Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"1" <1@home.com> wrote in message news:lM2uc.10655$%T.3453@okepread05...

> > Then counter argue, ----tard, otherwise you have nothing other than
> > empty-minded blubberings. Nothing surprising there, really.
> >
> >
> Nope- I just like hearing you squeal.
> A little louder. Im almost there

Where is the squealing in the stament you refer to?

--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"1" <1@home.com> wrote in message news:lM2uc.10655$%T.3453@okepread05...

> > Then counter argue, ----tard, otherwise you have nothing other than
> > empty-minded blubberings. Nothing surprising there, really.
> >
> >
> Nope- I just like hearing you squeal.
> A little louder. Im almost there

Where is the squealing in the stament you refer to?

--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"1" <1@home.com> wrote in message news:lM2uc.10655$%T.3453@okepread05...

> > Then counter argue, ----tard, otherwise you have nothing other than
> > empty-minded blubberings. Nothing surprising there, really.
> >
> >
> Nope- I just like hearing you squeal.
> A little louder. Im almost there

Where is the squealing in the stament you refer to?

--
Kadaitcha Man: Registered Linux User #344402
Akhenaten: Registered Linux Machine #235500
gentoo Linux kernel 2.6.5 <-- rolled my own

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c99it8.m94.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:

> I would not be surprised if you were ameriKKKan. ameriKKKans have such a
> tenuous grasp on language that the meaning of even the most mildly
> twisted notion escapes them.

Reality proves otherwise.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c99it8.m94.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:

> I would not be surprised if you were ameriKKKan. ameriKKKans have such a
> tenuous grasp on language that the meaning of even the most mildly
> twisted notion escapes them.

Reality proves otherwise.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c99it8.m94.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:

> I would not be surprised if you were ameriKKKan. ameriKKKans have such a
> tenuous grasp on language that the meaning of even the most mildly
> twisted notion escapes them.

Reality proves otherwise.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c99it8.m94.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:

> I would not be surprised if you were ameriKKKan. ameriKKKans have such a
> tenuous grasp on language that the meaning of even the most mildly
> twisted notion escapes them.

Reality proves otherwise.

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c9bdnm.15j0.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:

> <------- WHAING GREAT BITCHTHWACK>
>
> You didn't read it, did you, ----tard? Don't say you did, because DNA
> was dealt with and dismissed, with fully verifiable supporting argument,
> and to a level of proof acceptable in courts of law.
>
> You may now ---- right off and die, you dumb ----.

Is this the extent of your lame argument?

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c9bdnm.15j0.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:

> <------- WHAING GREAT BITCHTHWACK>
>
> You didn't read it, did you, ----tard? Don't say you did, because DNA
> was dealt with and dismissed, with fully verifiable supporting argument,
> and to a level of proof acceptable in courts of law.
>
> You may now ---- right off and die, you dumb ----.

Is this the extent of your lame argument?

Re: The great lie that is evolution
 

"Kadaitcha Man" <nospam@kadaitcha.cx> wrote in
news:c9bdnm.15j0.1@kadaitcha.ath.cx:

> <------- WHAING GREAT BITCHTHWACK>
>
> You didn't read it, did you, ----tard? Don't say you did, because DNA
> was dealt with and dismissed, with fully verifiable supporting argument,
> and to a level of proof acceptable in courts of law.
>
> You may now ---- right off and die, you dumb ----.

Is this the extent of your lame argument?