Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
09-30-2004 | 09:30 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
-Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
09-30-2004 | 09:37 PM
#2
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
Wblane did pass the time by typing:
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust
> flow would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
Nope, flow loss is additive.
--
DougW
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust
> flow would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
Nope, flow loss is additive.
--
DougW
09-30-2004 | 09:37 PM
#3
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
Wblane did pass the time by typing:
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust
> flow would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
Nope, flow loss is additive.
--
DougW
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust
> flow would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
Nope, flow loss is additive.
--
DougW
09-30-2004 | 09:37 PM
#4
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
Wblane did pass the time by typing:
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust
> flow would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
Nope, flow loss is additive.
--
DougW
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust
> flow would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
Nope, flow loss is additive.
--
DougW
09-30-2004 | 09:46 PM
#5
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
Hi Bill,
None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Wblane wrote:
>
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Wblane wrote:
>
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
09-30-2004 | 09:46 PM
#6
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
Hi Bill,
None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Wblane wrote:
>
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Wblane wrote:
>
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
09-30-2004 | 09:46 PM
#7
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
Hi Bill,
None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Wblane wrote:
>
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
Wblane wrote:
>
> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust system
> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the exhaust flow
> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
10-01-2004 | 07:57 AM
#8
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
I think he should just run 3 inch straight pipes and run on two cylinders
with a single fire ignition.
HarryS
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:415CA903.795340A1@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
> converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
> size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
> expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Wblane wrote:
>>
>> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust
>> system
>> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the
>> exhaust flow
>> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
with a single fire ignition.
HarryS
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:415CA903.795340A1@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
> converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
> size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
> expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Wblane wrote:
>>
>> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust
>> system
>> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the
>> exhaust flow
>> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
10-01-2004 | 07:57 AM
#9
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
I think he should just run 3 inch straight pipes and run on two cylinders
with a single fire ignition.
HarryS
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:415CA903.795340A1@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
> converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
> size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
> expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Wblane wrote:
>>
>> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust
>> system
>> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the
>> exhaust flow
>> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
with a single fire ignition.
HarryS
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:415CA903.795340A1@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
> converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
> size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
> expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Wblane wrote:
>>
>> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust
>> system
>> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the
>> exhaust flow
>> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
10-01-2004 | 07:57 AM
#10
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: Cat-back systems, headers and catcons
I think he should just run 3 inch straight pipes and run on two cylinders
with a single fire ignition.
HarryS
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:415CA903.795340A1@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
> converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
> size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
> expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Wblane wrote:
>>
>> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust
>> system
>> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the
>> exhaust flow
>> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)
with a single fire ignition.
HarryS
"L.W. ("ßill") ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:415CA903.795340A1@***.net...
> Hi Bill,
> None. They're just for looks. But you may buy high volume catalytic
> converters they're about a foot in diameter, or an oval of equivalent
> size, with four inch inlets, that may even work a little like an
> expansion chamber, of the two cycle engineering.
> God Bless America, ßill O|||||||O
> mailto:-------------------- http://www.----------.com/
>
> Wblane wrote:
>>
>> If the catalytic converter was the greatest restriction in any exhaust
>> system
>> what would be the point of headers or a cat-back system (since the
>> exhaust flow
>> would be limited by its greatest restriction)?
>> -Bill (remove "botizer" to reply via email)