"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1mpo5lgkm00@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > What seminars
>
> your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest
of
> the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.

Why must there be liberal seminars? Why must I have
attended them? Why are you so dense?

> >> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> > you
> >> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you
just
> >> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
> >> believe
> >> you.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
> provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
> defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.

Spin some more... dizzy is a good look
for you.

> here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
> coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).

You know... we could have told that about you
from the get-go... but we wanted to prove it
to the masses. You are what you despise...
blatant transferrence.

> > You used the manual for your leak detector
>
> yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
> keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
> refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)

Within the atmospheric science industry?
Limitiations, Nate! Own them! The engineers
that wrote your leak detector manual believe
in atmospheric science... why don't you?

> > Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
>
> its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
> valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)

Tell me again about how the sun degrades chlorine!
Don't forget to add the part about how mixing something
makes it heavier... also add the part about how a compound
and a mixture are the same thing.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42F52547.E7EC90FA@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > > him the understanding in the book.
> > > >
> > > > You lose!
> > > > __
> > > > Steve
> > > >> > .
> >
> > > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > > 360
> > > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
> >
> > If you look closely, that's the exact same
> > equation I just finished describing for you...
> > only I used words, and you used Google.
> > You may have passed an equation, but
> > you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> > .

> Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
> 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> -------------------------------
> 360

Let's look at what I posted:
<>
For the less-than-half full case:
Half he area of the circular face minus the quantity
twice the area of the triangle plus twice the area
of the pie wedge

For the more-than-half-full case:
Half the area of the circular face, plus twice the area of
the triangle, plus twice the area of the pie wedge.

Then times the length. Easy, wasn't it?
</>

I mentioned the liquid level earlier... really the most
trivial part of the equation, we know we're
starting with a stick reading, don't we? I was most
interested in hearing whether you understood
the decomposition of the equation.

> You completely forgot about your
> logarithms

When you mentioned 'logarithms' the answer was complete:
you haven't a clue.

> The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
> you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!

Bill, just because you can't read with comprehension
doesn't mean that my analysis was wrong. And if you
can find *anywhere* in your posted equation using
logs, I'll eat my hat.

And once again, I have to blow your little expectations
away... didn't you get the hint when I said 'stick the
tanks, read the pumps'? How many times do you
think *I've* done that?

I've worked at many service stations, I'm an
expert tire installer/repairman, I can do truck tires
as well as fuel/service/wash trucks. My first job
was at a Conoco in Lubbock... remember the five-
position mixer pumps? We had those... don't
remember the old man's name, but he had a class
act... only used SprayWay and blue towels on the
windshields. Busted my first tire on his manual
tire machine, really just a post bolted to the concrete
with a spin-down cone and a slip-on bead breaker.
Worked at a BF Goodrich tire dealer for a year...
I can run a Coats 4040a in my sleep. Hunter balancer.
Worked at a Gulf station in Austin for a year (my
parents were Gulf/Chevron jobbers). Worked for a year
at the Texaco truck stop, 183 and IH35... that's
where I learned truck tires and ran a service truck.
I'm leaving out some more SS jobs...
My last SS attendant job was at the Exxon in
Alpine, TX... just out of college, 1998. Did oil
change, lube, car wash... washing cars is good
exercise! Customer relations is perhaps the
most important part of the front/fueling operation...
skills that have served me well in later life.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42F52547.E7EC90FA@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > > him the understanding in the book.
> > > >
> > > > You lose!
> > > > __
> > > > Steve
> > > >> > .
> >
> > > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > > 360
> > > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
> >
> > If you look closely, that's the exact same
> > equation I just finished describing for you...
> > only I used words, and you used Google.
> > You may have passed an equation, but
> > you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> > .

> Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
> 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> -------------------------------
> 360

Let's look at what I posted:
<>
For the less-than-half full case:
Half he area of the circular face minus the quantity
twice the area of the triangle plus twice the area
of the pie wedge

For the more-than-half-full case:
Half the area of the circular face, plus twice the area of
the triangle, plus twice the area of the pie wedge.

Then times the length. Easy, wasn't it?
</>

I mentioned the liquid level earlier... really the most
trivial part of the equation, we know we're
starting with a stick reading, don't we? I was most
interested in hearing whether you understood
the decomposition of the equation.

> You completely forgot about your
> logarithms

When you mentioned 'logarithms' the answer was complete:
you haven't a clue.

> The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
> you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!

Bill, just because you can't read with comprehension
doesn't mean that my analysis was wrong. And if you
can find *anywhere* in your posted equation using
logs, I'll eat my hat.

And once again, I have to blow your little expectations
away... didn't you get the hint when I said 'stick the
tanks, read the pumps'? How many times do you
think *I've* done that?

I've worked at many service stations, I'm an
expert tire installer/repairman, I can do truck tires
as well as fuel/service/wash trucks. My first job
was at a Conoco in Lubbock... remember the five-
position mixer pumps? We had those... don't
remember the old man's name, but he had a class
act... only used SprayWay and blue towels on the
windshields. Busted my first tire on his manual
tire machine, really just a post bolted to the concrete
with a spin-down cone and a slip-on bead breaker.
Worked at a BF Goodrich tire dealer for a year...
I can run a Coats 4040a in my sleep. Hunter balancer.
Worked at a Gulf station in Austin for a year (my
parents were Gulf/Chevron jobbers). Worked for a year
at the Texaco truck stop, 183 and IH35... that's
where I learned truck tires and ran a service truck.
I'm leaving out some more SS jobs...
My last SS attendant job was at the Exxon in
Alpine, TX... just out of college, 1998. Did oil
change, lube, car wash... washing cars is good
exercise! Customer relations is perhaps the
most important part of the front/fueling operation...
skills that have served me well in later life.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42F52547.E7EC90FA@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > > him the understanding in the book.
> > > >
> > > > You lose!
> > > > __
> > > > Steve
> > > >> > .
> >
> > > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > > 360
> > > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
> >
> > If you look closely, that's the exact same
> > equation I just finished describing for you...
> > only I used words, and you used Google.
> > You may have passed an equation, but
> > you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> > .

> Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
> 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> -------------------------------
> 360

Let's look at what I posted:
<>
For the less-than-half full case:
Half he area of the circular face minus the quantity
twice the area of the triangle plus twice the area
of the pie wedge

For the more-than-half-full case:
Half the area of the circular face, plus twice the area of
the triangle, plus twice the area of the pie wedge.

Then times the length. Easy, wasn't it?
</>

I mentioned the liquid level earlier... really the most
trivial part of the equation, we know we're
starting with a stick reading, don't we? I was most
interested in hearing whether you understood
the decomposition of the equation.

> You completely forgot about your
> logarithms

When you mentioned 'logarithms' the answer was complete:
you haven't a clue.

> The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
> you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!

Bill, just because you can't read with comprehension
doesn't mean that my analysis was wrong. And if you
can find *anywhere* in your posted equation using
logs, I'll eat my hat.

And once again, I have to blow your little expectations
away... didn't you get the hint when I said 'stick the
tanks, read the pumps'? How many times do you
think *I've* done that?

I've worked at many service stations, I'm an
expert tire installer/repairman, I can do truck tires
as well as fuel/service/wash trucks. My first job
was at a Conoco in Lubbock... remember the five-
position mixer pumps? We had those... don't
remember the old man's name, but he had a class
act... only used SprayWay and blue towels on the
windshields. Busted my first tire on his manual
tire machine, really just a post bolted to the concrete
with a spin-down cone and a slip-on bead breaker.
Worked at a BF Goodrich tire dealer for a year...
I can run a Coats 4040a in my sleep. Hunter balancer.
Worked at a Gulf station in Austin for a year (my
parents were Gulf/Chevron jobbers). Worked for a year
at the Texaco truck stop, 183 and IH35... that's
where I learned truck tires and ran a service truck.
I'm leaving out some more SS jobs...
My last SS attendant job was at the Exxon in
Alpine, TX... just out of college, 1998. Did oil
change, lube, car wash... washing cars is good
exercise! Customer relations is perhaps the
most important part of the front/fueling operation...
skills that have served me well in later life.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
news:42F52547.E7EC90FA@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > "L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message
> > news:42F29A51.26D68D0D@***.net...
> > > Stephen Cowell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > But you're just pasting some Google stuff, like
> > > > you always do... I thought you went through
> > > > Calculus! You do remember the specifics of
> > > > the challenge... no Google! Even a chimpanzee
> > > > can wave a book over his head... doesn't give
> > > > him the understanding in the book.
> > > >
> > > > You lose!
> > > > __
> > > > Steve
> > > >> > .
> >
> > > Yes, I passed the equation:
> > > 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> > > ------------------------------- (Pi)r^2 + (r-h)Sqrt (2rh - h^2)
> > > 360
> > > as it proved you wrong, again. What an idiot! I pity you!
> >
> > If you look closely, that's the exact same
> > equation I just finished describing for you...
> > only I used words, and you used Google.
> > You may have passed an equation, but
> > you certainly didn't pass Calculus.
> > __
> > Steve
> > "i recognize my limitations and
> > immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
> > .

> Stevie, you left out the whole volume variable as read on the stick:
> 360 - 2(90 - arcsin [(r-h)/r])
> -------------------------------
> 360

Let's look at what I posted:
<>
For the less-than-half full case:
Half he area of the circular face minus the quantity
twice the area of the triangle plus twice the area
of the pie wedge

For the more-than-half-full case:
Half the area of the circular face, plus twice the area of
the triangle, plus twice the area of the pie wedge.

Then times the length. Easy, wasn't it?
</>

I mentioned the liquid level earlier... really the most
trivial part of the equation, we know we're
starting with a stick reading, don't we? I was most
interested in hearing whether you understood
the decomposition of the equation.

> You completely forgot about your
> logarithms

When you mentioned 'logarithms' the answer was complete:
you haven't a clue.

> The only time your equation would be correct is at one half stick. Geez,
> you couldn't even get a job at a gas station!

Bill, just because you can't read with comprehension
doesn't mean that my analysis was wrong. And if you
can find *anywhere* in your posted equation using
logs, I'll eat my hat.

And once again, I have to blow your little expectations
away... didn't you get the hint when I said 'stick the
tanks, read the pumps'? How many times do you
think *I've* done that?

I've worked at many service stations, I'm an
expert tire installer/repairman, I can do truck tires
as well as fuel/service/wash trucks. My first job
was at a Conoco in Lubbock... remember the five-
position mixer pumps? We had those... don't
remember the old man's name, but he had a class
act... only used SprayWay and blue towels on the
windshields. Busted my first tire on his manual
tire machine, really just a post bolted to the concrete
with a spin-down cone and a slip-on bead breaker.
Worked at a BF Goodrich tire dealer for a year...
I can run a Coats 4040a in my sleep. Hunter balancer.
Worked at a Gulf station in Austin for a year (my
parents were Gulf/Chevron jobbers). Worked for a year
at the Texaco truck stop, 183 and IH35... that's
where I learned truck tires and ran a service truck.
I'm leaving out some more SS jobs...
My last SS attendant job was at the Exxon in
Alpine, TX... just out of college, 1998. Did oil
change, lube, car wash... washing cars is good
exercise! Customer relations is perhaps the
most important part of the front/fueling operation...
skills that have served me well in later life.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1ea680tsqdf@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
> >> refrigeration certification.
> >
> > Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
>
> lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
> stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
> find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.

What does that have to do with your knowlege?
You didn't specify, you just said that the only
thing you didn't know about refrigeration was
geo. I busted your chops. Get over it, wuss.

> > I've already talked about it... you haven't.
>
> lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
> pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.

I've given enough... until you start talking, instead
of asking, just kiss my *** and Google me.

> you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
> anything out.

Why would I even bother? You don't
tell us anything... I wanna be just like you!

> > Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> > yourself unworthy of trust.
>
> lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that
statement
> bother me to much. :-)

Dig it deeper! You have a business on
the line!

> > More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> > if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> > head pressure control can be bypassed.
> > I win... again.
>
> lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
> bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still
have
> to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
> pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell
me
> why.

No, 'substitute' and 'bypass' are two different
things, Nate... let me educate you on that one.
One is a working equivalent, the other is a shunt.
I suggested a shunt... you started screaming about
'low ambient', which was *never* a *limiting condition*
in any post originating this challenge. Why argue
so hard about this? Because I'm right.. no low ambient
means no head pressure control necessary... you may
have to remove refrigerant to make this work, I specified
this and it addresses the 'regulation issue' you bring
up above.

OK, here's the mistake I made on the valve thing...
there are no valves that are good enough.... notice the
complete lack of same in any system. It has to be a sweat
connection. This means that the entire system has to be
evacuated in order to work on it, big PITA. Even the injection
points, the ones that use Schrader valves, have caps
on them.

> > You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
>
> LIAR. try again.

You don't. It's just a plain fact. Believe it.
I maintained cryo systems for five years
for NRAO... no cert here. It uses dry
helium... harmless gas, although expensive.

> > I think most of us can read
>
> and we have all read your LIES, liar.

Keep saying it... nobody believes it, but
it makes you look worse every time you
do it. We can all read.

> >> > Who do you think you're messing
> >> > around with?
> >>
> >> a LIAR. :-)
> >
> > Then why the goofy smiley?
>
> its so fun making a fool of you. :-)

The only fool here, your momma made.

> >> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
> >
> > Good... use the money to buy a clue!
>
> nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)

Here's a *free* clue... another new vehicle won't
give you happiness. After all your purchases,
you still don't see this.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1ea680tsqdf@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
> >> refrigeration certification.
> >
> > Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
>
> lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
> stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
> find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.

What does that have to do with your knowlege?
You didn't specify, you just said that the only
thing you didn't know about refrigeration was
geo. I busted your chops. Get over it, wuss.

> > I've already talked about it... you haven't.
>
> lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
> pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.

I've given enough... until you start talking, instead
of asking, just kiss my *** and Google me.

> you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
> anything out.

Why would I even bother? You don't
tell us anything... I wanna be just like you!

> > Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> > yourself unworthy of trust.
>
> lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that
statement
> bother me to much. :-)

Dig it deeper! You have a business on
the line!

> > More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> > if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> > head pressure control can be bypassed.
> > I win... again.
>
> lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
> bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still
have
> to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
> pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell
me
> why.

No, 'substitute' and 'bypass' are two different
things, Nate... let me educate you on that one.
One is a working equivalent, the other is a shunt.
I suggested a shunt... you started screaming about
'low ambient', which was *never* a *limiting condition*
in any post originating this challenge. Why argue
so hard about this? Because I'm right.. no low ambient
means no head pressure control necessary... you may
have to remove refrigerant to make this work, I specified
this and it addresses the 'regulation issue' you bring
up above.

OK, here's the mistake I made on the valve thing...
there are no valves that are good enough.... notice the
complete lack of same in any system. It has to be a sweat
connection. This means that the entire system has to be
evacuated in order to work on it, big PITA. Even the injection
points, the ones that use Schrader valves, have caps
on them.

> > You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
>
> LIAR. try again.

You don't. It's just a plain fact. Believe it.
I maintained cryo systems for five years
for NRAO... no cert here. It uses dry
helium... harmless gas, although expensive.

> > I think most of us can read
>
> and we have all read your LIES, liar.

Keep saying it... nobody believes it, but
it makes you look worse every time you
do it. We can all read.

> >> > Who do you think you're messing
> >> > around with?
> >>
> >> a LIAR. :-)
> >
> > Then why the goofy smiley?
>
> its so fun making a fool of you. :-)

The only fool here, your momma made.

> >> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
> >
> > Good... use the money to buy a clue!
>
> nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)

Here's a *free* clue... another new vehicle won't
give you happiness. After all your purchases,
you still don't see this.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1ea680tsqdf@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
> >> refrigeration certification.
> >
> > Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
>
> lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
> stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
> find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.

What does that have to do with your knowlege?
You didn't specify, you just said that the only
thing you didn't know about refrigeration was
geo. I busted your chops. Get over it, wuss.

> > I've already talked about it... you haven't.
>
> lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
> pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.

I've given enough... until you start talking, instead
of asking, just kiss my *** and Google me.

> you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
> anything out.

Why would I even bother? You don't
tell us anything... I wanna be just like you!

> > Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> > yourself unworthy of trust.
>
> lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that
statement
> bother me to much. :-)

Dig it deeper! You have a business on
the line!

> > More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> > if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> > head pressure control can be bypassed.
> > I win... again.
>
> lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
> bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still
have
> to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
> pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell
me
> why.

No, 'substitute' and 'bypass' are two different
things, Nate... let me educate you on that one.
One is a working equivalent, the other is a shunt.
I suggested a shunt... you started screaming about
'low ambient', which was *never* a *limiting condition*
in any post originating this challenge. Why argue
so hard about this? Because I'm right.. no low ambient
means no head pressure control necessary... you may
have to remove refrigerant to make this work, I specified
this and it addresses the 'regulation issue' you bring
up above.

OK, here's the mistake I made on the valve thing...
there are no valves that are good enough.... notice the
complete lack of same in any system. It has to be a sweat
connection. This means that the entire system has to be
evacuated in order to work on it, big PITA. Even the injection
points, the ones that use Schrader valves, have caps
on them.

> > You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
>
> LIAR. try again.

You don't. It's just a plain fact. Believe it.
I maintained cryo systems for five years
for NRAO... no cert here. It uses dry
helium... harmless gas, although expensive.

> > I think most of us can read
>
> and we have all read your LIES, liar.

Keep saying it... nobody believes it, but
it makes you look worse every time you
do it. We can all read.

> >> > Who do you think you're messing
> >> > around with?
> >>
> >> a LIAR. :-)
> >
> > Then why the goofy smiley?
>
> its so fun making a fool of you. :-)

The only fool here, your momma made.

> >> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
> >
> > Good... use the money to buy a clue!
>
> nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)

Here's a *free* clue... another new vehicle won't
give you happiness. After all your purchases,
you still don't see this.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11fa1ea680tsqdf@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
> >> refrigeration certification.
> >
> > Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
>
> lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
> stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
> find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.

What does that have to do with your knowlege?
You didn't specify, you just said that the only
thing you didn't know about refrigeration was
geo. I busted your chops. Get over it, wuss.

> > I've already talked about it... you haven't.
>
> lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
> pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.

I've given enough... until you start talking, instead
of asking, just kiss my *** and Google me.

> you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
> anything out.

Why would I even bother? You don't
tell us anything... I wanna be just like you!

> > Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> > yourself unworthy of trust.
>
> lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that
statement
> bother me to much. :-)

Dig it deeper! You have a business on
the line!

> > More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> > if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> > head pressure control can be bypassed.
> > I win... again.
>
> lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
> bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still
have
> to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
> pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell
me
> why.

No, 'substitute' and 'bypass' are two different
things, Nate... let me educate you on that one.
One is a working equivalent, the other is a shunt.
I suggested a shunt... you started screaming about
'low ambient', which was *never* a *limiting condition*
in any post originating this challenge. Why argue
so hard about this? Because I'm right.. no low ambient
means no head pressure control necessary... you may
have to remove refrigerant to make this work, I specified
this and it addresses the 'regulation issue' you bring
up above.

OK, here's the mistake I made on the valve thing...
there are no valves that are good enough.... notice the
complete lack of same in any system. It has to be a sweat
connection. This means that the entire system has to be
evacuated in order to work on it, big PITA. Even the injection
points, the ones that use Schrader valves, have caps
on them.

> > You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
>
> LIAR. try again.

You don't. It's just a plain fact. Believe it.
I maintained cryo systems for five years
for NRAO... no cert here. It uses dry
helium... harmless gas, although expensive.

> > I think most of us can read
>
> and we have all read your LIES, liar.

Keep saying it... nobody believes it, but
it makes you look worse every time you
do it. We can all read.

> >> > Who do you think you're messing
> >> > around with?
> >>
> >> a LIAR. :-)
> >
> > Then why the goofy smiley?
>
> its so fun making a fool of you. :-)

The only fool here, your momma made.

> >> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
> >
> > Good... use the money to buy a clue!
>
> nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)

Here's a *free* clue... another new vehicle won't
give you happiness. After all your purchases,
you still don't see this.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic)."... Nate
..

 

> "Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
> news:11fa1ea680tsqdf@corp.supernews.com...
>>lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
>>stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
>>find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
>

Would Air Liquide America in East Helena count?
BTW, My little brother is a cryo tech thanks to uncle and the USAF. I
understand a sealed gallon jug of LOX set on the tarmac can make one
hellacious Whump.

--
jeff