotion or political bias.
> > >
> > > >
> > > > How about the freedom to live in a world with a few trees left,
> > > > some clean air and water, some privacy free of overpopulation,
> > > > and where the quality of life is better than death?
> > >
> > > We have that now, at least I do. The world is looking much better now
> than
> > > it did even a few years ago. Pollution levels are dropping, streams
and
> > > lakes are cleaner, more people every year are working to make Earth a
> > little
> > > nicer. Change takes time, extreme measures traditionally bring less
than
> > > desirable results. Loosen up a little, you'll live longer and enjoy it
> > more,
> > > plus you'll accomplish far more good than your present ranting will
ever
> > > achieve.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>