"Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:TAXHe.557$646.60@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> You made $1000 gross on Sunday?

i said i _grossed_ it. yeah, it was sorta slow. :-)

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lsl7icap76a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:W5XHe.549$646.45@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > You can't give up... even though you are
> > digging the hole deeper and deeper.
> > We all can read... and remember. Just think...
> > this will live in the Google archives for thousands
> > of years! Own your limitations!
>
> lol, not a chance!
> your lies are there for one and all.

Exactly as I said... he can't give up.
I've proved him wrong, beat him at
his own challenge... even *proved*
him a liar and a welch. Watch yourself
in dealing with this person.

> > Now you're very confused again... I can
> > understand, since your head's been spinning
> > a mile a minute since this started. Please
> > try to keep this straight... I'll remind you as
> > necessary. The 'challenge' involved the
> > head pressure control... the 'argument'
> > involved CFC's antagonism to the global
> > ozone layer. When I refer to 'challenge',
> > you should address the proper issue.
> > All clear?
>
> TRANSLATION --> "its lying time"

It's all he's got, folks... put money on it.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lsl7icap76a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:W5XHe.549$646.45@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > You can't give up... even though you are
> > digging the hole deeper and deeper.
> > We all can read... and remember. Just think...
> > this will live in the Google archives for thousands
> > of years! Own your limitations!
>
> lol, not a chance!
> your lies are there for one and all.

Exactly as I said... he can't give up.
I've proved him wrong, beat him at
his own challenge... even *proved*
him a liar and a welch. Watch yourself
in dealing with this person.

> > Now you're very confused again... I can
> > understand, since your head's been spinning
> > a mile a minute since this started. Please
> > try to keep this straight... I'll remind you as
> > necessary. The 'challenge' involved the
> > head pressure control... the 'argument'
> > involved CFC's antagonism to the global
> > ozone layer. When I refer to 'challenge',
> > you should address the proper issue.
> > All clear?
>
> TRANSLATION --> "its lying time"

It's all he's got, folks... put money on it.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lsl7icap76a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:W5XHe.549$646.45@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > You can't give up... even though you are
> > digging the hole deeper and deeper.
> > We all can read... and remember. Just think...
> > this will live in the Google archives for thousands
> > of years! Own your limitations!
>
> lol, not a chance!
> your lies are there for one and all.

Exactly as I said... he can't give up.
I've proved him wrong, beat him at
his own challenge... even *proved*
him a liar and a welch. Watch yourself
in dealing with this person.

> > Now you're very confused again... I can
> > understand, since your head's been spinning
> > a mile a minute since this started. Please
> > try to keep this straight... I'll remind you as
> > necessary. The 'challenge' involved the
> > head pressure control... the 'argument'
> > involved CFC's antagonism to the global
> > ozone layer. When I refer to 'challenge',
> > you should address the proper issue.
> > All clear?
>
> TRANSLATION --> "its lying time"

It's all he's got, folks... put money on it.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lsl7icap76a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:W5XHe.549$646.45@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net.. .
> > You can't give up... even though you are
> > digging the hole deeper and deeper.
> > We all can read... and remember. Just think...
> > this will live in the Google archives for thousands
> > of years! Own your limitations!
>
> lol, not a chance!
> your lies are there for one and all.

Exactly as I said... he can't give up.
I've proved him wrong, beat him at
his own challenge... even *proved*
him a liar and a welch. Watch yourself
in dealing with this person.

> > Now you're very confused again... I can
> > understand, since your head's been spinning
> > a mile a minute since this started. Please
> > try to keep this straight... I'll remind you as
> > necessary. The 'challenge' involved the
> > head pressure control... the 'argument'
> > involved CFC's antagonism to the global
> > ozone layer. When I refer to 'challenge',
> > you should address the proper issue.
> > All clear?
>
> TRANSLATION --> "its lying time"

It's all he's got, folks... put money on it.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lp6hflfrd28@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:j0XHe.547$646.168@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> > We all read it... you gave an example
> > of 'in a pinch' as 'such as on a rooftop in -30 degree weather'...
>
> you stupid stool. were it not for low ambient the HMC wouldnt be needed
AT
> ALL. its funny to watch you squirm and spin, hoping desperately that you
> can convince use that you actually know something about refrigeration.
LOL!

That's why it's so important for you to
weasel and welch your way into a modified spec
for the challenge. As I stated in my first post
after you revealed what the magic letters HMC
stood for (a brand name, btw), it allows the
cooling system more bandwidth, i.e. operation
in larger extremes. Remember, this was before
I googled HMC and found the proper name,
as well as examples... I was *guessing*, and
beat your silly challenge. If the head pressure
control was leaking, and low ambient was not
in the forecast, you could bypass it with two
valves and a straight piece of pipe, to replace
it after the part came in on order.

I believe the psychological phenomenon you're
exhibiting is called 'transferrence'... read up on it.

> > No... you gave an example of 'in a pinch'. This in no
> > way defined the exact terms of the challenge
>
> lol --------, liar. i CLEARLY stated -30 degrees. now squirm boy! :-)

Doesn't matter.. you didn't specify it in the original
challenge, the only document that matters. You
even used the term 'such as' when elaborating on
a possible example of 'in a pinch'... we can flog
this to death (if it's not already there!) and you'll
never own up to your welchage. You are a complete
spoilsport and loser.

> > why do you attemp to put such a condition onto me,
> > when you didn't make the same condition to Jeff?
>
> being stump-stupid, you require further clarification. :-)

I believe we've already proven who's 'stump-stupid'
around here... do you do cryo?

> > Says a lot about you, doesn't it? Says 'welch' to me..
>
> you pathetic little liar! i outlined it for you BEFORE you even knew what
> an HMC was.

You didn't 'outline' anything... you gave an example
of 'in a pinch', even used the common example modifier
'such as'. All there for anyone to read. Watch Nate spin!
Spin, Nate.... spin!

> >> oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling
> > eyes>
> >
> > Logical fallacies
>
> lol.....youre actually trying to suggest that a URL including
"proudliberal"
> is credible? BUWHAHAHA! :-)

And why not? Your political proclivities have
blinded you, we can all see that. You are not
addressing the NOAA stuff, Nate... big science,
just waiting for some HVAC tech to debunk!
C'mon, you know your limitations... and your
lack of a degree in atmospheric science, or
any science at all, must not be one of them!
Tell us again how the rest of the world is wrong,
but you, Nate, with your knowlege of your
limitations, must be right!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lp6hflfrd28@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:j0XHe.547$646.168@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> > We all read it... you gave an example
> > of 'in a pinch' as 'such as on a rooftop in -30 degree weather'...
>
> you stupid stool. were it not for low ambient the HMC wouldnt be needed
AT
> ALL. its funny to watch you squirm and spin, hoping desperately that you
> can convince use that you actually know something about refrigeration.
LOL!

That's why it's so important for you to
weasel and welch your way into a modified spec
for the challenge. As I stated in my first post
after you revealed what the magic letters HMC
stood for (a brand name, btw), it allows the
cooling system more bandwidth, i.e. operation
in larger extremes. Remember, this was before
I googled HMC and found the proper name,
as well as examples... I was *guessing*, and
beat your silly challenge. If the head pressure
control was leaking, and low ambient was not
in the forecast, you could bypass it with two
valves and a straight piece of pipe, to replace
it after the part came in on order.

I believe the psychological phenomenon you're
exhibiting is called 'transferrence'... read up on it.

> > No... you gave an example of 'in a pinch'. This in no
> > way defined the exact terms of the challenge
>
> lol --------, liar. i CLEARLY stated -30 degrees. now squirm boy! :-)

Doesn't matter.. you didn't specify it in the original
challenge, the only document that matters. You
even used the term 'such as' when elaborating on
a possible example of 'in a pinch'... we can flog
this to death (if it's not already there!) and you'll
never own up to your welchage. You are a complete
spoilsport and loser.

> > why do you attemp to put such a condition onto me,
> > when you didn't make the same condition to Jeff?
>
> being stump-stupid, you require further clarification. :-)

I believe we've already proven who's 'stump-stupid'
around here... do you do cryo?

> > Says a lot about you, doesn't it? Says 'welch' to me..
>
> you pathetic little liar! i outlined it for you BEFORE you even knew what
> an HMC was.

You didn't 'outline' anything... you gave an example
of 'in a pinch', even used the common example modifier
'such as'. All there for anyone to read. Watch Nate spin!
Spin, Nate.... spin!

> >> oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling
> > eyes>
> >
> > Logical fallacies
>
> lol.....youre actually trying to suggest that a URL including
"proudliberal"
> is credible? BUWHAHAHA! :-)

And why not? Your political proclivities have
blinded you, we can all see that. You are not
addressing the NOAA stuff, Nate... big science,
just waiting for some HVAC tech to debunk!
C'mon, you know your limitations... and your
lack of a degree in atmospheric science, or
any science at all, must not be one of them!
Tell us again how the rest of the world is wrong,
but you, Nate, with your knowlege of your
limitations, must be right!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lp6hflfrd28@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:j0XHe.547$646.168@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> > We all read it... you gave an example
> > of 'in a pinch' as 'such as on a rooftop in -30 degree weather'...
>
> you stupid stool. were it not for low ambient the HMC wouldnt be needed
AT
> ALL. its funny to watch you squirm and spin, hoping desperately that you
> can convince use that you actually know something about refrigeration.
LOL!

That's why it's so important for you to
weasel and welch your way into a modified spec
for the challenge. As I stated in my first post
after you revealed what the magic letters HMC
stood for (a brand name, btw), it allows the
cooling system more bandwidth, i.e. operation
in larger extremes. Remember, this was before
I googled HMC and found the proper name,
as well as examples... I was *guessing*, and
beat your silly challenge. If the head pressure
control was leaking, and low ambient was not
in the forecast, you could bypass it with two
valves and a straight piece of pipe, to replace
it after the part came in on order.

I believe the psychological phenomenon you're
exhibiting is called 'transferrence'... read up on it.

> > No... you gave an example of 'in a pinch'. This in no
> > way defined the exact terms of the challenge
>
> lol --------, liar. i CLEARLY stated -30 degrees. now squirm boy! :-)

Doesn't matter.. you didn't specify it in the original
challenge, the only document that matters. You
even used the term 'such as' when elaborating on
a possible example of 'in a pinch'... we can flog
this to death (if it's not already there!) and you'll
never own up to your welchage. You are a complete
spoilsport and loser.

> > why do you attemp to put such a condition onto me,
> > when you didn't make the same condition to Jeff?
>
> being stump-stupid, you require further clarification. :-)

I believe we've already proven who's 'stump-stupid'
around here... do you do cryo?

> > Says a lot about you, doesn't it? Says 'welch' to me..
>
> you pathetic little liar! i outlined it for you BEFORE you even knew what
> an HMC was.

You didn't 'outline' anything... you gave an example
of 'in a pinch', even used the common example modifier
'such as'. All there for anyone to read. Watch Nate spin!
Spin, Nate.... spin!

> >> oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling
> > eyes>
> >
> > Logical fallacies
>
> lol.....youre actually trying to suggest that a URL including
"proudliberal"
> is credible? BUWHAHAHA! :-)

And why not? Your political proclivities have
blinded you, we can all see that. You are not
addressing the NOAA stuff, Nate... big science,
just waiting for some HVAC tech to debunk!
C'mon, you know your limitations... and your
lack of a degree in atmospheric science, or
any science at all, must not be one of them!
Tell us again how the rest of the world is wrong,
but you, Nate, with your knowlege of your
limitations, must be right!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0lp6hflfrd28@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:j0XHe.547$646.168@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> > We all read it... you gave an example
> > of 'in a pinch' as 'such as on a rooftop in -30 degree weather'...
>
> you stupid stool. were it not for low ambient the HMC wouldnt be needed
AT
> ALL. its funny to watch you squirm and spin, hoping desperately that you
> can convince use that you actually know something about refrigeration.
LOL!

That's why it's so important for you to
weasel and welch your way into a modified spec
for the challenge. As I stated in my first post
after you revealed what the magic letters HMC
stood for (a brand name, btw), it allows the
cooling system more bandwidth, i.e. operation
in larger extremes. Remember, this was before
I googled HMC and found the proper name,
as well as examples... I was *guessing*, and
beat your silly challenge. If the head pressure
control was leaking, and low ambient was not
in the forecast, you could bypass it with two
valves and a straight piece of pipe, to replace
it after the part came in on order.

I believe the psychological phenomenon you're
exhibiting is called 'transferrence'... read up on it.

> > No... you gave an example of 'in a pinch'. This in no
> > way defined the exact terms of the challenge
>
> lol --------, liar. i CLEARLY stated -30 degrees. now squirm boy! :-)

Doesn't matter.. you didn't specify it in the original
challenge, the only document that matters. You
even used the term 'such as' when elaborating on
a possible example of 'in a pinch'... we can flog
this to death (if it's not already there!) and you'll
never own up to your welchage. You are a complete
spoilsport and loser.

> > why do you attemp to put such a condition onto me,
> > when you didn't make the same condition to Jeff?
>
> being stump-stupid, you require further clarification. :-)

I believe we've already proven who's 'stump-stupid'
around here... do you do cryo?

> > Says a lot about you, doesn't it? Says 'welch' to me..
>
> you pathetic little liar! i outlined it for you BEFORE you even knew what
> an HMC was.

You didn't 'outline' anything... you gave an example
of 'in a pinch', even used the common example modifier
'such as'. All there for anyone to read. Watch Nate spin!
Spin, Nate.... spin!

> >> oh yeah, a link with "proudliberal" in the URL is credible. <rolling
> > eyes>
> >
> > Logical fallacies
>
> lol.....youre actually trying to suggest that a URL including
"proudliberal"
> is credible? BUWHAHAHA! :-)

And why not? Your political proclivities have
blinded you, we can all see that. You are not
addressing the NOAA stuff, Nate... big science,
just waiting for some HVAC tech to debunk!
C'mon, you know your limitations... and your
lack of a degree in atmospheric science, or
any science at all, must not be one of them!
Tell us again how the rest of the world is wrong,
but you, Nate, with your knowlege of your
limitations, must be right!
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message
news:11f0m1rqobb2cca@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:lvXHe.555$646.443@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net. ..
> >> lol reach all you want. if you think its a victory that im not doing
> >> cryo
> >> IN MONTANA then it just shows how pathetic you really are for any type
of
> >> loose victory. :-)
> >
> > No... I think it's a victory when I can point out your
> > silly mistakes... in your own avowed field of 'expertise'.
>
> lol you find a real one (you know, not something youre LYING about, liar)
> and then you might have something. :-)

Do you regard yourself as qualified in cryo? I mean,
are you stupid, or a liar?

> > And you seem to have forgotten that I was
> > chief site tech at a radiotelescope for four years.
> > You see, I *did* cryo
>
> lol now THAT is pathetic. now youre claiming to be a refrigeration guy?
> BUWAHAHA! :-) you couldnt even give me an alternative to replacing an
HMC
> but youre going to claim to be a cryo/refrigeration guy? LOL! :-)

But I *did* give you an alternative to
replacing a head pressure control, Nate...
we all read it. I even specified that lower
ambient was not allowable under the
circumstances.

Go ahead, google back,
see if you can find my early NG posts...
they go back to '92. You'll find NRAO
in there... ever hear of them? The VLBA?
Chief site tech, Nate... four years, my own
$6M site, 82 foot dish to maintain. Two
complete, separate cryo systems, with
5 or 6 refrigerators on each. 15 Kelvins...
that's some cold stuff, Nate... colder than
you'll *ever* work on. I call that *refrigeration*.
Why do you think I've been kicking your ***
so bad? Who do you think you're messing
around with? You're just an HVAC chump.
__
Steve
"i recognize my limitations and
immediately own it (sic). " -- Nate
..