134a Refrigerant
#3811
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E5C755.469340DB@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > You didn't point them out! I'd of thought you'd be
> > more than happy to point out my lies... unless I was
> > not lying, and you're just trying to get out of here
> > with your skin intact.
> Send it to me with the one inch required margins.
There's not enough of your skin left
to make up the required margins!
__
Steve
..
#3812
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E5C755.469340DB@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > You didn't point them out! I'd of thought you'd be
> > more than happy to point out my lies... unless I was
> > not lying, and you're just trying to get out of here
> > with your skin intact.
> Send it to me with the one inch required margins.
There's not enough of your skin left
to make up the required margins!
__
Steve
..
#3813
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E5C755.469340DB@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > You didn't point them out! I'd of thought you'd be
> > more than happy to point out my lies... unless I was
> > not lying, and you're just trying to get out of here
> > with your skin intact.
> Send it to me with the one inch required margins.
There's not enough of your skin left
to make up the required margins!
__
Steve
..
#3814
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ebl5clr9udf9a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:eMiFe.429$oY.237@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net.. .
> >Oh, I thought that my response was absolutely
> >killer... remember this?
> >>>> i know why you cling to this belief but the wind doesnt constantly blow.
> >>>I know why you cling to this belief but the atmosphere is
> >>>never still.
> >>it doesnt continually move enough air to lift heavier gases above lighter
> >>ones. to a degree, yes....but it settles before reaching the ozone layer.
> >You crapped all over yourself with *that* one...
>
> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
That's why you crapped yourself?
> >> and BTW, i found out why there are refrigerants found in the bottom of
> >> the
> >> ocean. care to take a guess?
>
> > Suppose you post the link... no begging the question here.
>
> i have no link, but talk to a navy veteran sometime. its quite common for
> the navy to dump refrigerant in and under water.
Another one from the nether regions... deserving
of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
And so what? It will eventually make its way
to the stratosphere... might take some time.
Don't forget, by your own estimation, you should
have nothing to say about CFC's and ozone:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
: )
__
Steve
..
#3815
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ebl5clr9udf9a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:eMiFe.429$oY.237@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net.. .
> >Oh, I thought that my response was absolutely
> >killer... remember this?
> >>>> i know why you cling to this belief but the wind doesnt constantly blow.
> >>>I know why you cling to this belief but the atmosphere is
> >>>never still.
> >>it doesnt continually move enough air to lift heavier gases above lighter
> >>ones. to a degree, yes....but it settles before reaching the ozone layer.
> >You crapped all over yourself with *that* one...
>
> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
That's why you crapped yourself?
> >> and BTW, i found out why there are refrigerants found in the bottom of
> >> the
> >> ocean. care to take a guess?
>
> > Suppose you post the link... no begging the question here.
>
> i have no link, but talk to a navy veteran sometime. its quite common for
> the navy to dump refrigerant in and under water.
Another one from the nether regions... deserving
of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
And so what? It will eventually make its way
to the stratosphere... might take some time.
Don't forget, by your own estimation, you should
have nothing to say about CFC's and ozone:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
: )
__
Steve
..
#3816
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ebl5clr9udf9a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:eMiFe.429$oY.237@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net.. .
> >Oh, I thought that my response was absolutely
> >killer... remember this?
> >>>> i know why you cling to this belief but the wind doesnt constantly blow.
> >>>I know why you cling to this belief but the atmosphere is
> >>>never still.
> >>it doesnt continually move enough air to lift heavier gases above lighter
> >>ones. to a degree, yes....but it settles before reaching the ozone layer.
> >You crapped all over yourself with *that* one...
>
> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
That's why you crapped yourself?
> >> and BTW, i found out why there are refrigerants found in the bottom of
> >> the
> >> ocean. care to take a guess?
>
> > Suppose you post the link... no begging the question here.
>
> i have no link, but talk to a navy veteran sometime. its quite common for
> the navy to dump refrigerant in and under water.
Another one from the nether regions... deserving
of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
And so what? It will eventually make its way
to the stratosphere... might take some time.
Don't forget, by your own estimation, you should
have nothing to say about CFC's and ozone:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
: )
__
Steve
..
#3817
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11ebl5clr9udf9a@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:eMiFe.429$oY.237@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net.. .
> >Oh, I thought that my response was absolutely
> >killer... remember this?
> >>>> i know why you cling to this belief but the wind doesnt constantly blow.
> >>>I know why you cling to this belief but the atmosphere is
> >>>never still.
> >>it doesnt continually move enough air to lift heavier gases above lighter
> >>ones. to a degree, yes....but it settles before reaching the ozone layer.
> >You crapped all over yourself with *that* one...
>
> thats because youre an ignorant fool.
That's why you crapped yourself?
> >> and BTW, i found out why there are refrigerants found in the bottom of
> >> the
> >> ocean. care to take a guess?
>
> > Suppose you post the link... no begging the question here.
>
> i have no link, but talk to a navy veteran sometime. its quite common for
> the navy to dump refrigerant in and under water.
Another one from the nether regions... deserving
of the source... (sound of commode flushing...).
And so what? It will eventually make its way
to the stratosphere... might take some time.
Don't forget, by your own estimation, you should
have nothing to say about CFC's and ozone:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
: )
__
Steve
..
#3818
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11eblcscsqunj8f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:dXiFe.433$oY.22@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> > I let folks be as girly as they want.
>
> its the only way to feel youre amongst peers. :-)
I don't care if your pee-er is an innie or an
outie... you *are* a welch, and you don't
have a clue about your limitations... ready
and willing to spout -------- at a moment's
notice.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3819
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11eblcscsqunj8f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:dXiFe.433$oY.22@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> > I let folks be as girly as they want.
>
> its the only way to feel youre amongst peers. :-)
I don't care if your pee-er is an innie or an
outie... you *are* a welch, and you don't
have a clue about your limitations... ready
and willing to spout -------- at a moment's
notice.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3820
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11eblcscsqunj8f@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:dXiFe.433$oY.22@newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> > I let folks be as girly as they want.
>
> its the only way to feel youre amongst peers. :-)
I don't care if your pee-er is an innie or an
outie... you *are* a welch, and you don't
have a clue about your limitations... ready
and willing to spout -------- at a moment's
notice.
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..