Cooling System Thermostat
11-01-2003 | 12:35 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
At least 192 or 195.
The hotter the better for interior heat.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jack Dow wrote:
>
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
The hotter the better for interior heat.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jack Dow wrote:
>
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
11-01-2003 | 12:35 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
At least 192 or 195.
The hotter the better for interior heat.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jack Dow wrote:
>
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
The hotter the better for interior heat.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jack Dow wrote:
>
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
11-01-2003 | 12:35 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
At least 192 or 195.
The hotter the better for interior heat.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jack Dow wrote:
>
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
The hotter the better for interior heat.
Mike
86/00 CJ7 Laredo, 33x9.5 BFG Muds, 'glass nose to tail in '00
88 Cherokee 235 BFG AT's
Jack Dow wrote:
>
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
11-01-2003 | 01:52 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
you have some other problems.
Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
Cheers.
Jack Dow wrote:
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
you have some other problems.
Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
Cheers.
Jack Dow wrote:
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
11-01-2003 | 01:52 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
you have some other problems.
Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
Cheers.
Jack Dow wrote:
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
you have some other problems.
Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
Cheers.
Jack Dow wrote:
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
11-01-2003 | 01:52 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
you have some other problems.
Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
Cheers.
Jack Dow wrote:
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
you have some other problems.
Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
Cheers.
Jack Dow wrote:
> '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> What temp should I get?
>
> Jack
>
>
>
11-01-2003 | 11:49 PM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
spamless@microsoft.net says...
> Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
> warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
> a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
> to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
> degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
> you have some other problems.
>
> Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
> and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
> wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Jack Dow wrote:
> > '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> > What temp should I get?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
I just bought one for my '85 four weeks ago, and tried to buy a hotter one
(trying to get more heat from the heater), but the standard 195 was all
that was available. With my three-row heavy-duty radiator, too much heat
has never been a problem.
Many will tell you that hotter (195) is better because vaporization is
better.
--
Dale Beckett
> Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
> warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
> a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
> to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
> degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
> you have some other problems.
>
> Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
> and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
> wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Jack Dow wrote:
> > '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> > What temp should I get?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
I just bought one for my '85 four weeks ago, and tried to buy a hotter one
(trying to get more heat from the heater), but the standard 195 was all
that was available. With my three-row heavy-duty radiator, too much heat
has never been a problem.
Many will tell you that hotter (195) is better because vaporization is
better.
--
Dale Beckett
11-01-2003 | 11:49 PM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
spamless@microsoft.net says...
> Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
> warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
> a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
> to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
> degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
> you have some other problems.
>
> Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
> and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
> wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Jack Dow wrote:
> > '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> > What temp should I get?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
I just bought one for my '85 four weeks ago, and tried to buy a hotter one
(trying to get more heat from the heater), but the standard 195 was all
that was available. With my three-row heavy-duty radiator, too much heat
has never been a problem.
Many will tell you that hotter (195) is better because vaporization is
better.
--
Dale Beckett
> Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
> warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
> a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
> to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
> degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
> you have some other problems.
>
> Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
> and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
> wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Jack Dow wrote:
> > '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> > What temp should I get?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
I just bought one for my '85 four weeks ago, and tried to buy a hotter one
(trying to get more heat from the heater), but the standard 195 was all
that was available. With my three-row heavy-duty radiator, too much heat
has never been a problem.
Many will tell you that hotter (195) is better because vaporization is
better.
--
Dale Beckett
11-01-2003 | 11:49 PM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cooling System Thermostat
spamless@microsoft.net says...
> Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
> warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
> a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
> to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
> degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
> you have some other problems.
>
> Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
> and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
> wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Jack Dow wrote:
> > '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> > What temp should I get?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
I just bought one for my '85 four weeks ago, and tried to buy a hotter one
(trying to get more heat from the heater), but the standard 195 was all
that was available. With my three-row heavy-duty radiator, too much heat
has never been a problem.
Many will tell you that hotter (195) is better because vaporization is
better.
--
Dale Beckett
> Get the standard one (192??) A lower one will not let the engine
> warm up to a good operating range for fuel economy. Your '89 has
> a temp sensor that should sense full temp and tell the computer
> to go to closed loop. IIRC, that sensor kicks in around 160
> degrees so you MIGHT be able to use a 180 degree thermostat if
> you have some other problems.
>
> Consider doing a full drain, chemical flush agent, power flush,
> and refil with new antifreeze. Takes a couple of hours, does
> wonders for better cab heat, lower engine temp, etc.
>
> Cheers.
>
> Jack Dow wrote:
> > '89 Wrangler 6 cyl. Want to change current one. Seems to have to much drift.
> > What temp should I get?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
> >
>
>
I just bought one for my '85 four weeks ago, and tried to buy a hotter one
(trying to get more heat from the heater), but the standard 195 was all
that was available. With my three-row heavy-duty radiator, too much heat
has never been a problem.
Many will tell you that hotter (195) is better because vaporization is
better.
--
Dale Beckett
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)