"L.W. (ßill) ------ III" <----------@***.net> wrote in message news:42E08FB7.A741FAAF@***.net...
> Stephen Cowell wrote:
> >
> > At least you're not a liar, Bill... 'fool'
> > is not nearly as bad.

> I never known Nathan to intentionally lie, but you do knowingly,
> here, and blatantly I bet in college.

Then you'll be more than happy to point out
the lie, right?
__
Steve
..

 

"c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:JQ%De.1938$Ok6.327@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
>
> <snip>
>
> > > You still don't see your grammatical error!
> >
> > lol....crying about grammar is yet another sign of your pitiful
> desperation!
>
> Grammer is how we communicate...
>
> <snip>
>
> Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.

You must be a big Seinfeld fan... that's the only
'grammer' you'll find around here.

Hint: next time you attempt a spelling flame,
use a dictionary first. Your heart's in the right
place, I can tell!
__
Steve
..

 

"c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:JQ%De.1938$Ok6.327@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
>
> <snip>
>
> > > You still don't see your grammatical error!
> >
> > lol....crying about grammar is yet another sign of your pitiful
> desperation!
>
> Grammer is how we communicate...
>
> <snip>
>
> Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.

You must be a big Seinfeld fan... that's the only
'grammer' you'll find around here.

Hint: next time you attempt a spelling flame,
use a dictionary first. Your heart's in the right
place, I can tell!
__
Steve
..

 

"c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:JQ%De.1938$Ok6.327@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
>
> <snip>
>
> > > You still don't see your grammatical error!
> >
> > lol....crying about grammar is yet another sign of your pitiful
> desperation!
>
> Grammer is how we communicate...
>
> <snip>
>
> Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.

You must be a big Seinfeld fan... that's the only
'grammer' you'll find around here.

Hint: next time you attempt a spelling flame,
use a dictionary first. Your heart's in the right
place, I can tell!
__
Steve
..

 

"c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
>
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:JQ%De.1938$Ok6.327@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
>
> <snip>
>
> > > You still don't see your grammatical error!
> >
> > lol....crying about grammar is yet another sign of your pitiful
> desperation!
>
> Grammer is how we communicate...
>
> <snip>
>
> Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.

You must be a big Seinfeld fan... that's the only
'grammer' you'll find around here.

Hint: next time you attempt a spelling flame,
use a dictionary first. Your heart's in the right
place, I can tell!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e23ac4h9i2t53@corp.supernews.com...
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> >> Grammer is how we communicate...
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.
>
> lol....priceless.
>
> hey stephen, if you _are_ so desperate as to whine about grammar, at least
> spell grammar right. it is afterall, how we communicate. lol

Indeed... I *am* human! Mistake noted!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e23ac4h9i2t53@corp.supernews.com...
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> >> Grammer is how we communicate...
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.
>
> lol....priceless.
>
> hey stephen, if you _are_ so desperate as to whine about grammar, at least
> spell grammar right. it is afterall, how we communicate. lol

Indeed... I *am* human! Mistake noted!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e23ac4h9i2t53@corp.supernews.com...
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> >> Grammer is how we communicate...
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.
>
> lol....priceless.
>
> hey stephen, if you _are_ so desperate as to whine about grammar, at least
> spell grammar right. it is afterall, how we communicate. lol

Indeed... I *am* human! Mistake noted!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e23ac4h9i2t53@corp.supernews.com...
> "c" <c@me.org> wrote in message news:bq0Ee.177$8g.7@tornado.rdc-kc.rr.com...
> >> Grammer is how we communicate...
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > Might want to spell it correctly to help get your point across.
>
> lol....priceless.
>
> hey stephen, if you _are_ so desperate as to whine about grammar, at least
> spell grammar right. it is afterall, how we communicate. lol

Indeed... I *am* human! Mistake noted!
__
Steve
..

 

"Nathan W. Collier" <MontanaJeeper@aol.com> wrote in message news:11e22mr91obr9f6@corp.supernews.com...
> "Stephen Cowell" <scowell@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
> news:JQ%De.1938$Ok6.327@newssvr29.news.prodigy.net ...
> > Grammer is how we communicate
>
> TRANSLATION --> "my argument is losing so ill attack grammar"
>
> :-) doesnt work bottom-boy, spin away from your losing all you want, we
> wont be diverted.

Yes, your 'ill' attack is not effective... another smelly little fish.
Double negative... elementary school stuff, Nate.

> >> that wasnt my post to you.....that was my post to jeff. my post to YOU
> >> clearly stated -30 degrees.
>
> > Spinning.... spinning.
>
> i know thats what youre trying to do but i wont let you. :-) my post to
> YOU clearly stated -30 degrees. :-)

But not as a limiting factor! Only as an elaboration...
and in no case holds for the original challenge, which
I met handily. You are a welch.

> > you try to weasel in a condition where
> > the ambient is low.
>
> LIAR! i CLEARLY stated -30 degrees to YOU well before you even knew what an
> HMC was.

Clearly with a 'such as' limiting case... not the
challenge definition. Why do you spin so?
Because without your self-imposed low
ambient spec, I win! Therefore, I win!
Again!

>>Here's a lie for you... someone once suggested to
>>me that he'd change his views on ozone depletion
>>when presented with convincing evidence of the
>>cause-and-effect due to CFC usage... after presenting
>>reams of high-quality evidence, the person did
>>not change their views... indeed, he proceeded
>>to pontificate his own version of atmospheric
>>science garnered from a leak detector user
>>manual. I'd call such a person a damn liar, wouldn't
>>you?
>
> this is a given with each statement you make.

?? Whatever... I don't have to call you a liar,
since you've already demonstrated you're a
welch.

And lest we forget, the millstone around your
neck:

<>
you:
> more babble. i nailed you on it. i recognize my limitations and
> immediately own it. you lie, make excuses, and attempt to dazzle us with
> -------- in hopes of hiding your blatent (sic) ignorance.

me:
You don't have a clue about your limitations... imagine you,
an HVAC tech, making pronouncements about atmospheric
science! That shows *extreme* hubris... you deserve what
you get.
</>

You deserve what you get... remember that.
__
Steve
..