"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:Zb5Fe.4105$vY2.302@trnddc09...
> The flip side of this is that no matter how much you dislike something you
> cannot make it go away by wishing it to, or denying it's existence.

im not trying to make it "go away". im stating that its _wrong_.


> in other parts of the world "jeep" is used generically. Like it or not,
> that's reality.

and its still WRONG. :-)


> Time to grow up Nate and realize that we do not get to impose our own
> versions of reality on the world.

time to own up jeff, and admit that you were WRONG.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:Zb5Fe.4105$vY2.302@trnddc09...
> The flip side of this is that no matter how much you dislike something you
> cannot make it go away by wishing it to, or denying it's existence.

im not trying to make it "go away". im stating that its _wrong_.


> in other parts of the world "jeep" is used generically. Like it or not,
> that's reality.

and its still WRONG. :-)


> Time to grow up Nate and realize that we do not get to impose our own
> versions of reality on the world.

time to own up jeff, and admit that you were WRONG.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:Zb5Fe.4105$vY2.302@trnddc09...
> The flip side of this is that no matter how much you dislike something you
> cannot make it go away by wishing it to, or denying it's existence.

im not trying to make it "go away". im stating that its _wrong_.


> in other parts of the world "jeep" is used generically. Like it or not,
> that's reality.

and its still WRONG. :-)


> Time to grow up Nate and realize that we do not get to impose our own
> versions of reality on the world.

time to own up jeff, and admit that you were WRONG.

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:bz5Fe.5295$mU3.3394@trnddc02...
> Nothing short of nuclear bombardment can destroy chlorine.

i have as many pool links as you can read saying otherwise.


>What you think of as "sunlight dissolving chlorine" or "sunlight destroying
>chlorine" is what I previously stated as sunlight causing the chlorine atom
>in hypochlorus acid to dissociate. It is breaking the chlorine atom free
>and allowing it to excape.

and where is it going....the ozone? :-)


> Chlorine is not destroyed, hypochlorous acid is.

so tell me jeff, why hundreds of links state that chlorine is destroyed, and
not one ive read says its the hypochlorous acid?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:bz5Fe.5295$mU3.3394@trnddc02...
> Nothing short of nuclear bombardment can destroy chlorine.

i have as many pool links as you can read saying otherwise.


>What you think of as "sunlight dissolving chlorine" or "sunlight destroying
>chlorine" is what I previously stated as sunlight causing the chlorine atom
>in hypochlorus acid to dissociate. It is breaking the chlorine atom free
>and allowing it to excape.

and where is it going....the ozone? :-)


> Chlorine is not destroyed, hypochlorous acid is.

so tell me jeff, why hundreds of links state that chlorine is destroyed, and
not one ive read says its the hypochlorous acid?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:bz5Fe.5295$mU3.3394@trnddc02...
> Nothing short of nuclear bombardment can destroy chlorine.

i have as many pool links as you can read saying otherwise.


>What you think of as "sunlight dissolving chlorine" or "sunlight destroying
>chlorine" is what I previously stated as sunlight causing the chlorine atom
>in hypochlorus acid to dissociate. It is breaking the chlorine atom free
>and allowing it to excape.

and where is it going....the ozone? :-)


> Chlorine is not destroyed, hypochlorous acid is.

so tell me jeff, why hundreds of links state that chlorine is destroyed, and
not one ive read says its the hypochlorous acid?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

"jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
news:bz5Fe.5295$mU3.3394@trnddc02...
> Nothing short of nuclear bombardment can destroy chlorine.

i have as many pool links as you can read saying otherwise.


>What you think of as "sunlight dissolving chlorine" or "sunlight destroying
>chlorine" is what I previously stated as sunlight causing the chlorine atom
>in hypochlorus acid to dissociate. It is breaking the chlorine atom free
>and allowing it to excape.

and where is it going....the ozone? :-)


> Chlorine is not destroyed, hypochlorous acid is.

so tell me jeff, why hundreds of links state that chlorine is destroyed, and
not one ive read says its the hypochlorous acid?

--
Nathan W. Collier
http://InlineDiesel.com
http://7SlotGrille.com
http://UtilityOffRoad.com
http://BighornRefrigeration.com

 

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:Zb5Fe.4105$vY2.302@trnddc09...
>
>>The flip side of this is that no matter how much you dislike something you
>>cannot make it go away by wishing it to, or denying it's existence.
>
> im not trying to make it "go away". im stating that its _wrong_.

>>in other parts of the world "jeep" is used generically. Like it or not,
>>that's reality.
>
> and its still WRONG. :-)

Yes it's wrong, but it is also reality. Just like when I showed you
dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other "insiders" referring to
"freon refrigeration". Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does
not make it so, nor does it make it go away, right or wrong.
>
>
>>Time to grow up Nate and realize that we do not get to impose our own
>>versions of reality on the world.
>
> time to own up jeff, and admit that you were WRONG.
>

I said freon is a compound. You say it's only a tradename. You say in
the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically. I show dozens of
examples of people in the industry using it in that way. All I have to
show is *ONE* usage in industry to throw your "nobody" out the window.
That's the problem with phrasing things in absolutist terms. Use some
common sense here: If I say Band-aid, do you know what I am talking
about? If you say that's only a tradename, and you refer to them as
adhesive bandage strips, I am going to guess you were toilet trained you
with a cattle prod...

--
jeff

 

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:Zb5Fe.4105$vY2.302@trnddc09...
>
>>The flip side of this is that no matter how much you dislike something you
>>cannot make it go away by wishing it to, or denying it's existence.
>
> im not trying to make it "go away". im stating that its _wrong_.

>>in other parts of the world "jeep" is used generically. Like it or not,
>>that's reality.
>
> and its still WRONG. :-)

Yes it's wrong, but it is also reality. Just like when I showed you
dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other "insiders" referring to
"freon refrigeration". Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does
not make it so, nor does it make it go away, right or wrong.
>
>
>>Time to grow up Nate and realize that we do not get to impose our own
>>versions of reality on the world.
>
> time to own up jeff, and admit that you were WRONG.
>

I said freon is a compound. You say it's only a tradename. You say in
the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically. I show dozens of
examples of people in the industry using it in that way. All I have to
show is *ONE* usage in industry to throw your "nobody" out the window.
That's the problem with phrasing things in absolutist terms. Use some
common sense here: If I say Band-aid, do you know what I am talking
about? If you say that's only a tradename, and you refer to them as
adhesive bandage strips, I am going to guess you were toilet trained you
with a cattle prod...

--
jeff

 

Nathan W. Collier wrote:
> "jeff" <jalowe44INVALID@hotmail.com.INVALID> wrote in message
> news:Zb5Fe.4105$vY2.302@trnddc09...
>
>>The flip side of this is that no matter how much you dislike something you
>>cannot make it go away by wishing it to, or denying it's existence.
>
> im not trying to make it "go away". im stating that its _wrong_.

>>in other parts of the world "jeep" is used generically. Like it or not,
>>that's reality.
>
> and its still WRONG. :-)

Yes it's wrong, but it is also reality. Just like when I showed you
dozens of links to HVAC contractors and other "insiders" referring to
"freon refrigeration". Just because *You* have defined it as wrong, does
not make it so, nor does it make it go away, right or wrong.
>
>
>>Time to grow up Nate and realize that we do not get to impose our own
>>versions of reality on the world.
>
> time to own up jeff, and admit that you were WRONG.
>

I said freon is a compound. You say it's only a tradename. You say in
the industry that *nobody* uses the name generically. I show dozens of
examples of people in the industry using it in that way. All I have to
show is *ONE* usage in industry to throw your "nobody" out the window.
That's the problem with phrasing things in absolutist terms. Use some
common sense here: If I say Band-aid, do you know what I am talking
about? If you say that's only a tradename, and you refer to them as
adhesive bandage strips, I am going to guess you were toilet trained you
with a cattle prod...

--
jeff