134a Refrigerant
08-06-2005 | 11:07 AM
#4161
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f4gb3q90thuf8@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:U8qIe.950$3M4.520@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net. ..
> > That's why it's so important for you to
> > weasel and welch your way into a modified spec
>
> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling you
> what an HMC was to begin with.
Don't spin so hard, Nate... your poor widdle head
might fall off! We can all read, btw.
> > As I stated in my first post
> > after you revealed what the magic letters HMC
> > stood for (a brand name, btw), it allows the
> > cooling system more bandwidth, i.e. operation
> > in larger extremes.
>
> WRONG.
Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
> > I googled HMC and found the proper name,
> > as well as examples... I was *guessing*, and
> > beat your silly challenge.
>
> lol no you didnt! you havent been right yet on anything youve said about
> it!
Obviously you're wrong there... otherwise, why
the protracted battle over the lack of the low ambient spec?
> > If the head pressure
> > control was leaking, and low ambient was not
> > in the forecast
>
> for starters, hmc's dont just develop leaks.....but ill play along becaust
> its possible supermarket hired a minimum wage flunky like you who doesnt
> know his *** from a hole in the ground and when he snuck into the mech
room
> to smoke his lil doobie on his break he could trip and cause damage.....so
> ill play along to this point.
Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
> > you could bypass it with two
> > valves and a straight piece of pipe, to replace
> > it after the part came in on order.
>
> lol......NO! please stop asking for help from those as ignorant as you
are
> and give me a REAL solution. do you have any idea just how ------- stupid
> your suggestion is?
>
> lol, of course you dont. you havent a clue as to the depths of your own
> ignorance but that doesnt stop you does it? :-)
>
> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
the wind...
> >> lol --------, liar. i CLEARLY stated -30 degrees. now squirm boy!
:-)
> >
> > Doesn't matter
>
> TRANSLATION --> "agreed, you DID clearly state -30 degrees" :-)
I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
the original challenge, and was presented with a 'such as'
caveat, which means it was not a binding specification.
We *all* can read.
> > you didn't specify it in the original
> > challenge, the only document that matters.
>
> LIAR. it was indeed in my original challenge TO YOU in the SAME post
where
> i told you what the hmc was to begin with!
There was no challenge in your post to me... go
back and read it.
> > You are a complete
> > spoilsport and loser.
>
> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
I had won the challenge long before I posted that... and
you haven't explained why it wouldn't work! OK, I'll
give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
pipe... happy now?
> > do you do cryo?
>
> do you? :-) if so, lets see your certification. when you fail to
produce
> it, dont bother with trying to LIE your way out of it. :-)
Google me... see my bona fides. Then kiss my ***.
> > You didn't 'outline' anything
>
> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious. Either you
refer to the original challenge, or you refer to a post
that doesn't contain a challenge, and doesn't give
a spec, but an example. You're spinning, and welching.
> >> lol.....youre actually trying to suggest that a URL including
> > "proudliberal"
> >> is credible? BUWHAHAHA! :-)
> >
> > And why not?
>
> lol you are PATHETIC. here it is folks, stephen admitting that he
considers
> pages with "proudliberal" in their web address to be impartial sources of
> credible information. LOL!
See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
be wrong... that's the worst kind of fallacy. It means that
you can't, or won't, acknowlege the truth when it is in front
of you. What if the site said 'proudconservative'? Would it
be wrong then too? You are indeed a case...
> > Your political proclivities have
> > blinded you
>
> i have not quoted one single link from rushlinbaugh.com or any other
> political source because theyre also biased.
That doesn't mean that you're not committing
the logical fallacy of ad hominem, abusive...
> > You are not
> > addressing the NOAA stuff
>
> --------. i asked for links that were credible and ruled out self-serving
> government sources from the very beginning.
See... more logical fallacies. Are you an
anarchist, or a Luddite? I tend to believe
the latter...
> > C'mon, you know your limitations
>
> exactly, and i admitted them to you when you were asking me questions
about
> tar. i know nothing about tar and told you that. yet, when asked
questions
> beyond your very limited field instead of owning up to your own
limitations
> to just tell lies, make excuses, and cry like a little kid. instead of
just
> saying "gee, i dunno anything about that (you know, like i did) you made
> references to hitler, my -----, and anything else you could bring up in
> hopes of smoking the fact that you were an ignorant fool. well stevie,
the
> smoke blew away and your ignorance is blinding. :-)
But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
Anyway, you are a fool, and we can all see that.
But most importantly, you are a welch, and not
to be trusted... and I'm doing the public a service
by pointing this out.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..
08-06-2005 | 02:47 PM
#4162
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 02:47 PM
#4163
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 02:47 PM
#4164
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 02:47 PM
#4165
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:w04Je.329$bV2.245@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> i never claimed to be qualified in cryo. cryo does not fall under my
>> refrigeration certification.
>
> Is it not in the field of refrigeration?
lol you really desperate to find ANY type of victory! :-) youre pitiful
stephen! :-) cryo has nothing to do with commercial refrigeration. you
find me ANY company in montana who handles cryo. you cant.
> I've already talked about it... you haven't.
lol youve dont NOTHING more than mention the name! give me working
pressures. give me componentry. give me the PMB.
you dont know ANY of that, so run do a google and see if you can find
anything out.
> Actually, I don't trust you... you've already proven
> yourself unworthy of trust.
lol coming from the biggest LIAR in the newsgroup i wont let that statement
bother me to much. :-)
> More spin... you've already agreed with me that
> if the ambient is not going to go low that the
> head pressure control can be bypassed.
> I win... again.
lol not only are you a LIAR but you are an ignorant fool! sure it can be
bypassed......that was my initial statement -------......but you still have
to regulate the pressure and your ridiculous "two valves and a straight
pipe" (BUWAHAHA!) is totally assinine and ill just bet you cant even tell me
why.
> You don't have to have certs to work on cryo
LIAR. try again.
> I think most of us can read
and we have all read your LIES, liar.
>> > Who do you think you're messing
>> > around with?
>>
>> a LIAR. :-)
>
> Then why the goofy smiley?
its so fun making a fool of you. :-)
>> lol, even with the mild temps ill gross at least $1500 today. :-)
>
> Good... use the money to buy a clue!
nope, but im getting ready to order another new jeep. :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 02:52 PM
#4166
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 02:52 PM
#4167
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 02:52 PM
#4168
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 02:52 PM
#4169
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:f64Je.330$bV2.76@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> What seminars
your liberal seminars, the ones that actually convinced you that the rest of
the world is to stupid to see through your LIES.
>> lol, you are a liar. you gave me links with "proudliberal" in them and
> you
>> consider that a credible source of information? of course not, you just
>> hope that if you tell the same LIE over and over that someone will
>> believe
>> you.
>
> Why not?
lol you really are a stupid ----. i asked you for a credible source, you
provide me with links containing "proudliberal" in the domain and then you
defend it, claiming its a valid source of unbiased information.
here, im going to whack you over the head with a clue-by-four. NOTHING
coming from a liberals mouth is unbiased (or honest in most cases).
> You used the manual for your leak detector
yup, written by ENGINEERS within the industry. its funny how you used to
keep stressing "ENGINEERS" but when i pointed out that those same manuals
refuting your claims were written by engineers your dropped it. LOL! :-)
> Deeper, Nate... dig the hole deeper!
its my pleasure to dig your hole deeper. :-) tell me again about the two
valves and piece of pipe. BUWAHAHA! :-)
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
08-06-2005 | 03:04 PM
#4170
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:om4Je.331$bV2.283@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
>> LIAR! my specification was clear in my VERY FIRST post to you telling
>> you
>> what an HMC was to begin with.
>
> Don't spin so hard
TRANSLATION --> "i have no response". :-) it was in my very first post to
you telling you what an HMc was to begin with. you choked on it boy. :-)
> Then why the incredible battle over low ambient?
because without it there is little reason to not just change the HMC so you
can complete the job in one service call instead of having to return later
to replace it. having a -30 (or comparable) ambient is a justifiable reason
to take two service calls to make the repair. i suppose being in the middle
of a thunderstorm would be another reason, but you can usually wait that
out.
> Believe it or not, *anything* can develop a leak...
certainly, but its not a realistic expectation. i do understand why you
would grasp at anything you can dream up at this point though. :-)
>> two valves and a straight piece of pipe......BUWHAHAHA! :-)
>
> Until you give an alternative, you're just pissing in
> the wind...
lol ok tell ya what. you tell me why your recommendation is SO LAUGHABLE
first, and then ill give you the _real_ alternative to changing the HMC in a
pinch. :-)
> I did read somewhere about -30 degrees.. it was not in
> the original challenge
LIAR! it was in my original challenge TO YOU. realizing he was out of his
league (hes not a refrigeration tech), i knew that jeff wouldnt attempt to
speak in total ignorance on the mechanical fundamentals of low temp
refrigeration. you on the other hand, cannot admit to being anything less
than omnipotent even at the expense of any shred of credibility that you
once had.
>> yeah, because of your two valves and a pipe. LOL!
>
> I had won the challenge long before I posted that
lol HOW in the hell do you figure you won when your suggestion is TOTALLY
WRONG? :-)
> and
> you haven't explained why it wouldn't work!
lol what a stool! pressure is dynamic and load is dynamic! are you going
to stand there 24/7 adjusting the valves continually to meet the changing
load?
.......what a dumb ***.
> OK, I'll
> give you a vacuum bleeder fitting on the piece of
> pipe... happy now?
as pathetic and assinine as your two valves and a pipe. LOL
>> LIAR. i clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> We can all read, Nate... it's so obvious.
exactly! its obvious that i clearly stated -30 degrees yet you still try to
LIE your way out of it.
> See? More logical fallacies... you're claiming that if
> the site said "the earth is almost spherical" then that would
> be wrong
what a stupid analogy (then again, after your two valves and a pipe thing
nothing surprises me! :-)
the earth is proven to be spherical. the whole refrigerant/ozone thing isnt
proven.
> But your ----- *is* like Hitlers! One ball, too...
TRANSLATION --> "look at how pitiful i have become"
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com