Full-time vs part-time 4X4
11-21-2003 | 02:53 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Full-time vs part-time 4X4
Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 03:08 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
You have it figured.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Barry Bean wrote:
>
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Barry Bean wrote:
>
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 03:08 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
You have it figured.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Barry Bean wrote:
>
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Barry Bean wrote:
>
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 03:08 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
You have it figured.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Barry Bean wrote:
>
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Barry Bean wrote:
>
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 04:11 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
That's pretty much it in a nutshell.
"Barry Bean" <bbbean@beancotton.com> wrote in message
news:Xns943A8326BB5F6eatmorecotton@207.14.113.17.. .
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
"Barry Bean" <bbbean@beancotton.com> wrote in message
news:Xns943A8326BB5F6eatmorecotton@207.14.113.17.. .
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 04:11 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
That's pretty much it in a nutshell.
"Barry Bean" <bbbean@beancotton.com> wrote in message
news:Xns943A8326BB5F6eatmorecotton@207.14.113.17.. .
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
"Barry Bean" <bbbean@beancotton.com> wrote in message
news:Xns943A8326BB5F6eatmorecotton@207.14.113.17.. .
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 04:11 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
That's pretty much it in a nutshell.
"Barry Bean" <bbbean@beancotton.com> wrote in message
news:Xns943A8326BB5F6eatmorecotton@207.14.113.17.. .
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
"Barry Bean" <bbbean@beancotton.com> wrote in message
news:Xns943A8326BB5F6eatmorecotton@207.14.113.17.. .
> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip between
> the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry pavement (or
> more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy patches), whereas "part
> time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it suitable only for mud, snow,
> or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 07:20 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
Thanks - that seems counter-intuitive, but OK.
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:3FBE62A9.9438E274@sympatico.ca:
> You have it figured.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> Barry Bean wrote:
>>
>> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip
>> between the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry
>> pavement (or more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy
>> patches), whereas "part time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it
>> suitable only for mud, snow, or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:3FBE62A9.9438E274@sympatico.ca:
> You have it figured.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> Barry Bean wrote:
>>
>> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip
>> between the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry
>> pavement (or more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy
>> patches), whereas "part time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it
>> suitable only for mud, snow, or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 07:20 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
Thanks - that seems counter-intuitive, but OK.
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:3FBE62A9.9438E274@sympatico.ca:
> You have it figured.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> Barry Bean wrote:
>>
>> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip
>> between the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry
>> pavement (or more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy
>> patches), whereas "part time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it
>> suitable only for mud, snow, or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:3FBE62A9.9438E274@sympatico.ca:
> You have it figured.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> Barry Bean wrote:
>>
>> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip
>> between the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry
>> pavement (or more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy
>> patches), whereas "part time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it
>> suitable only for mud, snow, or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
11-21-2003 | 07:20 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Full-time vs part-time 4X4
Thanks - that seems counter-intuitive, but OK.
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:3FBE62A9.9438E274@sympatico.ca:
> You have it figured.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> Barry Bean wrote:
>>
>> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip
>> between the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry
>> pavement (or more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy
>> patches), whereas "part time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it
>> suitable only for mud, snow, or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
Mike Romain <romainm@sympatico.ca> wrote in
news:3FBE62A9.9438E274@sympatico.ca:
> You have it figured.
>
> Mike
> 86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
> 88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
>
> Barry Bean wrote:
>>
>> Am I understanding correctly that "full time 4X4" allow some slip
>> between the front and rear axles, making it suitable for use on dry
>> pavement (or more realisticaly, driving when on a road with icy
>> patches), whereas "part time 4X4" locks the axles together, making it
>> suitable only for mud, snow, or similarly loose/slick surfaces?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
molotovfx@netscape.net
Jeep Mailing List
4
04-20-2005 02:06 PM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)