134a Refrigerant
#3731
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:eqaFe.1845$Eo3.733@trnddc08...
>> and its still WRONG. :-)
>
> Yes it's wrong
thank you. this was my only point with your usage.
> but it is also reality.
no doubt. its still however, _wrong_.
> Just like when I showed you dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other
> "insiders" referring to "freon refrigeration".
they are wrong as well.
> Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does not make it so, nor does
> it make it go away, right or wrong.
its not my definition, it is the industry definition. i haven tried to make
it go away. i simply stated that it was _wrong_ and it is relative here
_only_ because you presented yourself as an omnipotent engineer and if youre
going to set the standard that high, youd better use proper terminology.
> I said freon is a compound.
and that is _wrong_.
>You say it's only a tradename.
and that is right.
> You say in the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically.
they dont. nobody who knows the industry, anyway.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:eqaFe.1845$Eo3.733@trnddc08...
>> and its still WRONG. :-)
>
> Yes it's wrong
thank you. this was my only point with your usage.
> but it is also reality.
no doubt. its still however, _wrong_.
> Just like when I showed you dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other
> "insiders" referring to "freon refrigeration".
they are wrong as well.
> Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does not make it so, nor does
> it make it go away, right or wrong.
its not my definition, it is the industry definition. i haven tried to make
it go away. i simply stated that it was _wrong_ and it is relative here
_only_ because you presented yourself as an omnipotent engineer and if youre
going to set the standard that high, youd better use proper terminology.
> I said freon is a compound.
and that is _wrong_.
>You say it's only a tradename.
and that is right.
> You say in the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically.
they dont. nobody who knows the industry, anyway.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#3732
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:eqaFe.1845$Eo3.733@trnddc08...
>> and its still WRONG. :-)
>
> Yes it's wrong
thank you. this was my only point with your usage.
> but it is also reality.
no doubt. its still however, _wrong_.
> Just like when I showed you dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other
> "insiders" referring to "freon refrigeration".
they are wrong as well.
> Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does not make it so, nor does
> it make it go away, right or wrong.
its not my definition, it is the industry definition. i haven tried to make
it go away. i simply stated that it was _wrong_ and it is relative here
_only_ because you presented yourself as an omnipotent engineer and if youre
going to set the standard that high, youd better use proper terminology.
> I said freon is a compound.
and that is _wrong_.
>You say it's only a tradename.
and that is right.
> You say in the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically.
they dont. nobody who knows the industry, anyway.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:eqaFe.1845$Eo3.733@trnddc08...
>> and its still WRONG. :-)
>
> Yes it's wrong
thank you. this was my only point with your usage.
> but it is also reality.
no doubt. its still however, _wrong_.
> Just like when I showed you dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other
> "insiders" referring to "freon refrigeration".
they are wrong as well.
> Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does not make it so, nor does
> it make it go away, right or wrong.
its not my definition, it is the industry definition. i haven tried to make
it go away. i simply stated that it was _wrong_ and it is relative here
_only_ because you presented yourself as an omnipotent engineer and if youre
going to set the standard that high, youd better use proper terminology.
> I said freon is a compound.
and that is _wrong_.
>You say it's only a tradename.
and that is right.
> You say in the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically.
they dont. nobody who knows the industry, anyway.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#3733
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:eqaFe.1845$Eo3.733@trnddc08...
>> and its still WRONG. :-)
>
> Yes it's wrong
thank you. this was my only point with your usage.
> but it is also reality.
no doubt. its still however, _wrong_.
> Just like when I showed you dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other
> "insiders" referring to "freon refrigeration".
they are wrong as well.
> Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does not make it so, nor does
> it make it go away, right or wrong.
its not my definition, it is the industry definition. i haven tried to make
it go away. i simply stated that it was _wrong_ and it is relative here
_only_ because you presented yourself as an omnipotent engineer and if youre
going to set the standard that high, youd better use proper terminology.
> I said freon is a compound.
and that is _wrong_.
>You say it's only a tradename.
and that is right.
> You say in the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically.
they dont. nobody who knows the industry, anyway.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
news:eqaFe.1845$Eo3.733@trnddc08...
>> and its still WRONG. :-)
>
> Yes it's wrong
thank you. this was my only point with your usage.
> but it is also reality.
no doubt. its still however, _wrong_.
> Just like when I showed you dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other
> "insiders" referring to "freon refrigeration".
they are wrong as well.
> Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does not make it so, nor does
> it make it go away, right or wrong.
its not my definition, it is the industry definition. i haven tried to make
it go away. i simply stated that it was _wrong_ and it is relative here
_only_ because you presented yourself as an omnipotent engineer and if youre
going to set the standard that high, youd better use proper terminology.
> I said freon is a compound.
and that is _wrong_.
>You say it's only a tradename.
and that is right.
> You say in the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically.
they dont. nobody who knows the industry, anyway.
--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com
#3734
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e4t28lhferd83@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1BkEe.2076$Ok6.627@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
> > You forgot about:
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing to say but that never stops me" :-)
Sure I did... remember?
> > Is a compound a mixture?
That's what I said.
And lest we forget:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3735
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e4t28lhferd83@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1BkEe.2076$Ok6.627@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
> > You forgot about:
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing to say but that never stops me" :-)
Sure I did... remember?
> > Is a compound a mixture?
That's what I said.
And lest we forget:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3736
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e4t28lhferd83@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1BkEe.2076$Ok6.627@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
> > You forgot about:
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing to say but that never stops me" :-)
Sure I did... remember?
> > Is a compound a mixture?
That's what I said.
And lest we forget:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3737
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e4t28lhferd83@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:1BkEe.2076$Ok6.627@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
> > You forgot about:
>
> TRANSLATION --> "i have nothing to say but that never stops me" :-)
Sure I did... remember?
> > Is a compound a mixture?
That's what I said.
And lest we forget:
<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.
me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>
You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..
#3738
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E1E980.7071C2DF@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Then you'll be more than happy to point out
> > the lie, right?
> You know full well where they were in your thesis.
You didn't point them out! I'd of thought you'd be
more than happy to point out my lies... unless I was
not lying, and you're just trying to get out of here
with your skin intact.
Too late!
__
Steve
..
#3739
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E1E980.7071C2DF@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Then you'll be more than happy to point out
> > the lie, right?
> You know full well where they were in your thesis.
You didn't point them out! I'd of thought you'd be
more than happy to point out my lies... unless I was
not lying, and you're just trying to get out of here
with your skin intact.
Too late!
__
Steve
..
#3740
Guest
Posts: n/a
Re: 134a Refrigerant
"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E1E980.7071C2DF@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > Then you'll be more than happy to point out
> > the lie, right?
> You know full well where they were in your thesis.
You didn't point them out! I'd of thought you'd be
more than happy to point out my lies... unless I was
not lying, and you're just trying to get out of here
with your skin intact.
Too late!
__
Steve
..